The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation

Ninety-two patients (71 idiopathic, 15 neurogenic, 2 Marfan's syndrome, 1 Down's syndrome, 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome, 1 Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), ages 9-49 years, had posterior spine fusion and stabilization with Luque L-rods and sublaminar segmental wires...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 1992-10, Vol.17 (10), p.1174-1179
Hauptverfasser: OSEBOLD, W. R, YAMAMOTO, S. K, HURLEY, J. H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1179
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1174
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 17
creator OSEBOLD, W. R
YAMAMOTO, S. K
HURLEY, J. H
description Ninety-two patients (71 idiopathic, 15 neurogenic, 2 Marfan's syndrome, 1 Down's syndrome, 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome, 1 Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), ages 9-49 years, had posterior spine fusion and stabilization with Luque L-rods and sublaminar segmental wires (SSI) for progressive scoliosis. There were no neurologic complications. The average preoperative major curve of 52 degrees (37-113 degrees) initially corrected to 30 degrees (6-94 degrees), and at last follow-up (range, 2-7 years), was 33 degrees (8-90 degrees). There was marked variability in curvature correction and maintenance of correction, with 14 patients progressively decreasing their curvatures postoperatively. Average preoperative Pedriolle vertebral rotation angle for all 92 patients was 16 degrees (4-26 degrees), which initially corrected to 14 degrees (0-24 degrees), and at last follow-up remained 14 degrees (0-23 degrees). Although SSI had little influence on rotation, 12 patients progressively decreased their rotational deformity after operation. Aside from the positive influence of curve flexibility on the degree of postoperative curve correction, the authors could not identify factors explaining how curvature and vertebral rotation responded so variably to SSI. The authors recommend continued use of SSI to stabilize curvatures in osteopenic patients (particularly those with neuromuscular disease), but rotational deformity will probably persist.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/00007632-199210000-00008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73346614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73346614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b246c994f664ecaf696b0f316a25518775806aad889a6d7b6500999022e85cfc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhZIHYBv2MvUcVLQmJBWUeO64BREgePg9S_J2lLmcU87pyxpYtQRvANwbq4xWMUktGcaE3JNOVTUkdoTgRVOSFCH6M5ZpLmlDN5is4AvkZCMqJnaEY4n4Y5elt9uuzHRG8q3_i0yUKdRQd96MBNPdjQ-JC8zaD3nYMshQzcR-u6ZJqtNhbfQYrDVks-dOfopDYNuIt9XaD3h_vV8il_eX18Xt695JYxnfKKcmm15rWU3FlTSy0rXDMiDRWCqKIQCktj1kppI9dFJQXGWmtMqVPC1pYt0PXu3T6G78FBKlsP1jWN6VwYoCwY41ISPoJqB9oYAKKryz761sRNSXA5-Vn--Vke_NxKajy93P8xVK1b_x_uDBz3V_u9AWuaOprOejhgIyUolewXegZ9TA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73346614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>OSEBOLD, W. R ; YAMAMOTO, S. K ; HURLEY, J. H</creator><creatorcontrib>OSEBOLD, W. R ; YAMAMOTO, S. K ; HURLEY, J. H</creatorcontrib><description>Ninety-two patients (71 idiopathic, 15 neurogenic, 2 Marfan's syndrome, 1 Down's syndrome, 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome, 1 Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), ages 9-49 years, had posterior spine fusion and stabilization with Luque L-rods and sublaminar segmental wires (SSI) for progressive scoliosis. There were no neurologic complications. The average preoperative major curve of 52 degrees (37-113 degrees) initially corrected to 30 degrees (6-94 degrees), and at last follow-up (range, 2-7 years), was 33 degrees (8-90 degrees). There was marked variability in curvature correction and maintenance of correction, with 14 patients progressively decreasing their curvatures postoperatively. Average preoperative Pedriolle vertebral rotation angle for all 92 patients was 16 degrees (4-26 degrees), which initially corrected to 14 degrees (0-24 degrees), and at last follow-up remained 14 degrees (0-23 degrees). Although SSI had little influence on rotation, 12 patients progressively decreased their rotational deformity after operation. Aside from the positive influence of curve flexibility on the degree of postoperative curve correction, the authors could not identify factors explaining how curvature and vertebral rotation responded so variably to SSI. The authors recommend continued use of SSI to stabilize curvatures in osteopenic patients (particularly those with neuromuscular disease), but rotational deformity will probably persist.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199210000-00008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1440006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPINDD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bone Wires ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Internal Fixators ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Orthopedic surgery ; Postoperative Period ; Rotation ; Scoliosis - epidemiology ; Scoliosis - surgery ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Time Factors</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1992-10, Vol.17 (10), p.1174-1179</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b246c994f664ecaf696b0f316a25518775806aad889a6d7b6500999022e85cfc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=4405226$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1440006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>OSEBOLD, W. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAMOTO, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURLEY, J. H</creatorcontrib><title>The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>Ninety-two patients (71 idiopathic, 15 neurogenic, 2 Marfan's syndrome, 1 Down's syndrome, 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome, 1 Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), ages 9-49 years, had posterior spine fusion and stabilization with Luque L-rods and sublaminar segmental wires (SSI) for progressive scoliosis. There were no neurologic complications. The average preoperative major curve of 52 degrees (37-113 degrees) initially corrected to 30 degrees (6-94 degrees), and at last follow-up (range, 2-7 years), was 33 degrees (8-90 degrees). There was marked variability in curvature correction and maintenance of correction, with 14 patients progressively decreasing their curvatures postoperatively. Average preoperative Pedriolle vertebral rotation angle for all 92 patients was 16 degrees (4-26 degrees), which initially corrected to 14 degrees (0-24 degrees), and at last follow-up remained 14 degrees (0-23 degrees). Although SSI had little influence on rotation, 12 patients progressively decreased their rotational deformity after operation. Aside from the positive influence of curve flexibility on the degree of postoperative curve correction, the authors could not identify factors explaining how curvature and vertebral rotation responded so variably to SSI. The authors recommend continued use of SSI to stabilize curvatures in osteopenic patients (particularly those with neuromuscular disease), but rotational deformity will probably persist.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bone Wires</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Fixators</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Scoliosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Scoliosis - surgery</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkMtOwzAQRS0EKqXwCUhZIHYBv2MvUcVLQmJBWUeO64BREgePg9S_J2lLmcU87pyxpYtQRvANwbq4xWMUktGcaE3JNOVTUkdoTgRVOSFCH6M5ZpLmlDN5is4AvkZCMqJnaEY4n4Y5elt9uuzHRG8q3_i0yUKdRQd96MBNPdjQ-JC8zaD3nYMshQzcR-u6ZJqtNhbfQYrDVks-dOfopDYNuIt9XaD3h_vV8il_eX18Xt695JYxnfKKcmm15rWU3FlTSy0rXDMiDRWCqKIQCktj1kppI9dFJQXGWmtMqVPC1pYt0PXu3T6G78FBKlsP1jWN6VwYoCwY41ISPoJqB9oYAKKryz761sRNSXA5-Vn--Vke_NxKajy93P8xVK1b_x_uDBz3V_u9AWuaOprOejhgIyUolewXegZ9TA</recordid><startdate>19921001</startdate><enddate>19921001</enddate><creator>OSEBOLD, W. R</creator><creator>YAMAMOTO, S. K</creator><creator>HURLEY, J. H</creator><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19921001</creationdate><title>The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation</title><author>OSEBOLD, W. R ; YAMAMOTO, S. K ; HURLEY, J. H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-b246c994f664ecaf696b0f316a25518775806aad889a6d7b6500999022e85cfc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bone Wires</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Fixators</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Scoliosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Scoliosis - surgery</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>OSEBOLD, W. R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAMAMOTO, S. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HURLEY, J. H</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>OSEBOLD, W. R</au><au>YAMAMOTO, S. K</au><au>HURLEY, J. H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>1992-10-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1174</spage><epage>1179</epage><pages>1174-1179</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><coden>SPINDD</coden><abstract>Ninety-two patients (71 idiopathic, 15 neurogenic, 2 Marfan's syndrome, 1 Down's syndrome, 1 osteogenesis imperfecta, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome, 1 Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber syndrome), ages 9-49 years, had posterior spine fusion and stabilization with Luque L-rods and sublaminar segmental wires (SSI) for progressive scoliosis. There were no neurologic complications. The average preoperative major curve of 52 degrees (37-113 degrees) initially corrected to 30 degrees (6-94 degrees), and at last follow-up (range, 2-7 years), was 33 degrees (8-90 degrees). There was marked variability in curvature correction and maintenance of correction, with 14 patients progressively decreasing their curvatures postoperatively. Average preoperative Pedriolle vertebral rotation angle for all 92 patients was 16 degrees (4-26 degrees), which initially corrected to 14 degrees (0-24 degrees), and at last follow-up remained 14 degrees (0-23 degrees). Although SSI had little influence on rotation, 12 patients progressively decreased their rotational deformity after operation. Aside from the positive influence of curve flexibility on the degree of postoperative curve correction, the authors could not identify factors explaining how curvature and vertebral rotation responded so variably to SSI. The authors recommend continued use of SSI to stabilize curvatures in osteopenic patients (particularly those with neuromuscular disease), but rotational deformity will probably persist.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>Lippincott</pub><pmid>1440006</pmid><doi>10.1097/00007632-199210000-00008</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 1992-10, Vol.17 (10), p.1174-1179
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73346614
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Adolescent
Biological and medical sciences
Bone Wires
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Internal Fixators
Male
Medical sciences
Orthopedic surgery
Postoperative Period
Rotation
Scoliosis - epidemiology
Scoliosis - surgery
Spinal Fusion - instrumentation
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Time Factors
title The variability of response of scoliotic spines to segmental spinal instrumentation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A43%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20variability%20of%20response%20of%20scoliotic%20spines%20to%20segmental%20spinal%20instrumentation&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=OSEBOLD,%20W.%20R&rft.date=1992-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1174&rft.epage=1179&rft.pages=1174-1179&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft.coden=SPINDD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00007632-199210000-00008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73346614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73346614&rft_id=info:pmid/1440006&rfr_iscdi=true