Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data
Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of psychiatric research 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 275 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 267 |
container_title | Journal of psychiatric research |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Herwig, Uwe Lampe, Yvonne Juengling, Freimut D. Wunderlich, Arthur Walter, Henrik Spitzer, Manfred Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos |
description | Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022395603000426</els_id><sourcerecordid>73293702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5QgWHgL8Sx1xQVbUUqQik7t2a2JPKKBsvtlO1_x5vd0WPPc0cnnc-HkLecfaZM959uWFMiEaatvvI5CfGmBJN94KseK9Nw6U2L8nqP3JEjnP-UyEtuHpNjrjQXdsrsyLzmfdNnGla_7yhY0y0JISywbnQOFKP24Q5hzh_pUC3YYqF5rL4B7rkMN_WHhPGAvfBURfD1MxwF26h1AAF52LyO6pE-vtiTT0UeENejTBlfHuoJ2R9ebE-v2quf33_cX523TjV6tJA16EatOa9lGwAbji2auCm8602ve6BAUgzalOL8qLtOz0KYRTTDv3A5Qk53Y_dpvh3wVzsJmSH0wQzxiVbLYWRmokKtnvQpZhzwtFuU9hAerCc2Z1n--jZ7iRaJu2jZ9vV3PvDgmXYoH9KHcRW4MMBgOxgGhPMLuQnTmmjhGaV-7bnsNq4C5hsdgHn-kZI6Ir1MTxzyj-jTpmh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73293702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12765849</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPYRA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging ; Depressive Disorder - physiopathology ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neuronavigation ; PET ; Prefrontal cortex ; Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Severity of Illness Index ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychiatric research, 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14794270$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12765849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengling, Freimut D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunderlich, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><title>Journal of psychiatric research</title><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><description>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - physiopathology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neuronavigation</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0022-3956</issn><issn>1879-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5QgWHgL8Sx1xQVbUUqQik7t2a2JPKKBsvtlO1_x5vd0WPPc0cnnc-HkLecfaZM959uWFMiEaatvvI5CfGmBJN94KseK9Nw6U2L8nqP3JEjnP-UyEtuHpNjrjQXdsrsyLzmfdNnGla_7yhY0y0JISywbnQOFKP24Q5hzh_pUC3YYqF5rL4B7rkMN_WHhPGAvfBURfD1MxwF26h1AAF52LyO6pE-vtiTT0UeENejTBlfHuoJ2R9ebE-v2quf33_cX523TjV6tJA16EatOa9lGwAbji2auCm8602ve6BAUgzalOL8qLtOz0KYRTTDv3A5Qk53Y_dpvh3wVzsJmSH0wQzxiVbLYWRmokKtnvQpZhzwtFuU9hAerCc2Z1n--jZ7iRaJu2jZ9vV3PvDgmXYoH9KHcRW4MMBgOxgGhPMLuQnTmmjhGaV-7bnsNq4C5hsdgHn-kZI6Ir1MTxzyj-jTpmh</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Herwig, Uwe</creator><creator>Lampe, Yvonne</creator><creator>Juengling, Freimut D.</creator><creator>Wunderlich, Arthur</creator><creator>Walter, Henrik</creator><creator>Spitzer, Manfred</creator><creator>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><author>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - physiopathology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neuronavigation</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengling, Freimut D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunderlich, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herwig, Uwe</au><au>Lampe, Yvonne</au><au>Juengling, Freimut D.</au><au>Wunderlich, Arthur</au><au>Walter, Henrik</au><au>Spitzer, Manfred</au><au>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>267-275</pages><issn>0022-3956</issn><eissn>1879-1379</eissn><coden>JPYRA3</coden><abstract>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12765849</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3956 |
ispartof | Journal of psychiatric research, 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275 |
issn | 0022-3956 1879-1379 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293702 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Biological and medical sciences Depression Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging Depressive Disorder - physiopathology Depressive Disorder - therapy Double-Blind Method Electric Stimulation - methods Electromagnetic Fields Female Humans Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Miscellaneous Neuronavigation PET Prefrontal cortex Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology Psychiatric Status Rating Scales Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychopathology. Psychiatry Severity of Illness Index Tomography, Emission-Computed Transcranial magnetic stimulation Treatment Outcome Treatments |
title | Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T17%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Add-on%20rTMS%20for%20treatment%20of%20depression:%20a%20pilot%20study%20using%20stereotaxic%20coil-navigation%20according%20to%20PET%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychiatric%20research&rft.au=Herwig,%20Uwe&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=267-275&rft.issn=0022-3956&rft.eissn=1879-1379&rft.coden=JPYRA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73293702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73293702&rft_id=info:pmid/12765849&rft_els_id=S0022395603000426&rfr_iscdi=true |