Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09

To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836
Hauptverfasser: Fisher, Jacquelyn, Scott, Charles, Scarantino, Charles W, Leveque, Fran G, White, Robert L, Rotman, Marvin, Hodson, D.I, Meredith, Ruby F, Foote, Robert, Bachman, David G, Lee, Nancy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 836
container_issue 3
container_start_page 832
container_title International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
container_volume 56
creator Fisher, Jacquelyn
Scott, Charles
Scarantino, Charles W
Leveque, Fran G
White, Robert L
Rotman, Marvin
Hodson, D.I
Meredith, Ruby F
Foote, Robert
Bachman, David G
Lee, Nancy
description To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d. A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients. Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73347867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301603001214</els_id><sourcerecordid>73347867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURUcIRJbAJ4DcgKAw-I294xkahCIIK0VKBEGis7z2M2uYHU9sD2K7fAQNDR-XL8HZ3ZCSyi7O9fO7p6oeA3sJDJpXnxhvGOXl-pzxF4xBDVTcqWbQyo7y-fzL3Wr2DzmoHqT0jRUKpLhfHUAt2xa6elb9OVvphGSxWJCLSfc-b2hwtPcOScqT3ZCIaepzek38etQmkzCQUWePQ05Xl79vQiQ4sg3lUBJ2Mn74Sn5iDCmHtddEu4yRRG19yCuMetwQFyJZobZUD5YOaL4ToweD8ery18fz02PSScq6h9U9p_uEj_bnYfX5_bvzow_05PR4cfT2hBreQaZOd7WW1jVSaN5A10Gz1JZLBOHAWSdYXTdgeMuMMKIBu4SlAVbbMt-BNPywerZ7d4zhYsKU1dong32vBwxTUpJzIdtGFnC-A03ZLUV0aox-reNGAVPXYtRWjLpuXTGutmKUKLkn-wHTco32NrU3UYCne0Ano3sXSxk-3XKiFd2ct4V7s-Ow1PHDY1TJFBsGrY9osrLB_-crfwEMF63T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73347867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d. A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients. Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12788192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Head and neck ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Hyposalivation ; Karnofsky Performance Status ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use ; Pilocarpine ; Pilocarpine - therapeutic use ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Xerostomia ; Xerostomia - etiology ; Xerostomia - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301603001214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14849538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarantino, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Fran G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotman, Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, D.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Ruby F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d. A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients. Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and neck</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyposalivation</subject><subject>Karnofsky Performance Status</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pilocarpine</subject><subject>Pilocarpine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Xerostomia</subject><subject>Xerostomia - etiology</subject><subject>Xerostomia - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURUcIRJbAJ4DcgKAw-I294xkahCIIK0VKBEGis7z2M2uYHU9sD2K7fAQNDR-XL8HZ3ZCSyi7O9fO7p6oeA3sJDJpXnxhvGOXl-pzxF4xBDVTcqWbQyo7y-fzL3Wr2DzmoHqT0jRUKpLhfHUAt2xa6elb9OVvphGSxWJCLSfc-b2hwtPcOScqT3ZCIaepzek38etQmkzCQUWePQ05Xl79vQiQ4sg3lUBJ2Mn74Sn5iDCmHtddEu4yRRG19yCuMetwQFyJZobZUD5YOaL4ToweD8ery18fz02PSScq6h9U9p_uEj_bnYfX5_bvzow_05PR4cfT2hBreQaZOd7WW1jVSaN5A10Gz1JZLBOHAWSdYXTdgeMuMMKIBu4SlAVbbMt-BNPywerZ7d4zhYsKU1dong32vBwxTUpJzIdtGFnC-A03ZLUV0aox-reNGAVPXYtRWjLpuXTGutmKUKLkn-wHTco32NrU3UYCne0Ano3sXSxk-3XKiFd2ct4V7s-Ow1PHDY1TJFBsGrY9osrLB_-crfwEMF63T</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creator><creator>Scott, Charles</creator><creator>Scarantino, Charles W</creator><creator>Leveque, Fran G</creator><creator>White, Robert L</creator><creator>Rotman, Marvin</creator><creator>Hodson, D.I</creator><creator>Meredith, Ruby F</creator><creator>Foote, Robert</creator><creator>Bachman, David G</creator><creator>Lee, Nancy</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><author>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and neck</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyposalivation</topic><topic>Karnofsky Performance Status</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pilocarpine</topic><topic>Pilocarpine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Xerostomia</topic><topic>Xerostomia - etiology</topic><topic>Xerostomia - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarantino, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Fran G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotman, Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, D.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Ruby F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, Jacquelyn</au><au>Scott, Charles</au><au>Scarantino, Charles W</au><au>Leveque, Fran G</au><au>White, Robert L</au><au>Rotman, Marvin</au><au>Hodson, D.I</au><au>Meredith, Ruby F</au><au>Foote, Robert</au><au>Bachman, David G</au><au>Lee, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>832</spage><epage>836</epage><pages>832-836</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d. A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant ( p = 0.047 and p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients. Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12788192</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-3016
ispartof International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836
issn 0360-3016
1879-355X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73347867
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Female
Head and neck
Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Humans
Hyposalivation
Karnofsky Performance Status
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use
Pilocarpine
Pilocarpine - therapeutic use
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Radiotherapy Dosage
Surveys and Questionnaires
Xerostomia
Xerostomia - etiology
Xerostomia - prevention & control
title Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20III%20quality-of-life%20study%20results:%20impact%20on%20patients%E2%80%99%20quality%20of%20life%20to%20reducing%20xerostomia%20after%20radiotherapy%20for%20head-and-neck%20cancer%E2%80%94RTOG%2097-09&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Fisher,%20Jacquelyn&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=832&rft.epage=836&rft.pages=832-836&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73347867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73347867&rft_id=info:pmid/12788192&rft_els_id=S0360301603001214&rfr_iscdi=true