Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts

Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver graft...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transplantation 2003-05, Vol.75 (10), p.1683-1687
Hauptverfasser: WILSON, Dorian J, FISHER, Adrian, DAS, Kasturi, GOERLITZ, Fred, HOLLAND, Bart K, DE LA TORRE, Andrew N, MERCHANT, Anand, SEGUEL, Joseph, SAMANTA, Arun K, KONERU, Baburao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1687
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1683
container_title Transplantation
container_volume 75
creator WILSON, Dorian J
FISHER, Adrian
DAS, Kasturi
GOERLITZ, Fred
HOLLAND, Bart K
DE LA TORRE, Andrew N
MERCHANT, Anand
SEGUEL, Joseph
SAMANTA, Arun K
KONERU, Baburao
description Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver grafts. A total of 131 donor pairs with and without CA were matched in age, gender, and year of recovery. Hemodynamic stability was determined by vasopressor use. Abdominal and thoracic organs recovered and livers transplanted were compared between the groups. Liver graft function, injury, and IP benefit were examined by comparing liver chemistries after transplantation and postperfusion biopsies between recipients of grafts from both groups (n=40 each). Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups, but recovery of thoracic organs was significantly lower in CA versus non-CA donors (35 vs. 53%, P
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.TP.0000064542.63798.6B
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73348345</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18949521</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4acf6cffe85de2f449dd2ee40c0622bfc0529afbe048e2694518ff65d5eeb493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtvEzEQxy0EoqHlKyBzgNtu_faaGy2PVqpED-Fsee1xMNrYwd5Q9dt3QyPlyFxGM_rN84_Qe0p6Soy-JLRf3_fkYEpIwXrFtRl6dfUCrajkolNkIC_RihBBO8q5PkNvWvu94JJr_RqdUaa1HqRaofil5FIbfkjzL-xdDcl57GqFNn_Ct9tdLX8h4FI3LuMKfonqIx73M84F7w6JHNKcSk55g0fIENOMU8ZTWkDspqlsqotzu0CvopsavD36c_Tz29f19U139-P77fXnu84LJucuCOej8jHCIAOwKIQJgQEI4olibIyeSGZcHIGIAZgyQtIhRiWDBBiF4efo43PfZfE_--UIu03NwzS5DGXfrOZcDFzI_4J0MMJIRhfQPIO-ltYqRLuraevqo6XEHtSwhNr1vT2pYf-pYdXVUvvuOGQ_biGcKo_vX4APR8A176ZYXfapnTgxSCY140-DQ5Vs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18949521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>WILSON, Dorian J ; FISHER, Adrian ; DAS, Kasturi ; GOERLITZ, Fred ; HOLLAND, Bart K ; DE LA TORRE, Andrew N ; MERCHANT, Anand ; SEGUEL, Joseph ; SAMANTA, Arun K ; KONERU, Baburao</creator><creatorcontrib>WILSON, Dorian J ; FISHER, Adrian ; DAS, Kasturi ; GOERLITZ, Fred ; HOLLAND, Bart K ; DE LA TORRE, Andrew N ; MERCHANT, Anand ; SEGUEL, Joseph ; SAMANTA, Arun K ; KONERU, Baburao</creatorcontrib><description>Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver grafts. A total of 131 donor pairs with and without CA were matched in age, gender, and year of recovery. Hemodynamic stability was determined by vasopressor use. Abdominal and thoracic organs recovered and livers transplanted were compared between the groups. Liver graft function, injury, and IP benefit were examined by comparing liver chemistries after transplantation and postperfusion biopsies between recipients of grafts from both groups (n=40 each). Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups, but recovery of thoracic organs was significantly lower in CA versus non-CA donors (35 vs. 53%, P&lt;0.01). On the other hand, recovery rates of three or more abdominal organs from CA donors approached those of non-CA donors (77 vs. 87%, not significant). Although significantly fewer livers were transplanted from CA donors (69 vs. 85%, P&lt;0.01), posttransplantation graft function and injury parameters were similar between the two groups, and CA did not appear to trigger IP. Compared with historical data, cardiovascular stability and abdominal organ recovery rates have improved considerably in CA donors. Liver grafts from CA donors function similarly to grafts from non-CA donors with no IP from CA. Our data support the increased use of livers and other organs from donors with CA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-6080</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000064542.63798.6B</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12777856</identifier><identifier>CODEN: TRPLAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; cardiac arrest ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; graft function ; Heart - physiopathology ; Heart Arrest ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Ischemic Preconditioning ; Liver - physiopathology ; Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Surgery of the digestive system ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting ; Tissue Donors ; Transplantation, Homologous ; vasopressors</subject><ispartof>Transplantation, 2003-05, Vol.75 (10), p.1683-1687</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4acf6cffe85de2f449dd2ee40c0622bfc0529afbe048e2694518ff65d5eeb493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4acf6cffe85de2f449dd2ee40c0622bfc0529afbe048e2694518ff65d5eeb493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14852572$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12777856$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WILSON, Dorian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, Kasturi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOERLITZ, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLAND, Bart K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LA TORRE, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERCHANT, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEGUEL, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMANTA, Arun K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KONERU, Baburao</creatorcontrib><title>Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts</title><title>Transplantation</title><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><description>Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver grafts. A total of 131 donor pairs with and without CA were matched in age, gender, and year of recovery. Hemodynamic stability was determined by vasopressor use. Abdominal and thoracic organs recovered and livers transplanted were compared between the groups. Liver graft function, injury, and IP benefit were examined by comparing liver chemistries after transplantation and postperfusion biopsies between recipients of grafts from both groups (n=40 each). Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups, but recovery of thoracic organs was significantly lower in CA versus non-CA donors (35 vs. 53%, P&lt;0.01). On the other hand, recovery rates of three or more abdominal organs from CA donors approached those of non-CA donors (77 vs. 87%, not significant). Although significantly fewer livers were transplanted from CA donors (69 vs. 85%, P&lt;0.01), posttransplantation graft function and injury parameters were similar between the two groups, and CA did not appear to trigger IP. Compared with historical data, cardiovascular stability and abdominal organ recovery rates have improved considerably in CA donors. Liver grafts from CA donors function similarly to grafts from non-CA donors with no IP from CA. Our data support the increased use of livers and other organs from donors with CA.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cardiac arrest</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>graft function</subject><subject>Heart - physiopathology</subject><subject>Heart Arrest</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemic Preconditioning</subject><subject>Liver - physiopathology</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Surgery of the digestive system</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting</subject><subject>Tissue Donors</subject><subject>Transplantation, Homologous</subject><subject>vasopressors</subject><issn>0041-1337</issn><issn>1534-6080</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtvEzEQxy0EoqHlKyBzgNtu_faaGy2PVqpED-Fsee1xMNrYwd5Q9dt3QyPlyFxGM_rN84_Qe0p6Soy-JLRf3_fkYEpIwXrFtRl6dfUCrajkolNkIC_RihBBO8q5PkNvWvu94JJr_RqdUaa1HqRaofil5FIbfkjzL-xdDcl57GqFNn_Ct9tdLX8h4FI3LuMKfonqIx73M84F7w6JHNKcSk55g0fIENOMU8ZTWkDspqlsqotzu0CvopsavD36c_Tz29f19U139-P77fXnu84LJucuCOej8jHCIAOwKIQJgQEI4olibIyeSGZcHIGIAZgyQtIhRiWDBBiF4efo43PfZfE_--UIu03NwzS5DGXfrOZcDFzI_4J0MMJIRhfQPIO-ltYqRLuraevqo6XEHtSwhNr1vT2pYf-pYdXVUvvuOGQ_biGcKo_vX4APR8A176ZYXfapnTgxSCY140-DQ5Vs</recordid><startdate>20030527</startdate><enddate>20030527</enddate><creator>WILSON, Dorian J</creator><creator>FISHER, Adrian</creator><creator>DAS, Kasturi</creator><creator>GOERLITZ, Fred</creator><creator>HOLLAND, Bart K</creator><creator>DE LA TORRE, Andrew N</creator><creator>MERCHANT, Anand</creator><creator>SEGUEL, Joseph</creator><creator>SAMANTA, Arun K</creator><creator>KONERU, Baburao</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030527</creationdate><title>Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts</title><author>WILSON, Dorian J ; FISHER, Adrian ; DAS, Kasturi ; GOERLITZ, Fred ; HOLLAND, Bart K ; DE LA TORRE, Andrew N ; MERCHANT, Anand ; SEGUEL, Joseph ; SAMANTA, Arun K ; KONERU, Baburao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-d4acf6cffe85de2f449dd2ee40c0622bfc0529afbe048e2694518ff65d5eeb493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cardiac arrest</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>graft function</topic><topic>Heart - physiopathology</topic><topic>Heart Arrest</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemic Preconditioning</topic><topic>Liver - physiopathology</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Surgery of the digestive system</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting</topic><topic>Tissue Donors</topic><topic>Transplantation, Homologous</topic><topic>vasopressors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WILSON, Dorian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FISHER, Adrian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DAS, Kasturi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GOERLITZ, Fred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOLLAND, Bart K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE LA TORRE, Andrew N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MERCHANT, Anand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEGUEL, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SAMANTA, Arun K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KONERU, Baburao</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WILSON, Dorian J</au><au>FISHER, Adrian</au><au>DAS, Kasturi</au><au>GOERLITZ, Fred</au><au>HOLLAND, Bart K</au><au>DE LA TORRE, Andrew N</au><au>MERCHANT, Anand</au><au>SEGUEL, Joseph</au><au>SAMANTA, Arun K</au><au>KONERU, Baburao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts</atitle><jtitle>Transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Transplantation</addtitle><date>2003-05-27</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>75</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1683</spage><epage>1687</epage><pages>1683-1687</pages><issn>0041-1337</issn><eissn>1534-6080</eissn><coden>TRPLAU</coden><abstract>Historically, organ recovery rates in donors with cardiac arrest (CA) have been low, presumably from hemodynamic instability. We hypothesized that donor resuscitation has improved hemodynamic stability and organ recovery in CA donors, and that CA triggers ischemic preconditioning (IP) in liver grafts. A total of 131 donor pairs with and without CA were matched in age, gender, and year of recovery. Hemodynamic stability was determined by vasopressor use. Abdominal and thoracic organs recovered and livers transplanted were compared between the groups. Liver graft function, injury, and IP benefit were examined by comparing liver chemistries after transplantation and postperfusion biopsies between recipients of grafts from both groups (n=40 each). Hemodynamic stability was similar in both groups, but recovery of thoracic organs was significantly lower in CA versus non-CA donors (35 vs. 53%, P&lt;0.01). On the other hand, recovery rates of three or more abdominal organs from CA donors approached those of non-CA donors (77 vs. 87%, not significant). Although significantly fewer livers were transplanted from CA donors (69 vs. 85%, P&lt;0.01), posttransplantation graft function and injury parameters were similar between the two groups, and CA did not appear to trigger IP. Compared with historical data, cardiovascular stability and abdominal organ recovery rates have improved considerably in CA donors. Liver grafts from CA donors function similarly to grafts from non-CA donors with no IP from CA. Our data support the increased use of livers and other organs from donors with CA.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>12777856</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.TP.0000064542.63798.6B</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1337
ispartof Transplantation, 2003-05, Vol.75 (10), p.1683-1687
issn 0041-1337
1534-6080
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73348345
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Abdomen - surgery
Adolescent
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
cardiac arrest
Cohort Studies
Female
graft function
Heart - physiopathology
Heart Arrest
Hemodynamics
Humans
Ischemic Preconditioning
Liver - physiopathology
Liver Transplantation - statistics & numerical data
Liver, biliary tract, pancreas, portal circulation, spleen
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Surgery of the digestive system
Tissue and Organ Harvesting
Tissue Donors
Transplantation, Homologous
vasopressors
title Donors with cardiac arrest: Improved organ recovery but no preconditioning benefit in liver allografts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T20%3A51%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Donors%20with%20cardiac%20arrest:%20Improved%20organ%20recovery%20but%20no%20preconditioning%20benefit%20in%20liver%20allografts&rft.jtitle=Transplantation&rft.au=WILSON,%20Dorian%20J&rft.date=2003-05-27&rft.volume=75&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1683&rft.epage=1687&rft.pages=1683-1687&rft.issn=0041-1337&rft.eissn=1534-6080&rft.coden=TRPLAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.TP.0000064542.63798.6B&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18949521%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18949521&rft_id=info:pmid/12777856&rfr_iscdi=true