The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties
Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of commu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 355 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 344 |
container_title | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD |
description | Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733184034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S152586100900406X</els_id><sourcerecordid>733184034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7of-AkF651XrTJOmjaAgi6sLC7uwR_AupMnETe3HMWmF8--39axeeOPVzMXzzjDPMPYKoUBA-bYrOjM4U5QAqkAsAPgTdooVb3LF6-rp1pdV3kiEE3aWUgdQAir5nJ2UUCEilKdM7u4p24W-XeL37DKa0M-H7Gp0wZp5iu-y23Sw99NAcww2u43TnuIcKL1gz7zpE718rOfs6-Wn3cWX_Prm89XFx-vcilrNeVkTcO5EI1pZOUlYoveiQSNUZbxXqlSNN63lWFecvF1Br5xo0XnjrJT8nL05zt3H6edCadZDSJb63ow0LUnXnGMjgIuV5EfSximlSF7vYxhMPGgEvfnSnf7tS2--NKJefa2p14_zl3Yg9zfzR9AKvD8CtF75K1DUyQYaLbkQyc7aTeE_Cz78k7d9GFe7_Q86UOqmJY6rQI06lRr03fay7WOgAATIb_wB72OQ5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733184034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-8610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-9375</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20511102</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Frail Elderly ; Frailty ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; measurement instrument ; Medical Education ; Netherlands ; older people ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; reliability ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355</ispartof><rights>American Medical Directors Association</rights><rights>2010 American Medical Directors Association</rights><rights>Copyright 2010 American Medical Directors Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27926,27927,45997</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20511102$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><title>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</title><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><description>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Frail Elderly</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>measurement instrument</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>older people</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>reliability</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1525-8610</issn><issn>1538-9375</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV2L1TAQhoMo7of-AkF651XrTJOmjaAgi6sLC7uwR_AupMnETe3HMWmF8--39axeeOPVzMXzzjDPMPYKoUBA-bYrOjM4U5QAqkAsAPgTdooVb3LF6-rp1pdV3kiEE3aWUgdQAir5nJ2UUCEilKdM7u4p24W-XeL37DKa0M-H7Gp0wZp5iu-y23Sw99NAcww2u43TnuIcKL1gz7zpE718rOfs6-Wn3cWX_Prm89XFx-vcilrNeVkTcO5EI1pZOUlYoveiQSNUZbxXqlSNN63lWFecvF1Br5xo0XnjrJT8nL05zt3H6edCadZDSJb63ow0LUnXnGMjgIuV5EfSximlSF7vYxhMPGgEvfnSnf7tS2--NKJefa2p14_zl3Yg9zfzR9AKvD8CtF75K1DUyQYaLbkQyc7aTeE_Cz78k7d9GFe7_Q86UOqmJY6rQI06lRr03fay7WOgAATIb_wB72OQ5g</recordid><startdate>20100601</startdate><enddate>20100601</enddate><creator>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creator><creator>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creator><creator>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creator><creator>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creator><creator>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100601</creationdate><title>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</title><author>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc ; van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD ; Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD ; Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD ; Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c479t-27e033d484b65d6e121ff481a495aff99298fabc31753efc484f9d4b1dfadc663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Frail Elderly</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>measurement instrument</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>older people</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>reliability</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gobbens, Robbert J.J., RN, MSc</au><au>van Assen, Marcel A.L.M., PhD</au><au>Luijkx, Katrien G., PhD</au><au>Wijnen-Sponselee, Maria Th., PhD</au><au>Schols, Jos M.G.A., MD, PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Med Dir Assoc</addtitle><date>2010-06-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>344</spage><epage>355</epage><pages>344-355</pages><issn>1525-8610</issn><eissn>1538-9375</eissn><abstract>Objectives To assess the reliability, construct validity, and predictive (concurrent) validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI), a self-report questionnaire for measuring frailty in older persons. Design Cross-sectional. Setting Community-based. Participants Two representative samples of community-dwelling persons aged 75 years and older (n = 245; n = 234). Measurements The TFI was validated using the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire, BMI, Timed Up & Go test, Four test balance scale, Grip strength test, Shortened Fatigue Questionnaire, Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Mastery Scale, Loneliness Scale, and the Social Support List. Adverse outcomes were measured using the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale and questions regarding health care use. Quality of life was measured using the WHOQOL-BREF. Results The test-retest reliability of the TFI was good: 0.79 for frailty, and from 0.67 to 0.78 for its domains for a 1-year time interval. The 15 single components, and the frailty domains (physical, psychological, social) of the TFI correlated as expected with validated measures, demonstrating both convergent and divergent construct validity of the TFI. The predictive validity of the TFI and its physical domain was good for quality of life and the adverse outcomes disability and receiving personal care, nursing, and informal care. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the psychometric properties of the TFI are good, when performed in 2 samples of community-dwelling older people. The results regarding the TFI's validity provide strong evidence for an integral definition of frailty consisting of physical, psychological, and social domains.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>20511102</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-8610 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010-06, Vol.11 (5), p.344-355 |
issn | 1525-8610 1538-9375 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733184034 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Cross-Sectional Studies Female Frail Elderly Frailty Humans Internal Medicine Male measurement instrument Medical Education Netherlands older people Psychometrics Quality of Life reliability Surveys and Questionnaires - standards validity |
title | The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Psychometric Properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T10%3A45%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Tilburg%20Frailty%20Indicator:%20Psychometric%20Properties&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Medical%20Directors%20Association&rft.au=Gobbens,%20Robbert%20J.J.,%20RN,%20MSc&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=344&rft.epage=355&rft.pages=344-355&rft.issn=1525-8610&rft.eissn=1538-9375&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jamda.2009.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733184034%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733184034&rft_id=info:pmid/20511102&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S152586100900406X&rfr_iscdi=true |