Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care
Maternal mortality is still among the worst performing health indicators in resource-poor settings. For deaths occurring in health facilities, it is crucial to understand the processes of obstetric care in order to address any identified weakness or failure within the system and take corrective acti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology 2009-06, Vol.23 (3), p.287-296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 287 |
container_title | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Say, Lale, MD, MSc Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD Pattinson, Robert C |
description | Maternal mortality is still among the worst performing health indicators in resource-poor settings. For deaths occurring in health facilities, it is crucial to understand the processes of obstetric care in order to address any identified weakness or failure within the system and take corrective action. However, although a significant public health problem, maternal deaths are rare in absolute numbers especially within an individual facility. Studying cases of women who nearly died but survived a complication during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum (maternal near miss or severe acute maternal morbidity) are increasingly recognized as useful means to examine quality of obstetric care. Nevertheless, routine implementation and wider application of this concept in reviewing clinical care has been limited due to the lack of a standard definition and uniform case-identification criteria. WHO has initiated a process in agreeing on a definition and developing a uniform set of identification criteria for maternal near miss cases aiming to facilitate the reviews of these cases for monitoring and improving quality of obstetric care. A list of identification criteria was proposed together with one single definition. This article presents the proposed definition and the identification criteria of maternal near miss cases. It also suggests procedures to make maternal near miss audits operational in monitoring/evaluating quality of obstetric care. The practical implementation of maternal near miss concept should provide an important contribution to improving quality of obstetric care to reduce maternal deaths and improve maternal health. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733094755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S152169340900008X</els_id><sourcerecordid>733094755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7c62af6ecaf4bdd905cf8d7e036d2de55887cec15ed6662994b2f6e626e9f9f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROD_6CBp2rqrkp6CKjcZMxtFkjAs1cWMIBbdmaKuhByhN73wH39AnkUq3MXEjG07g3HNzv4vQE0paSqh8vmnHXRxv9qFlhKiW0JaQ_h46pYKzhirO7q-a0UYq3p2gs5w3hHCumHiITup_1XI4RV_emQIpmBkHMAlvfc7414-fuMTvJrmMDc7FBFd1fYoznmI1xeBLTD7c4LvFzL7scZzw9k_QLZi53GJrEjxCDyYzZ3h8vM_Rp9eXHy_eNNfvr95evLpubDeI0vRWMjNJsGbqRucUEXYaXA-ES8ccCDEMvQVLBTgpJVOqG1m1SyZBTWoi_Bw9O-TuUrxbIBddB7EwzyZAXLLuOSeq64WoTnFw2hRzTjDpXfJbk_aaEr2C1Rt9BKtXsJpQXcHWuqfHDsu4Bfe36kiyGl4eDFDn_OYh6Ww9BAvOJ7BFu-j_2-LFPwl29sFbM3-FPeRNXFa8WVOdmSb6w7rddblEkXqGz_w3AOKjsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733094755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Say, Lale, MD, MSc ; Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD ; Pattinson, Robert C</creator><creatorcontrib>Say, Lale, MD, MSc ; Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD ; Pattinson, Robert C ; for the WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications ; WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</creatorcontrib><description>Maternal mortality is still among the worst performing health indicators in resource-poor settings. For deaths occurring in health facilities, it is crucial to understand the processes of obstetric care in order to address any identified weakness or failure within the system and take corrective action. However, although a significant public health problem, maternal deaths are rare in absolute numbers especially within an individual facility. Studying cases of women who nearly died but survived a complication during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum (maternal near miss or severe acute maternal morbidity) are increasingly recognized as useful means to examine quality of obstetric care. Nevertheless, routine implementation and wider application of this concept in reviewing clinical care has been limited due to the lack of a standard definition and uniform case-identification criteria. WHO has initiated a process in agreeing on a definition and developing a uniform set of identification criteria for maternal near miss cases aiming to facilitate the reviews of these cases for monitoring and improving quality of obstetric care. A list of identification criteria was proposed together with one single definition. This article presents the proposed definition and the identification criteria of maternal near miss cases. It also suggests procedures to make maternal near miss audits operational in monitoring/evaluating quality of obstetric care. The practical implementation of maternal near miss concept should provide an important contribution to improving quality of obstetric care to reduce maternal deaths and improve maternal health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1521-6934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-1932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19303368</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Emergency Medical Services ; Female ; Humans ; maternal health epidemiology ; Maternal Health Services - methods ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; maternal mortality ; Maternal Mortality - trends ; maternal near miss ; Medical Audit - methods ; mothers ; Obstetric Labor Complications - diagnosis ; Obstetric Labor Complications - mortality ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; patient safety ; Pregnancy ; pregnancy complications ; Quality of Health Care - standards ; severe acute maternal morbidity ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Survivors</subject><ispartof>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2009-06, Vol.23 (3), p.287-296</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7c62af6ecaf4bdd905cf8d7e036d2de55887cec15ed6662994b2f6e626e9f9f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7c62af6ecaf4bdd905cf8d7e036d2de55887cec15ed6662994b2f6e626e9f9f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152169340900008X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19303368$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Say, Lale, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</creatorcontrib><title>Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care</title><title>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</title><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Maternal mortality is still among the worst performing health indicators in resource-poor settings. For deaths occurring in health facilities, it is crucial to understand the processes of obstetric care in order to address any identified weakness or failure within the system and take corrective action. However, although a significant public health problem, maternal deaths are rare in absolute numbers especially within an individual facility. Studying cases of women who nearly died but survived a complication during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum (maternal near miss or severe acute maternal morbidity) are increasingly recognized as useful means to examine quality of obstetric care. Nevertheless, routine implementation and wider application of this concept in reviewing clinical care has been limited due to the lack of a standard definition and uniform case-identification criteria. WHO has initiated a process in agreeing on a definition and developing a uniform set of identification criteria for maternal near miss cases aiming to facilitate the reviews of these cases for monitoring and improving quality of obstetric care. A list of identification criteria was proposed together with one single definition. This article presents the proposed definition and the identification criteria of maternal near miss cases. It also suggests procedures to make maternal near miss audits operational in monitoring/evaluating quality of obstetric care. The practical implementation of maternal near miss concept should provide an important contribution to improving quality of obstetric care to reduce maternal deaths and improve maternal health.</description><subject>Emergency Medical Services</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>maternal health epidemiology</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - methods</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>maternal mortality</subject><subject>Maternal Mortality - trends</subject><subject>maternal near miss</subject><subject>Medical Audit - methods</subject><subject>mothers</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - diagnosis</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - mortality</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>patient safety</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>pregnancy complications</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care - standards</subject><subject>severe acute maternal morbidity</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Survivors</subject><issn>1521-6934</issn><issn>1532-1932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2OFCEUhYnROD_6CBp2rqrkp6CKjcZMxtFkjAs1cWMIBbdmaKuhByhN73wH39AnkUq3MXEjG07g3HNzv4vQE0paSqh8vmnHXRxv9qFlhKiW0JaQ_h46pYKzhirO7q-a0UYq3p2gs5w3hHCumHiITup_1XI4RV_emQIpmBkHMAlvfc7414-fuMTvJrmMDc7FBFd1fYoznmI1xeBLTD7c4LvFzL7scZzw9k_QLZi53GJrEjxCDyYzZ3h8vM_Rp9eXHy_eNNfvr95evLpubDeI0vRWMjNJsGbqRucUEXYaXA-ES8ccCDEMvQVLBTgpJVOqG1m1SyZBTWoi_Bw9O-TuUrxbIBddB7EwzyZAXLLuOSeq64WoTnFw2hRzTjDpXfJbk_aaEr2C1Rt9BKtXsJpQXcHWuqfHDsu4Bfe36kiyGl4eDFDn_OYh6Ww9BAvOJ7BFu-j_2-LFPwl29sFbM3-FPeRNXFa8WVOdmSb6w7rddblEkXqGz_w3AOKjsQ</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Say, Lale, MD, MSc</creator><creator>Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Pattinson, Robert C</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care</title><author>Say, Lale, MD, MSc ; Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD ; Pattinson, Robert C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c485t-7c62af6ecaf4bdd905cf8d7e036d2de55887cec15ed6662994b2f6e626e9f9f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Emergency Medical Services</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>maternal health epidemiology</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - methods</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>maternal mortality</topic><topic>Maternal Mortality - trends</topic><topic>maternal near miss</topic><topic>Medical Audit - methods</topic><topic>mothers</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - diagnosis</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - mortality</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>patient safety</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>pregnancy complications</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care - standards</topic><topic>severe acute maternal morbidity</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Survivors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Say, Lale, MD, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pattinson, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Say, Lale, MD, MSc</au><au>Souza, João Paulo, MD, PhD</au><au>Pattinson, Robert C</au><aucorp>for the WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</aucorp><aucorp>WHO working group on Maternal Mortality and Morbidity classifications</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care</atitle><jtitle>Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>287</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>287-296</pages><issn>1521-6934</issn><eissn>1532-1932</eissn><abstract>Maternal mortality is still among the worst performing health indicators in resource-poor settings. For deaths occurring in health facilities, it is crucial to understand the processes of obstetric care in order to address any identified weakness or failure within the system and take corrective action. However, although a significant public health problem, maternal deaths are rare in absolute numbers especially within an individual facility. Studying cases of women who nearly died but survived a complication during pregnancy, childbirth or postpartum (maternal near miss or severe acute maternal morbidity) are increasingly recognized as useful means to examine quality of obstetric care. Nevertheless, routine implementation and wider application of this concept in reviewing clinical care has been limited due to the lack of a standard definition and uniform case-identification criteria. WHO has initiated a process in agreeing on a definition and developing a uniform set of identification criteria for maternal near miss cases aiming to facilitate the reviews of these cases for monitoring and improving quality of obstetric care. A list of identification criteria was proposed together with one single definition. This article presents the proposed definition and the identification criteria of maternal near miss cases. It also suggests procedures to make maternal near miss audits operational in monitoring/evaluating quality of obstetric care. The practical implementation of maternal near miss concept should provide an important contribution to improving quality of obstetric care to reduce maternal deaths and improve maternal health.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>19303368</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1521-6934 |
ispartof | Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology, 2009-06, Vol.23 (3), p.287-296 |
issn | 1521-6934 1532-1932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733094755 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Emergency Medical Services Female Humans maternal health epidemiology Maternal Health Services - methods Maternal Health Services - standards maternal mortality Maternal Mortality - trends maternal near miss Medical Audit - methods mothers Obstetric Labor Complications - diagnosis Obstetric Labor Complications - mortality Obstetrics and Gynecology patient safety Pregnancy pregnancy complications Quality of Health Care - standards severe acute maternal morbidity Socioeconomic Factors Survivors |
title | Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A39%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternal%20near%20miss%20%E2%80%93%20towards%20a%20standard%20tool%20for%20monitoring%20quality%20of%20maternal%20health%20care&rft.jtitle=Best%20practice%20&%20research.%20Clinical%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Say,%20Lale,%20MD,%20MSc&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20WHO%20working%20group%20on%20Maternal%20Mortality%20and%20Morbidity%20classifications&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=287&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=287-296&rft.issn=1521-6934&rft.eissn=1532-1932&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E733094755%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733094755&rft_id=info:pmid/19303368&rft_els_id=S152169340900008X&rfr_iscdi=true |