Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing

This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Operative dentistry 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286
Hauptverfasser: Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia, Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto, Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka, Panzeri, Heitor, Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães, Dinelli, Welingtom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 286
container_issue 3
container_start_page 281
container_title Operative dentistry
container_volume 28
creator Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia
Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto
Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka
Panzeri, Heitor
Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães
Dinelli, Welingtom
description This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73296574</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73296574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-77228b79ead9c3f5d14b693a96f18cb5c311f5da9ae214215af9b0835c59b32b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8gnbpH8iOOYW1XxkipxgQOnyHbWbVASB29y4N9jRHtaafab0WguyJrJihday3JFrhG_GCtVqdQVWXGhK6YZW5PPLSIgduOBzkeguKRgPdAUl8NxzA8aA7V0ijhD6mKiCTJLfRyy1M3wQCEE8PMfdvYi2D7n3ZDLYHuE29PdkI-nx_fdS7F_e37dbffFJJiecz0haqcN2NZ4GVTLS1cZaU0VeO2d8pLzrFpjQfBScGWDcayWyivjpHByQ-7_c6cUvxfAuRk69ND3doS4YKOlMJXSZQbvTuDiBmibKXWDTT_NeQz5C8xcWx0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73296574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</creator><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><description>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-7734</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12760700</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental Restoration Wear ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dentifrices - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Materials Testing ; Resin Cements - chemistry ; Surface Properties ; Toothbrushing</subject><ispartof>Operative dentistry, 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12760700$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzeri, Heitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><title>Operative dentistry</title><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><description>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</subject><subject>Composite Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Wear</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dentifrices - chemistry</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing</subject><subject>Resin Cements - chemistry</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>Toothbrushing</subject><issn>0361-7734</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kEtPwzAQhH0A0VL4C8gnbpH8iOOYW1XxkipxgQOnyHbWbVASB29y4N9jRHtaafab0WguyJrJihday3JFrhG_GCtVqdQVWXGhK6YZW5PPLSIgduOBzkeguKRgPdAUl8NxzA8aA7V0ijhD6mKiCTJLfRyy1M3wQCEE8PMfdvYi2D7n3ZDLYHuE29PdkI-nx_fdS7F_e37dbffFJJiecz0haqcN2NZ4GVTLS1cZaU0VeO2d8pLzrFpjQfBScGWDcayWyivjpHByQ-7_c6cUvxfAuRk69ND3doS4YKOlMJXSZQbvTuDiBmibKXWDTT_NeQz5C8xcWx0</recordid><startdate>200305</startdate><enddate>200305</enddate><creator>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creator><creator>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creator><creator>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creator><creator>Panzeri, Heitor</creator><creator>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creator><creator>Dinelli, Welingtom</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200305</creationdate><title>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</title><author>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia ; Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto ; Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka ; Panzeri, Heitor ; Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães ; Dinelli, Welingtom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p207t-77228b79ead9c3f5d14b693a96f18cb5c311f5da9ae214215af9b0835c59b32b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry</topic><topic>Composite Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Wear</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dentifrices - chemistry</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing</topic><topic>Resin Cements - chemistry</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>Toothbrushing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzeri, Heitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinelli, Welingtom</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takeuchi, Cristina Yoshie Garcia</au><au>Orbegoso Flores, Victor Humberto</au><au>Palma Dibb, Regina Guenka</au><au>Panzeri, Heitor</au><au>Lara, Elza Helena Guimarães</au><au>Dinelli, Welingtom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing</atitle><jtitle>Operative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Oper Dent</addtitle><date>2003-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>286</epage><pages>281-286</pages><issn>0361-7734</issn><abstract>This study assessed the in vitro influence of surface sealing on the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite before and after toothbrushing. Thirty specimens (13 mm diameter x 1 mm high) were fabricated from Filtek-P60 resin composite and randomly assigned to three groups (n = 10): a non-sealed control and two groups sealed with one of the tested materials-a surface-penetrating sealant (Protect-it!-PI) and a one bottle adhesive system (Single Bond-SB). The samples were subjected to a surface roughness reading to determine the initial roughness, then submitted to simulated toothbrushing with 35,600 cycles for 100 minutes. Specimens were then cleaned and a post-abrasion surface roughness reading accomplished. Means (microm), recorded before (B) and after (A) toothbrushing, and standard deviations were: Control--(B): 0.032 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.054 (+/- 0.005); PI-(B): 0.034 (+/- 0.005), (A): 0.060 (+/- 0.034); SB (B): 0.031 (+/- 0.004), (A): 0.047 (+/- 0.007). Data were tabulated and submitted to two-way ANOVA. No statistically significant difference was observed when the control and experimental groups were compared. However, a significant difference (p &lt; 0.05) was found between the measurements performed before and after toothbrushing. Based on these results, it may be concluded that using either a surface penetrating sealant or a one bottle adhesive system did not provide the optimization of superficial integrity. The use of a dentifrice and toothbrush resulted in significant alterations to the surface smoothness of the resin composite.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>12760700</pmid><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-7734
ispartof Operative dentistry, 2003-05, Vol.28 (3), p.281-286
issn 0361-7734
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73296574
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis of Variance
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistry
Composite Resins - chemistry
Dental Restoration Wear
Dental Restoration, Permanent
Dentifrices - chemistry
Dentistry
Humans
Materials Testing
Resin Cements - chemistry
Surface Properties
Toothbrushing
title Assessing the surface roughness of a posterior resin composite: effect of surface sealing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T03%3A41%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20surface%20roughness%20of%20a%20posterior%20resin%20composite:%20effect%20of%20surface%20sealing&rft.jtitle=Operative%20dentistry&rft.au=Takeuchi,%20Cristina%20Yoshie%20Garcia&rft.date=2003-05&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=286&rft.pages=281-286&rft.issn=0361-7734&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E73296574%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73296574&rft_id=info:pmid/12760700&rfr_iscdi=true