Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome

To assess the feasibility of following a decisional flowchart to decide whether to remove tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective study in a respiratory intensive care unit, with beds dedicated to weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. 108 tracheotomized patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Intensive care medicine 2003-05, Vol.29 (5), p.845-848
Hauptverfasser: CERIANA, Piero, CARLUCCI, Annalisa, NAVALESI, Paolo, RAMPULLA, Ciro, DELMASTRO, Monica, PIAGGI, Giancarlo, DE MATTIA, Elisa, NAVA, Stefano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 848
container_issue 5
container_start_page 845
container_title Intensive care medicine
container_volume 29
creator CERIANA, Piero
CARLUCCI, Annalisa
NAVALESI, Paolo
RAMPULLA, Ciro
DELMASTRO, Monica
PIAGGI, Giancarlo
DE MATTIA, Elisa
NAVA, Stefano
description To assess the feasibility of following a decisional flowchart to decide whether to remove tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective study in a respiratory intensive care unit, with beds dedicated to weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. 108 tracheotomized patients with respiratory failure of different causes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, postsurgical complications, recovery from hypoxemic respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders), 36 of whom died or could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. We applied a decisional flowchart based on some simple clinical and physiological parameters aimed at assessing the patient's ability to remove secretions, swallowing function, absence of psychiatric diseases, possibility of reaching spontaneous breathing, and amount of respiratory space. Following our flowchart 56 of the remaining patients were successfully weaned from the tracheotomy cannula, with a reintubation rate at 3 months of 3%. The main reasons for not proceeding to decannulation were inability to remove secretions and severe glottic stenosis. No statistical differences were found between patients who received a surgical or percutaneous tracheotomy. Using a simple decisional flowchart we were able to remove tracheotomy cannula in almost 80% of the patients with spontaneous breathing autonomy without major clinical complications. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this clinical approach in larger and different populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00134-003-1689-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73285926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>816782991</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3e753fc5f4e0b8af80b3434198d48d16c0a43c885642c1b120c7233eefaa819d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYM4OG3rD3AjQRh3GfOqqpQ7GcYHDLhRXIZU6mYmQyppk5TSs_SXm7YbBlxdLnznwDkHoVeMXjJKh3eFUiYkoVQQ1quRPDxBGyYFJ4wL9RRtqJCcyF7yc_S8lPtGD33HnqFzxnshRzVs0J8fYKKPt9jltOCajb2DVNOyxz7ikOItqZAXvIC9a5w1IezxL4jVB1NhxjtTffvKe-zAFD_54OseJ4cNnsH64lM0AbuQfjd9rtjEGdvg_znhtFabFniBzpwJBV6e7hZ9_3j97eozufn66cvVhxtiRScrETB0wtnOSaCTMk7RSUgh2ahmqWbWW2qksEp1La9lE-PUDlwIAGeMYuMstujt0XeX088VStWLLxZCMBHSWvQguOrG1swWvfkPvE9rbkGK5qznTPBxaBA7QjanUjI4vct-MXmvGdWHdfRxHd3W0Yd19EPTvD4Zr9MC86PiNEcDLk6AKa0hl01sJT5ycujVIdRfrLKZ1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>216213297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>CERIANA, Piero ; CARLUCCI, Annalisa ; NAVALESI, Paolo ; RAMPULLA, Ciro ; DELMASTRO, Monica ; PIAGGI, Giancarlo ; DE MATTIA, Elisa ; NAVA, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>CERIANA, Piero ; CARLUCCI, Annalisa ; NAVALESI, Paolo ; RAMPULLA, Ciro ; DELMASTRO, Monica ; PIAGGI, Giancarlo ; DE MATTIA, Elisa ; NAVA, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>To assess the feasibility of following a decisional flowchart to decide whether to remove tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective study in a respiratory intensive care unit, with beds dedicated to weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. 108 tracheotomized patients with respiratory failure of different causes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, postsurgical complications, recovery from hypoxemic respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders), 36 of whom died or could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. We applied a decisional flowchart based on some simple clinical and physiological parameters aimed at assessing the patient's ability to remove secretions, swallowing function, absence of psychiatric diseases, possibility of reaching spontaneous breathing, and amount of respiratory space. Following our flowchart 56 of the remaining patients were successfully weaned from the tracheotomy cannula, with a reintubation rate at 3 months of 3%. The main reasons for not proceeding to decannulation were inability to remove secretions and severe glottic stenosis. No statistical differences were found between patients who received a surgical or percutaneous tracheotomy. Using a simple decisional flowchart we were able to remove tracheotomy cannula in almost 80% of the patients with spontaneous breathing autonomy without major clinical complications. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this clinical approach in larger and different populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0342-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-1689-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12634987</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ICMED9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; APACHE ; Biological and medical sciences ; Clinical outcomes ; Decision Support Techniques ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Respiration, Artificial ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - classification ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy ; Tracheotomy ; Ventilator Weaning</subject><ispartof>Intensive care medicine, 2003-05, Vol.29 (5), p.845-848</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3e753fc5f4e0b8af80b3434198d48d16c0a43c885642c1b120c7233eefaa819d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3e753fc5f4e0b8af80b3434198d48d16c0a43c885642c1b120c7233eefaa819d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14768723$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12634987$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>CERIANA, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARLUCCI, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVALESI, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMPULLA, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELMASTRO, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIAGGI, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MATTIA, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVA, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome</title><title>Intensive care medicine</title><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><description>To assess the feasibility of following a decisional flowchart to decide whether to remove tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective study in a respiratory intensive care unit, with beds dedicated to weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. 108 tracheotomized patients with respiratory failure of different causes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, postsurgical complications, recovery from hypoxemic respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders), 36 of whom died or could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. We applied a decisional flowchart based on some simple clinical and physiological parameters aimed at assessing the patient's ability to remove secretions, swallowing function, absence of psychiatric diseases, possibility of reaching spontaneous breathing, and amount of respiratory space. Following our flowchart 56 of the remaining patients were successfully weaned from the tracheotomy cannula, with a reintubation rate at 3 months of 3%. The main reasons for not proceeding to decannulation were inability to remove secretions and severe glottic stenosis. No statistical differences were found between patients who received a surgical or percutaneous tracheotomy. Using a simple decisional flowchart we were able to remove tracheotomy cannula in almost 80% of the patients with spontaneous breathing autonomy without major clinical complications. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this clinical approach in larger and different populations.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>APACHE</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - classification</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</subject><subject>Tracheotomy</subject><subject>Ventilator Weaning</subject><issn>0342-4642</issn><issn>1432-1238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUuLFDEUhYM4OG3rD3AjQRh3GfOqqpQ7GcYHDLhRXIZU6mYmQyppk5TSs_SXm7YbBlxdLnznwDkHoVeMXjJKh3eFUiYkoVQQ1quRPDxBGyYFJ4wL9RRtqJCcyF7yc_S8lPtGD33HnqFzxnshRzVs0J8fYKKPt9jltOCajb2DVNOyxz7ikOItqZAXvIC9a5w1IezxL4jVB1NhxjtTffvKe-zAFD_54OseJ4cNnsH64lM0AbuQfjd9rtjEGdvg_znhtFabFniBzpwJBV6e7hZ9_3j97eozufn66cvVhxtiRScrETB0wtnOSaCTMk7RSUgh2ahmqWbWW2qksEp1La9lE-PUDlwIAGeMYuMstujt0XeX088VStWLLxZCMBHSWvQguOrG1swWvfkPvE9rbkGK5qznTPBxaBA7QjanUjI4vct-MXmvGdWHdfRxHd3W0Yd19EPTvD4Zr9MC86PiNEcDLk6AKa0hl01sJT5ycujVIdRfrLKZ1Q</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>CERIANA, Piero</creator><creator>CARLUCCI, Annalisa</creator><creator>NAVALESI, Paolo</creator><creator>RAMPULLA, Ciro</creator><creator>DELMASTRO, Monica</creator><creator>PIAGGI, Giancarlo</creator><creator>DE MATTIA, Elisa</creator><creator>NAVA, Stefano</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome</title><author>CERIANA, Piero ; CARLUCCI, Annalisa ; NAVALESI, Paolo ; RAMPULLA, Ciro ; DELMASTRO, Monica ; PIAGGI, Giancarlo ; DE MATTIA, Elisa ; NAVA, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-3e753fc5f4e0b8af80b3434198d48d16c0a43c885642c1b120c7233eefaa819d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>APACHE</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - classification</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy</topic><topic>Tracheotomy</topic><topic>Ventilator Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>CERIANA, Piero</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CARLUCCI, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVALESI, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RAMPULLA, Ciro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DELMASTRO, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIAGGI, Giancarlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DE MATTIA, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NAVA, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>CERIANA, Piero</au><au>CARLUCCI, Annalisa</au><au>NAVALESI, Paolo</au><au>RAMPULLA, Ciro</au><au>DELMASTRO, Monica</au><au>PIAGGI, Giancarlo</au><au>DE MATTIA, Elisa</au><au>NAVA, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome</atitle><jtitle>Intensive care medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Intensive Care Med</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>845</spage><epage>848</epage><pages>845-848</pages><issn>0342-4642</issn><eissn>1432-1238</eissn><coden>ICMED9</coden><abstract>To assess the feasibility of following a decisional flowchart to decide whether to remove tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients. Prospective study in a respiratory intensive care unit, with beds dedicated to weaning from prolonged mechanical ventilation. 108 tracheotomized patients with respiratory failure of different causes (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, postsurgical complications, recovery from hypoxemic respiratory failure, neuromuscular disorders), 36 of whom died or could not be weaned from mechanical ventilation. We applied a decisional flowchart based on some simple clinical and physiological parameters aimed at assessing the patient's ability to remove secretions, swallowing function, absence of psychiatric diseases, possibility of reaching spontaneous breathing, and amount of respiratory space. Following our flowchart 56 of the remaining patients were successfully weaned from the tracheotomy cannula, with a reintubation rate at 3 months of 3%. The main reasons for not proceeding to decannulation were inability to remove secretions and severe glottic stenosis. No statistical differences were found between patients who received a surgical or percutaneous tracheotomy. Using a simple decisional flowchart we were able to remove tracheotomy cannula in almost 80% of the patients with spontaneous breathing autonomy without major clinical complications. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm this clinical approach in larger and different populations.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12634987</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00134-003-1689-z</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0342-4642
ispartof Intensive care medicine, 2003-05, Vol.29 (5), p.845-848
issn 0342-4642
1432-1238
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73285926
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
APACHE
Biological and medical sciences
Clinical outcomes
Decision Support Techniques
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units
Male
Medical sciences
Respiration, Artificial
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - classification
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - physiopathology
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Adult - therapy
Tracheotomy
Ventilator Weaning
title Weaning from tracheotomy in long-term mechanically ventilated patients: feasibility of a decisional flowchart and clinical outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weaning%20from%20tracheotomy%20in%20long-term%20mechanically%20ventilated%20patients:%20feasibility%20of%20a%20decisional%20flowchart%20and%20clinical%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Intensive%20care%20medicine&rft.au=CERIANA,%20Piero&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=845&rft.epage=848&rft.pages=845-848&rft.issn=0342-4642&rft.eissn=1432-1238&rft.coden=ICMED9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00134-003-1689-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E816782991%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=216213297&rft_id=info:pmid/12634987&rfr_iscdi=true