Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls

Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463
Hauptverfasser: Greiter, M B, Keck, L, Siegmund, T, Hoeschen, C, Oeh, U, Paretzke, H G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 463
container_issue 6
container_start_page 455
container_title Diabetes technology & therapeutics
container_volume 12
creator Greiter, M B
Keck, L
Siegmund, T
Hoeschen, C
Oeh, U
Paretzke, H G
description Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls. Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS. We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively. These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.
doi_str_mv 10.1089/dia.2009.0181
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733316309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A227798044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A227798044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotn4cvUrAg6etk2S32RxL_QTBi14N2c3ERra7dZOi_e_N0ioIMocMye-FN_MIOWMwYVCqK-vNhAOoCbCS7ZExKwqZlYUS-0PPIVOsmI7IUQjvACAFZ4dkxCGXwAWMyeu1dw57bGsM1LcUvxamQUvfTKCrvnO-SfcVxk_Elq5M9NjGQD99XNC4WSHlNBlI74kyraULNE1cbGjdtbHvmnBCDpxpAp7uzmPycnvzPL_PHp_uHuazx6wWhYoZk6Jg3FiwUJvKCl7lSlpnmCxRqqpi0uamNmZqMQcOTBU5OFfBoGFMgTgml9t_k-ePNYaolz7U2DSmxW4dtBRCsKkAlciLLfmW5tS-dV3sTT3Qesa5lKqEPE_U5B8qlcWlT8PhsJi_gmwrqPsuhB6dXvV-afqNZqCHoHTakx6C0kNQiT_fGV5XS7S_9E8y4huBfo15</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733316309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</creator><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls. Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS. We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively. These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-9156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0181</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20470230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Blood ; Breath tests ; Breath Tests - methods ; Care and treatment ; Case-Control Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology ; Diagnosis ; Exhalation ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Medical examination ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Type 2 diabetes ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics, 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20470230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegmund, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeschen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oeh, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><title>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</title><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><description>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls. Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS. We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively. These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Breath tests</subject><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>1520-9156</issn><issn>1557-8593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotn4cvUrAg6etk2S32RxL_QTBi14N2c3ERra7dZOi_e_N0ioIMocMye-FN_MIOWMwYVCqK-vNhAOoCbCS7ZExKwqZlYUS-0PPIVOsmI7IUQjvACAFZ4dkxCGXwAWMyeu1dw57bGsM1LcUvxamQUvfTKCrvnO-SfcVxk_Elq5M9NjGQD99XNC4WSHlNBlI74kyraULNE1cbGjdtbHvmnBCDpxpAp7uzmPycnvzPL_PHp_uHuazx6wWhYoZk6Jg3FiwUJvKCl7lSlpnmCxRqqpi0uamNmZqMQcOTBU5OFfBoGFMgTgml9t_k-ePNYaolz7U2DSmxW4dtBRCsKkAlciLLfmW5tS-dV3sTT3Qesa5lKqEPE_U5B8qlcWlT8PhsJi_gmwrqPsuhB6dXvV-afqNZqCHoHTakx6C0kNQiT_fGV5XS7S_9E8y4huBfo15</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Greiter, M B</creator><creator>Keck, L</creator><creator>Siegmund, T</creator><creator>Hoeschen, C</creator><creator>Oeh, U</creator><creator>Paretzke, H G</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><author>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Breath tests</topic><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegmund, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeschen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oeh, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greiter, M B</au><au>Keck, L</au><au>Siegmund, T</au><au>Hoeschen, C</au><au>Oeh, U</au><au>Paretzke, H G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes technology &amp; therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>455-463</pages><issn>1520-9156</issn><eissn>1557-8593</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls. Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS. We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively. These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>20470230</pmid><doi>10.1089/dia.2009.0181</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-9156
ispartof Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463
issn 1520-9156
1557-8593
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733316309
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analysis
Blood
Breath tests
Breath Tests - methods
Care and treatment
Case-Control Studies
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology
Diagnosis
Exhalation
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Male
Mass Spectrometry - methods
Medical examination
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Statistics, Nonparametric
Type 2 diabetes
Volatile organic compounds
title Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A24%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20exhaled%20gas%20profiles%20between%20patients%20with%20type%202%20diabetes%20and%20healthy%20controls&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20technology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=Greiter,%20M%20B&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=455-463&rft.issn=1520-9156&rft.eissn=1557-8593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/dia.2009.0181&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA227798044%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733316309&rft_id=info:pmid/20470230&rft_galeid=A227798044&rfr_iscdi=true