Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear

Auditory sensitivity has often been measured by identifying neural threshold in real-time (online) which can introduce bias in the audiograms that are produced. We tested this by recording auditory nerve activity of the notodontid moth Nadata gibbosa elicited by bat-like ultrasound and analysing the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Comparative Physiology 2010-07, Vol.196 (7), p.453-462
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Matthew E, Asi, Navdeep S, Fullard, James H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 462
container_issue 7
container_start_page 453
container_title Journal of Comparative Physiology
container_volume 196
creator Jackson, Matthew E
Asi, Navdeep S
Fullard, James H
description Auditory sensitivity has often been measured by identifying neural threshold in real-time (online) which can introduce bias in the audiograms that are produced. We tested this by recording auditory nerve activity of the notodontid moth Nadata gibbosa elicited by bat-like ultrasound and analysing the response offline. We compared this audiogram with a published online audiogram showing that the bias introduced can result in a difference in the audiogram shape. In the second part of our study we compared offline audiograms using spike number as threshold with others that used spike period and stimulus/spike latency, variables that have been suggested as providing behaviourally functional criteria. These comparisons reveal that functional audiograms are more flatly tuned than simple spike audiograms. The shapes of behavioural audiograms are discussed in the context of the selection pressure that maintains their shape, bat predation. Finally, we make predictions on the distance from bats at which notodontid moths use negative phonotaxis or the acoustic startle response.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733400236</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2065618351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae8f42f59f8a66b66edb87b7b1b6add868e4b8384d7510b5c5847b16ddf05c533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1jAQhS0Eoj-FB2ADFhtWgfEtsdlVFTepEgvo2rLjSZoqiVvbqfS_PS4pILFgZVnnO8fjOYS8ZPCOAXTvM4BQpgEGDShuGvaIHJgUvGFCscfkAEJC0ykjT8iznK8BgDPOnpITDlIaZdSB3J5tYSoxHWnGNU9lupvKkbo1UOzjHMepdzNNOOOdW3v8QMsV0mFb-zLFtSquuuOY3EJdpksMOM8YqD_-4rwrNGDBCq9jVcsVRZeekyeDmzO-eDhPyeWnjz_OvzQX3z5_PT-7aHphZGkc6kHyQZlBu7b1bYvB6853nvnWhaBbjdJroWXoFAOveqVlFdsQBqgXIU7J2z33JsXbDXOxy5T7OqBbMW7ZdqJuB7hoK_nmH_I6bql-L1vFNNecd6pCbIf6FHNOONibNC0uHS0De9-G3duwtQ1734Zl1fPqIXjzC4Y_jt_rrwDfgVyldcT09-X_pb7eTYOL1o1pyvbyOwcmgGlljDDiJ_Z5nyU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>518282275</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Jackson, Matthew E ; Asi, Navdeep S ; Fullard, James H</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Matthew E ; Asi, Navdeep S ; Fullard, James H</creatorcontrib><description>Auditory sensitivity has often been measured by identifying neural threshold in real-time (online) which can introduce bias in the audiograms that are produced. We tested this by recording auditory nerve activity of the notodontid moth Nadata gibbosa elicited by bat-like ultrasound and analysing the response offline. We compared this audiogram with a published online audiogram showing that the bias introduced can result in a difference in the audiogram shape. In the second part of our study we compared offline audiograms using spike number as threshold with others that used spike period and stimulus/spike latency, variables that have been suggested as providing behaviourally functional criteria. These comparisons reveal that functional audiograms are more flatly tuned than simple spike audiograms. The shapes of behavioural audiograms are discussed in the context of the selection pressure that maintains their shape, bat predation. Finally, we make predictions on the distance from bats at which notodontid moths use negative phonotaxis or the acoustic startle response.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-7594</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20449595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Animal Physiology ; Animals ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chiroptera ; Cochlear Nerve - physiology ; Ecology ; Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology ; Hearing - physiology ; In Vitro Techniques ; Life Sciences ; Moths - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Online Systems ; Original Paper ; Psychoacoustics ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2010-07, Vol.196 (7), p.453-462</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae8f42f59f8a66b66edb87b7b1b6add868e4b8384d7510b5c5847b16ddf05c533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae8f42f59f8a66b66edb87b7b1b6add868e4b8384d7510b5c5847b16ddf05c533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20449595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asi, Navdeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullard, James H</creatorcontrib><title>Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear</title><title>Journal of Comparative Physiology</title><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A</addtitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><description>Auditory sensitivity has often been measured by identifying neural threshold in real-time (online) which can introduce bias in the audiograms that are produced. We tested this by recording auditory nerve activity of the notodontid moth Nadata gibbosa elicited by bat-like ultrasound and analysing the response offline. We compared this audiogram with a published online audiogram showing that the bias introduced can result in a difference in the audiogram shape. In the second part of our study we compared offline audiograms using spike number as threshold with others that used spike period and stimulus/spike latency, variables that have been suggested as providing behaviourally functional criteria. These comparisons reveal that functional audiograms are more flatly tuned than simple spike audiograms. The shapes of behavioural audiograms are discussed in the context of the selection pressure that maintains their shape, bat predation. Finally, we make predictions on the distance from bats at which notodontid moths use negative phonotaxis or the acoustic startle response.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Animal Physiology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Cochlear Nerve - physiology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Moths - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Online Systems</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Psychoacoustics</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-7594</issn><issn>1432-1351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1jAQhS0Eoj-FB2ADFhtWgfEtsdlVFTepEgvo2rLjSZoqiVvbqfS_PS4pILFgZVnnO8fjOYS8ZPCOAXTvM4BQpgEGDShuGvaIHJgUvGFCscfkAEJC0ykjT8iznK8BgDPOnpITDlIaZdSB3J5tYSoxHWnGNU9lupvKkbo1UOzjHMepdzNNOOOdW3v8QMsV0mFb-zLFtSquuuOY3EJdpksMOM8YqD_-4rwrNGDBCq9jVcsVRZeekyeDmzO-eDhPyeWnjz_OvzQX3z5_PT-7aHphZGkc6kHyQZlBu7b1bYvB6853nvnWhaBbjdJroWXoFAOveqVlFdsQBqgXIU7J2z33JsXbDXOxy5T7OqBbMW7ZdqJuB7hoK_nmH_I6bql-L1vFNNecd6pCbIf6FHNOONibNC0uHS0De9-G3duwtQ1734Zl1fPqIXjzC4Y_jt_rrwDfgVyldcT09-X_pb7eTYOL1o1pyvbyOwcmgGlljDDiJ_Z5nyU</recordid><startdate>20100701</startdate><enddate>20100701</enddate><creator>Jackson, Matthew E</creator><creator>Asi, Navdeep S</creator><creator>Fullard, James H</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100701</creationdate><title>Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear</title><author>Jackson, Matthew E ; Asi, Navdeep S ; Fullard, James H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-ae8f42f59f8a66b66edb87b7b1b6add868e4b8384d7510b5c5847b16ddf05c533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Animal Physiology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Cochlear Nerve - physiology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Moths - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Online Systems</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Psychoacoustics</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Matthew E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asi, Navdeep S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fullard, James H</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Matthew E</au><au>Asi, Navdeep S</au><au>Fullard, James H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Comparative Physiology</jtitle><stitle>J Comp Physiol A</stitle><addtitle>J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol</addtitle><date>2010-07-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>196</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>453</spage><epage>462</epage><pages>453-462</pages><issn>0340-7594</issn><eissn>1432-1351</eissn><abstract>Auditory sensitivity has often been measured by identifying neural threshold in real-time (online) which can introduce bias in the audiograms that are produced. We tested this by recording auditory nerve activity of the notodontid moth Nadata gibbosa elicited by bat-like ultrasound and analysing the response offline. We compared this audiogram with a published online audiogram showing that the bias introduced can result in a difference in the audiogram shape. In the second part of our study we compared offline audiograms using spike number as threshold with others that used spike period and stimulus/spike latency, variables that have been suggested as providing behaviourally functional criteria. These comparisons reveal that functional audiograms are more flatly tuned than simple spike audiograms. The shapes of behavioural audiograms are discussed in the context of the selection pressure that maintains their shape, bat predation. Finally, we make predictions on the distance from bats at which notodontid moths use negative phonotaxis or the acoustic startle response.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>20449595</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-7594
ispartof Journal of Comparative Physiology, 2010-07, Vol.196 (7), p.453-462
issn 0340-7594
1432-1351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733400236
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals
subjects Acoustic Stimulation - methods
Animal Physiology
Animals
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chiroptera
Cochlear Nerve - physiology
Ecology
Evoked Potentials, Auditory - physiology
Hearing - physiology
In Vitro Techniques
Life Sciences
Moths - physiology
Neurosciences
Online Systems
Original Paper
Psychoacoustics
Reaction Time - physiology
Zoology
title Auditory sensitivity and ecological relevance: the functional audiogram as modelled by the bat detecting moth ear
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T05%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Auditory%20sensitivity%20and%20ecological%20relevance:%20the%20functional%20audiogram%20as%20modelled%20by%20the%20bat%20detecting%20moth%20ear&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Comparative%20Physiology&rft.au=Jackson,%20Matthew%20E&rft.date=2010-07-01&rft.volume=196&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=453&rft.epage=462&rft.pages=453-462&rft.issn=0340-7594&rft.eissn=1432-1351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00359-010-0529-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2065618351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=518282275&rft_id=info:pmid/20449595&rfr_iscdi=true