Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910

An independent panel of experts, convened by the American Medical Association (AMA) Institute for Ethics, analyzed the roots of the racial divide within American medical organizations. In this, the first of a 2-part report, we describe 2 watershed moments that helped institutionalize the racial divi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the National Medical Association 2009-06, Vol.101 (6), p.501-512
Hauptverfasser: Baker, Robert B., Washington, Harriet A., Olakanmi, Ololade, Savitt, Todd L., Jacobs, Elizabeth A., Hoover, Eddie, Wynia, Matthew K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 512
container_issue 6
container_start_page 501
container_title Journal of the National Medical Association
container_volume 101
creator Baker, Robert B.
Washington, Harriet A.
Olakanmi, Ololade
Savitt, Todd L.
Jacobs, Elizabeth A.
Hoover, Eddie
Wynia, Matthew K.
description An independent panel of experts, convened by the American Medical Association (AMA) Institute for Ethics, analyzed the roots of the racial divide within American medical organizations. In this, the first of a 2-part report, we describe 2 watershed moments that helped institutionalize the racial divide. The first occurred in the 1870s, when 2 medical societies from Washington, DC, sent rival delegations to the AMA’s national meetings: an all-white delegation from a medical society that the US courts and Congress had formally censured for discriminating against black physicians; and an integrated delegation from a medical society led by physicians from Howard University. Through parliamentary maneuvers and variable enforcement of credentialing standards, the integrated delegation was twice excluded from the AMA’s meetings, while the all-white society’s delegations were admitted. AMA leaders then voted to devolve the power to select delegates to state societies, thereby accepting segregation in constituent societies and forcing African American physicians to create their own, separate organizations. A second watershed involved AMA-promoted educational reforms, including the 1910 Flexner report. Straightforwardly applied, the report’s population-based criterion for determining the need for physicians would have recommended increased training of African American physicians to serve the approximately 9 million African Americans in the segregated south. Instead, the report recommended closing all but 2 African American medical schools, helping to cement in place an African American educational system that was separate, unequal, and destined to be insufficient to the needs of African Americans nationwide.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30935-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733365326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0027968415309354</els_id><sourcerecordid>1743676211</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10fee0a4ae0c5534c824ed049014afb21714efa12690925b27c53c18f30bd52f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkd1rVDEQxYModlv9E5QgSBW8OpOPuze-yLL4BZUWqs8hmzu5puzm1uSuUP96s921gi8-zTD8zmE4h7EnCK8RsH1zCSDmjWk79QL1SwlG6kbdYzM0SjaqNfI-m90hR-y4lCsA6IzWD9kRGt1pg92MDctMbopp4I5f0pBpcBP1_Av10bs1v8hjoFLimN7yRcj1lvhiQ_vl4vtNiT66VLhLPT_Pg0vx1x91TPSKY6faBg3CI_YguHWhx4d5wr59eP91-ak5O__4ebk4a7wWMDUIgQiccgRea6l8JxT1oAygcmElcI6KgkPRGjBCr8Tca-mxCxJWvRZBnrDTve91Hn9sqUx2E4un9dolGrfFzqWUrZaireSzf8ircZtTfc4KVCCFMV2F9B7yeSwlU7DXOW5cvrEIdteDve3B7kK2qO1tD1ZV3dOD-Xa1of6v6hB8BZ4fAFdq0CG75GO54wS2uhrvjN7tOaqh_YyUbfGRkq8JZ_KT7cf4n1d-A5kFoZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214032998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baker, Robert B. ; Washington, Harriet A. ; Olakanmi, Ololade ; Savitt, Todd L. ; Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ; Hoover, Eddie ; Wynia, Matthew K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert B. ; Washington, Harriet A. ; Olakanmi, Ololade ; Savitt, Todd L. ; Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ; Hoover, Eddie ; Wynia, Matthew K. ; for the Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession ; Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</creatorcontrib><description>An independent panel of experts, convened by the American Medical Association (AMA) Institute for Ethics, analyzed the roots of the racial divide within American medical organizations. In this, the first of a 2-part report, we describe 2 watershed moments that helped institutionalize the racial divide. The first occurred in the 1870s, when 2 medical societies from Washington, DC, sent rival delegations to the AMA’s national meetings: an all-white delegation from a medical society that the US courts and Congress had formally censured for discriminating against black physicians; and an integrated delegation from a medical society led by physicians from Howard University. Through parliamentary maneuvers and variable enforcement of credentialing standards, the integrated delegation was twice excluded from the AMA’s meetings, while the all-white society’s delegations were admitted. AMA leaders then voted to devolve the power to select delegates to state societies, thereby accepting segregation in constituent societies and forcing African American physicians to create their own, separate organizations. A second watershed involved AMA-promoted educational reforms, including the 1910 Flexner report. Straightforwardly applied, the report’s population-based criterion for determining the need for physicians would have recommended increased training of African American physicians to serve the approximately 9 million African Americans in the segregated south. Instead, the report recommended closing all but 2 African American medical schools, helping to cement in place an African American educational system that was separate, unequal, and destined to be insufficient to the needs of African Americans nationwide.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0027-9684</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-4693</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30935-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19585918</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNMAAE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>African Americans ; African Americans - history ; African Americans - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Biological and medical sciences ; education ; European Continental Ancestry Group ; General aspects ; Health participants ; History, 19th Century ; History, 20th Century ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; National Medical Association ; Prejudice ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Social Justice - history ; Societies, Medical - history ; Societies, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the National Medical Association, 2009-06, Vol.101 (6), p.501-512</ispartof><rights>2008 National Medical Association</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright National Medical Association Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10fee0a4ae0c5534c824ed049014afb21714efa12690925b27c53c18f30bd52f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10fee0a4ae0c5534c824ed049014afb21714efa12690925b27c53c18f30bd52f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21650024$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19585918$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington, Harriet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olakanmi, Ololade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savitt, Todd L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Eddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wynia, Matthew K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</creatorcontrib><title>Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910</title><title>Journal of the National Medical Association</title><addtitle>J Natl Med Assoc</addtitle><description>An independent panel of experts, convened by the American Medical Association (AMA) Institute for Ethics, analyzed the roots of the racial divide within American medical organizations. In this, the first of a 2-part report, we describe 2 watershed moments that helped institutionalize the racial divide. The first occurred in the 1870s, when 2 medical societies from Washington, DC, sent rival delegations to the AMA’s national meetings: an all-white delegation from a medical society that the US courts and Congress had formally censured for discriminating against black physicians; and an integrated delegation from a medical society led by physicians from Howard University. Through parliamentary maneuvers and variable enforcement of credentialing standards, the integrated delegation was twice excluded from the AMA’s meetings, while the all-white society’s delegations were admitted. AMA leaders then voted to devolve the power to select delegates to state societies, thereby accepting segregation in constituent societies and forcing African American physicians to create their own, separate organizations. A second watershed involved AMA-promoted educational reforms, including the 1910 Flexner report. Straightforwardly applied, the report’s population-based criterion for determining the need for physicians would have recommended increased training of African American physicians to serve the approximately 9 million African Americans in the segregated south. Instead, the report recommended closing all but 2 African American medical schools, helping to cement in place an African American educational system that was separate, unequal, and destined to be insufficient to the needs of African Americans nationwide.</description><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>African Americans - history</subject><subject>African Americans - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>European Continental Ancestry Group</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>History, 19th Century</subject><subject>History, 20th Century</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>National Medical Association</subject><subject>Prejudice</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>Social Justice - history</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - history</subject><subject>Societies, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0027-9684</issn><issn>1943-4693</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkd1rVDEQxYModlv9E5QgSBW8OpOPuze-yLL4BZUWqs8hmzu5puzm1uSuUP96s921gi8-zTD8zmE4h7EnCK8RsH1zCSDmjWk79QL1SwlG6kbdYzM0SjaqNfI-m90hR-y4lCsA6IzWD9kRGt1pg92MDctMbopp4I5f0pBpcBP1_Av10bs1v8hjoFLimN7yRcj1lvhiQ_vl4vtNiT66VLhLPT_Pg0vx1x91TPSKY6faBg3CI_YguHWhx4d5wr59eP91-ak5O__4ebk4a7wWMDUIgQiccgRea6l8JxT1oAygcmElcI6KgkPRGjBCr8Tca-mxCxJWvRZBnrDTve91Hn9sqUx2E4un9dolGrfFzqWUrZaireSzf8ircZtTfc4KVCCFMV2F9B7yeSwlU7DXOW5cvrEIdteDve3B7kK2qO1tD1ZV3dOD-Xa1of6v6hB8BZ4fAFdq0CG75GO54wS2uhrvjN7tOaqh_YyUbfGRkq8JZ_KT7cf4n1d-A5kFoZY</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Baker, Robert B.</creator><creator>Washington, Harriet A.</creator><creator>Olakanmi, Ololade</creator><creator>Savitt, Todd L.</creator><creator>Jacobs, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Hoover, Eddie</creator><creator>Wynia, Matthew K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>National Medical Association</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910</title><author>Baker, Robert B. ; Washington, Harriet A. ; Olakanmi, Ololade ; Savitt, Todd L. ; Jacobs, Elizabeth A. ; Hoover, Eddie ; Wynia, Matthew K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c520t-10fee0a4ae0c5534c824ed049014afb21714efa12690925b27c53c18f30bd52f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>African Americans - history</topic><topic>African Americans - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>European Continental Ancestry Group</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>History, 19th Century</topic><topic>History, 20th Century</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>National Medical Association</topic><topic>Prejudice</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>Social Justice - history</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - history</topic><topic>Societies, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington, Harriet A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olakanmi, Ololade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Savitt, Todd L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobs, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Eddie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wynia, Matthew K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the National Medical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Robert B.</au><au>Washington, Harriet A.</au><au>Olakanmi, Ololade</au><au>Savitt, Todd L.</au><au>Jacobs, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Hoover, Eddie</au><au>Wynia, Matthew K.</au><aucorp>for the Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</aucorp><aucorp>Writing Group on the History of African Americans and the Medical Profession</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the National Medical Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Natl Med Assoc</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>501</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>501-512</pages><issn>0027-9684</issn><eissn>1943-4693</eissn><coden>JNMAAE</coden><abstract>An independent panel of experts, convened by the American Medical Association (AMA) Institute for Ethics, analyzed the roots of the racial divide within American medical organizations. In this, the first of a 2-part report, we describe 2 watershed moments that helped institutionalize the racial divide. The first occurred in the 1870s, when 2 medical societies from Washington, DC, sent rival delegations to the AMA’s national meetings: an all-white delegation from a medical society that the US courts and Congress had formally censured for discriminating against black physicians; and an integrated delegation from a medical society led by physicians from Howard University. Through parliamentary maneuvers and variable enforcement of credentialing standards, the integrated delegation was twice excluded from the AMA’s meetings, while the all-white society’s delegations were admitted. AMA leaders then voted to devolve the power to select delegates to state societies, thereby accepting segregation in constituent societies and forcing African American physicians to create their own, separate organizations. A second watershed involved AMA-promoted educational reforms, including the 1910 Flexner report. Straightforwardly applied, the report’s population-based criterion for determining the need for physicians would have recommended increased training of African American physicians to serve the approximately 9 million African Americans in the segregated south. Instead, the report recommended closing all but 2 African American medical schools, helping to cement in place an African American educational system that was separate, unequal, and destined to be insufficient to the needs of African Americans nationwide.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>19585918</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30935-4</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0027-9684
ispartof Journal of the National Medical Association, 2009-06, Vol.101 (6), p.501-512
issn 0027-9684
1943-4693
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733365326
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects African Americans
African Americans - history
African Americans - statistics & numerical data
Biological and medical sciences
education
European Continental Ancestry Group
General aspects
Health participants
History, 19th Century
History, 20th Century
Humans
Medical sciences
National Medical Association
Prejudice
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Social Justice - history
Societies, Medical - history
Societies, Medical - statistics & numerical data
United States
title Creating a Segregated Medical Profession: African American Physicians and Organized Medicine, 1846-1910
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T16%3A01%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Creating%20a%20Segregated%20Medical%20Profession:%20African%20American%20Physicians%20and%20Organized%20Medicine,%201846-1910&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20National%20Medical%20Association&rft.au=Baker,%20Robert%20B.&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20Writing%20Group%20on%20the%20History%20of%20African%20Americans%20and%20the%20Medical%20Profession&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=501&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=501-512&rft.issn=0027-9684&rft.eissn=1943-4693&rft.coden=JNMAAE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0027-9684(15)30935-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1743676211%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214032998&rft_id=info:pmid/19585918&rft_els_id=S0027968415309354&rfr_iscdi=true