Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind
There is an inconsistency regarding the relationship between thinking about personal past experiences during autobiographical memory (AM) and thinking about other people's mental states during theory of mind (ToM). Neuroimaging studies of AM and ToM consistently report overlap in the brain regi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cognitive neuroscience 2010-06, Vol.22 (6), p.1095-1111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1095 |
container_title | Journal of cognitive neuroscience |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Rabin, Jennifer S. Gilboa, Asaf Stuss, Donald T. Mar, Raymond A. Rosenbaum, R. Shayna |
description | There is an inconsistency regarding the relationship between thinking about personal past experiences during autobiographical memory (AM) and thinking about other people's mental states during theory of mind (ToM). Neuroimaging studies of AM and ToM consistently report overlap in the brain regions recruited. Lesion data, however, show that amnesic people with AM impairment can have intact ToM, suggesting that distinct neural mechanisms support these abilities [Rosenbaum, R. S., Stuss, D. T., Levine, B., & Tulving, E. Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.
1257, 2007]. The current fMRI study examined the functional and neural correlates of remembering one's own experiences in response to personal photos (AM condition) and imagining others' experiences in response to strangers' photos (ToM condition). AM and ToM conditions were matched in terms of content and vividness, and were compared directly and to a common baseline. Analyses revealed common activity within frontal and temporal–parietal regions, yet midline structures exhibited greater activity during AM. More specific analyses of event construction and detail elaboration revealed unique activation of the right hippocampus during AM construction, and of lateral regions, such as the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) during ToM elaboration. Moreover, a region of left hippocampus/perirhinal cortex appeared to be driven by event vividness. Thus, differences in AM and ToM emerge when a common baseline is used and temporal dynamics are taken into account. Furthermore, the right TPJ and related lateral regions, and not the hippocampus, may be needed for ToM, given that this ability is intact in amnesic people. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/jocn.2009.21344 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733455059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1990527511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-2f4d0fe4ec4a97d90b817c91d7783a85eb0dc33bac4a444df20049c07a08f59c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctr3DAQxkVpaDbbnHsrppcegndHL1s6BtM8IA8KCeQmZFlutNjWVloHkr8-cnYhIaT0NAPzm--b4UPoG4YFxgVZrrwZFgRALgimjH1CM8wp5EJI8RnNIJVcEnm3jw5iXAEA4QX7gvaxFEALwWfod-X73g-ZHprsdnB_R5td2THoLqt8CLbTGxsz32bH48bXzv8Jen3vTBpf2t6Hx5e9m3s7tYm6dEPzFe21uov2cFfn6Pbk1011ll9cn55Xxxe54VxsctKyBlrLrGFalo2EWuDSSNyUpaBacFtDYyitdZozxpo2fcmkgVKDaLk0dI5-bnXXwaez40b1LhrbdXqwfoyqZLzEnEn4P0kp4xy4TOSPd-TKj2FIbyhCKHDKZZGg5RYywccYbKvWwfU6PCoMakpFTamoKRX1kkra-L6THeveNq_8LoYEVFugd28sJ5kHQlyhKBDCkxoQnBwUCPXk1h_YHH2g8q-jngECiKp9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223053596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Rabin, Jennifer S. ; Gilboa, Asaf ; Stuss, Donald T. ; Mar, Raymond A. ; Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</creator><creatorcontrib>Rabin, Jennifer S. ; Gilboa, Asaf ; Stuss, Donald T. ; Mar, Raymond A. ; Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</creatorcontrib><description>There is an inconsistency regarding the relationship between thinking about personal past experiences during autobiographical memory (AM) and thinking about other people's mental states during theory of mind (ToM). Neuroimaging studies of AM and ToM consistently report overlap in the brain regions recruited. Lesion data, however, show that amnesic people with AM impairment can have intact ToM, suggesting that distinct neural mechanisms support these abilities [Rosenbaum, R. S., Stuss, D. T., Levine, B., & Tulving, E. Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.
1257, 2007]. The current fMRI study examined the functional and neural correlates of remembering one's own experiences in response to personal photos (AM condition) and imagining others' experiences in response to strangers' photos (ToM condition). AM and ToM conditions were matched in terms of content and vividness, and were compared directly and to a common baseline. Analyses revealed common activity within frontal and temporal–parietal regions, yet midline structures exhibited greater activity during AM. More specific analyses of event construction and detail elaboration revealed unique activation of the right hippocampus during AM construction, and of lateral regions, such as the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) during ToM elaboration. Moreover, a region of left hippocampus/perirhinal cortex appeared to be driven by event vividness. Thus, differences in AM and ToM emerge when a common baseline is used and temporal dynamics are taken into account. Furthermore, the right TPJ and related lateral regions, and not the hippocampus, may be needed for ToM, given that this ability is intact in amnesic people.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-8898</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21344</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19803685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analysis of Variance ; Brain ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Mapping ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognitive ability ; Female ; Functional Laterality - physiology ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Imagination - physiology ; Life Change Events ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Middle Aged ; Neuropsychological Tests ; Neurosciences ; Theory of Mind - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2010-06, Vol.22 (6), p.1095-1111</ispartof><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Jun 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-2f4d0fe4ec4a97d90b817c91d7783a85eb0dc33bac4a444df20049c07a08f59c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-2f4d0fe4ec4a97d90b817c91d7783a85eb0dc33bac4a444df20049c07a08f59c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/doi/10.1162/jocn.2009.21344$$EHTML$$P50$$Gmit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,53988,53989</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19803685$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rabin, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuss, Donald T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mar, Raymond A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</creatorcontrib><title>Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind</title><title>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</title><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><description>There is an inconsistency regarding the relationship between thinking about personal past experiences during autobiographical memory (AM) and thinking about other people's mental states during theory of mind (ToM). Neuroimaging studies of AM and ToM consistently report overlap in the brain regions recruited. Lesion data, however, show that amnesic people with AM impairment can have intact ToM, suggesting that distinct neural mechanisms support these abilities [Rosenbaum, R. S., Stuss, D. T., Levine, B., & Tulving, E. Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.
1257, 2007]. The current fMRI study examined the functional and neural correlates of remembering one's own experiences in response to personal photos (AM condition) and imagining others' experiences in response to strangers' photos (ToM condition). AM and ToM conditions were matched in terms of content and vividness, and were compared directly and to a common baseline. Analyses revealed common activity within frontal and temporal–parietal regions, yet midline structures exhibited greater activity during AM. More specific analyses of event construction and detail elaboration revealed unique activation of the right hippocampus during AM construction, and of lateral regions, such as the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) during ToM elaboration. Moreover, a region of left hippocampus/perirhinal cortex appeared to be driven by event vividness. Thus, differences in AM and ToM emerge when a common baseline is used and temporal dynamics are taken into account. Furthermore, the right TPJ and related lateral regions, and not the hippocampus, may be needed for ToM, given that this ability is intact in amnesic people.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Mapping</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Functional Laterality - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Imagination - physiology</subject><subject>Life Change Events</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuropsychological Tests</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Theory of Mind - physiology</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><issn>1530-8898</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctr3DAQxkVpaDbbnHsrppcegndHL1s6BtM8IA8KCeQmZFlutNjWVloHkr8-cnYhIaT0NAPzm--b4UPoG4YFxgVZrrwZFgRALgimjH1CM8wp5EJI8RnNIJVcEnm3jw5iXAEA4QX7gvaxFEALwWfod-X73g-ZHprsdnB_R5td2THoLqt8CLbTGxsz32bH48bXzv8Jen3vTBpf2t6Hx5e9m3s7tYm6dEPzFe21uov2cFfn6Pbk1011ll9cn55Xxxe54VxsctKyBlrLrGFalo2EWuDSSNyUpaBacFtDYyitdZozxpo2fcmkgVKDaLk0dI5-bnXXwaez40b1LhrbdXqwfoyqZLzEnEn4P0kp4xy4TOSPd-TKj2FIbyhCKHDKZZGg5RYywccYbKvWwfU6PCoMakpFTamoKRX1kkra-L6THeveNq_8LoYEVFugd28sJ5kHQlyhKBDCkxoQnBwUCPXk1h_YHH2g8q-jngECiKp9</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Rabin, Jennifer S.</creator><creator>Gilboa, Asaf</creator><creator>Stuss, Donald T.</creator><creator>Mar, Raymond A.</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind</title><author>Rabin, Jennifer S. ; Gilboa, Asaf ; Stuss, Donald T. ; Mar, Raymond A. ; Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c558t-2f4d0fe4ec4a97d90b817c91d7783a85eb0dc33bac4a444df20049c07a08f59c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Mapping</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Functional Laterality - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Imagination - physiology</topic><topic>Life Change Events</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuropsychological Tests</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Theory of Mind - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rabin, Jennifer S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilboa, Asaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stuss, Donald T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mar, Raymond A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rabin, Jennifer S.</au><au>Gilboa, Asaf</au><au>Stuss, Donald T.</au><au>Mar, Raymond A.</au><au>Rosenbaum, R. Shayna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cognitive neuroscience</jtitle><addtitle>J Cogn Neurosci</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1095</spage><epage>1111</epage><pages>1095-1111</pages><issn>0898-929X</issn><eissn>1530-8898</eissn><abstract>There is an inconsistency regarding the relationship between thinking about personal past experiences during autobiographical memory (AM) and thinking about other people's mental states during theory of mind (ToM). Neuroimaging studies of AM and ToM consistently report overlap in the brain regions recruited. Lesion data, however, show that amnesic people with AM impairment can have intact ToM, suggesting that distinct neural mechanisms support these abilities [Rosenbaum, R. S., Stuss, D. T., Levine, B., & Tulving, E. Theory of mind is independent of episodic memory.
1257, 2007]. The current fMRI study examined the functional and neural correlates of remembering one's own experiences in response to personal photos (AM condition) and imagining others' experiences in response to strangers' photos (ToM condition). AM and ToM conditions were matched in terms of content and vividness, and were compared directly and to a common baseline. Analyses revealed common activity within frontal and temporal–parietal regions, yet midline structures exhibited greater activity during AM. More specific analyses of event construction and detail elaboration revealed unique activation of the right hippocampus during AM construction, and of lateral regions, such as the right temporo-parietal junction (TPJ) during ToM elaboration. Moreover, a region of left hippocampus/perirhinal cortex appeared to be driven by event vividness. Thus, differences in AM and ToM emerge when a common baseline is used and temporal dynamics are taken into account. Furthermore, the right TPJ and related lateral regions, and not the hippocampus, may be needed for ToM, given that this ability is intact in amnesic people.</abstract><cop>One Rogers Street, Cambridge, MA 02142-1209, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><pmid>19803685</pmid><doi>10.1162/jocn.2009.21344</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-929X |
ispartof | Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2010-06, Vol.22 (6), p.1095-1111 |
issn | 0898-929X 1530-8898 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733455059 |
source | MEDLINE; MIT Press Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Brain Brain - physiology Brain Mapping Chi-Square Distribution Cognition - physiology Cognitive ability Female Functional Laterality - physiology Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Imagination - physiology Life Change Events Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Medical imaging Memory Mental Recall - physiology Middle Aged Neuropsychological Tests Neurosciences Theory of Mind - physiology |
title | Common and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A27%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Common%20and%20Unique%20Neural%20Correlates%20of%20Autobiographical%20Memory%20and%20Theory%20of%20Mind&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cognitive%20neuroscience&rft.au=Rabin,%20Jennifer%20S.&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1095&rft.epage=1111&rft.pages=1095-1111&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft.eissn=1530-8898&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/jocn.2009.21344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1990527511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223053596&rft_id=info:pmid/19803685&rfr_iscdi=true |