Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T
The purpose of this study was to describe relevant canine brain structures as seen on T2-weighted images following magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7 T and to compare the results with imaging at 1.5 T. Imaging was performed on five healthy laboratory beagle dogs using 1.5 and 7 T clinical scanners...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2009-11, Vol.50 (6), p.615-621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 621 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 615 |
container_title | Veterinary radiology & ultrasound |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Kang, B-T Ko, Ki-Jin Jang, Dong-Pyo Han, Jae-Yong Lim, Chae-Young Park, C Yoo, Jong-Hyun Kim, Ju-Won Jung, Dong-In Kim, Young-Bo Woo, Eung-Je Cho, Zang-Hee Park, Hee-Myung |
description | The purpose of this study was to describe relevant canine brain structures as seen on T2-weighted images following magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7 T and to compare the results with imaging at 1.5 T. Imaging was performed on five healthy laboratory beagle dogs using 1.5 and 7 T clinical scanners. At 1.5 T, spin echo images were acquired, while gradient echo images were acquired at 3 T. Image quality and conspicuity of anatomic structures were evaluated qualitatively by direct comparison of the images obtained from the two different magnetic fields. The signal-to-nose ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared between 1.5 and 7 T. The T2-weighted images at 7 T provided good spatial and contrast resolution for the identification of clinically relevant brain anatomy; these images provided better delineation and conspicuity of the brain stem and cerebellar structures, which were difficult to unequivocally identify at 1.5 T. However, frontal and parietal lobe and the trigeminal nerve were difficult to identify at 7 T due to susceptibility artifact. The SNR and CNR of the images at 7 T were significantly increased up to 318% and 715% compared with the 1.5 T images. If some disadvantages of 7 T imaging, such as susceptibility artifacts, technical difficulties, and high cost, can be improved, 7 T clinical MR imaging could provide a good experimental and diagnostic tool for the evaluation of canine brain disorders. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01591.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733114841</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733114841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-d78e5dfb86e503d0df7be31a1b81704af79a6ac2fd85d81dd6e3fba77608b51e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhL4BPcErqseOPXJBQRbcVLQjogsTFcuLJ4mU3KXZW3f57vM2qvSHmMiPNM6_lhxAKrIRcJ8sSdMUKwxWUnLG6ZCBrKLdPyNHD4mmemTSFASMOyfOUloxxqbl-Rg6hziWq6ojIK7focQwtjZiG3vUt0rB2i9Av6NDR8RfS1vWhR9pEF3rqRqrp9Qty0LlVwpf7fkzmZx-uT8-Ly8-zi9P3l0VbKQ6F1wal7xqjUDLhme90gwIcNAY0q1yna6dcyztvpDfgvULRNU5rxUwjAcUxeTvl3sThzwbTaNchtbhauR6HTbJaCIDKVJDJN_8keeZkxVQGzQS2cUgpYmdvYv5wvLPA7E6uXdqdQ7tzaHdy7b1cu82nr_ZvbJo1-sfDvc0MvJuA27DCu_8Ott-_zu_HHFBMASGNuH0IcPG3VVpoaX98mtnzmf748-yLsHXmX0985wbrFjEkO__GGQgGqlZScPEXZI-e5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21145406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kang, B-T ; Ko, Ki-Jin ; Jang, Dong-Pyo ; Han, Jae-Yong ; Lim, Chae-Young ; Park, C ; Yoo, Jong-Hyun ; Kim, Ju-Won ; Jung, Dong-In ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Woo, Eung-Je ; Cho, Zang-Hee ; Park, Hee-Myung</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, B-T ; Ko, Ki-Jin ; Jang, Dong-Pyo ; Han, Jae-Yong ; Lim, Chae-Young ; Park, C ; Yoo, Jong-Hyun ; Kim, Ju-Won ; Jung, Dong-In ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Woo, Eung-Je ; Cho, Zang-Hee ; Park, Hee-Myung</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to describe relevant canine brain structures as seen on T2-weighted images following magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7 T and to compare the results with imaging at 1.5 T. Imaging was performed on five healthy laboratory beagle dogs using 1.5 and 7 T clinical scanners. At 1.5 T, spin echo images were acquired, while gradient echo images were acquired at 3 T. Image quality and conspicuity of anatomic structures were evaluated qualitatively by direct comparison of the images obtained from the two different magnetic fields. The signal-to-nose ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared between 1.5 and 7 T. The T2-weighted images at 7 T provided good spatial and contrast resolution for the identification of clinically relevant brain anatomy; these images provided better delineation and conspicuity of the brain stem and cerebellar structures, which were difficult to unequivocally identify at 1.5 T. However, frontal and parietal lobe and the trigeminal nerve were difficult to identify at 7 T due to susceptibility artifact. The SNR and CNR of the images at 7 T were significantly increased up to 318% and 715% compared with the 1.5 T images. If some disadvantages of 7 T imaging, such as susceptibility artifacts, technical difficulties, and high cost, can be improved, 7 T clinical MR imaging could provide a good experimental and diagnostic tool for the evaluation of canine brain disorders.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-8261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01591.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19999344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</publisher><subject>7 T magnetic resonance imaging ; 7 T ; accuracy ; animal pathology ; Animals ; Beagle ; brain ; Brain - diagnostic imaging ; brain stem ; cerebellum ; dog ; dogs ; Dogs - anatomy & histology ; dosage ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Echo-Planar Imaging - standards ; Echo-Planar Imaging - veterinary ; Female ; image analysis ; magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - veterinary ; magnetism ; Male ; methodology ; normal values ; Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods ; validity</subject><ispartof>Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 2009-11, Vol.50 (6), p.615-621</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 by the American College of Veterinary Radiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-d78e5dfb86e503d0df7be31a1b81704af79a6ac2fd85d81dd6e3fba77608b51e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-d78e5dfb86e503d0df7be31a1b81704af79a6ac2fd85d81dd6e3fba77608b51e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1740-8261.2009.01591.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1740-8261.2009.01591.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19999344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, B-T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ki-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong-Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jae-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chae-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dong-In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Eung-Je</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee-Myung</creatorcontrib><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T</title><title>Veterinary radiology & ultrasound</title><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to describe relevant canine brain structures as seen on T2-weighted images following magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7 T and to compare the results with imaging at 1.5 T. Imaging was performed on five healthy laboratory beagle dogs using 1.5 and 7 T clinical scanners. At 1.5 T, spin echo images were acquired, while gradient echo images were acquired at 3 T. Image quality and conspicuity of anatomic structures were evaluated qualitatively by direct comparison of the images obtained from the two different magnetic fields. The signal-to-nose ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared between 1.5 and 7 T. The T2-weighted images at 7 T provided good spatial and contrast resolution for the identification of clinically relevant brain anatomy; these images provided better delineation and conspicuity of the brain stem and cerebellar structures, which were difficult to unequivocally identify at 1.5 T. However, frontal and parietal lobe and the trigeminal nerve were difficult to identify at 7 T due to susceptibility artifact. The SNR and CNR of the images at 7 T were significantly increased up to 318% and 715% compared with the 1.5 T images. If some disadvantages of 7 T imaging, such as susceptibility artifacts, technical difficulties, and high cost, can be improved, 7 T clinical MR imaging could provide a good experimental and diagnostic tool for the evaluation of canine brain disorders.</description><subject>7 T magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>7 T</subject><subject>accuracy</subject><subject>animal pathology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Beagle</subject><subject>brain</subject><subject>Brain - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>brain stem</subject><subject>cerebellum</subject><subject>dog</subject><subject>dogs</subject><subject>Dogs - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>dosage</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - standards</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - veterinary</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>image analysis</subject><subject>magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - veterinary</subject><subject>magnetism</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>methodology</subject><subject>normal values</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>validity</subject><issn>1058-8183</issn><issn>1740-8261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi1ERUvhL4BPcErqseOPXJBQRbcVLQjogsTFcuLJ4mU3KXZW3f57vM2qvSHmMiPNM6_lhxAKrIRcJ8sSdMUKwxWUnLG6ZCBrKLdPyNHD4mmemTSFASMOyfOUloxxqbl-Rg6hziWq6ojIK7focQwtjZiG3vUt0rB2i9Av6NDR8RfS1vWhR9pEF3rqRqrp9Qty0LlVwpf7fkzmZx-uT8-Ly8-zi9P3l0VbKQ6F1wal7xqjUDLhme90gwIcNAY0q1yna6dcyztvpDfgvULRNU5rxUwjAcUxeTvl3sThzwbTaNchtbhauR6HTbJaCIDKVJDJN_8keeZkxVQGzQS2cUgpYmdvYv5wvLPA7E6uXdqdQ7tzaHdy7b1cu82nr_ZvbJo1-sfDvc0MvJuA27DCu_8Ott-_zu_HHFBMASGNuH0IcPG3VVpoaX98mtnzmf748-yLsHXmX0985wbrFjEkO__GGQgGqlZScPEXZI-e5w</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Kang, B-T</creator><creator>Ko, Ki-Jin</creator><creator>Jang, Dong-Pyo</creator><creator>Han, Jae-Yong</creator><creator>Lim, Chae-Young</creator><creator>Park, C</creator><creator>Yoo, Jong-Hyun</creator><creator>Kim, Ju-Won</creator><creator>Jung, Dong-In</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Bo</creator><creator>Woo, Eung-Je</creator><creator>Cho, Zang-Hee</creator><creator>Park, Hee-Myung</creator><general>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T</title><author>Kang, B-T ; Ko, Ki-Jin ; Jang, Dong-Pyo ; Han, Jae-Yong ; Lim, Chae-Young ; Park, C ; Yoo, Jong-Hyun ; Kim, Ju-Won ; Jung, Dong-In ; Kim, Young-Bo ; Woo, Eung-Je ; Cho, Zang-Hee ; Park, Hee-Myung</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4621-d78e5dfb86e503d0df7be31a1b81704af79a6ac2fd85d81dd6e3fba77608b51e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>7 T magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>7 T</topic><topic>accuracy</topic><topic>animal pathology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Beagle</topic><topic>brain</topic><topic>Brain - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>brain stem</topic><topic>cerebellum</topic><topic>dog</topic><topic>dogs</topic><topic>Dogs - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>dosage</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - standards</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - veterinary</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>image analysis</topic><topic>magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - veterinary</topic><topic>magnetism</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>methodology</topic><topic>normal values</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, B-T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Ki-Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jang, Dong-Pyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Jae-Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Chae-Young</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoo, Jong-Hyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ju-Won</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, Dong-In</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woo, Eung-Je</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Zang-Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Hee-Myung</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary radiology & ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, B-T</au><au>Ko, Ki-Jin</au><au>Jang, Dong-Pyo</au><au>Han, Jae-Yong</au><au>Lim, Chae-Young</au><au>Park, C</au><au>Yoo, Jong-Hyun</au><au>Kim, Ju-Won</au><au>Jung, Dong-In</au><au>Kim, Young-Bo</au><au>Woo, Eung-Je</au><au>Cho, Zang-Hee</au><au>Park, Hee-Myung</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary radiology & ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>615</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>615-621</pages><issn>1058-8183</issn><eissn>1740-8261</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to describe relevant canine brain structures as seen on T2-weighted images following magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7 T and to compare the results with imaging at 1.5 T. Imaging was performed on five healthy laboratory beagle dogs using 1.5 and 7 T clinical scanners. At 1.5 T, spin echo images were acquired, while gradient echo images were acquired at 3 T. Image quality and conspicuity of anatomic structures were evaluated qualitatively by direct comparison of the images obtained from the two different magnetic fields. The signal-to-nose ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated and compared between 1.5 and 7 T. The T2-weighted images at 7 T provided good spatial and contrast resolution for the identification of clinically relevant brain anatomy; these images provided better delineation and conspicuity of the brain stem and cerebellar structures, which were difficult to unequivocally identify at 1.5 T. However, frontal and parietal lobe and the trigeminal nerve were difficult to identify at 7 T due to susceptibility artifact. The SNR and CNR of the images at 7 T were significantly increased up to 318% and 715% compared with the 1.5 T images. If some disadvantages of 7 T imaging, such as susceptibility artifacts, technical difficulties, and high cost, can be improved, 7 T clinical MR imaging could provide a good experimental and diagnostic tool for the evaluation of canine brain disorders.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Malden, USA : Blackwell Publishing Inc</pub><pmid>19999344</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01591.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-8183 |
ispartof | Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 2009-11, Vol.50 (6), p.615-621 |
issn | 1058-8183 1740-8261 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733114841 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | 7 T magnetic resonance imaging 7 T accuracy animal pathology Animals Beagle brain Brain - diagnostic imaging brain stem cerebellum dog dogs Dogs - anatomy & histology dosage Echo-Planar Imaging - methods Echo-Planar Imaging - standards Echo-Planar Imaging - veterinary Female image analysis magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - veterinary magnetism Male methodology normal values Radiographic Image Enhancement - methods validity |
title | Magnetic resonance imaging of the canine brain at 7 T |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20of%20the%20canine%20brain%20at%207%20T&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20radiology%20&%20ultrasound&rft.au=Kang,%20B-T&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=615&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=615-621&rft.issn=1058-8183&rft.eissn=1740-8261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01591.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733114841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21145406&rft_id=info:pmid/19999344&rfr_iscdi=true |