Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis
Volatile constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa (D. Don) Rehder were studied by two different extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and hydrodistillation (HD), and the results were compared with head space analysis (HS). Thirty-five constituents were identified in both the SFE a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Natural product communications 2010-04, Vol.5 (4), p.641-644 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 644 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 641 |
| container_title | Natural product communications |
| container_volume | 5 |
| creator | Saini, Rikki Guleria, Shailja Kaul, Vijay K. Lal, Brij Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran Singh, Bikram |
| description | Volatile constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa (D. Don) Rehder were studied by two different extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and hydrodistillation (HD), and the results were compared with head space analysis (HS). Thirty-five constituents were identified in both the SFE and HD oils and fourteen in the HS, accounting for 94.2%, 97.7% and 96.9% of the total identifications, respectively. A distinctive feature of the results was the very high content of non-terpenes (59.8%) in the HS, the high content of oxygenated monoterpenes (41.1%) in the HD oil and the high content of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (21.8%) in the SFE oil. Monoterpene hydrocarbons were represented in HS (13.6%), HD (19.4%) and SFE (4.3%). In SFE sesquiterpene hydrocarbons formed 21.8% of the total, as compared to 6.6% in the HD and 1.1% in the HS Oxygenated sesquiterpenes represented 3.0% in SFE, 0.8% in HD and were absent in HS. Diterpenes were only present in the SFE oil (3.4%). Non-terpenes were represented by 24.5% in the SFE oil and 29.8% in the HD oil. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1934578X1000500430 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733116592</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1934578X1000500430</sage_id><sourcerecordid>733116592</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-f45a5bb7cd2bcd7daa114f96f3ce0fc5dcab9ae611ee086618e2982e6c8a0ebb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpaUKSP9BD0a2XupFsy5aPYdl0C4EekobczFgaNwpay9XI0O0f6d-tzCa9FHqagfe9xzCPsXdSfJKybS9lV9Wq1Q9SCKGEqCvxip1KpVTR1a16nfcMFCtxwi6InjImtK5F3b1lJ2XmK6G7U_Z7E_YzREdh4mHk6RH5ffCQnEe-CRMllxacEq3i1tNj8OmXAz7GxSVnAgHf_kwRTELLhwPfHWwM1mWbX0PC9JHfLjNGE1ccPL_2i7MvnqxzmCzfIVh-O4NBfjWBP5Cjc_ZmBE948TzP2Lfr7d1mV9x8_fxlc3VTmEo3qRhrBWoYWmPLwdjWAkhZj10zVgbFaJQ1MHSAjZSIQjeN1Fh2usTGaBA4DNUZ-3DMnWP4sSClfu_IYL5-wrBQ31aVlI3qykyWR9LEQBRx7Ofo9hAPvRT9Wkn_byXZ9P45fhn2aP9aXgrIwOURIPiO_VNYYn4A_S_yD3NfmNU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733116592</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis</title><source>Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024</source><creator>Saini, Rikki ; Guleria, Shailja ; Kaul, Vijay K. ; Lal, Brij ; Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran ; Singh, Bikram</creator><creatorcontrib>Saini, Rikki ; Guleria, Shailja ; Kaul, Vijay K. ; Lal, Brij ; Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran ; Singh, Bikram</creatorcontrib><description>Volatile constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa (D. Don) Rehder were studied by two different extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and hydrodistillation (HD), and the results were compared with head space analysis (HS). Thirty-five constituents were identified in both the SFE and HD oils and fourteen in the HS, accounting for 94.2%, 97.7% and 96.9% of the total identifications, respectively. A distinctive feature of the results was the very high content of non-terpenes (59.8%) in the HS, the high content of oxygenated monoterpenes (41.1%) in the HD oil and the high content of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (21.8%) in the SFE oil. Monoterpene hydrocarbons were represented in HS (13.6%), HD (19.4%) and SFE (4.3%). In SFE sesquiterpene hydrocarbons formed 21.8% of the total, as compared to 6.6% in the HD and 1.1% in the HS Oxygenated sesquiterpenes represented 3.0% in SFE, 0.8% in HD and were absent in HS. Diterpenes were only present in the SFE oil (3.4%). Non-terpenes were represented by 24.5% in the SFE oil and 29.8% in the HD oil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-578X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9475</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1934578X1000500430</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20433089</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid - methods ; Distillation - methods ; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry ; Lamiaceae - chemistry ; Monoterpenes - analysis ; Oils, Volatile - chemistry ; Oils, Volatile - isolation & purification ; Plant Leaves - chemistry ; Plant Oils - chemistry ; Plant Oils - isolation & purification</subject><ispartof>Natural product communications, 2010-04, Vol.5 (4), p.641-644</ispartof><rights>2010 SAGE Publications Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-f45a5bb7cd2bcd7daa114f96f3ce0fc5dcab9ae611ee086618e2982e6c8a0ebb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-f45a5bb7cd2bcd7daa114f96f3ce0fc5dcab9ae611ee086618e2982e6c8a0ebb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1934578X1000500430$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1934578X1000500430$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21966,27853,27924,27925,44945,45333</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1934578X1000500430?utm_source=summon&utm_medium=discovery-provider$$EView_record_in_SAGE_Publications$$FView_record_in_$$GSAGE_Publications</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20433089$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saini, Rikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guleria, Shailja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Vijay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Brij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bikram</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis</title><title>Natural product communications</title><addtitle>Nat Prod Commun</addtitle><description>Volatile constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa (D. Don) Rehder were studied by two different extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and hydrodistillation (HD), and the results were compared with head space analysis (HS). Thirty-five constituents were identified in both the SFE and HD oils and fourteen in the HS, accounting for 94.2%, 97.7% and 96.9% of the total identifications, respectively. A distinctive feature of the results was the very high content of non-terpenes (59.8%) in the HS, the high content of oxygenated monoterpenes (41.1%) in the HD oil and the high content of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (21.8%) in the SFE oil. Monoterpene hydrocarbons were represented in HS (13.6%), HD (19.4%) and SFE (4.3%). In SFE sesquiterpene hydrocarbons formed 21.8% of the total, as compared to 6.6% in the HD and 1.1% in the HS Oxygenated sesquiterpenes represented 3.0% in SFE, 0.8% in HD and were absent in HS. Diterpenes were only present in the SFE oil (3.4%). Non-terpenes were represented by 24.5% in the SFE oil and 29.8% in the HD oil.</description><subject>Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Distillation - methods</subject><subject>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Lamiaceae - chemistry</subject><subject>Monoterpenes - analysis</subject><subject>Oils, Volatile - chemistry</subject><subject>Oils, Volatile - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Oils - chemistry</subject><subject>Plant Oils - isolation & purification</subject><issn>1934-578X</issn><issn>1555-9475</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFr3DAQhUVpaUKSP9BD0a2XupFsy5aPYdl0C4EekobczFgaNwpay9XI0O0f6d-tzCa9FHqagfe9xzCPsXdSfJKybS9lV9Wq1Q9SCKGEqCvxip1KpVTR1a16nfcMFCtxwi6InjImtK5F3b1lJ2XmK6G7U_Z7E_YzREdh4mHk6RH5ffCQnEe-CRMllxacEq3i1tNj8OmXAz7GxSVnAgHf_kwRTELLhwPfHWwM1mWbX0PC9JHfLjNGE1ccPL_2i7MvnqxzmCzfIVh-O4NBfjWBP5Cjc_ZmBE948TzP2Lfr7d1mV9x8_fxlc3VTmEo3qRhrBWoYWmPLwdjWAkhZj10zVgbFaJQ1MHSAjZSIQjeN1Fh2usTGaBA4DNUZ-3DMnWP4sSClfu_IYL5-wrBQ31aVlI3qykyWR9LEQBRx7Ofo9hAPvRT9Wkn_byXZ9P45fhn2aP9aXgrIwOURIPiO_VNYYn4A_S_yD3NfmNU</recordid><startdate>20100401</startdate><enddate>20100401</enddate><creator>Saini, Rikki</creator><creator>Guleria, Shailja</creator><creator>Kaul, Vijay K.</creator><creator>Lal, Brij</creator><creator>Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran</creator><creator>Singh, Bikram</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100401</creationdate><title>Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis</title><author>Saini, Rikki ; Guleria, Shailja ; Kaul, Vijay K. ; Lal, Brij ; Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran ; Singh, Bikram</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-f45a5bb7cd2bcd7daa114f96f3ce0fc5dcab9ae611ee086618e2982e6c8a0ebb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Distillation - methods</topic><topic>Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Lamiaceae - chemistry</topic><topic>Monoterpenes - analysis</topic><topic>Oils, Volatile - chemistry</topic><topic>Oils, Volatile - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Oils - chemistry</topic><topic>Plant Oils - isolation & purification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saini, Rikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guleria, Shailja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Vijay K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Brij</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Bikram</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Natural product communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saini, Rikki</au><au>Guleria, Shailja</au><au>Kaul, Vijay K.</au><au>Lal, Brij</au><au>Babu, Garikapati D. Kiran</au><au>Singh, Bikram</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Natural product communications</jtitle><addtitle>Nat Prod Commun</addtitle><date>2010-04-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>641</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>641-644</pages><issn>1934-578X</issn><eissn>1555-9475</eissn><abstract>Volatile constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa (D. Don) Rehder were studied by two different extraction techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and hydrodistillation (HD), and the results were compared with head space analysis (HS). Thirty-five constituents were identified in both the SFE and HD oils and fourteen in the HS, accounting for 94.2%, 97.7% and 96.9% of the total identifications, respectively. A distinctive feature of the results was the very high content of non-terpenes (59.8%) in the HS, the high content of oxygenated monoterpenes (41.1%) in the HD oil and the high content of sesquiterpene hydrocarbons (21.8%) in the SFE oil. Monoterpene hydrocarbons were represented in HS (13.6%), HD (19.4%) and SFE (4.3%). In SFE sesquiterpene hydrocarbons formed 21.8% of the total, as compared to 6.6% in the HD and 1.1% in the HS Oxygenated sesquiterpenes represented 3.0% in SFE, 0.8% in HD and were absent in HS. Diterpenes were only present in the SFE oil (3.4%). Non-terpenes were represented by 24.5% in the SFE oil and 29.8% in the HD oil.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>20433089</pmid><doi>10.1177/1934578X1000500430</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1934-578X |
| ispartof | Natural product communications, 2010-04, Vol.5 (4), p.641-644 |
| issn | 1934-578X 1555-9475 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733116592 |
| source | Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 |
| subjects | Chromatography, Supercritical Fluid - methods Distillation - methods Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Lamiaceae - chemistry Monoterpenes - analysis Oils, Volatile - chemistry Oils, Volatile - isolation & purification Plant Leaves - chemistry Plant Oils - chemistry Plant Oils - isolation & purification |
| title | Comparison of the Volatile Constituents of Elsholtzia fruiticosa Extracted by Hydrodistillation, Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Head Space Analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A31%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_AFRWT&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20Volatile%20Constituents%20of%20Elsholtzia%20fruiticosa%20Extracted%20by%20Hydrodistillation,%20Supercritical%20Fluid%20Extraction%20and%20Head%20Space%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Natural%20product%20communications&rft.au=Saini,%20Rikki&rft.date=2010-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=641&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=641-644&rft.issn=1934-578X&rft.eissn=1555-9475&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1934578X1000500430&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_AFRWT%3E733116592%3C/proquest_AFRWT%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733116592&rft_id=info:pmid/20433089&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1934578X1000500430&rfr_iscdi=true |