The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties

Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of commu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355
Hauptverfasser: Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc, van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD, Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD, Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD, Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 355
container_issue 5
container_start_page 344
container_title Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
container_volume 11
creator Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc
van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD
Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD
Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD
Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD
description Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733184034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S152586100900406X</els_id><sourcerecordid>733184034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7of-AkF651XrTJOmjaAgi6sLC7uwR_AupMnETe3HMWmF8--39axeeOPVzMXzzjDPMPYKoUBA-bYrOjM4U5QAqkAsAPgTdooVb3LF6-rp1pdV3kiEE3aWUgdQAir5nJ2UUCEilKdM7u4p24W-XeL37DKa0M-H7Gp0wZp5iu-y23Sw99NAcww2u43TnuIcKL1gz7zpE718rOfs6-Wn3cWX_Prm89XFx-vcilrNeVkTcO5EI1pZOUlYoveiQSNUZbxXqlSNN63lWFecvF1Br5xo0XnjrJT8nL05zt3H6edCadZDSJb63ow0LUnXnGMjgIuV5EfSximlSF7vYxhMPGgEvfnSnf7tS2--NKJefa2p14_zl3Yg9zfzR9AKvD8CtF75K1DUyQYaLbkQyc7aTeE_Cz78k7d9GFe7_Q86UOqmJY6rQI06lRr03fay7WOgAATIb_wB72OQ5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733184034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up &amp; Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20511102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Frailty ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; measurement instrument ; Medical Education ; Netherlands ; older people ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; reliability ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355</ispartof><rights>American Medical Directors Association</rights><rights>2010 American Medical Directors Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20511102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up &amp; Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measurement instrument</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>older people</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7of-AkF651XrTJOmjaAgi6sLC7uwR_AupMnETe3HMWmF8--39axeeOPVzMXzzjDPMPYKoUBA-bYrOjM4U5QAqkAsAPgTdooVb3LF6-rp1pdV3kiEE3aWUgdQAir5nJ2UUCEilKdM7u4p24W-XeL37DKa0M-H7Gp0wZp5iu-y23Sw99NAcww2u43TnuIcKL1gz7zpE718rOfs6-Wn3cWX_Prm89XFx-vcilrNeVkTcO5EI1pZOUlYoveiQSNUZbxXqlSNN63lWFecvF1Br5xo0XnjrJT8nL05zt3H6edCadZDSJb63ow0LUnXnGMjgIuV5EfSximlSF7vYxhMPGgEvfnSnf7tS2--NKJefa2p14_zl3Yg9zfzR9AKvD8CtF75K1DUyQYaLbkQyc7aTeE_Cz78k7d9GFe7_Q86UOqmJY6rQI06lRr03fay7WOgAATIb_wB72OQ5g</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creator><creator>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creator><creator>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creator><creator>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creator><creator>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><author>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measurement instrument</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>older people</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</au><au>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</au><au>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</au><au>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</au><au>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>344-355</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up &amp; Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20511102</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-8610
ispartof Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355
issn 1525-8610
1538-9375
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733184034
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Frail Elderly
Frailty
Humans
Internal Medicine
Male
measurement instrument
Medical Education
Netherlands
older people
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
reliability
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
validity
title The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Tilburg%20Frailty%20Indicator:%20Psychometric%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Gobbens,%20Robbert%20J.J.,%20RN,%20MSc&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=344-355&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733184034%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733184034&rft_id=info:pmid/20511102&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S152586100900406X&rfr_iscdi=true