Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis

The line-of-sight gravity field for Venus has been mapped by tracking the Pioneer Venus spacecraft in the vicinity of periapsis for a 45° swath of longitude eastward of 294°. There are consistent and systematic variations in the gravity signature from orbit to orbit, attesting to the reality of obse...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 1979-07, Vol.205 (4401), p.93-96
Hauptverfasser: Phillips, Roger J., Sjogren, William L., Abbott, Elsa A., Smith, John C., Wimberly, Ray N., Wagner, Cari A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 96
container_issue 4401
container_start_page 93
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 205
creator Phillips, Roger J.
Sjogren, William L.
Abbott, Elsa A.
Smith, John C.
Wimberly, Ray N.
Wagner, Cari A.
description The line-of-sight gravity field for Venus has been mapped by tracking the Pioneer Venus spacecraft in the vicinity of periapsis for a 45° swath of longitude eastward of 294°. There are consistent and systematic variations in the gravity signature from orbit to orbit, attesting to the reality of observed anomalies. Orbit 93 passes over a large positive topographic feature, the "northern plateau," for which there is no corresponding gravity signature. If this region has no isostatic compensation, the gravity signal would exceed the noise level by a factor of 7. The results of simulation modeling indicate that the northern plateau must be compensated at depths of about 100 kilometers or less. The long-wavelength anomalies seen in the Venus gravity data have been Fourier-decomposed along the orbital tracks and compared to analogous spectra for Earth. The gross power in the two mean spectra is approximately the same, but systematic variations among the harmonics suggest differences in dynamic processes or lithospheric behavior, or both, for the two planets.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.205.4401.93
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733195739</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A1325020</galeid><jstor_id>1748527</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A1325020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b13734533b7c8f31cf18f70ec2ee99059582b2cc19003ab974694865a825baa73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFqGzEQhkVIqR23T5AQ9tQcym4ljbSScjMmdguB9ND2KrTKbJCRd53VOsRvXxkb0lPoaQ7z_cPMfIRcMloxxutvyQfsPFacykoIyioDZ2TKqJGl4RTOyZRSqEtNlZyQi5TWlOaegY9kwpRS2jAxJdVqcC9h3BfLgPGx6NviD3a7dFvMi58DxrAJnRv2xbxzcZ9C-kQ-tC4m_HyqM_J7efdr8b28f1j9WMzvSy8kH8uGgQIhARrldQvMt0y3iqLniMZQaaTmDfeembyia4wStRG6lk5z2TinYEZujnO3Q_-8wzTaTUgeY3Qd9rtkFQAzUoHJ5Jd3SQ5CUU31_4C1qcVh4tcj-OQi2tD5vhvxdfR9jPiENt-5eLBzBlzS_OYZgSPthz6lAVu7HcIm_8wyag-e7MmTzZ7swZM1kFPXp2V2zQYf3zInMRm4OgLrNPbDP32hJVfwF6nyla4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>23469649</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Phillips, Roger J. ; Sjogren, William L. ; Abbott, Elsa A. ; Smith, John C. ; Wimberly, Ray N. ; Wagner, Cari A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Roger J. ; Sjogren, William L. ; Abbott, Elsa A. ; Smith, John C. ; Wimberly, Ray N. ; Wagner, Cari A.</creatorcontrib><description>The line-of-sight gravity field for Venus has been mapped by tracking the Pioneer Venus spacecraft in the vicinity of periapsis for a 45° swath of longitude eastward of 294°. There are consistent and systematic variations in the gravity signature from orbit to orbit, attesting to the reality of observed anomalies. Orbit 93 passes over a large positive topographic feature, the "northern plateau," for which there is no corresponding gravity signature. If this region has no isostatic compensation, the gravity signal would exceed the noise level by a factor of 7. The results of simulation modeling indicate that the northern plateau must be compensated at depths of about 100 kilometers or less. The long-wavelength anomalies seen in the Venus gravity data have been Fourier-decomposed along the orbital tracks and compared to analogous spectra for Earth. The gross power in the two mean spectra is approximately the same, but systematic variations among the harmonics suggest differences in dynamic processes or lithospheric behavior, or both, for the two planets.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.205.4401.93</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17778914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association for the Advancement of Science</publisher><subject>Gravitational anomalies ; Gravitational fields ; Gravity ; Gravity (Force) ; Harmonics ; Observations ; Overtone series ; Periapsis ; Space probes ; Spacecraft ; Spacecraft orbits ; Spherical harmonics ; Venus ; Venus (Planet)</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1979-07, Vol.205 (4401), p.93-96</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1979 American Association for the Advancement of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b13734533b7c8f31cf18f70ec2ee99059582b2cc19003ab974694865a825baa73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b13734533b7c8f31cf18f70ec2ee99059582b2cc19003ab974694865a825baa73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1748527$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1748527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,2871,2872,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17778914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjogren, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Elsa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimberly, Ray N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Cari A.</creatorcontrib><title>Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>The line-of-sight gravity field for Venus has been mapped by tracking the Pioneer Venus spacecraft in the vicinity of periapsis for a 45° swath of longitude eastward of 294°. There are consistent and systematic variations in the gravity signature from orbit to orbit, attesting to the reality of observed anomalies. Orbit 93 passes over a large positive topographic feature, the "northern plateau," for which there is no corresponding gravity signature. If this region has no isostatic compensation, the gravity signal would exceed the noise level by a factor of 7. The results of simulation modeling indicate that the northern plateau must be compensated at depths of about 100 kilometers or less. The long-wavelength anomalies seen in the Venus gravity data have been Fourier-decomposed along the orbital tracks and compared to analogous spectra for Earth. The gross power in the two mean spectra is approximately the same, but systematic variations among the harmonics suggest differences in dynamic processes or lithospheric behavior, or both, for the two planets.</description><subject>Gravitational anomalies</subject><subject>Gravitational fields</subject><subject>Gravity</subject><subject>Gravity (Force)</subject><subject>Harmonics</subject><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Overtone series</subject><subject>Periapsis</subject><subject>Space probes</subject><subject>Spacecraft</subject><subject>Spacecraft orbits</subject><subject>Spherical harmonics</subject><subject>Venus</subject><subject>Venus (Planet)</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1979</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFqGzEQhkVIqR23T5AQ9tQcym4ljbSScjMmdguB9ND2KrTKbJCRd53VOsRvXxkb0lPoaQ7z_cPMfIRcMloxxutvyQfsPFacykoIyioDZ2TKqJGl4RTOyZRSqEtNlZyQi5TWlOaegY9kwpRS2jAxJdVqcC9h3BfLgPGx6NviD3a7dFvMi58DxrAJnRv2xbxzcZ9C-kQ-tC4m_HyqM_J7efdr8b28f1j9WMzvSy8kH8uGgQIhARrldQvMt0y3iqLniMZQaaTmDfeembyia4wStRG6lk5z2TinYEZujnO3Q_-8wzTaTUgeY3Qd9rtkFQAzUoHJ5Jd3SQ5CUU31_4C1qcVh4tcj-OQi2tD5vhvxdfR9jPiENt-5eLBzBlzS_OYZgSPthz6lAVu7HcIm_8wyag-e7MmTzZ7swZM1kFPXp2V2zQYf3zInMRm4OgLrNPbDP32hJVfwF6nyla4</recordid><startdate>19790706</startdate><enddate>19790706</enddate><creator>Phillips, Roger J.</creator><creator>Sjogren, William L.</creator><creator>Abbott, Elsa A.</creator><creator>Smith, John C.</creator><creator>Wimberly, Ray N.</creator><creator>Wagner, Cari A.</creator><general>American Association for the Advancement of Science</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19790706</creationdate><title>Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis</title><author>Phillips, Roger J. ; Sjogren, William L. ; Abbott, Elsa A. ; Smith, John C. ; Wimberly, Ray N. ; Wagner, Cari A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-b13734533b7c8f31cf18f70ec2ee99059582b2cc19003ab974694865a825baa73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1979</creationdate><topic>Gravitational anomalies</topic><topic>Gravitational fields</topic><topic>Gravity</topic><topic>Gravity (Force)</topic><topic>Harmonics</topic><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Overtone series</topic><topic>Periapsis</topic><topic>Space probes</topic><topic>Spacecraft</topic><topic>Spacecraft orbits</topic><topic>Spherical harmonics</topic><topic>Venus</topic><topic>Venus (Planet)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Roger J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjogren, William L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Elsa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wimberly, Ray N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Cari A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Roger J.</au><au>Sjogren, William L.</au><au>Abbott, Elsa A.</au><au>Smith, John C.</au><au>Wimberly, Ray N.</au><au>Wagner, Cari A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>1979-07-06</date><risdate>1979</risdate><volume>205</volume><issue>4401</issue><spage>93</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>93-96</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>The line-of-sight gravity field for Venus has been mapped by tracking the Pioneer Venus spacecraft in the vicinity of periapsis for a 45° swath of longitude eastward of 294°. There are consistent and systematic variations in the gravity signature from orbit to orbit, attesting to the reality of observed anomalies. Orbit 93 passes over a large positive topographic feature, the "northern plateau," for which there is no corresponding gravity signature. If this region has no isostatic compensation, the gravity signal would exceed the noise level by a factor of 7. The results of simulation modeling indicate that the northern plateau must be compensated at depths of about 100 kilometers or less. The long-wavelength anomalies seen in the Venus gravity data have been Fourier-decomposed along the orbital tracks and compared to analogous spectra for Earth. The gross power in the two mean spectra is approximately the same, but systematic variations among the harmonics suggest differences in dynamic processes or lithospheric behavior, or both, for the two planets.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association for the Advancement of Science</pub><pmid>17778914</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.205.4401.93</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 1979-07, Vol.205 (4401), p.93-96
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733195739
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Gravitational anomalies
Gravitational fields
Gravity
Gravity (Force)
Harmonics
Observations
Overtone series
Periapsis
Space probes
Spacecraft
Spacecraft orbits
Spherical harmonics
Venus
Venus (Planet)
title Gravity Field of Venus: A Preliminary Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T13%3A06%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gravity%20Field%20of%20Venus:%20A%20Preliminary%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Phillips,%20Roger%20J.&rft.date=1979-07-06&rft.volume=205&rft.issue=4401&rft.spage=93&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=93-96&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.205.4401.93&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA1325020%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=23469649&rft_id=info:pmid/17778914&rft_galeid=A1325020&rft_jstor_id=1748527&rfr_iscdi=true