Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block

Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery by targeting thoracolumbar nerves between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Posterior and subcostal approaches using ultrasound guidance have been described. However there have been i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anaesthesia and intensive care 2010-05, Vol.38 (3), p.452-460
Hauptverfasser: LEE, T. H. W, BARRINGTON, M. J, TRAN, T. M. N, WONG, D, HEBBARD, P. D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 460
container_issue 3
container_start_page 452
container_title Anaesthesia and intensive care
container_volume 38
creator LEE, T. H. W
BARRINGTON, M. J
TRAN, T. M. N
WONG, D
HEBBARD, P. D
description Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery by targeting thoracolumbar nerves between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Posterior and subcostal approaches using ultrasound guidance have been described. However there have been inconsistent results in relation to the extent of the sensory block. This observational study evaluated the distributions of sensory block following either a posterior or subcostal approach and the quality of analgesia achieved. Following ethics committee approval, 50 patients undergoing minimally invasive and major abdominal surgery were recruited. A total of 81 transversus abdominis plane blocks were performed preoperatively under real-time ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, patients received multimodal analgesia including morphine via patient-controlled pumps. Ninety-eight percent of patients had some degree of demonstrable sensory block and the dermatomal spread differed between posterior and subcostal approaches (P < 0.001). The posterior approach produced a median sensory block of three dermatomal segments (interquartile range 2 to 4), the most cephalad being T10 (interquartile range T9 to T10), while the subcostal approach blocked a median of four segments (interquartile range 3 to 5), the most cephalad being T8 (interquartile range T7 to T9, P < 0.001). Maximum dermatomal block distribution was observed at 30 minutes and usually regressed by 24 hours. Median cumulative morphine consumption was 40.8 mg (interquartile range 17 to 50 mg) at 24 hours. Median pain scores at rest and with coughing were 20 (interquartile range 10 to 35) and 50 (interquartile range 29 to 67) respectively at 24 hours. The posterior approach appears to be more appropriate for lower abdominal surgery and the subcostal approach better suited to upper abdominal surgery. Whichever approach is used, transversus abdominis plane block is only one component of a multimodal analgesic technique.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0310057x1003800307
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733128228</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A229718174</galeid><sourcerecordid>A229718174</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-ef2c4ddfff0e4ebeb34a07dffd6d3b77acfc71906b5119940bb43a8a27fc291c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkduKFDEQhoMo7rj6Al5IUBaves2pO92Xy-CqsOCNwt41OY5Z00mb6tbdR_CtzTCjiyIhhyq-v1LFj9BzSs4plfIN4ZSQVt7Wk_d1E_kAbagQfUOYpA_RZg80lbg-QU8AbgihA5PtY3TCSEvF0LIN-rnN06xKgJxw9tjdLi4t-xe4BLncYR2z-Yp9jjH_CGmH5wyLKyEXrJLFsGpTEypiNc8lK_PFAV4yXuNSFOQ12Wa3BussrnGC767AClhpm6eQAuA5quQOfzxFj7yK4J4d71P0-fLtp-375urjuw_bi6vGtLxbGueZEdZ674kTTjvNhSKyxrazXEupjDeSDqTTLaXDIIjWgqteMekNG6jhp-j1oW7t99vqYBmnAMbFfSd5hVFyTlnPWF_Jl_-QN3ktqTY38q5jvegIrdCrA7RT0Y0h-VwnNfuS4wVjg6Q9laJS5_-h6rJuCiYn50PN_yVgB4EpGaA4P84lTKrcjZSMe_fHo_vX9-5X0Ytjw6uenP0j-W13Bc6OgAKjoq-emAD3XJ27FaLjvwDYg7nN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>366284601</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>LEE, T. H. W ; BARRINGTON, M. J ; TRAN, T. M. N ; WONG, D ; HEBBARD, P. D</creator><creatorcontrib>LEE, T. H. W ; BARRINGTON, M. J ; TRAN, T. M. N ; WONG, D ; HEBBARD, P. D</creatorcontrib><description>Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery by targeting thoracolumbar nerves between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Posterior and subcostal approaches using ultrasound guidance have been described. However there have been inconsistent results in relation to the extent of the sensory block. This observational study evaluated the distributions of sensory block following either a posterior or subcostal approach and the quality of analgesia achieved. Following ethics committee approval, 50 patients undergoing minimally invasive and major abdominal surgery were recruited. A total of 81 transversus abdominis plane blocks were performed preoperatively under real-time ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, patients received multimodal analgesia including morphine via patient-controlled pumps. Ninety-eight percent of patients had some degree of demonstrable sensory block and the dermatomal spread differed between posterior and subcostal approaches (P &lt; 0.001). The posterior approach produced a median sensory block of three dermatomal segments (interquartile range 2 to 4), the most cephalad being T10 (interquartile range T9 to T10), while the subcostal approach blocked a median of four segments (interquartile range 3 to 5), the most cephalad being T8 (interquartile range T7 to T9, P &lt; 0.001). Maximum dermatomal block distribution was observed at 30 minutes and usually regressed by 24 hours. Median cumulative morphine consumption was 40.8 mg (interquartile range 17 to 50 mg) at 24 hours. Median pain scores at rest and with coughing were 20 (interquartile range 10 to 35) and 50 (interquartile range 29 to 67) respectively at 24 hours. The posterior approach appears to be more appropriate for lower abdominal surgery and the subcostal approach better suited to upper abdominal surgery. Whichever approach is used, transversus abdominis plane block is only one component of a multimodal analgesic technique.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0310-057X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-0271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0310057x1003800307</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20514952</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AINCBS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Edgecliff: Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</publisher><subject>Abdomen - surgery ; Adult ; Aged ; Analgesia ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Female ; Health aspects ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Nerve Block - methods ; Pain, Postoperative - therapy ; Physiological aspects ; Prospective Studies ; Sensory deprivation ; Ultrasonic waves ; Ultrasonics</subject><ispartof>Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2010-05, Vol.38 (3), p.452-460</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Australian Society of Anaesthetists May 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-ef2c4ddfff0e4ebeb34a07dffd6d3b77acfc71906b5119940bb43a8a27fc291c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-ef2c4ddfff0e4ebeb34a07dffd6d3b77acfc71906b5119940bb43a8a27fc291c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22825446$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20514952$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LEE, T. H. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRINGTON, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRAN, T. M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBBARD, P. D</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block</title><title>Anaesthesia and intensive care</title><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><description>Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery by targeting thoracolumbar nerves between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Posterior and subcostal approaches using ultrasound guidance have been described. However there have been inconsistent results in relation to the extent of the sensory block. This observational study evaluated the distributions of sensory block following either a posterior or subcostal approach and the quality of analgesia achieved. Following ethics committee approval, 50 patients undergoing minimally invasive and major abdominal surgery were recruited. A total of 81 transversus abdominis plane blocks were performed preoperatively under real-time ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, patients received multimodal analgesia including morphine via patient-controlled pumps. Ninety-eight percent of patients had some degree of demonstrable sensory block and the dermatomal spread differed between posterior and subcostal approaches (P &lt; 0.001). The posterior approach produced a median sensory block of three dermatomal segments (interquartile range 2 to 4), the most cephalad being T10 (interquartile range T9 to T10), while the subcostal approach blocked a median of four segments (interquartile range 3 to 5), the most cephalad being T8 (interquartile range T7 to T9, P &lt; 0.001). Maximum dermatomal block distribution was observed at 30 minutes and usually regressed by 24 hours. Median cumulative morphine consumption was 40.8 mg (interquartile range 17 to 50 mg) at 24 hours. Median pain scores at rest and with coughing were 20 (interquartile range 10 to 35) and 50 (interquartile range 29 to 67) respectively at 24 hours. The posterior approach appears to be more appropriate for lower abdominal surgery and the subcostal approach better suited to upper abdominal surgery. Whichever approach is used, transversus abdominis plane block is only one component of a multimodal analgesic technique.</description><subject>Abdomen - surgery</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Sensory deprivation</subject><subject>Ultrasonic waves</subject><subject>Ultrasonics</subject><issn>0310-057X</issn><issn>1448-0271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNptkduKFDEQhoMo7rj6Al5IUBaves2pO92Xy-CqsOCNwt41OY5Z00mb6tbdR_CtzTCjiyIhhyq-v1LFj9BzSs4plfIN4ZSQVt7Wk_d1E_kAbagQfUOYpA_RZg80lbg-QU8AbgihA5PtY3TCSEvF0LIN-rnN06xKgJxw9tjdLi4t-xe4BLncYR2z-Yp9jjH_CGmH5wyLKyEXrJLFsGpTEypiNc8lK_PFAV4yXuNSFOQ12Wa3BussrnGC767AClhpm6eQAuA5quQOfzxFj7yK4J4d71P0-fLtp-375urjuw_bi6vGtLxbGueZEdZ674kTTjvNhSKyxrazXEupjDeSDqTTLaXDIIjWgqteMekNG6jhp-j1oW7t99vqYBmnAMbFfSd5hVFyTlnPWF_Jl_-QN3ktqTY38q5jvegIrdCrA7RT0Y0h-VwnNfuS4wVjg6Q9laJS5_-h6rJuCiYn50PN_yVgB4EpGaA4P84lTKrcjZSMe_fHo_vX9-5X0Ytjw6uenP0j-W13Bc6OgAKjoq-emAD3XJ27FaLjvwDYg7nN</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>LEE, T. H. W</creator><creator>BARRINGTON, M. J</creator><creator>TRAN, T. M. N</creator><creator>WONG, D</creator><creator>HEBBARD, P. D</creator><general>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block</title><author>LEE, T. H. W ; BARRINGTON, M. J ; TRAN, T. M. N ; WONG, D ; HEBBARD, P. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-ef2c4ddfff0e4ebeb34a07dffd6d3b77acfc71906b5119940bb43a8a27fc291c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Abdomen - surgery</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - therapy</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Sensory deprivation</topic><topic>Ultrasonic waves</topic><topic>Ultrasonics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LEE, T. H. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRINGTON, M. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TRAN, T. M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WONG, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HEBBARD, P. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Australia &amp; New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LEE, T. H. W</au><au>BARRINGTON, M. J</au><au>TRAN, T. M. N</au><au>WONG, D</au><au>HEBBARD, P. D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block</atitle><jtitle>Anaesthesia and intensive care</jtitle><addtitle>Anaesth Intensive Care</addtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>452</spage><epage>460</epage><pages>452-460</pages><issn>0310-057X</issn><eissn>1448-0271</eissn><coden>AINCBS</coden><abstract>Transversus abdominis plane block provides postoperative analgesia following abdominal surgery by targeting thoracolumbar nerves between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles. Posterior and subcostal approaches using ultrasound guidance have been described. However there have been inconsistent results in relation to the extent of the sensory block. This observational study evaluated the distributions of sensory block following either a posterior or subcostal approach and the quality of analgesia achieved. Following ethics committee approval, 50 patients undergoing minimally invasive and major abdominal surgery were recruited. A total of 81 transversus abdominis plane blocks were performed preoperatively under real-time ultrasound guidance. Postoperatively, patients received multimodal analgesia including morphine via patient-controlled pumps. Ninety-eight percent of patients had some degree of demonstrable sensory block and the dermatomal spread differed between posterior and subcostal approaches (P &lt; 0.001). The posterior approach produced a median sensory block of three dermatomal segments (interquartile range 2 to 4), the most cephalad being T10 (interquartile range T9 to T10), while the subcostal approach blocked a median of four segments (interquartile range 3 to 5), the most cephalad being T8 (interquartile range T7 to T9, P &lt; 0.001). Maximum dermatomal block distribution was observed at 30 minutes and usually regressed by 24 hours. Median cumulative morphine consumption was 40.8 mg (interquartile range 17 to 50 mg) at 24 hours. Median pain scores at rest and with coughing were 20 (interquartile range 10 to 35) and 50 (interquartile range 29 to 67) respectively at 24 hours. The posterior approach appears to be more appropriate for lower abdominal surgery and the subcostal approach better suited to upper abdominal surgery. Whichever approach is used, transversus abdominis plane block is only one component of a multimodal analgesic technique.</abstract><cop>Edgecliff</cop><pub>Anaesthesia Society of Anaesthetists</pub><pmid>20514952</pmid><doi>10.1177/0310057x1003800307</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0310-057X
ispartof Anaesthesia and intensive care, 2010-05, Vol.38 (3), p.452-460
issn 0310-057X
1448-0271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733128228
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Abdomen - surgery
Adult
Aged
Analgesia
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Female
Health aspects
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Methods
Middle Aged
Nerve Block - methods
Pain, Postoperative - therapy
Physiological aspects
Prospective Studies
Sensory deprivation
Ultrasonic waves
Ultrasonics
title Comparison of extent of sensory block following posterior and subcostal approaches to ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T22%3A18%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20extent%20of%20sensory%20block%20following%20posterior%20and%20subcostal%20approaches%20to%20ultrasound-guided%20transversus%20abdominis%20plane%20block&rft.jtitle=Anaesthesia%20and%20intensive%20care&rft.au=LEE,%20T.%20H.%20W&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=452&rft.epage=460&rft.pages=452-460&rft.issn=0310-057X&rft.eissn=1448-0271&rft.coden=AINCBS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0310057x1003800307&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA229718174%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=366284601&rft_id=info:pmid/20514952&rft_galeid=A229718174&rfr_iscdi=true