The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial

Background. Adherence interventions were implemented in a 1-year community-based colon cancer prevention clinical trial ( n = 110) using wheat bran fiber and calcium dietary supplements. The adherence promotion strategy was guided by a theoretical model. Methods. The adherence intervention contains...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Preventive medicine 1992-09, Vol.21 (5), p.637-653
Hauptverfasser: Atwood, Jan R., Aickin, Mikel, Giordano, Lisa, Benedict, Jamie, Bell, Mary, Ritenbaugh, Cheryl, Rees-McGee, Shirley, Sheehan, Ed, Buller, Mary, Ho, EE, Meyskens, Frank L., Alberts, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 653
container_issue 5
container_start_page 637
container_title Preventive medicine
container_volume 21
creator Atwood, Jan R.
Aickin, Mikel
Giordano, Lisa
Benedict, Jamie
Bell, Mary
Ritenbaugh, Cheryl
Rees-McGee, Shirley
Sheehan, Ed
Buller, Mary
Ho, EE
Meyskens, Frank L.
Alberts, David
description Background. Adherence interventions were implemented in a 1-year community-based colon cancer prevention clinical trial ( n = 110) using wheat bran fiber and calcium dietary supplements. The adherence promotion strategy was guided by a theoretical model. Methods. The adherence intervention contains both a generalized portion given to all participants and an individualized portion given to marginal (50–74% intake) and low (under 50% intake) adherers. A regression model was employed to assess the effectiveness of the interventions both at the first intervention and at subsequent times. Results. The Health Behavior in Cancer Prevention Model-based adherence promotion intervention was associated with retention of participants, both during the run-in period and after randomization ( P = 0.05); and maximization of the percentage of the 13.5-g recommended fiber supplement consumed during the trial (92.5%). The positive effects of the adherence intervention were greater with first-time nonadherers and the control group than with the experimental group. The high-fiber group had notably more biological GI effects from the increased fiber intake, more preexisting comorbidities, and lower perceived cognitive and physical health status. Conclusions. Randomized participants had excellent adherence overall. Retention rates in the trial were better than would be expected without the adherence intervention, especially among those participants who may have been at higher risk for dropping out of the study. This suggests that a systematic, theoretically based adherence strategy should be further tested in clinical trial settings in which lower adherence is a problem.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90071-O
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73320944</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>009174359290071O</els_id><sourcerecordid>73320944</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-953860c065d32b462f4ef10a863df598bf5da86c2d058705dfa10c5b37c9c01f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotX78AVHYk-hhdZLsR3MRpPgFhR5szyFNJjay3a3JtuC_N-tWvXmaGZ53JuQh5JzCDQVa3AIImpYZz68EuxYAJU2ne2RIQRQpsAL2yfA3ckiOQngHoLSAbEAGlHMGjA3JbLbEBK1F3bot1hhC0thEmSV6rDUmrm7RR9C6po5DohLdVLHVKlKfrD3-QOuwMknrnapOyIFVVcDTXT0m88eH2fg5nUyfXsb3k1RnjLWpyPmoAA1FbjhbZAWzGVoKalRwY3MxWtjcxEEzA_mohNxYRUHnC15qoYFafkwu-7tr33xsMLRy5YLGqlI1Npsgy-6XIstiMOuD2jcheLRy7d1K-U9JQXYyZWdKdqakYPJbppzGtYvd_c1iheZvqbcX-VnPrWqkevMuyPmr4CxK7uBdDzEa2Dr0MmjXOTXOR9vSNO7_178AvUKLqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73320944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Atwood, Jan R. ; Aickin, Mikel ; Giordano, Lisa ; Benedict, Jamie ; Bell, Mary ; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ; Rees-McGee, Shirley ; Sheehan, Ed ; Buller, Mary ; Ho, EE ; Meyskens, Frank L. ; Alberts, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Atwood, Jan R. ; Aickin, Mikel ; Giordano, Lisa ; Benedict, Jamie ; Bell, Mary ; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ; Rees-McGee, Shirley ; Sheehan, Ed ; Buller, Mary ; Ho, EE ; Meyskens, Frank L. ; Alberts, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Adherence interventions were implemented in a 1-year community-based colon cancer prevention clinical trial ( n = 110) using wheat bran fiber and calcium dietary supplements. The adherence promotion strategy was guided by a theoretical model. Methods. The adherence intervention contains both a generalized portion given to all participants and an individualized portion given to marginal (50–74% intake) and low (under 50% intake) adherers. A regression model was employed to assess the effectiveness of the interventions both at the first intervention and at subsequent times. Results. The Health Behavior in Cancer Prevention Model-based adherence promotion intervention was associated with retention of participants, both during the run-in period and after randomization ( P = 0.05); and maximization of the percentage of the 13.5-g recommended fiber supplement consumed during the trial (92.5%). The positive effects of the adherence intervention were greater with first-time nonadherers and the control group than with the experimental group. The high-fiber group had notably more biological GI effects from the increased fiber intake, more preexisting comorbidities, and lower perceived cognitive and physical health status. Conclusions. Randomized participants had excellent adherence overall. Retention rates in the trial were better than would be expected without the adherence intervention, especially among those participants who may have been at higher risk for dropping out of the study. This suggests that a systematic, theoretically based adherence strategy should be further tested in clinical trial settings in which lower adherence is a problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-7435</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(92)90071-O</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1332022</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ABSORCION DE SUBSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS ; ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES ; ADDITIF ; ADITIVOS ; Aged ; BLE ; CALCIO ; CALCIUM ; Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage ; CARCINOMA ; CARCINOME ; Colonic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO ; COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN ; CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES ; CONTROLE DE MALADIES ; Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage ; EFFICACITE ; EFICACIA ; ESSAI ; Female ; FIBRA DE LA DIETA ; FIBRE ALIMENTAIRE ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; INTESTIN ; INTESTINOS ; Male ; Middle Aged ; MODELE ; MODELOS ; Models, Statistical ; NUTRICION HUMANA ; NUTRITION HUMAINE ; Patient Compliance ; PRUEBAS ; Risk Factors ; SALVADO ; SON ; TRASTORNOS DIGESTIVOS ; TRIGO ; TROUBLE DIGESTIF</subject><ispartof>Preventive medicine, 1992-09, Vol.21 (5), p.637-653</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-953860c065d32b462f4ef10a863df598bf5da86c2d058705dfa10c5b37c9c01f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-953860c065d32b462f4ef10a863df598bf5da86c2d058705dfa10c5b37c9c01f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90071-O$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1332022$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atwood, Jan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aickin, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritenbaugh, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees-McGee, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buller, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, EE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyskens, Frank L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberts, David</creatorcontrib><title>The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial</title><title>Preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background. Adherence interventions were implemented in a 1-year community-based colon cancer prevention clinical trial ( n = 110) using wheat bran fiber and calcium dietary supplements. The adherence promotion strategy was guided by a theoretical model. Methods. The adherence intervention contains both a generalized portion given to all participants and an individualized portion given to marginal (50–74% intake) and low (under 50% intake) adherers. A regression model was employed to assess the effectiveness of the interventions both at the first intervention and at subsequent times. Results. The Health Behavior in Cancer Prevention Model-based adherence promotion intervention was associated with retention of participants, both during the run-in period and after randomization ( P = 0.05); and maximization of the percentage of the 13.5-g recommended fiber supplement consumed during the trial (92.5%). The positive effects of the adherence intervention were greater with first-time nonadherers and the control group than with the experimental group. The high-fiber group had notably more biological GI effects from the increased fiber intake, more preexisting comorbidities, and lower perceived cognitive and physical health status. Conclusions. Randomized participants had excellent adherence overall. Retention rates in the trial were better than would be expected without the adherence intervention, especially among those participants who may have been at higher risk for dropping out of the study. This suggests that a systematic, theoretically based adherence strategy should be further tested in clinical trial settings in which lower adherence is a problem.</description><subject>ABSORCION DE SUBSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS</subject><subject>ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES</subject><subject>ADDITIF</subject><subject>ADITIVOS</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>BLE</subject><subject>CALCIO</subject><subject>CALCIUM</subject><subject>Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>CARCINOMA</subject><subject>CARCINOME</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</subject><subject>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</subject><subject>CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES</subject><subject>CONTROLE DE MALADIES</subject><subject>Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>EFFICACITE</subject><subject>EFICACIA</subject><subject>ESSAI</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>FIBRA DE LA DIETA</subject><subject>FIBRE ALIMENTAIRE</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>INTESTIN</subject><subject>INTESTINOS</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>MODELE</subject><subject>MODELOS</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>NUTRICION HUMANA</subject><subject>NUTRITION HUMAINE</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>PRUEBAS</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>SALVADO</subject><subject>SON</subject><subject>TRASTORNOS DIGESTIVOS</subject><subject>TRIGO</subject><subject>TROUBLE DIGESTIF</subject><issn>0091-7435</issn><issn>1096-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotX78AVHYk-hhdZLsR3MRpPgFhR5szyFNJjay3a3JtuC_N-tWvXmaGZ53JuQh5JzCDQVa3AIImpYZz68EuxYAJU2ne2RIQRQpsAL2yfA3ckiOQngHoLSAbEAGlHMGjA3JbLbEBK1F3bot1hhC0thEmSV6rDUmrm7RR9C6po5DohLdVLHVKlKfrD3-QOuwMknrnapOyIFVVcDTXT0m88eH2fg5nUyfXsb3k1RnjLWpyPmoAA1FbjhbZAWzGVoKalRwY3MxWtjcxEEzA_mohNxYRUHnC15qoYFafkwu-7tr33xsMLRy5YLGqlI1Npsgy-6XIstiMOuD2jcheLRy7d1K-U9JQXYyZWdKdqakYPJbppzGtYvd_c1iheZvqbcX-VnPrWqkevMuyPmr4CxK7uBdDzEa2Dr0MmjXOTXOR9vSNO7_178AvUKLqQ</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Atwood, Jan R.</creator><creator>Aickin, Mikel</creator><creator>Giordano, Lisa</creator><creator>Benedict, Jamie</creator><creator>Bell, Mary</creator><creator>Ritenbaugh, Cheryl</creator><creator>Rees-McGee, Shirley</creator><creator>Sheehan, Ed</creator><creator>Buller, Mary</creator><creator>Ho, EE</creator><creator>Meyskens, Frank L.</creator><creator>Alberts, David</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial</title><author>Atwood, Jan R. ; Aickin, Mikel ; Giordano, Lisa ; Benedict, Jamie ; Bell, Mary ; Ritenbaugh, Cheryl ; Rees-McGee, Shirley ; Sheehan, Ed ; Buller, Mary ; Ho, EE ; Meyskens, Frank L. ; Alberts, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-953860c065d32b462f4ef10a863df598bf5da86c2d058705dfa10c5b37c9c01f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>ABSORCION DE SUBSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS</topic><topic>ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES</topic><topic>ADDITIF</topic><topic>ADITIVOS</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>BLE</topic><topic>CALCIO</topic><topic>CALCIUM</topic><topic>Calcium, Dietary - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>CARCINOMA</topic><topic>CARCINOME</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO</topic><topic>COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN</topic><topic>CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES</topic><topic>CONTROLE DE MALADIES</topic><topic>Dietary Fiber - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>EFFICACITE</topic><topic>EFICACIA</topic><topic>ESSAI</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>FIBRA DE LA DIETA</topic><topic>FIBRE ALIMENTAIRE</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>INTESTIN</topic><topic>INTESTINOS</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>MODELE</topic><topic>MODELOS</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>NUTRICION HUMANA</topic><topic>NUTRITION HUMAINE</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>PRUEBAS</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>SALVADO</topic><topic>SON</topic><topic>TRASTORNOS DIGESTIVOS</topic><topic>TRIGO</topic><topic>TROUBLE DIGESTIF</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atwood, Jan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aickin, Mikel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Jamie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ritenbaugh, Cheryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees-McGee, Shirley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheehan, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buller, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, EE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyskens, Frank L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberts, David</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atwood, Jan R.</au><au>Aickin, Mikel</au><au>Giordano, Lisa</au><au>Benedict, Jamie</au><au>Bell, Mary</au><au>Ritenbaugh, Cheryl</au><au>Rees-McGee, Shirley</au><au>Sheehan, Ed</au><au>Buller, Mary</au><au>Ho, EE</au><au>Meyskens, Frank L.</au><au>Alberts, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial</atitle><jtitle>Preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Prev Med</addtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>637-653</pages><issn>0091-7435</issn><eissn>1096-0260</eissn><abstract>Background. Adherence interventions were implemented in a 1-year community-based colon cancer prevention clinical trial ( n = 110) using wheat bran fiber and calcium dietary supplements. The adherence promotion strategy was guided by a theoretical model. Methods. The adherence intervention contains both a generalized portion given to all participants and an individualized portion given to marginal (50–74% intake) and low (under 50% intake) adherers. A regression model was employed to assess the effectiveness of the interventions both at the first intervention and at subsequent times. Results. The Health Behavior in Cancer Prevention Model-based adherence promotion intervention was associated with retention of participants, both during the run-in period and after randomization ( P = 0.05); and maximization of the percentage of the 13.5-g recommended fiber supplement consumed during the trial (92.5%). The positive effects of the adherence intervention were greater with first-time nonadherers and the control group than with the experimental group. The high-fiber group had notably more biological GI effects from the increased fiber intake, more preexisting comorbidities, and lower perceived cognitive and physical health status. Conclusions. Randomized participants had excellent adherence overall. Retention rates in the trial were better than would be expected without the adherence intervention, especially among those participants who may have been at higher risk for dropping out of the study. This suggests that a systematic, theoretically based adherence strategy should be further tested in clinical trial settings in which lower adherence is a problem.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1332022</pmid><doi>10.1016/0091-7435(92)90071-O</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-7435
ispartof Preventive medicine, 1992-09, Vol.21 (5), p.637-653
issn 0091-7435
1096-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73320944
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects ABSORCION DE SUBSTANCIAS NUTRITIVAS
ABSORPTION DE SUBSTANCES NUTRITIVES
ADDITIF
ADITIVOS
Aged
BLE
CALCIO
CALCIUM
Calcium, Dietary - administration & dosage
CARCINOMA
CARCINOME
Colonic Neoplasms - prevention & control
COMPORTAMIENTO HUMANO
COMPORTEMENT HUMAIN
CONTROL DE ENFERMEDADES
CONTROLE DE MALADIES
Dietary Fiber - administration & dosage
EFFICACITE
EFICACIA
ESSAI
Female
FIBRA DE LA DIETA
FIBRE ALIMENTAIRE
Health Behavior
Humans
INTESTIN
INTESTINOS
Male
Middle Aged
MODELE
MODELOS
Models, Statistical
NUTRICION HUMANA
NUTRITION HUMAINE
Patient Compliance
PRUEBAS
Risk Factors
SALVADO
SON
TRASTORNOS DIGESTIVOS
TRIGO
TROUBLE DIGESTIF
title The effectiveness of adherence intervention in a colon cancer prevention field trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effectiveness%20of%20adherence%20intervention%20in%20a%20colon%20cancer%20prevention%20field%20trial&rft.jtitle=Preventive%20medicine&rft.au=Atwood,%20Jan%20R.&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=637-653&rft.issn=0091-7435&rft.eissn=1096-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0091-7435(92)90071-O&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73320944%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73320944&rft_id=info:pmid/1332022&rft_els_id=009174359290071O&rfr_iscdi=true