Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods

The control of night-break timing was studied in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil (Choisy cv. Violet) following a single continuous or skeleton photoperiod. There was a rhythmic response to a red (R) interruption of an inductive dark period, and the phasing of the rhythm was influenced by the p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plant physiology (Bethesda) 1982-07, Vol.70 (1), p.277-282
Hauptverfasser: Lumsden, P, Thomas, B, Vince-Prue, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 282
container_issue 1
container_start_page 277
container_title Plant physiology (Bethesda)
container_volume 70
creator Lumsden, P
Thomas, B
Vince-Prue, D
description The control of night-break timing was studied in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil (Choisy cv. Violet) following a single continuous or skeleton photoperiod. There was a rhythmic response to a red (R) interruption of an inductive dark period, and the phasing of the rhythm was influenced by the preceding light treatment. Following a continuous white light photoperiod of 6 hours or less, the points of maximum inhibition of flowering were constant in real time. Following a continuous photoperiod of more than 6 hours, maximum inhibition occurred at 9 and 32.5 hours after the end of the light period. The amplitude of the rhythm during the second circadian cycle was much reduced following prolonged photoperiods. Following a skeleton photoperiod, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was always related to the second pulse of the skeleton, R2, with the first point of maximum inhibition of flowering occurring after 12 to 18 hours and the second after 39 hours. Without a second R pulse, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was related to the initial R1 pulse. A 'light-off' or dusk signal was not mimicked by a R pulse ending a skeleton photoperiod; such a pulse only generated a 'light-on' signal and initiated a new rhythm. It is concluded that the timing of sensitivity to a R interruption of an inductive dark period in Pharbitis nil is controlled by a single circadian rhythm initiated by a light-on signal. After 6 hours in continuous white light, the phase of this rhythm is determined by the transition to darkness. Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.
doi_str_mv 10.1104/pp.70.1.277
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733490388</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4267482</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4267482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-68428e7bec90a162bc1b1ddbad73b79985465263fc01977af5224d30708cf2d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTju6ciciWelCqk1SqSS1HBpfMOCAM-uQyqMrM-mkTNIM8x_80abtxtm5uodzP-65cAB4jdEaY0Q_LcuaN7kmnD8BKzz0pCMDFU_BCqGmkRDjGXhRyi1CCPeYPgdnmDFGKEMr8PtqTjUtNvtkvIY6xZpTgMlBF9J9s-MW-giNynfdNqf7CIu1JjS7HKCrWeXJV19g9AFu5uTLwxpezxZa56yuB6bc2WBrilBF8zfAx33aFxj8dq5wecwvL8Ezp0Kxr07zHNx8-Xy9-dZd_vj6fXNx2WkiSO2YoERYPlk9IoUZmTSesDGTMryf-DiKgbKBsN5phEfOlRsIoaZHHAntSIPOwYfj3SWnX3tbqtz5om0IKtr2meR9T0fUC9HI9_8l8TBQTAfSwI9HUOdUSrZOLtnvVH6QGMlDTXJZJG9Stpoa_e50dj_trHlkT7004O0RuC015X97Shin4pD25rh2Kkm1zb7Im5_NZ7g1_Aewk6E2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>15541452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lumsden, P ; Thomas, B ; Vince-Prue, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lumsden, P ; Thomas, B ; Vince-Prue, D</creatorcontrib><description>The control of night-break timing was studied in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil (Choisy cv. Violet) following a single continuous or skeleton photoperiod. There was a rhythmic response to a red (R) interruption of an inductive dark period, and the phasing of the rhythm was influenced by the preceding light treatment. Following a continuous white light photoperiod of 6 hours or less, the points of maximum inhibition of flowering were constant in real time. Following a continuous photoperiod of more than 6 hours, maximum inhibition occurred at 9 and 32.5 hours after the end of the light period. The amplitude of the rhythm during the second circadian cycle was much reduced following prolonged photoperiods. Following a skeleton photoperiod, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was always related to the second pulse of the skeleton, R2, with the first point of maximum inhibition of flowering occurring after 12 to 18 hours and the second after 39 hours. Without a second R pulse, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was related to the initial R1 pulse. A 'light-off' or dusk signal was not mimicked by a R pulse ending a skeleton photoperiod; such a pulse only generated a 'light-on' signal and initiated a new rhythm. It is concluded that the timing of sensitivity to a R interruption of an inductive dark period in Pharbitis nil is controlled by a single circadian rhythm initiated by a light-on signal. After 6 hours in continuous white light, the phase of this rhythm is determined by the transition to darkness. Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0889</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2548</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1104/pp.70.1.277</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16662460</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Plant Physiologists</publisher><subject>Circadian rhythm ; Flowering ; Hourglasses ; Pharbitis nil ; Photoperiod ; Photophase ; Plants ; Scotophase ; Seedlings ; Skeleton ; Timing devices</subject><ispartof>Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1982-07, Vol.70 (1), p.277-282</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1982 The American Society of Plant Physiologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4267482$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4267482$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16662460$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lumsden, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vince-Prue, D</creatorcontrib><title>Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods</title><title>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</title><addtitle>Plant Physiol</addtitle><description>The control of night-break timing was studied in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil (Choisy cv. Violet) following a single continuous or skeleton photoperiod. There was a rhythmic response to a red (R) interruption of an inductive dark period, and the phasing of the rhythm was influenced by the preceding light treatment. Following a continuous white light photoperiod of 6 hours or less, the points of maximum inhibition of flowering were constant in real time. Following a continuous photoperiod of more than 6 hours, maximum inhibition occurred at 9 and 32.5 hours after the end of the light period. The amplitude of the rhythm during the second circadian cycle was much reduced following prolonged photoperiods. Following a skeleton photoperiod, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was always related to the second pulse of the skeleton, R2, with the first point of maximum inhibition of flowering occurring after 12 to 18 hours and the second after 39 hours. Without a second R pulse, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was related to the initial R1 pulse. A 'light-off' or dusk signal was not mimicked by a R pulse ending a skeleton photoperiod; such a pulse only generated a 'light-on' signal and initiated a new rhythm. It is concluded that the timing of sensitivity to a R interruption of an inductive dark period in Pharbitis nil is controlled by a single circadian rhythm initiated by a light-on signal. After 6 hours in continuous white light, the phase of this rhythm is determined by the transition to darkness. Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.</description><subject>Circadian rhythm</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Hourglasses</subject><subject>Pharbitis nil</subject><subject>Photoperiod</subject><subject>Photophase</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Scotophase</subject><subject>Seedlings</subject><subject>Skeleton</subject><subject>Timing devices</subject><issn>0032-0889</issn><issn>1532-2548</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuLFDEUhYMoTju6ciciWelCqk1SqSS1HBpfMOCAM-uQyqMrM-mkTNIM8x_80abtxtm5uodzP-65cAB4jdEaY0Q_LcuaN7kmnD8BKzz0pCMDFU_BCqGmkRDjGXhRyi1CCPeYPgdnmDFGKEMr8PtqTjUtNvtkvIY6xZpTgMlBF9J9s-MW-giNynfdNqf7CIu1JjS7HKCrWeXJV19g9AFu5uTLwxpezxZa56yuB6bc2WBrilBF8zfAx33aFxj8dq5wecwvL8Ezp0Kxr07zHNx8-Xy9-dZd_vj6fXNx2WkiSO2YoERYPlk9IoUZmTSesDGTMryf-DiKgbKBsN5phEfOlRsIoaZHHAntSIPOwYfj3SWnX3tbqtz5om0IKtr2meR9T0fUC9HI9_8l8TBQTAfSwI9HUOdUSrZOLtnvVH6QGMlDTXJZJG9Stpoa_e50dj_trHlkT7004O0RuC015X97Shin4pD25rh2Kkm1zb7Im5_NZ7g1_Aewk6E2</recordid><startdate>198207</startdate><enddate>198207</enddate><creator>Lumsden, P</creator><creator>Thomas, B</creator><creator>Vince-Prue, D</creator><general>American Society of Plant Physiologists</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198207</creationdate><title>Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods</title><author>Lumsden, P ; Thomas, B ; Vince-Prue, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c282t-68428e7bec90a162bc1b1ddbad73b79985465263fc01977af5224d30708cf2d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><topic>Circadian rhythm</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Hourglasses</topic><topic>Pharbitis nil</topic><topic>Photoperiod</topic><topic>Photophase</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Scotophase</topic><topic>Seedlings</topic><topic>Skeleton</topic><topic>Timing devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lumsden, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vince-Prue, D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lumsden, P</au><au>Thomas, B</au><au>Vince-Prue, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods</atitle><jtitle>Plant physiology (Bethesda)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Physiol</addtitle><date>1982-07</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>282</epage><pages>277-282</pages><issn>0032-0889</issn><eissn>1532-2548</eissn><abstract>The control of night-break timing was studied in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil (Choisy cv. Violet) following a single continuous or skeleton photoperiod. There was a rhythmic response to a red (R) interruption of an inductive dark period, and the phasing of the rhythm was influenced by the preceding light treatment. Following a continuous white light photoperiod of 6 hours or less, the points of maximum inhibition of flowering were constant in real time. Following a continuous photoperiod of more than 6 hours, maximum inhibition occurred at 9 and 32.5 hours after the end of the light period. The amplitude of the rhythm during the second circadian cycle was much reduced following prolonged photoperiods. Following a skeleton photoperiod, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was always related to the second pulse of the skeleton, R2, with the first point of maximum inhibition of flowering occurring after 12 to 18 hours and the second after 39 hours. Without a second R pulse, the time of maximum sensitivity to a R interruption was related to the initial R1 pulse. A 'light-off' or dusk signal was not mimicked by a R pulse ending a skeleton photoperiod; such a pulse only generated a 'light-on' signal and initiated a new rhythm. It is concluded that the timing of sensitivity to a R interruption of an inductive dark period in Pharbitis nil is controlled by a single circadian rhythm initiated by a light-on signal. After 6 hours in continuous white light, the phase of this rhythm is determined by the transition to darkness. Following an extended photoperiod, the timing characteristics were those of an hourglass; this seemed to be due to an effect on the coupling or expression of a single circadian timer during the second and subsequent cycles, rather than to the operation of a different timing mechanism. In addition to the effects on timing, the photoperiod affected the magnitude of the flowering response.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Plant Physiologists</pub><pmid>16662460</pmid><doi>10.1104/pp.70.1.277</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0889
ispartof Plant physiology (Bethesda), 1982-07, Vol.70 (1), p.277-282
issn 0032-0889
1532-2548
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733490388
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Circadian rhythm
Flowering
Hourglasses
Pharbitis nil
Photoperiod
Photophase
Plants
Scotophase
Seedlings
Skeleton
Timing devices
title Photoperiodic control of flowering in dark-grown seedlings of Pharbitis nil Choisy. The effect of skeleton and continuous light photoperiods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T18%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photoperiodic%20control%20of%20flowering%20in%20dark-grown%20seedlings%20of%20Pharbitis%20nil%20Choisy.%20The%20effect%20of%20skeleton%20and%20continuous%20light%20photoperiods&rft.jtitle=Plant%20physiology%20(Bethesda)&rft.au=Lumsden,%20P&rft.date=1982-07&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=282&rft.pages=277-282&rft.issn=0032-0889&rft.eissn=1532-2548&rft_id=info:doi/10.1104/pp.70.1.277&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4267482%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=15541452&rft_id=info:pmid/16662460&rft_jstor_id=4267482&rfr_iscdi=true