Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls
Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Diabetes technology & therapeutics 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 463 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 455 |
container_title | Diabetes technology & therapeutics |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Greiter, M B Keck, L Siegmund, T Hoeschen, C Oeh, U Paretzke, H G |
description | Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.
Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS.
We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively.
These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/dia.2009.0181 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733316309</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A227798044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A227798044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotn4cvUrAg6etk2S32RxL_QTBi14N2c3ERra7dZOi_e_N0ioIMocMye-FN_MIOWMwYVCqK-vNhAOoCbCS7ZExKwqZlYUS-0PPIVOsmI7IUQjvACAFZ4dkxCGXwAWMyeu1dw57bGsM1LcUvxamQUvfTKCrvnO-SfcVxk_Elq5M9NjGQD99XNC4WSHlNBlI74kyraULNE1cbGjdtbHvmnBCDpxpAp7uzmPycnvzPL_PHp_uHuazx6wWhYoZk6Jg3FiwUJvKCl7lSlpnmCxRqqpi0uamNmZqMQcOTBU5OFfBoGFMgTgml9t_k-ePNYaolz7U2DSmxW4dtBRCsKkAlciLLfmW5tS-dV3sTT3Qesa5lKqEPE_U5B8qlcWlT8PhsJi_gmwrqPsuhB6dXvV-afqNZqCHoHTakx6C0kNQiT_fGV5XS7S_9E8y4huBfo15</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733316309</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</creator><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><description>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.
Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS.
We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively.
These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-9156</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8593</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/dia.2009.0181</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20470230</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Blood ; Breath tests ; Breath Tests - methods ; Care and treatment ; Case-Control Studies ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis ; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology ; Diagnosis ; Exhalation ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Mass Spectrometry - methods ; Medical examination ; Middle Aged ; Prognosis ; Prospective Studies ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; Type 2 diabetes ; Volatile organic compounds</subject><ispartof>Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20470230$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegmund, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeschen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oeh, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><title>Diabetes technology & therapeutics</title><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><description>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.
Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS.
We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively.
These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Blood</subject><subject>Breath tests</subject><subject>Breath Tests - methods</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</subject><subject>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry - methods</subject><subject>Medical examination</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><issn>1520-9156</issn><issn>1557-8593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1LAzEQxYMotn4cvUrAg6etk2S32RxL_QTBi14N2c3ERra7dZOi_e_N0ioIMocMye-FN_MIOWMwYVCqK-vNhAOoCbCS7ZExKwqZlYUS-0PPIVOsmI7IUQjvACAFZ4dkxCGXwAWMyeu1dw57bGsM1LcUvxamQUvfTKCrvnO-SfcVxk_Elq5M9NjGQD99XNC4WSHlNBlI74kyraULNE1cbGjdtbHvmnBCDpxpAp7uzmPycnvzPL_PHp_uHuazx6wWhYoZk6Jg3FiwUJvKCl7lSlpnmCxRqqpi0uamNmZqMQcOTBU5OFfBoGFMgTgml9t_k-ePNYaolz7U2DSmxW4dtBRCsKkAlciLLfmW5tS-dV3sTT3Qesa5lKqEPE_U5B8qlcWlT8PhsJi_gmwrqPsuhB6dXvV-afqNZqCHoHTakx6C0kNQiT_fGV5XS7S_9E8y4huBfo15</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Greiter, M B</creator><creator>Keck, L</creator><creator>Siegmund, T</creator><creator>Hoeschen, C</creator><creator>Oeh, U</creator><creator>Paretzke, H G</creator><general>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</title><author>Greiter, M B ; Keck, L ; Siegmund, T ; Hoeschen, C ; Oeh, U ; Paretzke, H G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-173512ad0d0cabd32b497dfa178e79bb17d4acaa6de402019540ffb012ad11903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Blood</topic><topic>Breath tests</topic><topic>Breath Tests - methods</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis</topic><topic>Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry - methods</topic><topic>Medical examination</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greiter, M B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegmund, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeschen, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oeh, U</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paretzke, H G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Diabetes technology & therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greiter, M B</au><au>Keck, L</au><au>Siegmund, T</au><au>Hoeschen, C</au><au>Oeh, U</au><au>Paretzke, H G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes technology & therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Diabetes Technol Ther</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>455</spage><epage>463</epage><pages>455-463</pages><issn>1520-9156</issn><eissn>1557-8593</eissn><abstract>Recent advances in analytical technology allow the detection of several hundred volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human exhaled air, many of which reflect unidentified endogenous pathways. This study was performed to determine whether a breath gas analysis using proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) could serve as a noninvasive method to distinguish between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and healthy controls.
Breath and room air samples were measured from 21 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and 26 healthy controls. VOCs in the mass range of 20-200 atomic mass units were analyzed using PTR-MS.
We identified eight masses characteristic of endogenous VOCs that showed significant differences in the gas profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy control subjects. Using these VOCs for linear discriminant analysis, the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 90% and 92%, respectively.
These results suggest that it is possible to separate patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 from healthy controls by multivariate analysis of exhaled endogenous VOCs. This is a first step towards the development of a noninvasive test using breath gas of at-risk persons and making it an attractive option for large-scale testing of at-risk populations. However, the establishment of exhaled volatiles as metabolic markers requires additional confirmatory investigations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Mary Ann Liebert, Inc</pub><pmid>20470230</pmid><doi>10.1089/dia.2009.0181</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1520-9156 |
ispartof | Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2010-06, Vol.12 (6), p.455-463 |
issn | 1520-9156 1557-8593 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733316309 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Analysis Blood Breath tests Breath Tests - methods Care and treatment Case-Control Studies Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - diagnosis Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 - physiopathology Diagnosis Exhalation Female Health aspects Humans Male Mass Spectrometry - methods Medical examination Middle Aged Prognosis Prospective Studies Sensitivity and Specificity Statistics, Nonparametric Type 2 diabetes Volatile organic compounds |
title | Differences in exhaled gas profiles between patients with type 2 diabetes and healthy controls |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A24%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20exhaled%20gas%20profiles%20between%20patients%20with%20type%202%20diabetes%20and%20healthy%20controls&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20technology%20&%20therapeutics&rft.au=Greiter,%20M%20B&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=455&rft.epage=463&rft.pages=455-463&rft.issn=1520-9156&rft.eissn=1557-8593&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/dia.2009.0181&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA227798044%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733316309&rft_id=info:pmid/20470230&rft_galeid=A227798044&rfr_iscdi=true |