Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses

ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality & safety in health care 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172
Hauptverfasser: Holden, L M, Watts, D D, Walker, P H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 172
container_issue 3
container_start_page 169
container_title Quality & safety in health care
container_volume 19
creator Holden, L M
Watts, D D
Walker, P H
description ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/qshc.2008.026435
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733265002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4011910861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQhy3UCihw7wlF6oFDm2VsJ7bTW7tqaRGCAy-pF8uvaLPksXgStfz3JAQ49MJpbM83P48-Qj5SWFDKxfE9rtyCAagFMJHxfIvs0kzmKS-Avns5q0LtkA-IawBasIJukx0GlHEpYJeYZdc0Q1s501ddm5jWJ66ra2O7-PTyNan6I0zG-9An_Sokm5WJjXEV9vglMZj8DXU91bn3gJWrTItPQe0QMeA-eV-aGsPBc90j1z9_XC1_pWcXJ7-X385SmwH0qS-UNN47F0rhRSYEt9QbyG2pSq5CyGnhvVHSMscKEby3FMAqy1npIOOB75GjOXcTu_shYK-bCt24nWlDN6CWnDORA7CR_PQfue6G2I7LaSqlUlkm1ETBTLnYIcZQ6k2sGhMfNAU92deTfT3Z17P9ceTwOXiwTfCvAy-6RyCdgVFf-PfaN_FOC8llrs9vlvr09pL9uZIn-vvIf55526zf_v4RUgeeUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778844682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-3898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.026435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20123760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory care ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Cooperative Behavior ; Drug stores ; Health administration ; Healthcare quality ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intensive care ; interdisciplinary collaboration ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Job satisfaction ; Likert scale ; Medical errors ; Midwestern United States ; Military Medicine ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Patient safety ; Patient Safety - standards ; Perceptions ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacists - psychology ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Primary Health Care - manpower ; questionnaire ; Questionnaires ; Safety Management - standards ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teamwork ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Quality &amp; safety in health care, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172</ispartof><rights>2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 (c) 2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/3/169.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/3/169.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,777,781,3183,23552,27905,27906,77349,77380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20123760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><title>Quality &amp; safety in health care</title><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><description>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Healthcare quality</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>interdisciplinary collaboration</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Midwestern United States</subject><subject>Military Medicine</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient Safety - standards</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacists - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - manpower</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Safety Management - standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1475-3898</issn><issn>1475-3901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQhy3UCihw7wlF6oFDm2VsJ7bTW7tqaRGCAy-pF8uvaLPksXgStfz3JAQ49MJpbM83P48-Qj5SWFDKxfE9rtyCAagFMJHxfIvs0kzmKS-Avns5q0LtkA-IawBasIJukx0GlHEpYJeYZdc0Q1s501ddm5jWJ66ra2O7-PTyNan6I0zG-9An_Sokm5WJjXEV9vglMZj8DXU91bn3gJWrTItPQe0QMeA-eV-aGsPBc90j1z9_XC1_pWcXJ7-X385SmwH0qS-UNN47F0rhRSYEt9QbyG2pSq5CyGnhvVHSMscKEby3FMAqy1npIOOB75GjOXcTu_shYK-bCt24nWlDN6CWnDORA7CR_PQfue6G2I7LaSqlUlkm1ETBTLnYIcZQ6k2sGhMfNAU92deTfT3Z17P9ceTwOXiwTfCvAy-6RyCdgVFf-PfaN_FOC8llrs9vlvr09pL9uZIn-vvIf55526zf_v4RUgeeUg</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Holden, L M</creator><creator>Watts, D D</creator><creator>Walker, P H</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><author>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Healthcare quality</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>interdisciplinary collaboration</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Midwestern United States</topic><topic>Military Medicine</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient Safety - standards</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacists - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - manpower</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Safety Management - standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality &amp; safety in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, L M</au><au>Watts, D D</au><au>Walker, P H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</atitle><jtitle>Quality &amp; safety in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>169-172</pages><issn>1475-3898</issn><eissn>1475-3901</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>20123760</pmid><doi>10.1136/qshc.2008.026435</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1475-3898
ispartof Quality & safety in health care, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172
issn 1475-3898
1475-3901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733265002
source MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Adult
Ambulatory care
Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitudes
Clinical outcomes
Collaboration
Communication
Cooperative Behavior
Drug stores
Health administration
Healthcare quality
Hospitals
Humans
Intensive care
interdisciplinary collaboration
Interdisciplinary Communication
Job satisfaction
Likert scale
Medical errors
Midwestern United States
Military Medicine
Nurses
Nurses - psychology
Patient safety
Patient Safety - standards
Perceptions
Pharmacists
Pharmacists - psychology
Physicians
Physicians - psychology
Primary Health Care - manpower
questionnaire
Questionnaires
Safety Management - standards
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teamwork
Working conditions
title Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T22%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20and%20collaboration:%20it's%20about%20the%20pharmacists,%20as%20well%20as%20the%20physicians%20and%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20safety%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Holden,%20L%20M&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=169-172&rft.issn=1475-3898&rft.eissn=1475-3901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/qshc.2008.026435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4011910861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778844682&rft_id=info:pmid/20123760&rfr_iscdi=true