Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea

Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses; a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher flu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499
Hauptverfasser: Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL), Kaufman, L.S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 499
container_issue 2
container_start_page 495
container_title Plant physiology (Bethesda)
container_volume 92
creator Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)
Kaufman, L.S
description Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses; a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light
doi_str_mv 10.1104/pp.92.2.495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733493433</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4272647</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4272647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3425-80844ad31a77f33adcfc5827e07888434db03a872c1e23d68d868e3fd29f63da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0M1LwzAYBvAgis6PkzcR6UHwIJ1J3jRNjyLzAwYenOeQJemMZE1MWsT_3o4NPeWF58cDeRA6J3hKCGZ3MU4bOqVT1lR7aEIqoCWtmNhHE4zHGwvRHKHjnD8xxgQIO0RHhHNeA4YJmi2-Q2Fc7l2n-2LpB1t6t_roi2RzDF22ebxWg1e9LWx0OvQ_vrA-dCvVu9AVriuiVafooFU-27Pde4LeH2eLh-dy_vr08nA_LzUwWpUCC8aUAaLqugVQRre6ErS2uBZCMGBmiUGJmmpiKRgujODCQmto03IwCk7QzbY3pvA12NzLtcvaeq86G4YsawDWAAMY5e1W6hRyTraVMbm1Sj-SYLmZTcYoGyqpHGcb9dWud1iurfm3u51GcL0DKmvl26Q67fKf44Js_jGyyy37zH1IfzGjNeVsE19s41YFqVZpbHh_azBgRjn8AusEhe4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733493433</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL) ; Kaufman, L.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL) ; Kaufman, L.S</creatorcontrib><description>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses; a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1104/pp.92.2.495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16667303</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PPHYA5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Curvature ; EPICOTILOS ; EPICOTYLE ; Epicotyls ; Fluence ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; INDICE DE CRECIMIENTO ; Internodes ; Irradiation ; Kinetics ; LUMIERE ; LUZ ; Peas ; Physical agents ; PISUM SATIVUM ; Plant physiology and development ; Plants ; PLANTULAS ; PLANTULE ; RNA ; Seedlings ; TAUX DE CROISSANCE ; Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence</subject><ispartof>Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1990 American Society of Plant Physiologists</rights><rights>1990 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3425-80844ad31a77f33adcfc5827e07888434db03a872c1e23d68d868e3fd29f63da3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4272647$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4272647$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=6815827$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16667303$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, L.S</creatorcontrib><title>Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea</title><title>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</title><addtitle>Plant Physiol</addtitle><description>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses; a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Curvature</subject><subject>EPICOTILOS</subject><subject>EPICOTYLE</subject><subject>Epicotyls</subject><subject>Fluence</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>INDICE DE CRECIMIENTO</subject><subject>Internodes</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Kinetics</subject><subject>LUMIERE</subject><subject>LUZ</subject><subject>Peas</subject><subject>Physical agents</subject><subject>PISUM SATIVUM</subject><subject>Plant physiology and development</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>PLANTULAS</subject><subject>PLANTULE</subject><subject>RNA</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>TAUX DE CROISSANCE</subject><subject>Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence</subject><issn>0032-0889</issn><issn>1532-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpF0M1LwzAYBvAgis6PkzcR6UHwIJ1J3jRNjyLzAwYenOeQJemMZE1MWsT_3o4NPeWF58cDeRA6J3hKCGZ3MU4bOqVT1lR7aEIqoCWtmNhHE4zHGwvRHKHjnD8xxgQIO0RHhHNeA4YJmi2-Q2Fc7l2n-2LpB1t6t_roi2RzDF22ebxWg1e9LWx0OvQ_vrA-dCvVu9AVriuiVafooFU-27Pde4LeH2eLh-dy_vr08nA_LzUwWpUCC8aUAaLqugVQRre6ErS2uBZCMGBmiUGJmmpiKRgujODCQmto03IwCk7QzbY3pvA12NzLtcvaeq86G4YsawDWAAMY5e1W6hRyTraVMbm1Sj-SYLmZTcYoGyqpHGcb9dWud1iurfm3u51GcL0DKmvl26Q67fKf44Js_jGyyy37zH1IfzGjNeVsE19s41YFqVZpbHh_azBgRjn8AusEhe4</recordid><startdate>199002</startdate><enddate>199002</enddate><creator>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)</creator><creator>Kaufman, L.S</creator><general>American Society of Plant Physiologists</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199002</creationdate><title>Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea</title><author>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL) ; Kaufman, L.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3425-80844ad31a77f33adcfc5827e07888434db03a872c1e23d68d868e3fd29f63da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Curvature</topic><topic>EPICOTILOS</topic><topic>EPICOTYLE</topic><topic>Epicotyls</topic><topic>Fluence</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>INDICE DE CRECIMIENTO</topic><topic>Internodes</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Kinetics</topic><topic>LUMIERE</topic><topic>LUZ</topic><topic>Peas</topic><topic>Physical agents</topic><topic>PISUM SATIVUM</topic><topic>Plant physiology and development</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>PLANTULAS</topic><topic>PLANTULE</topic><topic>RNA</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>TAUX DE CROISSANCE</topic><topic>Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, L.S</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warpeha, K.M.F. (University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL)</au><au>Kaufman, L.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea</atitle><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Physiol</addtitle><date>1990-02</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>495</spage><epage>499</epage><pages>495-499</pages><issn>0032-0889</issn><eissn>1532-2548</eissn><coden>PPHYA5</coden><abstract>Blue light induces a long-term suppression of epicotyl elongation in red-light grown pea (Pisum sativum L.) seedlings. The fluence-response characteristics are bell-shaped, indicating the possibility of two different blue-light responses; a lower fluence response causing suppression and a higher fluence response alleviating the suppression. To determine if two responses are in effect, we have grown pea seedlings under dark conditions hoping to eliminate one or the other response. Under these growth conditions, only the lower fluence portion of the response (suppression of elongation) is apparent. The kinetics of suppression are similar to those observed for the lower fluence response of red-light-grown seedlings. The response to blue light in the dark-grown seedlings is not due to the excitation of phytochrome because a pulse of far-red light large enough to negate phytochrome-induced suppression has no effect on the blue-light-induced suppression. Furthermore, treatment of the dark-grown seedlings with red light immediately prior to treatment with high fluence blue light does not elicit the higher fluence response, indicating that the role of red light in the blue high fluence response is to allow the plant to achieve a specific developmental state in which it is competent to respond to the higher fluences of blue light</abstract><cop>Rockville, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Plant Physiologists</pub><pmid>16667303</pmid><doi>10.1104/pp.92.2.495</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0889
ispartof Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1990-02, Vol.92 (2), p.495-499
issn 0032-0889
1532-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733493433
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Curvature
EPICOTILOS
EPICOTYLE
Epicotyls
Fluence
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
INDICE DE CRECIMIENTO
Internodes
Irradiation
Kinetics
LUMIERE
LUZ
Peas
Physical agents
PISUM SATIVUM
Plant physiology and development
Plants
PLANTULAS
PLANTULE
RNA
Seedlings
TAUX DE CROISSANCE
Vegetative apparatus, growth and morphogenesis. Senescence
title Two distinct blue-light responses regulate epicotyl elongation in pea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T02%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20distinct%20blue-light%20responses%20regulate%20epicotyl%20elongation%20in%20pea&rft.jtitle=Plant%20physiology%20(Bethesda)&rft.au=Warpeha,%20K.M.F.%20(University%20of%20Illinois%20at%20Chicago,%20Chicago,%20IL)&rft.date=1990-02&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=495&rft.epage=499&rft.pages=495-499&rft.issn=0032-0889&rft.eissn=1532-2548&rft.coden=PPHYA5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1104/pp.92.2.495&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4272647%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733493433&rft_id=info:pmid/16667303&rft_jstor_id=4272647&rfr_iscdi=true