Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows
Background: A meniscal repair technique that combines the strength of vertical mattress sutures and the decreased tissue morbidity of an all-inside technique would be advantageous. Hypothesis: The FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System will provide load at failure, stiffness, and displacement equiva...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The American journal of sports medicine 2003-05, Vol.31 (3), p.374-378 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 378 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 374 |
| container_title | The American journal of sports medicine |
| container_volume | 31 |
| creator | Borden, Peter Nyland, John Caborn, David N. M. Pienkowski, David |
| description | Background: A meniscal repair technique that combines the strength of vertical mattress sutures and the decreased tissue morbidity of
an all-inside technique would be advantageous.
Hypothesis: The FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System will provide load at failure, stiffness, and displacement equivalent to that of
vertical mattress sutures and superior to that of Meniscus Arrows.
Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study.
Methods: After repair of a 2-cm vertical longitudinal medial meniscal lesion, three groups of six human cadaveric knees were biomechanically
tested in a random order on a servohydraulic device, and three groups of five specimens underwent cyclic loading.
Results: Specimens repaired with Meniscus Arrows had reduced load at failure, stiffness, and displacement, but there were no differences
between the FasT-Fix and vertical mattress suture methods. During cyclic loading, specimens repaired with two Meniscus Arrows
failed before test completion, whereas specimens repaired with two vertical mattress sutures (6.0 ± 3.7 mm) or with two FasT-Fix
implants (5.1 ± 1.4 mm) maintained fixation with comparable displacements.
Conclusions: The FasT-Fix provided load at failure, stiffness, and displacement comparable with that of vertical mattress sutures.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that the FasT-Fix may be preferable to Meniscus Arrows for meniscal repair with minimal associated tissue
morbidity. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/03635465030310030801 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73284727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A102946941</galeid><sage_id>10.1177_03635465030310030801</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A102946941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-7843353936100483c6731481a5730d3fefc6d7bba9b811523be8de9da90b9f443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkVGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0SCoG_VpEma5HEcHBV2WXBXX0Pa3k4ztM2YpMzOvzd1igsi7Evuy3dPzrkny14T_IEQIT5iWlLOSo4ppgSnV2LyJFsRzouc0pI_zVYzks_MRfYihD3GmIhSPs8uSCE4JoVaZadP1g1Qd2a0tenRxg0H421wI3Itih2grQl3-dbeo2sYbZiZ73Aw1qPbKU4e0O0pRBjQ0cYO_QQf_8hcmxg9hLBAAZmxWQSmgNbeu2N4mT1rTR_g1TIvsx_bz3ebr_nVzZdvm_VVXieLMReSUcqpomUKySStS0EJk8RwQXFDW2jrshFVZVQlCeEFrUA2oBqjcKVaxuhl9v6se_Du1wQh6iHZgL43I7gpaEELyUQhHgWJFKrgYlZ8-w-4d5MfUwhdEIElUYokKD9DO9ODtmPtxgj3sXZ9DzvQKeLmRq8JLhQrFZt5duZr70Lw0OqDt4PxJ02wngvX_ys8rb1ZvEzVAM3D0tJwAt4tgJnba70ZaxseOCbTzZRMHDlzwSR7fwM98vmi3dldd7QedBhM3ycrVJt9oERTTdPBfgO0J8s7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217081991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Borden, Peter ; Nyland, John ; Caborn, David N. M. ; Pienkowski, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Borden, Peter ; Nyland, John ; Caborn, David N. M. ; Pienkowski, David</creatorcontrib><description>Background: A meniscal repair technique that combines the strength of vertical mattress sutures and the decreased tissue morbidity of
an all-inside technique would be advantageous.
Hypothesis: The FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System will provide load at failure, stiffness, and displacement equivalent to that of
vertical mattress sutures and superior to that of Meniscus Arrows.
Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study.
Methods: After repair of a 2-cm vertical longitudinal medial meniscal lesion, three groups of six human cadaveric knees were biomechanically
tested in a random order on a servohydraulic device, and three groups of five specimens underwent cyclic loading.
Results: Specimens repaired with Meniscus Arrows had reduced load at failure, stiffness, and displacement, but there were no differences
between the FasT-Fix and vertical mattress suture methods. During cyclic loading, specimens repaired with two Meniscus Arrows
failed before test completion, whereas specimens repaired with two vertical mattress sutures (6.0 ± 3.7 mm) or with two FasT-Fix
implants (5.1 ± 1.4 mm) maintained fixation with comparable displacements.
Conclusions: The FasT-Fix provided load at failure, stiffness, and displacement comparable with that of vertical mattress sutures.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that the FasT-Fix may be preferable to Meniscus Arrows for meniscal repair with minimal associated tissue
morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03635465030310030801</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12750129</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJSMDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Cadaver ; Evaluation ; Female ; Humans ; Knee ; Knee injuries ; Male ; Medical procedures ; Medical sciences ; Menisci, Tibial - surgery ; Methods ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedic surgery ; Sports injuries ; Sports medicine ; Stress, Mechanical ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Suture Techniques ; Suturing ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments ; Tissues</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2003-05, Vol.31 (3), p.374-378</ispartof><rights>2003 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Journal of Sports Medicine May/Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-7843353936100483c6731481a5730d3fefc6d7bba9b811523be8de9da90b9f443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-7843353936100483c6731481a5730d3fefc6d7bba9b811523be8de9da90b9f443</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03635465030310030801$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03635465030310030801$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14852398$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12750129$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borden, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caborn, David N. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienkowski, David</creatorcontrib><title>Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: A meniscal repair technique that combines the strength of vertical mattress sutures and the decreased tissue morbidity of
an all-inside technique would be advantageous.
Hypothesis: The FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System will provide load at failure, stiffness, and displacement equivalent to that of
vertical mattress sutures and superior to that of Meniscus Arrows.
Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study.
Methods: After repair of a 2-cm vertical longitudinal medial meniscal lesion, three groups of six human cadaveric knees were biomechanically
tested in a random order on a servohydraulic device, and three groups of five specimens underwent cyclic loading.
Results: Specimens repaired with Meniscus Arrows had reduced load at failure, stiffness, and displacement, but there were no differences
between the FasT-Fix and vertical mattress suture methods. During cyclic loading, specimens repaired with two Meniscus Arrows
failed before test completion, whereas specimens repaired with two vertical mattress sutures (6.0 ± 3.7 mm) or with two FasT-Fix
implants (5.1 ± 1.4 mm) maintained fixation with comparable displacements.
Conclusions: The FasT-Fix provided load at failure, stiffness, and displacement comparable with that of vertical mattress sutures.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that the FasT-Fix may be preferable to Meniscus Arrows for meniscal repair with minimal associated tissue
morbidity.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee injuries</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical procedures</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Menisci, Tibial - surgery</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedic surgery</subject><subject>Sports injuries</subject><subject>Sports medicine</subject><subject>Stress, Mechanical</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Suture Techniques</subject><subject>Suturing</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkVGL1DAUhYso7rj6D0SCoG_VpEma5HEcHBV2WXBXX0Pa3k4ztM2YpMzOvzd1igsi7Evuy3dPzrkny14T_IEQIT5iWlLOSo4ppgSnV2LyJFsRzouc0pI_zVYzks_MRfYihD3GmIhSPs8uSCE4JoVaZadP1g1Qd2a0tenRxg0H421wI3Itih2grQl3-dbeo2sYbZiZ73Aw1qPbKU4e0O0pRBjQ0cYO_QQf_8hcmxg9hLBAAZmxWQSmgNbeu2N4mT1rTR_g1TIvsx_bz3ebr_nVzZdvm_VVXieLMReSUcqpomUKySStS0EJk8RwQXFDW2jrshFVZVQlCeEFrUA2oBqjcKVaxuhl9v6se_Du1wQh6iHZgL43I7gpaEELyUQhHgWJFKrgYlZ8-w-4d5MfUwhdEIElUYokKD9DO9ODtmPtxgj3sXZ9DzvQKeLmRq8JLhQrFZt5duZr70Lw0OqDt4PxJ02wngvX_ys8rb1ZvEzVAM3D0tJwAt4tgJnba70ZaxseOCbTzZRMHDlzwSR7fwM98vmi3dldd7QedBhM3ycrVJt9oERTTdPBfgO0J8s7</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Borden, Peter</creator><creator>Nyland, John</creator><creator>Caborn, David N. M.</creator><creator>Pienkowski, David</creator><general>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows</title><author>Borden, Peter ; Nyland, John ; Caborn, David N. M. ; Pienkowski, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-7843353936100483c6731481a5730d3fefc6d7bba9b811523be8de9da90b9f443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee injuries</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical procedures</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Menisci, Tibial - surgery</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedic surgery</topic><topic>Sports injuries</topic><topic>Sports medicine</topic><topic>Stress, Mechanical</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Suture Techniques</topic><topic>Suturing</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borden, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nyland, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caborn, David N. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pienkowski, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borden, Peter</au><au>Nyland, John</au><au>Caborn, David N. M.</au><au>Pienkowski, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>378</epage><pages>374-378</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><coden>AJSMDO</coden><abstract>Background: A meniscal repair technique that combines the strength of vertical mattress sutures and the decreased tissue morbidity of
an all-inside technique would be advantageous.
Hypothesis: The FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System will provide load at failure, stiffness, and displacement equivalent to that of
vertical mattress sutures and superior to that of Meniscus Arrows.
Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study.
Methods: After repair of a 2-cm vertical longitudinal medial meniscal lesion, three groups of six human cadaveric knees were biomechanically
tested in a random order on a servohydraulic device, and three groups of five specimens underwent cyclic loading.
Results: Specimens repaired with Meniscus Arrows had reduced load at failure, stiffness, and displacement, but there were no differences
between the FasT-Fix and vertical mattress suture methods. During cyclic loading, specimens repaired with two Meniscus Arrows
failed before test completion, whereas specimens repaired with two vertical mattress sutures (6.0 ± 3.7 mm) or with two FasT-Fix
implants (5.1 ± 1.4 mm) maintained fixation with comparable displacements.
Conclusions: The FasT-Fix provided load at failure, stiffness, and displacement comparable with that of vertical mattress sutures.
Clinical Relevance: The results suggest that the FasT-Fix may be preferable to Meniscus Arrows for meniscal repair with minimal associated tissue
morbidity.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine</pub><pmid>12750129</pmid><doi>10.1177/03635465030310030801</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0363-5465 |
| ispartof | The American journal of sports medicine, 2003-05, Vol.31 (3), p.374-378 |
| issn | 0363-5465 1552-3365 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73284727 |
| source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Analysis of Variance Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Cadaver Evaluation Female Humans Knee Knee injuries Male Medical procedures Medical sciences Menisci, Tibial - surgery Methods Middle Aged Orthopedic surgery Sports injuries Sports medicine Stress, Mechanical Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Suture Techniques Suturing Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments Tissues |
| title | Biomechanical Comparison of the FasT-Fix Meniscal Repair Suture System with Vertical Mattress Sutures and Meniscus Arrows |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T17%3A09%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biomechanical%20Comparison%20of%20the%20FasT-Fix%20Meniscal%20Repair%20Suture%20System%20with%20Vertical%20Mattress%20Sutures%20and%20Meniscus%20Arrows&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Borden,%20Peter&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=378&rft.pages=374-378&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft.coden=AJSMDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03635465030310030801&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA102946941%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217081991&rft_id=info:pmid/12750129&rft_galeid=A102946941&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03635465030310030801&rfr_iscdi=true |