Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative
Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community‐based programs. These programs have an average of only seven full‐time equivalent physician faculty. This report summarizes results of the Residency Assistance Pro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2003-06, Vol.51 (6), p.858-862 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 862 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 858 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Warshaw, Gregg A. Murphy, John B. Kahn, Norman B. Hejduk, Gerald R. Singleton, Stacy R. |
description | Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community‐based programs. These programs have an average of only seven full‐time equivalent physician faculty. This report summarizes results of the Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatric Initiative (RAP/HGI) geriatric medicine curriculum consultations for family practice (FP) residency programs conducted from 1996 to 2001. This project was developed as part of the RAP in family practice. Ten experienced FP educators were selected and trained as special consultants. Between 1996 and 2001, 39 FP residency programs participated in the 1‐ to 4‐day RAP/HGI consultations. The programs were diverse in size and location. The consultations reached 308 family practice residency faculty members involved in training 807 residents. Program evaluations of the consultants were uniformly in the very good to excellent range, with a mean rating of 4.6 (5‐point scale, with 5 indicating excellent). At the end of the initial consultation visit, the residency program faculty and the consultant developed short‐term goals for geriatrics program development. Eighty‐five percent (33/39) of the programs submitted their curriculum goals in writing. The mean number of goals per program was 4.8 (range = 3–11). Of the 33 programs with written goals, follow‐up was documented for 29 programs. Seventy‐nine percent of the programs' self‐defined educational goals were met during the 6 to 12 months of follow‐up (range 50–100%). Ten of the programs implemented all of their educational goals. The RAP/HGI project demonstrated that achievable geriatric medicine curriculum improvements could occur as part of an onsite consultation process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51270.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293521</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>57032046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-411f070a0e3a35375ffdf9d7c785e7b32f6c957ff1a490e0b4ed9cebe1e243d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFZA3sEvqa5ywQBqNaFpULoKidmd5nGPwkEtrJzB5MN4PpzOaWYK88LH1_f85On-SIIIzgnl-tskIy0VKWVFmFGOWCUIlzraPkgURjKaCE_E4WWCMaVrkhJ8kz0LYYEwoLoqnyUmkRTz5IvlTgXd68M6gD1A74zpAq9HH99iMLVr1XRibQQ8uFsj2Hp3r1jUT-uy1GZwB9AWCq6Ez81f_3es2vEHLNpoa3aGl0TW0E-rtQfdjCrGLjm5H5TIEFwbdRbu9ydmF9kNsV6PDfAFddm6ItfsFz5MnVjcBXuzv0-Tb-bvr1UV69am6XC2vUsNzgVNOiMUSawxMM8GksLa2ZS2NLATINaM2N6WQ1hLNSwx4zaEuDayBAOWsLtlp8nrne-f7-xHCoFoXDDSN7qAfg5KMlkxQ8k9QSMxoTC6CxQ40vg_Bg1V33rXaT4pgNWerNmrOVs3Zqjlb9ZCt2kbpy32Pcd1CfRTuw4zAqz2gg9GN9XGjLhw5XpQ0Zzxyb3fcb9fA9N8DqPfV14cyGqQ7g5gabA8G2v9UuYxrVjcfK8Vuq9ub_Joqwf4CxKXTcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57032046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Warshaw, Gregg A. ; Murphy, John B. ; Kahn, Norman B. ; Hejduk, Gerald R. ; Singleton, Stacy R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Warshaw, Gregg A. ; Murphy, John B. ; Kahn, Norman B. ; Hejduk, Gerald R. ; Singleton, Stacy R.</creatorcontrib><description>Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community‐based programs. These programs have an average of only seven full‐time equivalent physician faculty. This report summarizes results of the Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatric Initiative (RAP/HGI) geriatric medicine curriculum consultations for family practice (FP) residency programs conducted from 1996 to 2001. This project was developed as part of the RAP in family practice. Ten experienced FP educators were selected and trained as special consultants. Between 1996 and 2001, 39 FP residency programs participated in the 1‐ to 4‐day RAP/HGI consultations. The programs were diverse in size and location. The consultations reached 308 family practice residency faculty members involved in training 807 residents. Program evaluations of the consultants were uniformly in the very good to excellent range, with a mean rating of 4.6 (5‐point scale, with 5 indicating excellent). At the end of the initial consultation visit, the residency program faculty and the consultant developed short‐term goals for geriatrics program development. Eighty‐five percent (33/39) of the programs submitted their curriculum goals in writing. The mean number of goals per program was 4.8 (range = 3–11). Of the 33 programs with written goals, follow‐up was documented for 29 programs. Seventy‐nine percent of the programs' self‐defined educational goals were met during the 6 to 12 months of follow‐up (range 50–100%). Ten of the programs implemented all of their educational goals. The RAP/HGI project demonstrated that achievable geriatric medicine curriculum improvements could occur as part of an onsite consultation process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51270.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12757576</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA, USA: Blackwell Science Inc</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Community based programmes ; Connecticut ; Consultants ; Curriculum ; Documentation ; Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration ; family practice ; Family Practice - education ; Family Practice - organization & administration ; Family Practice - standards ; General practice ; Geriatric medicine ; geriatric medicine curriculum ; Geriatrics - education ; Health participants ; Humans ; Internship and Residency - organization & administration ; Medical sciences ; Medical students ; Organizational Objectives ; Practice placements ; Program Development ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; residency training ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2003-06, Vol.51 (6), p.858-862</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-411f070a0e3a35375ffdf9d7c785e7b32f6c957ff1a490e0b4ed9cebe1e243d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-411f070a0e3a35375ffdf9d7c785e7b32f6c957ff1a490e0b4ed9cebe1e243d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2389.2003.51270.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1365-2389.2003.51270.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,30977,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14892634$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12757576$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Warshaw, Gregg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Norman B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hejduk, Gerald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Stacy R.</creatorcontrib><title>Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</addtitle><description>Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community‐based programs. These programs have an average of only seven full‐time equivalent physician faculty. This report summarizes results of the Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatric Initiative (RAP/HGI) geriatric medicine curriculum consultations for family practice (FP) residency programs conducted from 1996 to 2001. This project was developed as part of the RAP in family practice. Ten experienced FP educators were selected and trained as special consultants. Between 1996 and 2001, 39 FP residency programs participated in the 1‐ to 4‐day RAP/HGI consultations. The programs were diverse in size and location. The consultations reached 308 family practice residency faculty members involved in training 807 residents. Program evaluations of the consultants were uniformly in the very good to excellent range, with a mean rating of 4.6 (5‐point scale, with 5 indicating excellent). At the end of the initial consultation visit, the residency program faculty and the consultant developed short‐term goals for geriatrics program development. Eighty‐five percent (33/39) of the programs submitted their curriculum goals in writing. The mean number of goals per program was 4.8 (range = 3–11). Of the 33 programs with written goals, follow‐up was documented for 29 programs. Seventy‐nine percent of the programs' self‐defined educational goals were met during the 6 to 12 months of follow‐up (range 50–100%). Ten of the programs implemented all of their educational goals. The RAP/HGI project demonstrated that achievable geriatric medicine curriculum improvements could occur as part of an onsite consultation process.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Community based programmes</subject><subject>Connecticut</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</subject><subject>family practice</subject><subject>Family Practice - education</subject><subject>Family Practice - organization & administration</subject><subject>Family Practice - standards</subject><subject>General practice</subject><subject>Geriatric medicine</subject><subject>geriatric medicine curriculum</subject><subject>Geriatrics - education</subject><subject>Health participants</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Organizational Objectives</subject><subject>Practice placements</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>residency training</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhiMEokPhFZA3sEvqa5ywQBqNaFpULoKidmd5nGPwkEtrJzB5MN4PpzOaWYK88LH1_f85On-SIIIzgnl-tskIy0VKWVFmFGOWCUIlzraPkgURjKaCE_E4WWCMaVrkhJ8kz0LYYEwoLoqnyUmkRTz5IvlTgXd68M6gD1A74zpAq9HH99iMLVr1XRibQQ8uFsj2Hp3r1jUT-uy1GZwB9AWCq6Ez81f_3es2vEHLNpoa3aGl0TW0E-rtQfdjCrGLjm5H5TIEFwbdRbu9ydmF9kNsV6PDfAFddm6ItfsFz5MnVjcBXuzv0-Tb-bvr1UV69am6XC2vUsNzgVNOiMUSawxMM8GksLa2ZS2NLATINaM2N6WQ1hLNSwx4zaEuDayBAOWsLtlp8nrne-f7-xHCoFoXDDSN7qAfg5KMlkxQ8k9QSMxoTC6CxQ40vg_Bg1V33rXaT4pgNWerNmrOVs3Zqjlb9ZCt2kbpy32Pcd1CfRTuw4zAqz2gg9GN9XGjLhw5XpQ0Zzxyb3fcb9fA9N8DqPfV14cyGqQ7g5gabA8G2v9UuYxrVjcfK8Vuq9ub_Joqwf4CxKXTcA</recordid><startdate>200306</startdate><enddate>200306</enddate><creator>Warshaw, Gregg A.</creator><creator>Murphy, John B.</creator><creator>Kahn, Norman B.</creator><creator>Hejduk, Gerald R.</creator><creator>Singleton, Stacy R.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Inc</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200306</creationdate><title>Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative</title><author>Warshaw, Gregg A. ; Murphy, John B. ; Kahn, Norman B. ; Hejduk, Gerald R. ; Singleton, Stacy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4650-411f070a0e3a35375ffdf9d7c785e7b32f6c957ff1a490e0b4ed9cebe1e243d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Community based programmes</topic><topic>Connecticut</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration</topic><topic>family practice</topic><topic>Family Practice - education</topic><topic>Family Practice - organization & administration</topic><topic>Family Practice - standards</topic><topic>General practice</topic><topic>Geriatric medicine</topic><topic>geriatric medicine curriculum</topic><topic>Geriatrics - education</topic><topic>Health participants</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Organizational Objectives</topic><topic>Practice placements</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>residency training</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Warshaw, Gregg A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, John B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kahn, Norman B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hejduk, Gerald R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singleton, Stacy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Warshaw, Gregg A.</au><au>Murphy, John B.</au><au>Kahn, Norman B.</au><au>Hejduk, Gerald R.</au><au>Singleton, Stacy R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society</addtitle><date>2003-06</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>858</spage><epage>862</epage><pages>858-862</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>Increasing the quality and quantity of geriatric medicine training for family practice residents is a particular challenge for community‐based programs. These programs have an average of only seven full‐time equivalent physician faculty. This report summarizes results of the Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatric Initiative (RAP/HGI) geriatric medicine curriculum consultations for family practice (FP) residency programs conducted from 1996 to 2001. This project was developed as part of the RAP in family practice. Ten experienced FP educators were selected and trained as special consultants. Between 1996 and 2001, 39 FP residency programs participated in the 1‐ to 4‐day RAP/HGI consultations. The programs were diverse in size and location. The consultations reached 308 family practice residency faculty members involved in training 807 residents. Program evaluations of the consultants were uniformly in the very good to excellent range, with a mean rating of 4.6 (5‐point scale, with 5 indicating excellent). At the end of the initial consultation visit, the residency program faculty and the consultant developed short‐term goals for geriatrics program development. Eighty‐five percent (33/39) of the programs submitted their curriculum goals in writing. The mean number of goals per program was 4.8 (range = 3–11). Of the 33 programs with written goals, follow‐up was documented for 29 programs. Seventy‐nine percent of the programs' self‐defined educational goals were met during the 6 to 12 months of follow‐up (range 50–100%). Ten of the programs implemented all of their educational goals. The RAP/HGI project demonstrated that achievable geriatric medicine curriculum improvements could occur as part of an onsite consultation process.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA, USA</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Inc</pub><pmid>12757576</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51270.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2003-06, Vol.51 (6), p.858-862 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73293521 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Community based programmes Connecticut Consultants Curriculum Documentation Education, Medical, Graduate - organization & administration family practice Family Practice - education Family Practice - organization & administration Family Practice - standards General practice Geriatric medicine geriatric medicine curriculum Geriatrics - education Health participants Humans Internship and Residency - organization & administration Medical sciences Medical students Organizational Objectives Practice placements Program Development Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine residency training USA |
title | Geriatric Medicine Curriculum Consultations for Family Practice Residency Programs: American Academy of Family Physicians Residency Assistance Program/Hartford Geriatrics Initiative |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T18%3A37%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Geriatric%20Medicine%20Curriculum%20Consultations%20for%20Family%20Practice%20Residency%20Programs:%20American%20Academy%20of%20Family%20Physicians%20Residency%20Assistance%20Program/Hartford%20Geriatrics%20Initiative&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Warshaw,%20Gregg%20A.&rft.date=2003-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=858&rft.epage=862&rft.pages=858-862&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.51270.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E57032046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57032046&rft_id=info:pmid/12757576&rfr_iscdi=true |