Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model
A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage. To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyc...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2003-05, Vol.28 (10), p.1010-1014 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1014 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1010 |
| container_title | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) |
| container_volume | 28 |
| creator | Totoribe, Koji Matsumoto, Masanori Goel, Vijay K Yang, S J Tajima, Naoya Shikinami, Yasuo |
| description | A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage.
To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyclic loading on construct stability.
Threaded cages have been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to provide initial stability during the fusion process. However, metallic instrumentation has several limitations. Recently, totally bioresorbable bone fixation devices made of F-u-HA/PLLA have been developed, including a cage for spinal interbody fusion. However, no biomechanical study has compared the F-u-HA/poly-L-lactide (PLLA) cage with metallic cages.
For this study, 12 fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C4-C7) were used. After anterior discectomy across C5-C6, stabilization was achieved with the F-u-HA/PLLA cage in six spines and with the Ray threaded fusion cage in the remaining six spines. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed with six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after cyclic loading of the stabilized spines (5000 cycles of flexion-extension at 0.5 Nm).
The specimens stabilized with either the F-u-HA/PLLA cage or the Ray cage were significantly more stable than the discectomy case in all directions except in extension. In extension, both groups were stiffer, although not at a significant level (P > 0.05). After fatigue, the stiffness, as compared with that in the prefatigue case, decreased in both groups, although not at a significant level. The Ray cage group exhibited better stability than the F-u-HA/PLLA cage group in all directions, although a significant difference was found only in right axial rotation.
The F-u-HA/PLLA cage has the possibility to supplant the use of metallic devices in interbody fusions of the cervical spine. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061993.27807.B1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73336741</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73336741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1919-479ecc47ac4326a623ec4154a7581d176954b83a42cb1adbbafeee9d1491c5943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCKyCLA7eETOzEMTd21QLSSkgFztbEnqVGSRzs7Kp5Dl6YZLtS5zLS6Pv_OXyMvYcih0KrjwXk2_sfebFODVqLvFRNofItvGAbqMomA6j0S7YpRF1mpRT1NXud0p8VF6BfsWsoVd2A0Bv2bxf6ESNO_kS89aEn-4CDt9hxHLCbk088HDhyS_F0Plv8TbxHR-f7wI9D8sNEkRx_mF0MjzOOS91EfOmdvO1ooRwfQzdn-6xDO_kla5e3Ia2UH9Z2dHiiyPvgqHvDrg7YJXp72Tfs193tz93XbP_9y7fd531mQYPOpNJkrVRopShrrEtBVkIlUVUNOFC1rmTbCJSlbQFd2-KBiLQDqcFWWoob9uGpd4zh75HSZHqfLHUdDhSOySghRK0kLOCnJ9DGkFKkgxmj7zHOBgqzKjEFmEWJeVZizkrMdg2_u3w5tj255-jFgfgP99qK2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73336741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Totoribe, Koji ; Matsumoto, Masanori ; Goel, Vijay K ; Yang, S J ; Tajima, Naoya ; Shikinami, Yasuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Totoribe, Koji ; Matsumoto, Masanori ; Goel, Vijay K ; Yang, S J ; Tajima, Naoya ; Shikinami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><description>A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage.
To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyclic loading on construct stability.
Threaded cages have been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to provide initial stability during the fusion process. However, metallic instrumentation has several limitations. Recently, totally bioresorbable bone fixation devices made of F-u-HA/PLLA have been developed, including a cage for spinal interbody fusion. However, no biomechanical study has compared the F-u-HA/poly-L-lactide (PLLA) cage with metallic cages.
For this study, 12 fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C4-C7) were used. After anterior discectomy across C5-C6, stabilization was achieved with the F-u-HA/PLLA cage in six spines and with the Ray threaded fusion cage in the remaining six spines. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed with six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after cyclic loading of the stabilized spines (5000 cycles of flexion-extension at 0.5 Nm).
The specimens stabilized with either the F-u-HA/PLLA cage or the Ray cage were significantly more stable than the discectomy case in all directions except in extension. In extension, both groups were stiffer, although not at a significant level (P > 0.05). After fatigue, the stiffness, as compared with that in the prefatigue case, decreased in both groups, although not at a significant level. The Ray cage group exhibited better stability than the F-u-HA/PLLA cage group in all directions, although a significant difference was found only in right axial rotation.
The F-u-HA/PLLA cage has the possibility to supplant the use of metallic devices in interbody fusions of the cervical spine.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000061993.27807.B1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12768139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology ; Cervical Vertebrae - surgery ; Durapatite ; Humans ; Particle Size ; Polyesters ; Rotation ; Spinal Fusion - instrumentation ; Spinal Fusion - methods ; Stress, Mechanical</subject><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2003-05, Vol.28 (10), p.1010-1014</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1919-479ecc47ac4326a623ec4154a7581d176954b83a42cb1adbbafeee9d1491c5943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1919-479ecc47ac4326a623ec4154a7581d176954b83a42cb1adbbafeee9d1491c5943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12768139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Totoribe, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Vijay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Naoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikinami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage.
To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyclic loading on construct stability.
Threaded cages have been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to provide initial stability during the fusion process. However, metallic instrumentation has several limitations. Recently, totally bioresorbable bone fixation devices made of F-u-HA/PLLA have been developed, including a cage for spinal interbody fusion. However, no biomechanical study has compared the F-u-HA/poly-L-lactide (PLLA) cage with metallic cages.
For this study, 12 fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C4-C7) were used. After anterior discectomy across C5-C6, stabilization was achieved with the F-u-HA/PLLA cage in six spines and with the Ray threaded fusion cage in the remaining six spines. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed with six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after cyclic loading of the stabilized spines (5000 cycles of flexion-extension at 0.5 Nm).
The specimens stabilized with either the F-u-HA/PLLA cage or the Ray cage were significantly more stable than the discectomy case in all directions except in extension. In extension, both groups were stiffer, although not at a significant level (P > 0.05). After fatigue, the stiffness, as compared with that in the prefatigue case, decreased in both groups, although not at a significant level. The Ray cage group exhibited better stability than the F-u-HA/PLLA cage group in all directions, although a significant difference was found only in right axial rotation.
The F-u-HA/PLLA cage has the possibility to supplant the use of metallic devices in interbody fusions of the cervical spine.</description><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</subject><subject>Durapatite</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Particle Size</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</subject><subject>Spinal Fusion - methods</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCKyCLA7eETOzEMTd21QLSSkgFztbEnqVGSRzs7Kp5Dl6YZLtS5zLS6Pv_OXyMvYcih0KrjwXk2_sfebFODVqLvFRNofItvGAbqMomA6j0S7YpRF1mpRT1NXud0p8VF6BfsWsoVd2A0Bv2bxf6ESNO_kS89aEn-4CDt9hxHLCbk088HDhyS_F0Plv8TbxHR-f7wI9D8sNEkRx_mF0MjzOOS91EfOmdvO1ooRwfQzdn-6xDO_kla5e3Ia2UH9Z2dHiiyPvgqHvDrg7YJXp72Tfs193tz93XbP_9y7fd531mQYPOpNJkrVRopShrrEtBVkIlUVUNOFC1rmTbCJSlbQFd2-KBiLQDqcFWWoob9uGpd4zh75HSZHqfLHUdDhSOySghRK0kLOCnJ9DGkFKkgxmj7zHOBgqzKjEFmEWJeVZizkrMdg2_u3w5tj255-jFgfgP99qK2Q</recordid><startdate>20030515</startdate><enddate>20030515</enddate><creator>Totoribe, Koji</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Masanori</creator><creator>Goel, Vijay K</creator><creator>Yang, S J</creator><creator>Tajima, Naoya</creator><creator>Shikinami, Yasuo</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030515</creationdate><title>Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model</title><author>Totoribe, Koji ; Matsumoto, Masanori ; Goel, Vijay K ; Yang, S J ; Tajima, Naoya ; Shikinami, Yasuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1919-479ecc47ac4326a623ec4154a7581d176954b83a42cb1adbbafeee9d1491c5943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cervical Vertebrae - surgery</topic><topic>Durapatite</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Particle Size</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - instrumentation</topic><topic>Spinal Fusion - methods</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Totoribe, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Masanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goel, Vijay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, S J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tajima, Naoya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shikinami, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Totoribe, Koji</au><au>Matsumoto, Masanori</au><au>Goel, Vijay K</au><au>Yang, S J</au><au>Tajima, Naoya</au><au>Shikinami, Yasuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2003-05-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1010</spage><epage>1014</epage><pages>1010-1014</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>A new cage made from a forged composite of unsintered hydroxyapatite particles and poly-L-lactide (F-u-HA/PLLA) is compared biomechanically with the Ray threaded fusion cage.
To compare the stability imparted to the human cadaveric spine by two different threaded cervical cages and the effect of cyclic loading on construct stability.
Threaded cages have been developed for use in anterior cervical interbody fusions to provide initial stability during the fusion process. However, metallic instrumentation has several limitations. Recently, totally bioresorbable bone fixation devices made of F-u-HA/PLLA have been developed, including a cage for spinal interbody fusion. However, no biomechanical study has compared the F-u-HA/poly-L-lactide (PLLA) cage with metallic cages.
For this study, 12 fresh ligamentous human cervical spines (C4-C7) were used. After anterior discectomy across C5-C6, stabilization was achieved with the F-u-HA/PLLA cage in six spines and with the Ray threaded fusion cage in the remaining six spines. Biomechanical testing of the spines was performed with six degrees of freedom before and after stabilization, and after cyclic loading of the stabilized spines (5000 cycles of flexion-extension at 0.5 Nm).
The specimens stabilized with either the F-u-HA/PLLA cage or the Ray cage were significantly more stable than the discectomy case in all directions except in extension. In extension, both groups were stiffer, although not at a significant level (P > 0.05). After fatigue, the stiffness, as compared with that in the prefatigue case, decreased in both groups, although not at a significant level. The Ray cage group exhibited better stability than the F-u-HA/PLLA cage group in all directions, although a significant difference was found only in right axial rotation.
The F-u-HA/PLLA cage has the possibility to supplant the use of metallic devices in interbody fusions of the cervical spine.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12768139</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.BRS.0000061993.27807.B1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0362-2436 |
| ispartof | Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2003-05, Vol.28 (10), p.1010-1014 |
| issn | 0362-2436 1528-1159 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73336741 |
| source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
| subjects | Biomechanical Phenomena Cadaver Cervical Vertebrae - physiopathology Cervical Vertebrae - surgery Durapatite Humans Particle Size Polyesters Rotation Spinal Fusion - instrumentation Spinal Fusion - methods Stress, Mechanical |
| title | Comparative biomechanical analysis of a cervical cage made of an unsintered hydroxyapatite particle and poly-L-lactide composite in a cadaver model |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A08%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20biomechanical%20analysis%20of%20a%20cervical%20cage%20made%20of%20an%20unsintered%20hydroxyapatite%20particle%20and%20poly-L-lactide%20composite%20in%20a%20cadaver%20model&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Totoribe,%20Koji&rft.date=2003-05-15&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1010&rft.epage=1014&rft.pages=1010-1014&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.BRS.0000061993.27807.B1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73336741%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73336741&rft_id=info:pmid/12768139&rfr_iscdi=true |