Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria
Operative vaginal deliveries are frequent features of obstetrics practice in tertiary levels of care even in developing countries. It is essential to review these practices in order to assess their benefits or otherwise to safe motherhood in resource limited settings. Labor records on operative vagi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of African medicine 2009-04, Vol.8 (2), p.95-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Annals of African medicine |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Adaji, S E Shittu, S O Sule, S T |
description | Operative vaginal deliveries are frequent features of obstetrics practice in tertiary levels of care even in developing countries. It is essential to review these practices in order to assess their benefits or otherwise to safe motherhood in resource limited settings.
Labor records on operative vaginal delivery cases and matched controls who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and December 2001 at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria, were analyzed with respect to mode of delivery, indication for operative vaginal delivery, anesthesia use, fetal 5-min Apgar score, birth weight, fetal, and maternal complications.
Of 7,327 deliveries at the center in the study period, 262 (3.6%) were by operative vaginal deliveries. Forceps delivery was most frequently performed (55.7%), while vacuum delivery was found to be in increased use (38.2%). Embryotomy procedures were performed selectively (6.1%). Operative vaginal deliveries were more commonly employed on primigravida (78.6%) compared to multiparas and the most common indication was delayed second stage of labor. Forcep- and vacuum-assisted deliveries were both associated with maternal and newborn complications. There was no significant difference in the use of anesthesia between forceps and vacuum deliveries.
Operative vaginal delivery rates in this center are comparable to other centers as are the possible complications. Making these procedures safer will improve safe motherhood in settings where there are performed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/1596-3519.56236 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733219696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A210462809</galeid><sourcerecordid>A210462809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-830ec8f61feef80a734e821b9c57bda522c89e077de467110184a53607b6ef3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkclLAzEUh4MoWpezNxk86MWp2ZdjETcQvejFS0gzb2pkOlOTGcH_3tQWN3IIefl-j_f4EDokeMwJZudEGFkyQcxYSMrkBhpho0QplOSbaPT9u4N2U3rFmAshxTbaIUZjYZgZofHDAqLrwzsU724WWtcUFTT5GQOkIrTFs4vBnRX3YZZLbh9t1a5JcLC-99DT1eXjxU1593B9ezG5Kz1nvC81w-B1LUkNUGvsFOOgKZkaL9S0coJSrw1gpSrgUhGCieZOMInVVELNPNtDp6u-i9i9DZB6Ow_JQ9O4FrohWcUYJUYamcnjf-RrN8S8R7KaG8kZpTxD4xU0cw3Y0NZdH53Pp4J58F0Ldcj1CSWYS6qxyYGTX4EXcE3_krpm6EPXpr_g-Qr0sUspQm0XMcxd_LAE26Uiu5RglxLsl6KcOFoPPEznUP3wayfsEwqEh8Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>849643224</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Adaji, S E ; Shittu, S O ; Sule, S T</creator><creatorcontrib>Adaji, S E ; Shittu, S O ; Sule, S T</creatorcontrib><description>Operative vaginal deliveries are frequent features of obstetrics practice in tertiary levels of care even in developing countries. It is essential to review these practices in order to assess their benefits or otherwise to safe motherhood in resource limited settings.
Labor records on operative vaginal delivery cases and matched controls who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and December 2001 at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria, were analyzed with respect to mode of delivery, indication for operative vaginal delivery, anesthesia use, fetal 5-min Apgar score, birth weight, fetal, and maternal complications.
Of 7,327 deliveries at the center in the study period, 262 (3.6%) were by operative vaginal deliveries. Forceps delivery was most frequently performed (55.7%), while vacuum delivery was found to be in increased use (38.2%). Embryotomy procedures were performed selectively (6.1%). Operative vaginal deliveries were more commonly employed on primigravida (78.6%) compared to multiparas and the most common indication was delayed second stage of labor. Forcep- and vacuum-assisted deliveries were both associated with maternal and newborn complications. There was no significant difference in the use of anesthesia between forceps and vacuum deliveries.
Operative vaginal delivery rates in this center are comparable to other centers as are the possible complications. Making these procedures safer will improve safe motherhood in settings where there are performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1596-3519</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-5764</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/1596-3519.56236</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19805939</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analgesia, Epidural ; Apgar Score ; Birth Weight ; Births ; Case-Control Studies ; Childbirth ; Childbirth & labor ; Delivery, Obstetric - methods ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data ; Developing Countries ; Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Methods ; Nigeria ; Obstetrical Forceps - statistics & numerical data ; Obstetricians ; Obstetrics ; Practice ; Preeclampsia ; Pregnancy ; Risk Factors ; Teaching hospitals ; Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - statistics & numerical data ; Vagina - surgery ; Women</subject><ispartof>Annals of African medicine, 2009-04, Vol.8 (2), p.95-99</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2009 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jun 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-830ec8f61feef80a734e821b9c57bda522c89e077de467110184a53607b6ef3c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19805939$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adaji, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shittu, S O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sule, S T</creatorcontrib><title>Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria</title><title>Annals of African medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Afr Med</addtitle><description>Operative vaginal deliveries are frequent features of obstetrics practice in tertiary levels of care even in developing countries. It is essential to review these practices in order to assess their benefits or otherwise to safe motherhood in resource limited settings.
Labor records on operative vaginal delivery cases and matched controls who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and December 2001 at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria, were analyzed with respect to mode of delivery, indication for operative vaginal delivery, anesthesia use, fetal 5-min Apgar score, birth weight, fetal, and maternal complications.
Of 7,327 deliveries at the center in the study period, 262 (3.6%) were by operative vaginal deliveries. Forceps delivery was most frequently performed (55.7%), while vacuum delivery was found to be in increased use (38.2%). Embryotomy procedures were performed selectively (6.1%). Operative vaginal deliveries were more commonly employed on primigravida (78.6%) compared to multiparas and the most common indication was delayed second stage of labor. Forcep- and vacuum-assisted deliveries were both associated with maternal and newborn complications. There was no significant difference in the use of anesthesia between forceps and vacuum deliveries.
Operative vaginal delivery rates in this center are comparable to other centers as are the possible complications. Making these procedures safer will improve safe motherhood in settings where there are performed.</description><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Apgar Score</subject><subject>Birth Weight</subject><subject>Births</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Childbirth</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>Obstetrical Forceps - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Obstetricians</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Preeclampsia</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Teaching hospitals</subject><subject>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Vagina - surgery</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1596-3519</issn><issn>0975-5764</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkclLAzEUh4MoWpezNxk86MWp2ZdjETcQvejFS0gzb2pkOlOTGcH_3tQWN3IIefl-j_f4EDokeMwJZudEGFkyQcxYSMrkBhpho0QplOSbaPT9u4N2U3rFmAshxTbaIUZjYZgZofHDAqLrwzsU724WWtcUFTT5GQOkIrTFs4vBnRX3YZZLbh9t1a5JcLC-99DT1eXjxU1593B9ezG5Kz1nvC81w-B1LUkNUGvsFOOgKZkaL9S0coJSrw1gpSrgUhGCieZOMInVVELNPNtDp6u-i9i9DZB6Ow_JQ9O4FrohWcUYJUYamcnjf-RrN8S8R7KaG8kZpTxD4xU0cw3Y0NZdH53Pp4J58F0Ldcj1CSWYS6qxyYGTX4EXcE3_krpm6EPXpr_g-Qr0sUspQm0XMcxd_LAE26Uiu5RglxLsl6KcOFoPPEznUP3wayfsEwqEh8Q</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Adaji, S E</creator><creator>Shittu, S O</creator><creator>Sule, S T</creator><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria</title><author>Adaji, S E ; Shittu, S O ; Sule, S T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-830ec8f61feef80a734e821b9c57bda522c89e077de467110184a53607b6ef3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Apgar Score</topic><topic>Birth Weight</topic><topic>Births</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Childbirth</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - methods</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>Obstetrical Forceps - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Obstetricians</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Preeclampsia</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Teaching hospitals</topic><topic>Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Vagina - surgery</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adaji, S E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shittu, S O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sule, S T</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of African medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adaji, S E</au><au>Shittu, S O</au><au>Sule, S T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria</atitle><jtitle>Annals of African medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Afr Med</addtitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>1596-3519</issn><eissn>0975-5764</eissn><abstract>Operative vaginal deliveries are frequent features of obstetrics practice in tertiary levels of care even in developing countries. It is essential to review these practices in order to assess their benefits or otherwise to safe motherhood in resource limited settings.
Labor records on operative vaginal delivery cases and matched controls who had spontaneous vaginal deliveries between January 1997 and December 2001 at the Ahmadu Bello University Teaching Hospital, Zaria, Nigeria, were analyzed with respect to mode of delivery, indication for operative vaginal delivery, anesthesia use, fetal 5-min Apgar score, birth weight, fetal, and maternal complications.
Of 7,327 deliveries at the center in the study period, 262 (3.6%) were by operative vaginal deliveries. Forceps delivery was most frequently performed (55.7%), while vacuum delivery was found to be in increased use (38.2%). Embryotomy procedures were performed selectively (6.1%). Operative vaginal deliveries were more commonly employed on primigravida (78.6%) compared to multiparas and the most common indication was delayed second stage of labor. Forcep- and vacuum-assisted deliveries were both associated with maternal and newborn complications. There was no significant difference in the use of anesthesia between forceps and vacuum deliveries.
Operative vaginal delivery rates in this center are comparable to other centers as are the possible complications. Making these procedures safer will improve safe motherhood in settings where there are performed.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>19805939</pmid><doi>10.4103/1596-3519.56236</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1596-3519 |
ispartof | Annals of African medicine, 2009-04, Vol.8 (2), p.95-99 |
issn | 1596-3519 0975-5764 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733219696 |
source | MEDLINE; Bioline International; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Analgesia, Epidural Apgar Score Birth Weight Births Case-Control Studies Childbirth Childbirth & labor Delivery, Obstetric - methods Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data Developing Countries Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data Female Health aspects Humans Methods Nigeria Obstetrical Forceps - statistics & numerical data Obstetricians Obstetrics Practice Preeclampsia Pregnancy Risk Factors Teaching hospitals Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical - statistics & numerical data Vagina - surgery Women |
title | Operative vaginal deliveries in Zaria, Nigeria |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A50%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Operative%20vaginal%20deliveries%20in%20Zaria,%20Nigeria&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20African%20medicine&rft.au=Adaji,%20S%20E&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=1596-3519&rft.eissn=0975-5764&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/1596-3519.56236&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA210462809%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=849643224&rft_id=info:pmid/19805939&rft_galeid=A210462809&rfr_iscdi=true |