Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study

The scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in early-stage breast cancer is a widely accepted diagnostic method. However, which radiotracer administration mode should be used is still controversial. This prospective study aimed to intra-individually compare the detection rates obtained...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2003-05, Vol.30 (5), p.651-656
Hauptverfasser: MAZA, Sofiane, VALENCIA, Ray, GEWORSKI, Lilli, ZANDER, Andreas, GUSKI, Hans, WINZER, Klaus J, MUNZ, Dieter L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 656
container_issue 5
container_start_page 651
container_title European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 30
creator MAZA, Sofiane
VALENCIA, Ray
GEWORSKI, Lilli
ZANDER, Andreas
GUSKI, Hans
WINZER, Klaus J
MUNZ, Dieter L
description The scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in early-stage breast cancer is a widely accepted diagnostic method. However, which radiotracer administration mode should be used is still controversial. This prospective study aimed to intra-individually compare the detection rates obtained after peritumoural versus subareolar injection with regard to SN number and localisation. Fifty-one women (age, 32-76 years) with breast cancer were investigated on two consecutive days. On day 1, 140-400 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was injected along the peripheral tumour margins. Static lymphoscintigrams of the axilla, thorax and neck were taken in various views 1 and 19 h p.i. On day 2, 10 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was injected subareolarly in the clock position of the tumour and dynamic and static scans were performed immediately. Thereafter, 30 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was administered peri-subareolarly and lymphoscintigrams were acquired in a dynamic and static manner. In 49/51 women, the different injection techniques disclosed the identical number and location of SNs in the axilla. In seven patients, the peritumoural injection detected additional SNs in the parasternal group. Axillary SNs were detected as early as 2-15 min following subareolar injection, both in the clock position and peri-subareolarly, as compared with about 1 h after peritumoural administration. Sixteen patients showed at least one tumour-positive SN, and nine also had tumour-positive non-SNs. One patient with a tumour-negative SN, visualised concordantly by both subareolar and peritumoural administration, demonstrated two metastatic non-SNs, yielding a false-negative rate of 5.9%. In conclusion, a simple subareolar injection in the clock position is sufficient for SN detection in breast cancer, if it is accepted that parasternal lymph node detection has no therapeutic consequences.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00259-003-1128-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73285123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73285123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7852d284b5c666b0e5cc10d38bdcf824ac5124c68c7171b8889e51dd4f6311443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc2KFTEQhRtRnHH0AdxIEHTXmqT_0u6GwT8Y0IWum3RSzWRIJ9dUcqGf0Ney2ntxwFUC9Z2qU3Wq6qXg7wTnw3vkXHZjzXlTCyFVvT2qLkUvxnrganz87z_wi-oZ4j3nQkk1Pq0uhOyJF-Ky-v0dkstljSVpz46QsCDDMusE0evEtF1dcJiTzi4GFheWwdwFyK6s9TiuLOgQTfQ-OsuWmBhCyC6AZ35bD3csRAvMAon-6l1gcwKNmRkdDKQP7JDAO5qh08YSYPEZ9ymaChEPu-wIJCMDtQvWHZ0tZNTE9aB3T1TEXOz2vHqyaI_w4vxeVT8_ffxx86W-_fb56831bW2ars31oDpppWrnzvR9P3PojBHcNmq2ZlGy1aYTsjW9MoMYxKyUGqET1rZL3wjRts1V9fbUl-z9KoB5Wh0a8F4HiAWnoZGKWjQEvv4PvKcbB_I2SdH2A5ejJEicIEPLYoJlOiS30ikmwac94ukU8UQRT3vE00aaV-fGZV7BPijOmRLw5gxoNNoviS7t8IFrh7GTvG_-AG3vtK4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>214670292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>MAZA, Sofiane ; VALENCIA, Ray ; GEWORSKI, Lilli ; ZANDER, Andreas ; GUSKI, Hans ; WINZER, Klaus J ; MUNZ, Dieter L</creator><creatorcontrib>MAZA, Sofiane ; VALENCIA, Ray ; GEWORSKI, Lilli ; ZANDER, Andreas ; GUSKI, Hans ; WINZER, Klaus J ; MUNZ, Dieter L</creatorcontrib><description>The scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in early-stage breast cancer is a widely accepted diagnostic method. However, which radiotracer administration mode should be used is still controversial. This prospective study aimed to intra-individually compare the detection rates obtained after peritumoural versus subareolar injection with regard to SN number and localisation. Fifty-one women (age, 32-76 years) with breast cancer were investigated on two consecutive days. On day 1, 140-400 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was injected along the peripheral tumour margins. Static lymphoscintigrams of the axilla, thorax and neck were taken in various views 1 and 19 h p.i. On day 2, 10 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was injected subareolarly in the clock position of the tumour and dynamic and static scans were performed immediately. Thereafter, 30 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was administered peri-subareolarly and lymphoscintigrams were acquired in a dynamic and static manner. In 49/51 women, the different injection techniques disclosed the identical number and location of SNs in the axilla. In seven patients, the peritumoural injection detected additional SNs in the parasternal group. Axillary SNs were detected as early as 2-15 min following subareolar injection, both in the clock position and peri-subareolarly, as compared with about 1 h after peritumoural administration. Sixteen patients showed at least one tumour-positive SN, and nine also had tumour-positive non-SNs. One patient with a tumour-negative SN, visualised concordantly by both subareolar and peritumoural administration, demonstrated two metastatic non-SNs, yielding a false-negative rate of 5.9%. In conclusion, a simple subareolar injection in the clock position is sufficient for SN detection in breast cancer, if it is accepted that parasternal lymph node detection has no therapeutic consequences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1619-7070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1619-7089</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1128-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12612811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Female ; Humans ; Injections - methods ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - pathology ; Lymphatic Metastasis ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Radiopharmaceuticals - administration &amp; dosage ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods ; Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin - administration &amp; dosage ; Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2003-05, Vol.30 (5), p.651-656</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7852d284b5c666b0e5cc10d38bdcf824ac5124c68c7171b8889e51dd4f6311443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7852d284b5c666b0e5cc10d38bdcf824ac5124c68c7171b8889e51dd4f6311443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14795206$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12612811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MAZA, Sofiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALENCIA, Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEWORSKI, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANDER, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSKI, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINZER, Klaus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNZ, Dieter L</creatorcontrib><title>Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study</title><title>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><description>The scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in early-stage breast cancer is a widely accepted diagnostic method. However, which radiotracer administration mode should be used is still controversial. This prospective study aimed to intra-individually compare the detection rates obtained after peritumoural versus subareolar injection with regard to SN number and localisation. Fifty-one women (age, 32-76 years) with breast cancer were investigated on two consecutive days. On day 1, 140-400 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was injected along the peripheral tumour margins. Static lymphoscintigrams of the axilla, thorax and neck were taken in various views 1 and 19 h p.i. On day 2, 10 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was injected subareolarly in the clock position of the tumour and dynamic and static scans were performed immediately. Thereafter, 30 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was administered peri-subareolarly and lymphoscintigrams were acquired in a dynamic and static manner. In 49/51 women, the different injection techniques disclosed the identical number and location of SNs in the axilla. In seven patients, the peritumoural injection detected additional SNs in the parasternal group. Axillary SNs were detected as early as 2-15 min following subareolar injection, both in the clock position and peri-subareolarly, as compared with about 1 h after peritumoural administration. Sixteen patients showed at least one tumour-positive SN, and nine also had tumour-positive non-SNs. One patient with a tumour-negative SN, visualised concordantly by both subareolar and peritumoural administration, demonstrated two metastatic non-SNs, yielding a false-negative rate of 5.9%. In conclusion, a simple subareolar injection in the clock position is sufficient for SN detection in breast cancer, if it is accepted that parasternal lymph node detection has no therapeutic consequences.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - pathology</subject><subject>Lymphatic Metastasis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Radiopharmaceuticals - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</subject><issn>1619-7070</issn><issn>1619-7089</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc2KFTEQhRtRnHH0AdxIEHTXmqT_0u6GwT8Y0IWum3RSzWRIJ9dUcqGf0Ney2ntxwFUC9Z2qU3Wq6qXg7wTnw3vkXHZjzXlTCyFVvT2qLkUvxnrganz87z_wi-oZ4j3nQkk1Pq0uhOyJF-Ky-v0dkstljSVpz46QsCDDMusE0evEtF1dcJiTzi4GFheWwdwFyK6s9TiuLOgQTfQ-OsuWmBhCyC6AZ35bD3csRAvMAon-6l1gcwKNmRkdDKQP7JDAO5qh08YSYPEZ9ymaChEPu-wIJCMDtQvWHZ0tZNTE9aB3T1TEXOz2vHqyaI_w4vxeVT8_ffxx86W-_fb56831bW2ars31oDpppWrnzvR9P3PojBHcNmq2ZlGy1aYTsjW9MoMYxKyUGqET1rZL3wjRts1V9fbUl-z9KoB5Wh0a8F4HiAWnoZGKWjQEvv4PvKcbB_I2SdH2A5ejJEicIEPLYoJlOiS30ikmwac94ukU8UQRT3vE00aaV-fGZV7BPijOmRLw5gxoNNoviS7t8IFrh7GTvG_-AG3vtK4</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>MAZA, Sofiane</creator><creator>VALENCIA, Ray</creator><creator>GEWORSKI, Lilli</creator><creator>ZANDER, Andreas</creator><creator>GUSKI, Hans</creator><creator>WINZER, Klaus J</creator><creator>MUNZ, Dieter L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study</title><author>MAZA, Sofiane ; VALENCIA, Ray ; GEWORSKI, Lilli ; ZANDER, Andreas ; GUSKI, Hans ; WINZER, Klaus J ; MUNZ, Dieter L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-7852d284b5c666b0e5cc10d38bdcf824ac5124c68c7171b8889e51dd4f6311443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - pathology</topic><topic>Lymphatic Metastasis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Radiopharmaceuticals - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MAZA, Sofiane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VALENCIA, Ray</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GEWORSKI, Lilli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ZANDER, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSKI, Hans</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WINZER, Klaus J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MUNZ, Dieter L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MAZA, Sofiane</au><au>VALENCIA, Ray</au><au>GEWORSKI, Lilli</au><au>ZANDER, Andreas</au><au>GUSKI, Hans</au><au>WINZER, Klaus J</au><au>MUNZ, Dieter L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>651</spage><epage>656</epage><pages>651-656</pages><issn>1619-7070</issn><eissn>1619-7089</eissn><abstract>The scintigraphic detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SNs) in early-stage breast cancer is a widely accepted diagnostic method. However, which radiotracer administration mode should be used is still controversial. This prospective study aimed to intra-individually compare the detection rates obtained after peritumoural versus subareolar injection with regard to SN number and localisation. Fifty-one women (age, 32-76 years) with breast cancer were investigated on two consecutive days. On day 1, 140-400 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid was injected along the peripheral tumour margins. Static lymphoscintigrams of the axilla, thorax and neck were taken in various views 1 and 19 h p.i. On day 2, 10 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was injected subareolarly in the clock position of the tumour and dynamic and static scans were performed immediately. Thereafter, 30 MBq (99m)Tc-nanocolloid was administered peri-subareolarly and lymphoscintigrams were acquired in a dynamic and static manner. In 49/51 women, the different injection techniques disclosed the identical number and location of SNs in the axilla. In seven patients, the peritumoural injection detected additional SNs in the parasternal group. Axillary SNs were detected as early as 2-15 min following subareolar injection, both in the clock position and peri-subareolarly, as compared with about 1 h after peritumoural administration. Sixteen patients showed at least one tumour-positive SN, and nine also had tumour-positive non-SNs. One patient with a tumour-negative SN, visualised concordantly by both subareolar and peritumoural administration, demonstrated two metastatic non-SNs, yielding a false-negative rate of 5.9%. In conclusion, a simple subareolar injection in the clock position is sufficient for SN detection in breast cancer, if it is accepted that parasternal lymph node detection has no therapeutic consequences.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12612811</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00259-003-1128-y</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1619-7070
ispartof European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2003-05, Vol.30 (5), p.651-656
issn 1619-7070
1619-7089
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73285123
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Female
Humans
Injections - methods
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - pathology
Lymphatic Metastasis
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Radiopharmaceuticals - administration & dosage
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy - methods
Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin - administration & dosage
Tomography, Emission-Computed - methods
title Peritumoural versus subareolar administration of technetium-99m nanocolloid for sentinel lymph node detection in breast cancer: preliminary results of a prospective intra-individual comparative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peritumoural%20versus%20subareolar%20administration%20of%20technetium-99m%20nanocolloid%20for%20sentinel%20lymph%20node%20detection%20in%20breast%20cancer:%20preliminary%20results%20of%20a%20prospective%20intra-individual%20comparative%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=MAZA,%20Sofiane&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=651&rft.epage=656&rft.pages=651-656&rft.issn=1619-7070&rft.eissn=1619-7089&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00259-003-1128-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73285123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=214670292&rft_id=info:pmid/12612811&rfr_iscdi=true