Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age
Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age was assessed by using data from a case-control study of childhood strabismus. The sample consisted of 383 cases of strabismus and their age-matched controls, diagnosed between 1985 and 1986 in Baltimore, Maryland, who wer...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of epidemiology 1992-09, Vol.136 (5), p.566-567 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 567 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 566 |
| container_title | American journal of epidemiology |
| container_volume | 136 |
| creator | Hakim, Rosemarie B. Tielsch, James M. See, Lai Chu |
| description | Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age was assessed by using data from a case-control study of childhood strabismus. The sample consisted of 383 cases of strabismus and their age-matched controls, diagnosed between 1985 and 1986 in Baltimore, Maryland, who were under age 7 years when diagnosed. Medical record-based gestational age was derived, in order of priority, from early ultrasound examination, time from the last menstrual period, pediatric examination, and obstetric examination. The intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa, and mean difference were used to compare agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and characteristics related to study design. Overall, 86 percent of mothers were within 2 weeks of the gestational age reported in the medical record. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing maternal and medical record-based gestational age was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.86). Agreement was positively associated with shorter length of recall, low birth order, and having a neonatal illness related to prematurity. Agreement was poor among mothers of healthy preterm infants. There was a weak positive association between recall and some sociodemographic covariates. There was greater misclassification of prematurity in the controls than in the cases. The results suggest that, in general, women recall gestational age well, which supports the use of gestational age derived from maternal interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 566–73 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116534 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73330632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1306652625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-5109520af8fc094681ce6487b4652c9cad6c7be4db6a79996c105fe1a51931463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNlKAzEUhoMoWpdHEAYV76ZmT-NdqVorbriAeBMymTMytZ2pyVTr25vSquhVQv7vLPkQ2iO4TbBmR_WsqH0-rKe-sqPQtkNoW0KkYHwFtQhXMpVUyFXUwhjTVFNJN9BmCEOMCdECr6N1wjlVFLfQdffFA4yhapIMmg-AKrmyDcwbJ4MqXt5L-EgTW-XJFeSli8934OL0JLMB8qQPobFNWc_57gtso7UirgQ7y3MLPZ6dPvTO08ub_qDXvUwdo7xJRfyGoNgWncJhzWWHOJC8ozIuBXXa2Vw6lQHPM2mV1lo6gkUBxAqiGeGSbaHDRd-Jr9-mcQczLoOD0chWUE-DUYwxLBmN4P4_8FubIZGI46KqSB0vKOfrEDwUZuLLsfWfhmAzV27-KjdRuVkqj8W7yxHTbAz5b-nCccwPlrkN0V_hbeXK8INxLrnAJGLpAitDA7Of2PpXIxVTwpw_PRt10WH3t_rEXLMviIWddQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1306652625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Hakim, Rosemarie B. ; Tielsch, James M. ; See, Lai Chu</creator><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Rosemarie B. ; Tielsch, James M. ; See, Lai Chu</creatorcontrib><description>Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age was assessed by using data from a case-control study of childhood strabismus. The sample consisted of 383 cases of strabismus and their age-matched controls, diagnosed between 1985 and 1986 in Baltimore, Maryland, who were under age 7 years when diagnosed. Medical record-based gestational age was derived, in order of priority, from early ultrasound examination, time from the last menstrual period, pediatric examination, and obstetric examination. The intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa, and mean difference were used to compare agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and characteristics related to study design. Overall, 86 percent of mothers were within 2 weeks of the gestational age reported in the medical record. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing maternal and medical record-based gestational age was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.86). Agreement was positively associated with shorter length of recall, low birth order, and having a neonatal illness related to prematurity. Agreement was poor among mothers of healthy preterm infants. There was a weak positive association between recall and some sociodemographic covariates. There was greater misclassification of prematurity in the controls than in the cases. The results suggest that, in general, women recall gestational age well, which supports the use of gestational age derived from maternal interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 566–73</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-6256</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116534</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1442720</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJEPAS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cary, NC: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Baltimore - epidemiology ; Bias ; Biological and medical sciences ; Birth Order ; Case-Control Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Educational Status ; epidemiologic methods ; Epidemiology ; Ethnic Groups ; Female ; General aspects ; Gestational Age ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; Interviews as Topic - standards ; Maternal Age ; medical records ; Medical Records - standards ; Medical sciences ; Menstruation ; Methodology ; Mothers - psychology ; obstetrics ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; questionnaires ; recall ; Reproducibility of Results ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Strabismus - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>American journal of epidemiology, 1992-09, Vol.136 (5), p.566-567</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-5109520af8fc094681ce6487b4652c9cad6c7be4db6a79996c105fe1a51931463</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27846,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4464501$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1442720$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Rosemarie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielsch, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>See, Lai Chu</creatorcontrib><title>Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age</title><title>American journal of epidemiology</title><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age was assessed by using data from a case-control study of childhood strabismus. The sample consisted of 383 cases of strabismus and their age-matched controls, diagnosed between 1985 and 1986 in Baltimore, Maryland, who were under age 7 years when diagnosed. Medical record-based gestational age was derived, in order of priority, from early ultrasound examination, time from the last menstrual period, pediatric examination, and obstetric examination. The intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa, and mean difference were used to compare agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and characteristics related to study design. Overall, 86 percent of mothers were within 2 weeks of the gestational age reported in the medical record. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing maternal and medical record-based gestational age was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.86). Agreement was positively associated with shorter length of recall, low birth order, and having a neonatal illness related to prematurity. Agreement was poor among mothers of healthy preterm infants. There was a weak positive association between recall and some sociodemographic covariates. There was greater misclassification of prematurity in the controls than in the cases. The results suggest that, in general, women recall gestational age well, which supports the use of gestational age derived from maternal interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 566–73</description><subject>Baltimore - epidemiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Birth Order</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>epidemiologic methods</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethnic Groups</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Gestational Age</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic - standards</subject><subject>Maternal Age</subject><subject>medical records</subject><subject>Medical Records - standards</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menstruation</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Mothers - psychology</subject><subject>obstetrics</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>questionnaires</subject><subject>recall</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Strabismus - epidemiology</subject><issn>0002-9262</issn><issn>1476-6256</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNlKAzEUhoMoWpdHEAYV76ZmT-NdqVorbriAeBMymTMytZ2pyVTr25vSquhVQv7vLPkQ2iO4TbBmR_WsqH0-rKe-sqPQtkNoW0KkYHwFtQhXMpVUyFXUwhjTVFNJN9BmCEOMCdECr6N1wjlVFLfQdffFA4yhapIMmg-AKrmyDcwbJ4MqXt5L-EgTW-XJFeSli8934OL0JLMB8qQPobFNWc_57gtso7UirgQ7y3MLPZ6dPvTO08ub_qDXvUwdo7xJRfyGoNgWncJhzWWHOJC8ozIuBXXa2Vw6lQHPM2mV1lo6gkUBxAqiGeGSbaHDRd-Jr9-mcQczLoOD0chWUE-DUYwxLBmN4P4_8FubIZGI46KqSB0vKOfrEDwUZuLLsfWfhmAzV27-KjdRuVkqj8W7yxHTbAz5b-nCccwPlrkN0V_hbeXK8INxLrnAJGLpAitDA7Of2PpXIxVTwpw_PRt10WH3t_rEXLMviIWddQ</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Hakim, Rosemarie B.</creator><creator>Tielsch, James M.</creator><creator>See, Lai Chu</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>School of Hygiene and Public Health of the Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>HVZBN</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age</title><author>Hakim, Rosemarie B. ; Tielsch, James M. ; See, Lai Chu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c324t-5109520af8fc094681ce6487b4652c9cad6c7be4db6a79996c105fe1a51931463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Baltimore - epidemiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Birth Order</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>epidemiologic methods</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethnic Groups</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Gestational Age</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic - standards</topic><topic>Maternal Age</topic><topic>medical records</topic><topic>Medical Records - standards</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menstruation</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Mothers - psychology</topic><topic>obstetrics</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>questionnaires</topic><topic>recall</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Strabismus - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hakim, Rosemarie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tielsch, James M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>See, Lai Chu</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 24</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hakim, Rosemarie B.</au><au>Tielsch, James M.</au><au>See, Lai Chu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age</atitle><jtitle>American journal of epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Epidemiol</addtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>136</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>566</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>566-567</pages><issn>0002-9262</issn><eissn>1476-6256</eissn><coden>AJEPAS</coden><abstract>Agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age was assessed by using data from a case-control study of childhood strabismus. The sample consisted of 383 cases of strabismus and their age-matched controls, diagnosed between 1985 and 1986 in Baltimore, Maryland, who were under age 7 years when diagnosed. Medical record-based gestational age was derived, in order of priority, from early ultrasound examination, time from the last menstrual period, pediatric examination, and obstetric examination. The intraclass correlation coefficient, kappa, and mean difference were used to compare agreement between maternal interview- and medical record-based gestational age by maternal and pregnancy characteristics and characteristics related to study design. Overall, 86 percent of mothers were within 2 weeks of the gestational age reported in the medical record. The intraclass correlation coefficient comparing maternal and medical record-based gestational age was 0.83 (95% confidence interval 0.80–0.86). Agreement was positively associated with shorter length of recall, low birth order, and having a neonatal illness related to prematurity. Agreement was poor among mothers of healthy preterm infants. There was a weak positive association between recall and some sociodemographic covariates. There was greater misclassification of prematurity in the controls than in the cases. The results suggest that, in general, women recall gestational age well, which supports the use of gestational age derived from maternal interviews. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136: 566–73</abstract><cop>Cary, NC</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>1442720</pmid><doi>10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116534</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0002-9262 |
| ispartof | American journal of epidemiology, 1992-09, Vol.136 (5), p.566-567 |
| issn | 0002-9262 1476-6256 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73330632 |
| source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals Digital Archive Legacy; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Baltimore - epidemiology Bias Biological and medical sciences Birth Order Case-Control Studies Delivery, Obstetric - methods Educational Status epidemiologic methods Epidemiology Ethnic Groups Female General aspects Gestational Age Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Premature Interviews as Topic - standards Maternal Age medical records Medical Records - standards Medical sciences Menstruation Methodology Mothers - psychology obstetrics Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine questionnaires recall Reproducibility of Results Smoking - epidemiology Socioeconomic Factors Strabismus - epidemiology |
| title | Agreement between Maternal Interview- and Medical Record based Gestational Age |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A34%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agreement%20between%20Maternal%20Interview-%20and%20Medical%20Record%20based%20Gestational%20Age&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20epidemiology&rft.au=Hakim,%20Rosemarie%20B.&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=136&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=566&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=566-567&rft.issn=0002-9262&rft.eissn=1476-6256&rft.coden=AJEPAS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116534&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1306652625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1306652625&rft_id=info:pmid/1442720&rfr_iscdi=true |