Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme

Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QA...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurology 2003-05, Vol.250 (5), p.561-568
Hauptverfasser: MUACEVIC, Alexander, W.KRETH, Friedrich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 568
container_issue 5
container_start_page 561
container_title Journal of neurology
container_volume 250
creator MUACEVIC, Alexander
W.KRETH, Friedrich
description Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QAS data after standard treatment were checked for concordant/discordant findings. Their usefulness for estimation of treatment effects and treatment strategies was then evaluated. 123 patients >or= 65 years of age with a supratentorial, de novo glioblastoma were included in the current retrospective report. Microsurgery plus radiation therapy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) was performed in 58 patients, and radiation therapy alone after stereotactic biopsy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) in 65 patients. The functional status of each patient was scored when joining the study and at every follow-up using 15 selected neurological signs and symptoms (NSSs). Gradation of severity of each NSS was performed with subjective weights. Survival time of each patient was adjusted according to any changes in these NSSs to become the Quality Time (Q-TIME). Time intervals spent with side effects of the treatment (TOX) were subtracted from Q-TIME to become the patient's QAS (QAS = Q-TIME-TOX). Prognostic factors for both survival and QAS were obtained from the Cox model. Overall survival and QAS were 24 weeks and 10.5 weeks, respectively. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 5.2 % and 1.7 % in the surgery group and 1.5 % and 1.5 % in the biopsy group, respectively (p > 0.05). Tumor resection gained favorable prognostic importance for patients with midline shift in terms of both survival and QAS (p < 0.0001). Otherwise, radiation therapy alone was as effective as surgery plus radiation therapy (concordant finding). A pretreatment Karnofsky Score (KPS) < 70 was an unfavorable predictor for QAS (p < 0.002) but not for survival (discordant finding). Median QAS for patients with a pretreatment KPS < 70 was only 10 weeks. Age did not reach prognostic relevance. The dramatic decrease of QAS as compared with survival indicates extremely limited posttreatment improvement and/or rapid deterioration of the neurological score after standard treatment for the older subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme. Supportive treatment should be considered for patients with a pretreatment KPS < 70.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00415-003-1036-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73275965</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73275965</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5096c3b7ee69ca127809f2895df9b84096679d66811b566f8b1a32fff94d772c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV1rFDEYhYModq3-AG8kCPUuNpl8TS6lWBUKIrTXIZMPmyUzs-ajdv31Zt2FglcvnPOclwMHgLcEfyQYy8uCMSMcYUwRwVSgx2dgQxgdEGFcPQcbTBlGnHJ2Bl6VssUYj914Cc7IIKmQlG_Anx_NpFj3yLhtK9U7WFp-iA8mQROqz7C2ec0w--JtjesCzeIuD4Jx0fwT6r3PZreHoas-OZ_THu665Zda4O9Y7-HPFNcpmVLX2cC5pRo7O_vX4EUwqfg3p3sO7q4_3159RTffv3y7-nSDbG9eEcdKWDpJ74WypjcfsQrDqLgLahpZd4VUToiRkIkLEcaJGDqEEBRzUg6WnoMPx7-7vP5qvlQ9x2J9Smbxayta0kFyJXgH3_8HbteWl95ND2QkTPKRdogcIZvXUrIPepfjbPJeE6wPq-jjKrqvog-r6MeeeXd63KbZu6fEaYYOXJwAU6xJIZvFxvLEMSk5GzD9C-mJlz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218147583</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>MUACEVIC, Alexander ; W.KRETH, Friedrich</creator><creatorcontrib>MUACEVIC, Alexander ; W.KRETH, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><description>Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QAS data after standard treatment were checked for concordant/discordant findings. Their usefulness for estimation of treatment effects and treatment strategies was then evaluated. 123 patients &gt;or= 65 years of age with a supratentorial, de novo glioblastoma were included in the current retrospective report. Microsurgery plus radiation therapy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) was performed in 58 patients, and radiation therapy alone after stereotactic biopsy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) in 65 patients. The functional status of each patient was scored when joining the study and at every follow-up using 15 selected neurological signs and symptoms (NSSs). Gradation of severity of each NSS was performed with subjective weights. Survival time of each patient was adjusted according to any changes in these NSSs to become the Quality Time (Q-TIME). Time intervals spent with side effects of the treatment (TOX) were subtracted from Q-TIME to become the patient's QAS (QAS = Q-TIME-TOX). Prognostic factors for both survival and QAS were obtained from the Cox model. Overall survival and QAS were 24 weeks and 10.5 weeks, respectively. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 5.2 % and 1.7 % in the surgery group and 1.5 % and 1.5 % in the biopsy group, respectively (p &gt; 0.05). Tumor resection gained favorable prognostic importance for patients with midline shift in terms of both survival and QAS (p &lt; 0.0001). Otherwise, radiation therapy alone was as effective as surgery plus radiation therapy (concordant finding). A pretreatment Karnofsky Score (KPS) &lt; 70 was an unfavorable predictor for QAS (p &lt; 0.002) but not for survival (discordant finding). Median QAS for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70 was only 10 weeks. Age did not reach prognostic relevance. The dramatic decrease of QAS as compared with survival indicates extremely limited posttreatment improvement and/or rapid deterioration of the neurological score after standard treatment for the older subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme. Supportive treatment should be considered for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5354</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00415-003-1036-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12736735</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JNRYA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biopsy ; Female ; Glioblastoma - diagnosis ; Glioblastoma - radiotherapy ; Glioblastoma - surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical sciences ; Multivariate Analysis ; Neurology ; Patients ; Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Radiation therapy ; Retrospective Studies ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery ; Surgery ; Survival analysis ; Survival Rate ; Toxicity ; Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</subject><ispartof>Journal of neurology, 2003-05, Vol.250 (5), p.561-568</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Springer-Verlag 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5096c3b7ee69ca127809f2895df9b84096679d66811b566f8b1a32fff94d772c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14775420$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12736735$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>MUACEVIC, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.KRETH, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><title>Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme</title><title>Journal of neurology</title><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><description>Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QAS data after standard treatment were checked for concordant/discordant findings. Their usefulness for estimation of treatment effects and treatment strategies was then evaluated. 123 patients &gt;or= 65 years of age with a supratentorial, de novo glioblastoma were included in the current retrospective report. Microsurgery plus radiation therapy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) was performed in 58 patients, and radiation therapy alone after stereotactic biopsy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) in 65 patients. The functional status of each patient was scored when joining the study and at every follow-up using 15 selected neurological signs and symptoms (NSSs). Gradation of severity of each NSS was performed with subjective weights. Survival time of each patient was adjusted according to any changes in these NSSs to become the Quality Time (Q-TIME). Time intervals spent with side effects of the treatment (TOX) were subtracted from Q-TIME to become the patient's QAS (QAS = Q-TIME-TOX). Prognostic factors for both survival and QAS were obtained from the Cox model. Overall survival and QAS were 24 weeks and 10.5 weeks, respectively. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 5.2 % and 1.7 % in the surgery group and 1.5 % and 1.5 % in the biopsy group, respectively (p &gt; 0.05). Tumor resection gained favorable prognostic importance for patients with midline shift in terms of both survival and QAS (p &lt; 0.0001). Otherwise, radiation therapy alone was as effective as surgery plus radiation therapy (concordant finding). A pretreatment Karnofsky Score (KPS) &lt; 70 was an unfavorable predictor for QAS (p &lt; 0.002) but not for survival (discordant finding). Median QAS for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70 was only 10 weeks. Age did not reach prognostic relevance. The dramatic decrease of QAS as compared with survival indicates extremely limited posttreatment improvement and/or rapid deterioration of the neurological score after standard treatment for the older subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme. Supportive treatment should be considered for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Glioblastoma - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</subject><issn>0340-5354</issn><issn>1432-1459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV1rFDEYhYModq3-AG8kCPUuNpl8TS6lWBUKIrTXIZMPmyUzs-ajdv31Zt2FglcvnPOclwMHgLcEfyQYy8uCMSMcYUwRwVSgx2dgQxgdEGFcPQcbTBlGnHJ2Bl6VssUYj914Cc7IIKmQlG_Anx_NpFj3yLhtK9U7WFp-iA8mQROqz7C2ec0w--JtjesCzeIuD4Jx0fwT6r3PZreHoas-OZ_THu665Zda4O9Y7-HPFNcpmVLX2cC5pRo7O_vX4EUwqfg3p3sO7q4_3159RTffv3y7-nSDbG9eEcdKWDpJ74WypjcfsQrDqLgLahpZd4VUToiRkIkLEcaJGDqEEBRzUg6WnoMPx7-7vP5qvlQ9x2J9Smbxayta0kFyJXgH3_8HbteWl95ND2QkTPKRdogcIZvXUrIPepfjbPJeE6wPq-jjKrqvog-r6MeeeXd63KbZu6fEaYYOXJwAU6xJIZvFxvLEMSk5GzD9C-mJlz4</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>MUACEVIC, Alexander</creator><creator>W.KRETH, Friedrich</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme</title><author>MUACEVIC, Alexander ; W.KRETH, Friedrich</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-5096c3b7ee69ca127809f2895df9b84096679d66811b566f8b1a32fff94d772c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Glioblastoma - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Patients - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Quality-Adjusted Life Years</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>MUACEVIC, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>W.KRETH, Friedrich</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>MUACEVIC, Alexander</au><au>W.KRETH, Friedrich</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neurology</jtitle><addtitle>J Neurol</addtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>250</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>561</spage><epage>568</epage><pages>561-568</pages><issn>0340-5354</issn><eissn>1432-1459</eissn><coden>JNRYA9</coden><abstract>Prognostic factors are poorly defined for the elderly subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme and have been exclusively related to conventional survival analysis. In this study an additional quality adjusted survival analysis (QAS) was performed. The prognostic evaluation of both survival- and QAS data after standard treatment were checked for concordant/discordant findings. Their usefulness for estimation of treatment effects and treatment strategies was then evaluated. 123 patients &gt;or= 65 years of age with a supratentorial, de novo glioblastoma were included in the current retrospective report. Microsurgery plus radiation therapy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) was performed in 58 patients, and radiation therapy alone after stereotactic biopsy (planned tumor dose: 60 Gy) in 65 patients. The functional status of each patient was scored when joining the study and at every follow-up using 15 selected neurological signs and symptoms (NSSs). Gradation of severity of each NSS was performed with subjective weights. Survival time of each patient was adjusted according to any changes in these NSSs to become the Quality Time (Q-TIME). Time intervals spent with side effects of the treatment (TOX) were subtracted from Q-TIME to become the patient's QAS (QAS = Q-TIME-TOX). Prognostic factors for both survival and QAS were obtained from the Cox model. Overall survival and QAS were 24 weeks and 10.5 weeks, respectively. Perioperative morbidity and mortality were 5.2 % and 1.7 % in the surgery group and 1.5 % and 1.5 % in the biopsy group, respectively (p &gt; 0.05). Tumor resection gained favorable prognostic importance for patients with midline shift in terms of both survival and QAS (p &lt; 0.0001). Otherwise, radiation therapy alone was as effective as surgery plus radiation therapy (concordant finding). A pretreatment Karnofsky Score (KPS) &lt; 70 was an unfavorable predictor for QAS (p &lt; 0.002) but not for survival (discordant finding). Median QAS for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70 was only 10 weeks. Age did not reach prognostic relevance. The dramatic decrease of QAS as compared with survival indicates extremely limited posttreatment improvement and/or rapid deterioration of the neurological score after standard treatment for the older subpopulation with glioblastoma multiforme. Supportive treatment should be considered for patients with a pretreatment KPS &lt; 70.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>12736735</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00415-003-1036-x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5354
ispartof Journal of neurology, 2003-05, Vol.250 (5), p.561-568
issn 0340-5354
1432-1459
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73275965
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Aged
Biological and medical sciences
Biopsy
Female
Glioblastoma - diagnosis
Glioblastoma - radiotherapy
Glioblastoma - surgery
Humans
Male
Medical prognosis
Medical sciences
Multivariate Analysis
Neurology
Patients
Patients - statistics & numerical data
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Radiation therapy
Retrospective Studies
Supratentorial Neoplasms - diagnosis
Supratentorial Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Supratentorial Neoplasms - surgery
Surgery
Survival analysis
Survival Rate
Toxicity
Tumors of the nervous system. Phacomatoses
title Quality-adjusted survival after tumor resection and/or radiation therapy for elderly patients with glioblastoma multiforme
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A47%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality-adjusted%20survival%20after%20tumor%20resection%20and/or%20radiation%20therapy%20for%20elderly%20patients%20with%20glioblastoma%20multiforme&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neurology&rft.au=MUACEVIC,%20Alexander&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=250&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=561&rft.epage=568&rft.pages=561-568&rft.issn=0340-5354&rft.eissn=1432-1459&rft.coden=JNRYA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00415-003-1036-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73275965%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218147583&rft_id=info:pmid/12736735&rfr_iscdi=true