Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data

Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of psychiatric research 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275
Hauptverfasser: Herwig, Uwe, Lampe, Yvonne, Juengling, Freimut D., Wunderlich, Arthur, Walter, Henrik, Spitzer, Manfred, Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 275
container_issue 4
container_start_page 267
container_title Journal of psychiatric research
container_volume 37
creator Herwig, Uwe
Lampe, Yvonne
Juengling, Freimut D.
Wunderlich, Arthur
Walter, Henrik
Spitzer, Manfred
Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos
description Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022395603000426</els_id><sourcerecordid>73293702</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5QgWHgL8Sx1xQVbUUqQik7t2a2JPKKBsvtlO1_x5vd0WPPc0cnnc-HkLecfaZM959uWFMiEaatvvI5CfGmBJN94KseK9Nw6U2L8nqP3JEjnP-UyEtuHpNjrjQXdsrsyLzmfdNnGla_7yhY0y0JISywbnQOFKP24Q5hzh_pUC3YYqF5rL4B7rkMN_WHhPGAvfBURfD1MxwF26h1AAF52LyO6pE-vtiTT0UeENejTBlfHuoJ2R9ebE-v2quf33_cX523TjV6tJA16EatOa9lGwAbji2auCm8602ve6BAUgzalOL8qLtOz0KYRTTDv3A5Qk53Y_dpvh3wVzsJmSH0wQzxiVbLYWRmokKtnvQpZhzwtFuU9hAerCc2Z1n--jZ7iRaJu2jZ9vV3PvDgmXYoH9KHcRW4MMBgOxgGhPMLuQnTmmjhGaV-7bnsNq4C5hsdgHn-kZI6Ir1MTxzyj-jTpmh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73293702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3956</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1379</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12765849</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPYRA3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Depression ; Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging ; Depressive Disorder - physiopathology ; Depressive Disorder - therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Electric Stimulation - methods ; Electromagnetic Fields ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Miscellaneous ; Neuronavigation ; PET ; Prefrontal cortex ; Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging ; Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychopathology. Psychiatry ; Severity of Illness Index ; Tomography, Emission-Computed ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Treatment Outcome ; Treatments</subject><ispartof>Journal of psychiatric research, 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,3552,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14794270$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12765849$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengling, Freimut D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunderlich, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><title>Journal of psychiatric research</title><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><description>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Depression</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - physiopathology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder - therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Neuronavigation</subject><subject>PET</subject><subject>Prefrontal cortex</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Treatments</subject><issn>0022-3956</issn><issn>1879-1379</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwD5QgWHgL8Sx1xQVbUUqQik7t2a2JPKKBsvtlO1_x5vd0WPPc0cnnc-HkLecfaZM959uWFMiEaatvvI5CfGmBJN94KseK9Nw6U2L8nqP3JEjnP-UyEtuHpNjrjQXdsrsyLzmfdNnGla_7yhY0y0JISywbnQOFKP24Q5hzh_pUC3YYqF5rL4B7rkMN_WHhPGAvfBURfD1MxwF26h1AAF52LyO6pE-vtiTT0UeENejTBlfHuoJ2R9ebE-v2quf33_cX523TjV6tJA16EatOa9lGwAbji2auCm8602ve6BAUgzalOL8qLtOz0KYRTTDv3A5Qk53Y_dpvh3wVzsJmSH0wQzxiVbLYWRmokKtnvQpZhzwtFuU9hAerCc2Z1n--jZ7iRaJu2jZ9vV3PvDgmXYoH9KHcRW4MMBgOxgGhPMLuQnTmmjhGaV-7bnsNq4C5hsdgHn-kZI6Ir1MTxzyj-jTpmh</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Herwig, Uwe</creator><creator>Lampe, Yvonne</creator><creator>Juengling, Freimut D.</creator><creator>Wunderlich, Arthur</creator><creator>Walter, Henrik</creator><creator>Spitzer, Manfred</creator><creator>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</title><author>Herwig, Uwe ; Lampe, Yvonne ; Juengling, Freimut D. ; Wunderlich, Arthur ; Walter, Henrik ; Spitzer, Manfred ; Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-a66e4b7718330ba191e54b196d579878a0aa39f79aa34d25867f229407cedb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Depression</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - physiopathology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder - therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Neuronavigation</topic><topic>PET</topic><topic>Prefrontal cortex</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychopathology. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Treatments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampe, Yvonne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juengling, Freimut D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunderlich, Arthur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walter, Henrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spitzer, Manfred</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Herwig, Uwe</au><au>Lampe, Yvonne</au><au>Juengling, Freimut D.</au><au>Wunderlich, Arthur</au><au>Walter, Henrik</au><au>Spitzer, Manfred</au><au>Schönfeldt-Lecuona, Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of psychiatric research</jtitle><addtitle>J Psychiatr Res</addtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>267</spage><epage>275</epage><pages>267-275</pages><issn>0022-3956</issn><eissn>1879-1379</eissn><coden>JPYRA3</coden><abstract>Objective: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is regarded as a potentially new tool to treat depression. In a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled pilot study we investigated the efficacy of neuronavigated rTMS, guided according to the prefrontal metabolic state determined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: 25 patients with major depression were included. Prior to rTMS, PET scans were obtained. For the real stimulation condition, the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) with lower metabolic activity compared to the contralateral hemisphere was selected, if detected by prior PET. Stimulation parameters were 15 Hz, 110% motor threshold (MT), 3000 stimuli/day, for 10 days. A neuronavigational system was used to place the magnetic coil above each individuals’ selected cortical region (real condition: DLPFC, sham: midline parieto-occipital, intensity 90% of MT). RTMS was administered add-on to medication. Depression-related symptoms were rated with Beck's, Hamilton's (HAM-D), and Montgomery–Asberg's (MADRS) depression rating scales. Results: Real stimulation improved depression according to HAM-D and MADRS moderately but significantly better compared to sham at the end of the stimulation sessions. In the real condition, four out of 13 patients responded with a mean improvement in HAM-D and/or MADRS of at least 50%, whereas none responded to sham. Antidepressant effects of stimulation of the relatively hypometabolic DLPFC were comparable to stimulation in absence of metabolic differences. Conclusions: A moderate improvement of depressive symptoms after rTMS was observed. Our preliminary data show that stimulation of prefrontal hypometabolism may not be advantageous to stimulation irrespective of the metabolic state.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12765849</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3956
ispartof Journal of psychiatric research, 2003-07, Vol.37 (4), p.267-275
issn 0022-3956
1879-1379
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293702
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Depression
Depressive Disorder - diagnostic imaging
Depressive Disorder - physiopathology
Depressive Disorder - therapy
Double-Blind Method
Electric Stimulation - methods
Electromagnetic Fields
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Miscellaneous
Neuronavigation
PET
Prefrontal cortex
Prefrontal Cortex - diagnostic imaging
Prefrontal Cortex - physiopathology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychopathology. Psychiatry
Severity of Illness Index
Tomography, Emission-Computed
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Treatment Outcome
Treatments
title Add-on rTMS for treatment of depression: a pilot study using stereotaxic coil-navigation according to PET data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T17%3A40%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Add-on%20rTMS%20for%20treatment%20of%20depression:%20a%20pilot%20study%20using%20stereotaxic%20coil-navigation%20according%20to%20PET%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20psychiatric%20research&rft.au=Herwig,%20Uwe&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=267&rft.epage=275&rft.pages=267-275&rft.issn=0022-3956&rft.eissn=1879-1379&rft.coden=JPYRA3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0022-3956(03)00042-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73293702%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73293702&rft_id=info:pmid/12765849&rft_els_id=S0022395603000426&rfr_iscdi=true