Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09
To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL). Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 836 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 832 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Fisher, Jacquelyn Scott, Charles Scarantino, Charles W Leveque, Fran G White, Robert L Rotman, Marvin Hodson, D.I Meredith, Ruby F Foote, Robert Bachman, David G Lee, Nancy |
description | To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL).
Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d.
A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant (
p = 0.047 and
p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients.
Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73347867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301603001214</els_id><sourcerecordid>73347867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURUcIRJbAJ4DcgKAw-I294xkahCIIK0VKBEGis7z2M2uYHU9sD2K7fAQNDR-XL8HZ3ZCSyi7O9fO7p6oeA3sJDJpXnxhvGOXl-pzxF4xBDVTcqWbQyo7y-fzL3Wr2DzmoHqT0jRUKpLhfHUAt2xa6elb9OVvphGSxWJCLSfc-b2hwtPcOScqT3ZCIaepzek38etQmkzCQUWePQ05Xl79vQiQ4sg3lUBJ2Mn74Sn5iDCmHtddEu4yRRG19yCuMetwQFyJZobZUD5YOaL4ToweD8ery18fz02PSScq6h9U9p_uEj_bnYfX5_bvzow_05PR4cfT2hBreQaZOd7WW1jVSaN5A10Gz1JZLBOHAWSdYXTdgeMuMMKIBu4SlAVbbMt-BNPywerZ7d4zhYsKU1dong32vBwxTUpJzIdtGFnC-A03ZLUV0aox-reNGAVPXYtRWjLpuXTGutmKUKLkn-wHTco32NrU3UYCne0Ano3sXSxk-3XKiFd2ct4V7s-Ow1PHDY1TJFBsGrY9osrLB_-crfwEMF63T</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73347867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</creator><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL).
Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d.
A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant (
p = 0.047 and
p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients.
Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12788192</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IOBPD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Head and neck ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Humans ; Hyposalivation ; Karnofsky Performance Status ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use ; Pilocarpine ; Pilocarpine - therapeutic use ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Xerostomia ; Xerostomia - etiology ; Xerostomia - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301603001214$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14849538$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788192$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarantino, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Fran G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotman, Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, D.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Ruby F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL).
Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d.
A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant (
p = 0.047 and
p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients.
Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and neck</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyposalivation</subject><subject>Karnofsky Performance Status</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pilocarpine</subject><subject>Pilocarpine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Xerostomia</subject><subject>Xerostomia - etiology</subject><subject>Xerostomia - prevention & control</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkbFuFDEURUcIRJbAJ4DcgKAw-I294xkahCIIK0VKBEGis7z2M2uYHU9sD2K7fAQNDR-XL8HZ3ZCSyi7O9fO7p6oeA3sJDJpXnxhvGOXl-pzxF4xBDVTcqWbQyo7y-fzL3Wr2DzmoHqT0jRUKpLhfHUAt2xa6elb9OVvphGSxWJCLSfc-b2hwtPcOScqT3ZCIaepzek38etQmkzCQUWePQ05Xl79vQiQ4sg3lUBJ2Mn74Sn5iDCmHtddEu4yRRG19yCuMetwQFyJZobZUD5YOaL4ToweD8ery18fz02PSScq6h9U9p_uEj_bnYfX5_bvzow_05PR4cfT2hBreQaZOd7WW1jVSaN5A10Gz1JZLBOHAWSdYXTdgeMuMMKIBu4SlAVbbMt-BNPywerZ7d4zhYsKU1dong32vBwxTUpJzIdtGFnC-A03ZLUV0aox-reNGAVPXYtRWjLpuXTGutmKUKLkn-wHTco32NrU3UYCne0Ano3sXSxk-3XKiFd2ct4V7s-Ow1PHDY1TJFBsGrY9osrLB_-crfwEMF63T</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creator><creator>Scott, Charles</creator><creator>Scarantino, Charles W</creator><creator>Leveque, Fran G</creator><creator>White, Robert L</creator><creator>Rotman, Marvin</creator><creator>Hodson, D.I</creator><creator>Meredith, Ruby F</creator><creator>Foote, Robert</creator><creator>Bachman, David G</creator><creator>Lee, Nancy</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</title><author>Fisher, Jacquelyn ; Scott, Charles ; Scarantino, Charles W ; Leveque, Fran G ; White, Robert L ; Rotman, Marvin ; Hodson, D.I ; Meredith, Ruby F ; Foote, Robert ; Bachman, David G ; Lee, Nancy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c391t-fa92a7df674a3619916bad37e14f1fdf402261c380c4c461db1bc102deadf17c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and neck</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyposalivation</topic><topic>Karnofsky Performance Status</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pilocarpine</topic><topic>Pilocarpine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Xerostomia</topic><topic>Xerostomia - etiology</topic><topic>Xerostomia - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scott, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarantino, Charles W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leveque, Fran G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Robert L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotman, Marvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodson, D.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meredith, Ruby F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foote, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachman, David G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Nancy</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fisher, Jacquelyn</au><au>Scott, Charles</au><au>Scarantino, Charles W</au><au>Leveque, Fran G</au><au>White, Robert L</au><au>Rotman, Marvin</au><au>Hodson, D.I</au><au>Meredith, Ruby F</au><au>Foote, Robert</au><au>Bachman, David G</au><au>Lee, Nancy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>832</spage><epage>836</epage><pages>832-836</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><coden>IOBPD3</coden><abstract>To determine whether prevention of hyposalivation after curative radiotherapy (RT) to the head and neck improves patients’ quality of life (QOL).
Patients were to receive at least 50 Gy to 50% of the volume of the major salivary glands, provide unstimulated and stimulated saliva samples, and complete the University of Washington head-and-neck QOL tool before RT and 3 and 6 months after RT. Patients were randomized to receive pilocarpine 5 mg or placebo q.i.d.
A total of 249 patients was randomized between March 1998 and January 2000. Of these, 214 were eligible for QOL analysis. Patients were evenly distributed between arms by race, gender, tobacco use, tumor site, T stage (50% T2-T3), and salivary function. A Karnofsky performance status of 90% was more common in the pilocarpine arm. Twenty percent of the patients on the pilocarpine arm and 29% of the patients on the placebo arm were taking nutritional supplements. The placebo arm patients had greater mouth pain and chewing difficulties. Compliance for the QOL tool at 3 and 6 months was 65% and 50%, respectively. Despite statistically significant (
p = 0.047 and
p = 0.049, respectively) preservation of salivary function in the pilocarpine arm, patients on the pilocarpine arm reported difficulties with swallowing (75%), activity (80%), hyposalivation (64%), and taste (81%). No difference was noted between arms at 3 months in mucositis scores, with both arms demonstrating increased requirement for oral nutrients.
Objective prevention of hyposalivation did not affect patients’ assessment of salivary function or QOL because of the greater impact mucositis plays in QOL after RT.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12788192</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2003-07, Vol.56 (3), p.832-836 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73347867 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Female Head and neck Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy Humans Hyposalivation Karnofsky Performance Status Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Muscarinic Agonists - therapeutic use Pilocarpine Pilocarpine - therapeutic use Psychometrics Quality of Life Radiotherapy Dosage Surveys and Questionnaires Xerostomia Xerostomia - etiology Xerostomia - prevention & control |
title | Phase III quality-of-life study results: impact on patients’ quality of life to reducing xerostomia after radiotherapy for head-and-neck cancer—RTOG 97-09 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T13%3A15%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Phase%20III%20quality-of-life%20study%20results:%20impact%20on%20patients%E2%80%99%20quality%20of%20life%20to%20reducing%20xerostomia%20after%20radiotherapy%20for%20head-and-neck%20cancer%E2%80%94RTOG%2097-09&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Fisher,%20Jacquelyn&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=832&rft.epage=836&rft.pages=832-836&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft.coden=IOBPD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00121-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73347867%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73347867&rft_id=info:pmid/12788192&rft_els_id=S0360301603001214&rfr_iscdi=true |