Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses
ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quality & safety in health care 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 172 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 169 |
container_title | Quality & safety in health care |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Holden, L M Watts, D D Walker, P H |
description | ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/qshc.2008.026435 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733265002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4011910861</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQhy3UCihw7wlF6oFDm2VsJ7bTW7tqaRGCAy-pF8uvaLPksXgStfz3JAQ49MJpbM83P48-Qj5SWFDKxfE9rtyCAagFMJHxfIvs0kzmKS-Avns5q0LtkA-IawBasIJukx0GlHEpYJeYZdc0Q1s501ddm5jWJ66ra2O7-PTyNan6I0zG-9An_Sokm5WJjXEV9vglMZj8DXU91bn3gJWrTItPQe0QMeA-eV-aGsPBc90j1z9_XC1_pWcXJ7-X385SmwH0qS-UNN47F0rhRSYEt9QbyG2pSq5CyGnhvVHSMscKEby3FMAqy1npIOOB75GjOXcTu_shYK-bCt24nWlDN6CWnDORA7CR_PQfue6G2I7LaSqlUlkm1ETBTLnYIcZQ6k2sGhMfNAU92deTfT3Z17P9ceTwOXiwTfCvAy-6RyCdgVFf-PfaN_FOC8llrs9vlvr09pL9uZIn-vvIf55526zf_v4RUgeeUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1778844682</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</creator><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1475-3898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-3901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2008.026435</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20123760</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Ambulatory care ; Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Clinical outcomes ; Collaboration ; Communication ; Cooperative Behavior ; Drug stores ; Health administration ; Healthcare quality ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Intensive care ; interdisciplinary collaboration ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Job satisfaction ; Likert scale ; Medical errors ; Midwestern United States ; Military Medicine ; Nurses ; Nurses - psychology ; Patient safety ; Patient Safety - standards ; Perceptions ; Pharmacists ; Pharmacists - psychology ; Physicians ; Physicians - psychology ; Primary Health Care - manpower ; questionnaire ; Questionnaires ; Safety Management - standards ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teamwork ; Working conditions</subject><ispartof>Quality & safety in health care, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172</ispartof><rights>2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 (c) 2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/3/169.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/19/3/169.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,777,781,3183,23552,27905,27906,77349,77380</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20123760$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><title>Quality & safety in health care</title><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><description>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Ambulatory care</subject><subject>Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Health administration</subject><subject>Healthcare quality</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>interdisciplinary collaboration</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical errors</subject><subject>Midwestern United States</subject><subject>Military Medicine</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nurses - psychology</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patient Safety - standards</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pharmacists - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - manpower</subject><subject>questionnaire</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Safety Management - standards</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teamwork</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><issn>1475-3898</issn><issn>1475-3901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtP3DAQhy3UCihw7wlF6oFDm2VsJ7bTW7tqaRGCAy-pF8uvaLPksXgStfz3JAQ49MJpbM83P48-Qj5SWFDKxfE9rtyCAagFMJHxfIvs0kzmKS-Avns5q0LtkA-IawBasIJukx0GlHEpYJeYZdc0Q1s501ddm5jWJ66ra2O7-PTyNan6I0zG-9An_Sokm5WJjXEV9vglMZj8DXU91bn3gJWrTItPQe0QMeA-eV-aGsPBc90j1z9_XC1_pWcXJ7-X385SmwH0qS-UNN47F0rhRSYEt9QbyG2pSq5CyGnhvVHSMscKEby3FMAqy1npIOOB75GjOXcTu_shYK-bCt24nWlDN6CWnDORA7CR_PQfue6G2I7LaSqlUlkm1ETBTLnYIcZQ6k2sGhMfNAU92deTfT3Z17P9ceTwOXiwTfCvAy-6RyCdgVFf-PfaN_FOC8llrs9vlvr09pL9uZIn-vvIf55526zf_v4RUgeeUg</recordid><startdate>201006</startdate><enddate>201006</enddate><creator>Holden, L M</creator><creator>Watts, D D</creator><creator>Walker, P H</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201006</creationdate><title>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</title><author>Holden, L M ; Watts, D D ; Walker, P H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b400t-d987addccef6d64663b1da05bf8f38ee519dda87b2c296eddb100b8b32fc043e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Ambulatory care</topic><topic>Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Health administration</topic><topic>Healthcare quality</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>interdisciplinary collaboration</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical errors</topic><topic>Midwestern United States</topic><topic>Military Medicine</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nurses - psychology</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patient Safety - standards</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pharmacists - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - manpower</topic><topic>questionnaire</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Safety Management - standards</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teamwork</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holden, L M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, D D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, P H</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quality & safety in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holden, L M</au><au>Watts, D D</au><au>Walker, P H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses</atitle><jtitle>Quality & safety in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Qual Saf Health Care</addtitle><date>2010-06</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>169</spage><epage>172</epage><pages>169-172</pages><issn>1475-3898</issn><eissn>1475-3901</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveCollaboration and communication as dimensions of patient safety climate have been measured in acute care hospital units, and discrepant viewpoints have been documented between different professional groups, particularly between physicians and nurses. In the ambulatory care setting, these groups often work more closely together throughout the day than in acute care settings, thereby enhancing effective collaboration and communication. This study sought to determine if the communication differences that are known to impact patient safety, which are found in acute care, also exist in ambulatory care.MethodsThe Safety Attitudes Questionnaire, a 77-item survey of collaboration, communication and safety attitudes, was administered to the primary care staff at four Midwestern military ambulatory care clinics.ResultsThere were 107 participants consisting of nurses (n=46), nurse practitioners (n=12), pharmacists (n=10) and physicians (n=39), yielding an overall response rate of 65%. All groups rated their peer group higher than other professional groups. The ratings of nurses and physicians were very similar: 85.0% of nurses rated physicians, and 85.7% of physicians rated nurses as high or very high in communication and collaboration. Pharmacists were rated the lowest by each of the other professional groups. Only 60% of pharmacists rated physicians as high or very high.ConclusionsCollaboration and communication ratings among physicians and nurses appear to be higher in the ambulatory care setting than in the acute care. However, interactions with pharmacists are more problematic, perceived as adversarial. Teamwork training that focuses on specific interactions among professional groups should target these concerns.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><pmid>20123760</pmid><doi>10.1136/qshc.2008.026435</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1475-3898 |
ispartof | Quality & safety in health care, 2010-06, Vol.19 (3), p.169-172 |
issn | 1475-3898 1475-3901 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733265002 |
source | MEDLINE; BMJ Journals - NESLi2 |
subjects | Adult Ambulatory care Ambulatory Care Facilities - manpower Attitude of Health Personnel Attitudes Clinical outcomes Collaboration Communication Cooperative Behavior Drug stores Health administration Healthcare quality Hospitals Humans Intensive care interdisciplinary collaboration Interdisciplinary Communication Job satisfaction Likert scale Medical errors Midwestern United States Military Medicine Nurses Nurses - psychology Patient safety Patient Safety - standards Perceptions Pharmacists Pharmacists - psychology Physicians Physicians - psychology Primary Health Care - manpower questionnaire Questionnaires Safety Management - standards Studies Surveys and Questionnaires Teamwork Working conditions |
title | Communication and collaboration: it's about the pharmacists, as well as the physicians and nurses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T22%3A54%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Communication%20and%20collaboration:%20it's%20about%20the%20pharmacists,%20as%20well%20as%20the%20physicians%20and%20nurses&rft.jtitle=Quality%20&%20safety%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Holden,%20L%20M&rft.date=2010-06&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=169&rft.epage=172&rft.pages=169-172&rft.issn=1475-3898&rft.eissn=1475-3901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/qshc.2008.026435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4011910861%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1778844682&rft_id=info:pmid/20123760&rfr_iscdi=true |