Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing
This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Operative dentistry 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 286 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 281 |
container_title | Operative dentistry |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka Panzeri, Heitor Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães Dinelli, Welingtom |
description | This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73296574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73296574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-77228b79ead9c3f5d14b693a96f18cb5c311f5da9ae214215af9b0835c59b32b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8gnbpH8iOOYW1XxkipxgQOnyHbWbVASB29y4N9jRHtaafab0WguyJrJihday3JFrhG_GCtVqdQVWXGhK6YZW5PPLSIgduOBzkeguKRgPdAUl8NxzA8aA7V0ijhD6mKiCTJLfRyy1M3wQCEE8PMfdvYi2D7n3ZDLYHuE29PdkI-nx_fdS7F_e37dbffFJJiecz0haqcN2NZ4GVTLS1cZaU0VeO2d8pLzrFpjQfBScGWDcayWyivjpHByQ-7_c6cUvxfAuRk69ND3doS4YKOlMJXSZQbvTuDiBmibKXWDTT_NeQz5C8xcWx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73296574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</creator><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12760700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Wear ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentifrices - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Surface Properties ; Toothbrushing</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12760700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzeri, Heitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Wear</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentifrices - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Toothbrushing</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8gnbpH8iOOYW1XxkipxgQOnyHbWbVASB29y4N9jRHtaafab0WguyJrJihday3JFrhG_GCtVqdQVWXGhK6YZW5PPLSIgduOBzkeguKRgPdAUl8NxzA8aA7V0ijhD6mKiCTJLfRyy1M3wQCEE8PMfdvYi2D7n3ZDLYHuE29PdkI-nx_fdS7F_e37dbffFJJiecz0haqcN2NZ4GVTLS1cZaU0VeO2d8pLzrFpjQfBScGWDcayWyivjpHByQ-7_c6cUvxfAuRk69ND3doS4YKOlMJXSZQbvTuDiBmibKXWDTT_NeQz5C8xcWx0</recordid><startdate>200305</startdate><enddate>200305</enddate><creator>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creator><creator>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creator><creator>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creator><creator>Panzeri, Heitor</creator><creator>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creator><creator>Dinelli, Welingtom</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200305</creationdate><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><author>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-77228b79ead9c3f5d14b693a96f18cb5c311f5da9ae214215af9b0835c59b32b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Wear</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentifrices - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Toothbrushing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzeri, Heitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</au><au>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</au><au>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</au><au>Panzeri, Heitor</au><au>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</au><au>Dinelli, Welingtom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2003-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><abstract>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12760700</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0361-7734 |
ispartof | Operative dentistry, 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286 |
issn | 0361-7734 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73296574 |
source | MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry Composite Resins - chemistry Dental Restoration Wear Dental Restoration, Permanent Dentifrices - chemistry Dentistry Humans Materials Testing Resin Cements - chemistry Surface Properties Toothbrushing |
title | Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A41%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20surface%20roughness%20of%20a%20posterior%20resin%20composite:%20effect%20of%20surface%20sealing&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Takeuchi,%20Cristina%20Yoshie%20Garcia&rft.date=2003-05&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73296574%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73296574&rft_id=info:pmid/12760700&rfr_iscdi=true |