Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability
To determine whether focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) in a rural hospital provides information that prompts immediate transfer to a tertiary care facility for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who would otherwise be discharged or held for observation. Prior to the study, participating...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of emergency medicine 2004-11, Vol.6 (6), p.408-415 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 415 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 408 |
container_title | Canadian journal of emergency medicine |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Shuster, Michael Abu-Laban, Riyad B. Boyd, Jeff Gauthier, Charles Mergler, Sandra Shepherd, Lance Turner, Chris |
description | To determine whether focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) in a rural hospital provides information that prompts immediate transfer to a tertiary care facility for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who would otherwise be discharged or held for observation.
Prior to the study, participating emergency physicians underwent a minimum of 30 hours of ultrasound training. All patients who presented with blunt abdominal trauma to our rural hospital between Mar. 1, 2002, and Apr. 30, 2003, were eligible for study. Following a history and physical examination, the emergency physician documented his or her disposition decision. A FAST was then performed, and the disposition reconsidered in light of the FAST results.
Sixty-seven FAST exams were performed on 65 patients. Three examinations (4.5%) were true-positive (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%-12.5%); 60 (89.6%) were true-negative (95% CI 79.7%-95.7%), 4 (6%) were false-negative (95% CI 1.7%-14.6%) and none (0%) were false-positive (95% CI 0%-5.4%). These values reflect sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive values of 43%, 100%, 94% and 100% respectively. FAST results did not alter the decision to transfer any patient (0%: 95% CI 0.0%-5.4%), although one positive FAST may have led to an expedited transfer. One of 38 patients who was discharged after a negative FAST study returned 24 hours later because of worsening symptoms, and was ultimately found to have splenic and pancreatic injuries.
This study failed to demonstrate that FAST improves disposition decisions for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who are evaluated in a hospital without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability. However, the study is not sufficiently powered to rule out a role for FAST in these circumstances, and our data suggest that up to 5.4% of transfer decisions could be influenced by FAST. Rural emergency physicians should not allow a negative FAST study to override a clinical indication for transfer to a trauma centre; however, positive FAST studies can be used to accelerate transfer for definitive treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1481803500009404 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733453268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1481803500009404</cupid><galeid>A135925339</galeid><sourcerecordid>A135925339</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-fd21fdad2517dc5aadb2b765ee2e686b680a4f7863546218f50df252da1a84443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQxaXikGLHduIcq4pCpQoOhXM0sSfBVWKndgzsrY-Oq13RLpT4EGv0zWf59xTFa0ZPGGXN-ysmFFOUS5q_VlDxpDi8K5WKCv70z57Lg-JFjNeUskoy9bw4YA1vVCvbw-L23OsU0RDojZ-tg4mkaQ0QfXKGDD6QfkpuJbmUZiDWEXAEZwwjOr0hBhcI64yZ-GnX7z6tBMwPcDob7QyjdSPJDu_KaFckMYXR6nyGhgV6O9l187J4NsAU8dXuf1R8O__w9exTefnl48XZ6WWpRd2IcjAVGwyYfIHGaAlg-qpvaolYYa3qvlYUxNComktRV0wNkpqhkpUBBkoIwY-K4613Cf4mYVy72UaN0wQOfYpdw7mQvKpVJt_-RV77FHIysWOtbBRnss5QuYVGmLCzbvA5IZ1DwQCTdzjYXD5lXLaV5Ly9l-7xerE33UPo5BEoL4Oz1Y9a3-01ZGbFX-sIKcbu4urzPsu2rA4-xoBDt4T8RGHTMdrdjVP3zzjlnje7KFI_o7nv2M1PBvhOCnMfrBnxQVj_1f4G9zrTDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195783156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Shuster, Michael ; Abu-Laban, Riyad B. ; Boyd, Jeff ; Gauthier, Charles ; Mergler, Sandra ; Shepherd, Lance ; Turner, Chris</creator><creatorcontrib>Shuster, Michael ; Abu-Laban, Riyad B. ; Boyd, Jeff ; Gauthier, Charles ; Mergler, Sandra ; Shepherd, Lance ; Turner, Chris</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) in a rural hospital provides information that prompts immediate transfer to a tertiary care facility for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who would otherwise be discharged or held for observation.
Prior to the study, participating emergency physicians underwent a minimum of 30 hours of ultrasound training. All patients who presented with blunt abdominal trauma to our rural hospital between Mar. 1, 2002, and Apr. 30, 2003, were eligible for study. Following a history and physical examination, the emergency physician documented his or her disposition decision. A FAST was then performed, and the disposition reconsidered in light of the FAST results.
Sixty-seven FAST exams were performed on 65 patients. Three examinations (4.5%) were true-positive (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%-12.5%); 60 (89.6%) were true-negative (95% CI 79.7%-95.7%), 4 (6%) were false-negative (95% CI 1.7%-14.6%) and none (0%) were false-positive (95% CI 0%-5.4%). These values reflect sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive values of 43%, 100%, 94% and 100% respectively. FAST results did not alter the decision to transfer any patient (0%: 95% CI 0.0%-5.4%), although one positive FAST may have led to an expedited transfer. One of 38 patients who was discharged after a negative FAST study returned 24 hours later because of worsening symptoms, and was ultimately found to have splenic and pancreatic injuries.
This study failed to demonstrate that FAST improves disposition decisions for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who are evaluated in a hospital without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability. However, the study is not sufficiently powered to rule out a role for FAST in these circumstances, and our data suggest that up to 5.4% of transfer decisions could be influenced by FAST. Rural emergency physicians should not allow a negative FAST study to override a clinical indication for transfer to a trauma centre; however, positive FAST studies can be used to accelerate transfer for definitive treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-8035</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1481-8043</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1481803500009404</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17378959</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Decision making ; Em Advances • Innovations en MU ; Emergency medical care ; Injuries ; Onsite ; Patients ; Physicians ; Rural areas ; Rural health care ; Trauma ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Workers' compensation</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2004-11, Vol.6 (6), p.408-415</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2004</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2004 Decker Publishing</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Medical Association Nov 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-fd21fdad2517dc5aadb2b765ee2e686b680a4f7863546218f50df252da1a84443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-fd21fdad2517dc5aadb2b765ee2e686b680a4f7863546218f50df252da1a84443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378959$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shuster, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Laban, Riyad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergler, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Chris</creatorcontrib><title>Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability</title><title>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Can J Emergen Med</addtitle><description>To determine whether focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) in a rural hospital provides information that prompts immediate transfer to a tertiary care facility for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who would otherwise be discharged or held for observation.
Prior to the study, participating emergency physicians underwent a minimum of 30 hours of ultrasound training. All patients who presented with blunt abdominal trauma to our rural hospital between Mar. 1, 2002, and Apr. 30, 2003, were eligible for study. Following a history and physical examination, the emergency physician documented his or her disposition decision. A FAST was then performed, and the disposition reconsidered in light of the FAST results.
Sixty-seven FAST exams were performed on 65 patients. Three examinations (4.5%) were true-positive (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%-12.5%); 60 (89.6%) were true-negative (95% CI 79.7%-95.7%), 4 (6%) were false-negative (95% CI 1.7%-14.6%) and none (0%) were false-positive (95% CI 0%-5.4%). These values reflect sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive values of 43%, 100%, 94% and 100% respectively. FAST results did not alter the decision to transfer any patient (0%: 95% CI 0.0%-5.4%), although one positive FAST may have led to an expedited transfer. One of 38 patients who was discharged after a negative FAST study returned 24 hours later because of worsening symptoms, and was ultimately found to have splenic and pancreatic injuries.
This study failed to demonstrate that FAST improves disposition decisions for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who are evaluated in a hospital without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability. However, the study is not sufficiently powered to rule out a role for FAST in these circumstances, and our data suggest that up to 5.4% of transfer decisions could be influenced by FAST. Rural emergency physicians should not allow a negative FAST study to override a clinical indication for transfer to a trauma centre; however, positive FAST studies can be used to accelerate transfer for definitive treatment.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Em Advances • Innovations en MU</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Onsite</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural health care</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Workers' compensation</subject><issn>1481-8035</issn><issn>1481-8043</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1ksFu1DAQhiMEoqXwAFyQxaXikGLHduIcq4pCpQoOhXM0sSfBVWKndgzsrY-Oq13RLpT4EGv0zWf59xTFa0ZPGGXN-ysmFFOUS5q_VlDxpDi8K5WKCv70z57Lg-JFjNeUskoy9bw4YA1vVCvbw-L23OsU0RDojZ-tg4mkaQ0QfXKGDD6QfkpuJbmUZiDWEXAEZwwjOr0hBhcI64yZ-GnX7z6tBMwPcDob7QyjdSPJDu_KaFckMYXR6nyGhgV6O9l187J4NsAU8dXuf1R8O__w9exTefnl48XZ6WWpRd2IcjAVGwyYfIHGaAlg-qpvaolYYa3qvlYUxNComktRV0wNkpqhkpUBBkoIwY-K4613Cf4mYVy72UaN0wQOfYpdw7mQvKpVJt_-RV77FHIysWOtbBRnss5QuYVGmLCzbvA5IZ1DwQCTdzjYXD5lXLaV5Ly9l-7xerE33UPo5BEoL4Oz1Y9a3-01ZGbFX-sIKcbu4urzPsu2rA4-xoBDt4T8RGHTMdrdjVP3zzjlnje7KFI_o7nv2M1PBvhOCnMfrBnxQVj_1f4G9zrTDA</recordid><startdate>200411</startdate><enddate>200411</enddate><creator>Shuster, Michael</creator><creator>Abu-Laban, Riyad B.</creator><creator>Boyd, Jeff</creator><creator>Gauthier, Charles</creator><creator>Mergler, Sandra</creator><creator>Shepherd, Lance</creator><creator>Turner, Chris</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>Decker Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200411</creationdate><title>Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability</title><author>Shuster, Michael ; Abu-Laban, Riyad B. ; Boyd, Jeff ; Gauthier, Charles ; Mergler, Sandra ; Shepherd, Lance ; Turner, Chris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4674-fd21fdad2517dc5aadb2b765ee2e686b680a4f7863546218f50df252da1a84443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Em Advances • Innovations en MU</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Onsite</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural health care</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Workers' compensation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shuster, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu-Laban, Riyad B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyd, Jeff</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauthier, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mergler, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepherd, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Chris</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Proquest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shuster, Michael</au><au>Abu-Laban, Riyad B.</au><au>Boyd, Jeff</au><au>Gauthier, Charles</au><au>Mergler, Sandra</au><au>Shepherd, Lance</au><au>Turner, Chris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Emergen Med</addtitle><date>2004-11</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>408</spage><epage>415</epage><pages>408-415</pages><issn>1481-8035</issn><eissn>1481-8043</eissn><abstract>To determine whether focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST) in a rural hospital provides information that prompts immediate transfer to a tertiary care facility for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who would otherwise be discharged or held for observation.
Prior to the study, participating emergency physicians underwent a minimum of 30 hours of ultrasound training. All patients who presented with blunt abdominal trauma to our rural hospital between Mar. 1, 2002, and Apr. 30, 2003, were eligible for study. Following a history and physical examination, the emergency physician documented his or her disposition decision. A FAST was then performed, and the disposition reconsidered in light of the FAST results.
Sixty-seven FAST exams were performed on 65 patients. Three examinations (4.5%) were true-positive (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%-12.5%); 60 (89.6%) were true-negative (95% CI 79.7%-95.7%), 4 (6%) were false-negative (95% CI 1.7%-14.6%) and none (0%) were false-positive (95% CI 0%-5.4%). These values reflect sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive values of 43%, 100%, 94% and 100% respectively. FAST results did not alter the decision to transfer any patient (0%: 95% CI 0.0%-5.4%), although one positive FAST may have led to an expedited transfer. One of 38 patients who was discharged after a negative FAST study returned 24 hours later because of worsening symptoms, and was ultimately found to have splenic and pancreatic injuries.
This study failed to demonstrate that FAST improves disposition decisions for patients with blunt abdominal trauma who are evaluated in a hospital without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability. However, the study is not sufficiently powered to rule out a role for FAST in these circumstances, and our data suggest that up to 5.4% of transfer decisions could be influenced by FAST. Rural emergency physicians should not allow a negative FAST study to override a clinical indication for transfer to a trauma centre; however, positive FAST studies can be used to accelerate transfer for definitive treatment.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>17378959</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1481803500009404</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1481-8035 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of emergency medicine, 2004-11, Vol.6 (6), p.408-415 |
issn | 1481-8035 1481-8043 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733453268 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Abdomen Decision making Em Advances • Innovations en MU Emergency medical care Injuries Onsite Patients Physicians Rural areas Rural health care Trauma Ultrasonic imaging Workers' compensation |
title | Focused abdominal ultrasound for blunt trauma in an emergency department without advanced imaging or on-site surgical capability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T23%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Focused%20abdominal%20ultrasound%20for%20blunt%20trauma%20in%20an%20emergency%20department%20without%20advanced%20imaging%20or%20on-site%20surgical%20capability&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Shuster,%20Michael&rft.date=2004-11&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=408&rft.epage=415&rft.pages=408-415&rft.issn=1481-8035&rft.eissn=1481-8043&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1481803500009404&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA135925339%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195783156&rft_id=info:pmid/17378959&rft_galeid=A135925339&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1481803500009404&rfr_iscdi=true |