Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients

Objectives: to evaluate the performance of hospitals using eight indicators designed to assess prescribing practice in medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Design: local coalition teams were invited to collect cross‐sectional prescribing and clinical data on 100 consecutive medical in‐patients aged ≥...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Age and ageing 2003-05, Vol.32 (3), p.292-298
Hauptverfasser: Batty, Gwenno M., Grant, Robert L., Aggarwal, Reena, Lowe, Derek, Potter, Jonathon M., Pearson, Michael G., Jackson, Stephen H. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 3
container_start_page 292
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 32
creator Batty, Gwenno M.
Grant, Robert L.
Aggarwal, Reena
Lowe, Derek
Potter, Jonathon M.
Pearson, Michael G.
Jackson, Stephen H. D.
description Objectives: to evaluate the performance of hospitals using eight indicators designed to assess prescribing practice in medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Design: local coalition teams were invited to collect cross‐sectional prescribing and clinical data on 100 consecutive medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years during a specific week in April 1999. Setting: 102 hospitals across England. Participants: all NHS Trust hospitals in Wales and England were invited to participate in the study. Main outcome measures: the performance and inter‐hospital variation of hospitals in eight indicators of prescribing. Also, the age‐related appropriate use of anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, of aspirin in angina and of benzodiazepines. Results: data were collected on 9,979 patients prescribed 70,458 medications. The number of hospitals achieving the prescribing goal for the indicators varied between 0 and 70. Frequency of administration instructions with ‘as required’ prescriptions were documented on 60% (10,403/17,258) of occasions. Generic (or acceptable proprietary) names were used for 84% (58,953/70,458) medications, 50% (4,870/9,778) of patients had documentation of allergy status on the drug chart and 23% (1,380/6,060) of patients had the potential risk of exceeding the maximum recommended dosage (4 g/24 h) of paracetamol. Long‐acting hypoglycaemic drugs were prescribed to 50 patients. Anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation were used appropriately for 53% (805/1,518) of patients, aspirin was used appropriately in angina for 90% (952/1,052) of patients and benzodiazepines were used appropriately for 49% (824/1,689) of patients. For the latter three indicators, the appropriate use of medications declined from 60% to 44%, 95% to 85% and 53% to 44% in patients aged ≥85 years compared with those aged 65–74 years. Conclusions: prescribing indicators were effective in evaluating the performance of 102 hospitals on prescribing practice to medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients is sub‐optimal but targets were achieved by some hospitals. This should inspire those hospitals not achieving high standards to improve their performance. The higher level of inappropriate prescribing with increasing age is unacceptable.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/32.3.292
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73254816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A102657633</galeid><sourcerecordid>A102657633</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cdd5fce2f7a18eb9ef2d707f0193464421cb64d6e9bf945b30268116bf9214413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS1URENhza6aVXeT-N_jZRW1lKpSF1ApYmN5PHeCW2cmtT1Ss-MReEaeBEeJqFixsq_8nXOPfBD6RPCcYM0Wdg1-WC8YnbM51fQNmhEum5o2jJ-gGcaY1lhRfYrep_RYRiIIfYdOCVUUSyJmyD2kYlBtIyQXfbu_-6HzzuYxpiqP1QZsmiJU-QdUz5MNPu-qsf9HUCgIHcSwK_ReG4rH75-_tjZ7GHL6gN72NiT4eDzP0MP11bflTX13__nL8vKudpyTXLuuE70D2itLGmg19LRTWPWYaMYl55S4VvJOgm57zUXLMJUNIbJMlBQHdoYuDr7bOD5PkLLZ-OQgBDvAOCWjGBW8IfK_oFBEaqFVAesDuLYBjB_cOGR4yW4MAdZgSvrlvbkkJYhQkrHCLw68i2NKEXqzjX5j484QbPaFmUNhhlHDTCmsKM6PUaa2fN4rf2zoNYJPZfXfdxufjFRMCXOz-m5u8deVXonG3LI_DJiizg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>57169597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Batty, Gwenno M. ; Grant, Robert L. ; Aggarwal, Reena ; Lowe, Derek ; Potter, Jonathon M. ; Pearson, Michael G. ; Jackson, Stephen H. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Batty, Gwenno M. ; Grant, Robert L. ; Aggarwal, Reena ; Lowe, Derek ; Potter, Jonathon M. ; Pearson, Michael G. ; Jackson, Stephen H. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: to evaluate the performance of hospitals using eight indicators designed to assess prescribing practice in medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Design: local coalition teams were invited to collect cross‐sectional prescribing and clinical data on 100 consecutive medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years during a specific week in April 1999. Setting: 102 hospitals across England. Participants: all NHS Trust hospitals in Wales and England were invited to participate in the study. Main outcome measures: the performance and inter‐hospital variation of hospitals in eight indicators of prescribing. Also, the age‐related appropriate use of anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, of aspirin in angina and of benzodiazepines. Results: data were collected on 9,979 patients prescribed 70,458 medications. The number of hospitals achieving the prescribing goal for the indicators varied between 0 and 70. Frequency of administration instructions with ‘as required’ prescriptions were documented on 60% (10,403/17,258) of occasions. Generic (or acceptable proprietary) names were used for 84% (58,953/70,458) medications, 50% (4,870/9,778) of patients had documentation of allergy status on the drug chart and 23% (1,380/6,060) of patients had the potential risk of exceeding the maximum recommended dosage (4 g/24 h) of paracetamol. Long‐acting hypoglycaemic drugs were prescribed to 50 patients. Anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation were used appropriately for 53% (805/1,518) of patients, aspirin was used appropriately in angina for 90% (952/1,052) of patients and benzodiazepines were used appropriately for 49% (824/1,689) of patients. For the latter three indicators, the appropriate use of medications declined from 60% to 44%, 95% to 85% and 53% to 44% in patients aged ≥85 years compared with those aged 65–74 years. Conclusions: prescribing indicators were effective in evaluating the performance of 102 hospitals on prescribing practice to medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients is sub‐optimal but targets were achieved by some hospitals. This should inspire those hospitals not achieving high standards to improve their performance. The higher level of inappropriate prescribing with increasing age is unacceptable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/32.3.292</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12720615</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged patients ; Aged, 80 and over ; Appropriateness ; Care and treatment ; Company business management ; Drug Prescriptions - standards ; Drug Utilization - standards ; Drugs ; Elderly patients ; Elderly people ; England ; England and Wales ; Evaluation ; Female ; Governance ; Hospitals ; Humans ; indicators ; Inpatients ; Male ; Medical care ; Medical care quality ; Medical treatment ; Prescribing ; Prescriptions (Drugs) ; Professional Practice - standards ; Quality management</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2003-05, Vol.32 (3), p.292-298</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cdd5fce2f7a18eb9ef2d707f0193464421cb64d6e9bf945b30268116bf9214413</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12720615$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batty, Gwenno M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Reena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Jonathon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Stephen H. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Objectives: to evaluate the performance of hospitals using eight indicators designed to assess prescribing practice in medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Design: local coalition teams were invited to collect cross‐sectional prescribing and clinical data on 100 consecutive medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years during a specific week in April 1999. Setting: 102 hospitals across England. Participants: all NHS Trust hospitals in Wales and England were invited to participate in the study. Main outcome measures: the performance and inter‐hospital variation of hospitals in eight indicators of prescribing. Also, the age‐related appropriate use of anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, of aspirin in angina and of benzodiazepines. Results: data were collected on 9,979 patients prescribed 70,458 medications. The number of hospitals achieving the prescribing goal for the indicators varied between 0 and 70. Frequency of administration instructions with ‘as required’ prescriptions were documented on 60% (10,403/17,258) of occasions. Generic (or acceptable proprietary) names were used for 84% (58,953/70,458) medications, 50% (4,870/9,778) of patients had documentation of allergy status on the drug chart and 23% (1,380/6,060) of patients had the potential risk of exceeding the maximum recommended dosage (4 g/24 h) of paracetamol. Long‐acting hypoglycaemic drugs were prescribed to 50 patients. Anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation were used appropriately for 53% (805/1,518) of patients, aspirin was used appropriately in angina for 90% (952/1,052) of patients and benzodiazepines were used appropriately for 49% (824/1,689) of patients. For the latter three indicators, the appropriate use of medications declined from 60% to 44%, 95% to 85% and 53% to 44% in patients aged ≥85 years compared with those aged 65–74 years. Conclusions: prescribing indicators were effective in evaluating the performance of 102 hospitals on prescribing practice to medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients is sub‐optimal but targets were achieved by some hospitals. This should inspire those hospitals not achieving high standards to improve their performance. The higher level of inappropriate prescribing with increasing age is unacceptable.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged patients</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Appropriateness</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions - standards</subject><subject>Drug Utilization - standards</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Elderly patients</subject><subject>Elderly people</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>England and Wales</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>indicators</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Prescribing</subject><subject>Prescriptions (Drugs)</subject><subject>Professional Practice - standards</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS1URENhza6aVXeT-N_jZRW1lKpSF1ApYmN5PHeCW2cmtT1Ss-MReEaeBEeJqFixsq_8nXOPfBD6RPCcYM0Wdg1-WC8YnbM51fQNmhEum5o2jJ-gGcaY1lhRfYrep_RYRiIIfYdOCVUUSyJmyD2kYlBtIyQXfbu_-6HzzuYxpiqP1QZsmiJU-QdUz5MNPu-qsf9HUCgIHcSwK_ReG4rH75-_tjZ7GHL6gN72NiT4eDzP0MP11bflTX13__nL8vKudpyTXLuuE70D2itLGmg19LRTWPWYaMYl55S4VvJOgm57zUXLMJUNIbJMlBQHdoYuDr7bOD5PkLLZ-OQgBDvAOCWjGBW8IfK_oFBEaqFVAesDuLYBjB_cOGR4yW4MAdZgSvrlvbkkJYhQkrHCLw68i2NKEXqzjX5j484QbPaFmUNhhlHDTCmsKM6PUaa2fN4rf2zoNYJPZfXfdxufjFRMCXOz-m5u8deVXonG3LI_DJiizg</recordid><startdate>200305</startdate><enddate>200305</enddate><creator>Batty, Gwenno M.</creator><creator>Grant, Robert L.</creator><creator>Aggarwal, Reena</creator><creator>Lowe, Derek</creator><creator>Potter, Jonathon M.</creator><creator>Pearson, Michael G.</creator><creator>Jackson, Stephen H. D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200305</creationdate><title>Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients</title><author>Batty, Gwenno M. ; Grant, Robert L. ; Aggarwal, Reena ; Lowe, Derek ; Potter, Jonathon M. ; Pearson, Michael G. ; Jackson, Stephen H. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-cdd5fce2f7a18eb9ef2d707f0193464421cb64d6e9bf945b30268116bf9214413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged patients</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Appropriateness</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions - standards</topic><topic>Drug Utilization - standards</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Elderly patients</topic><topic>Elderly people</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>England and Wales</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>indicators</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Prescribing</topic><topic>Prescriptions (Drugs)</topic><topic>Professional Practice - standards</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batty, Gwenno M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grant, Robert L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, Reena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lowe, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potter, Jonathon M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Stephen H. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batty, Gwenno M.</au><au>Grant, Robert L.</au><au>Aggarwal, Reena</au><au>Lowe, Derek</au><au>Potter, Jonathon M.</au><au>Pearson, Michael G.</au><au>Jackson, Stephen H. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2003-05</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>292</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>292-298</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract>Objectives: to evaluate the performance of hospitals using eight indicators designed to assess prescribing practice in medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Design: local coalition teams were invited to collect cross‐sectional prescribing and clinical data on 100 consecutive medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years during a specific week in April 1999. Setting: 102 hospitals across England. Participants: all NHS Trust hospitals in Wales and England were invited to participate in the study. Main outcome measures: the performance and inter‐hospital variation of hospitals in eight indicators of prescribing. Also, the age‐related appropriate use of anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation, of aspirin in angina and of benzodiazepines. Results: data were collected on 9,979 patients prescribed 70,458 medications. The number of hospitals achieving the prescribing goal for the indicators varied between 0 and 70. Frequency of administration instructions with ‘as required’ prescriptions were documented on 60% (10,403/17,258) of occasions. Generic (or acceptable proprietary) names were used for 84% (58,953/70,458) medications, 50% (4,870/9,778) of patients had documentation of allergy status on the drug chart and 23% (1,380/6,060) of patients had the potential risk of exceeding the maximum recommended dosage (4 g/24 h) of paracetamol. Long‐acting hypoglycaemic drugs were prescribed to 50 patients. Anti‐thrombotic stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation were used appropriately for 53% (805/1,518) of patients, aspirin was used appropriately in angina for 90% (952/1,052) of patients and benzodiazepines were used appropriately for 49% (824/1,689) of patients. For the latter three indicators, the appropriate use of medications declined from 60% to 44%, 95% to 85% and 53% to 44% in patients aged ≥85 years compared with those aged 65–74 years. Conclusions: prescribing indicators were effective in evaluating the performance of 102 hospitals on prescribing practice to medical in‐patients aged ≥65 years. Prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients is sub‐optimal but targets were achieved by some hospitals. This should inspire those hospitals not achieving high standards to improve their performance. The higher level of inappropriate prescribing with increasing age is unacceptable.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>12720615</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/32.3.292</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2003-05, Vol.32 (3), p.292-298
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73254816
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); MEDLINE; Oxford Journals - Connect here FIRST to enable access; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged patients
Aged, 80 and over
Appropriateness
Care and treatment
Company business management
Drug Prescriptions - standards
Drug Utilization - standards
Drugs
Elderly patients
Elderly people
England
England and Wales
Evaluation
Female
Governance
Hospitals
Humans
indicators
Inpatients
Male
Medical care
Medical care quality
Medical treatment
Prescribing
Prescriptions (Drugs)
Professional Practice - standards
Quality management
title Using prescribing indicators to measure the quality of prescribing to elderly medical in‐patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T18%3A07%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20prescribing%20indicators%20to%20measure%20the%20quality%20of%20prescribing%20to%20elderly%20medical%20in%E2%80%90patients&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Batty,%20Gwenno%20M.&rft.date=2003-05&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=292&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=292-298&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/32.3.292&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA102657633%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=57169597&rft_id=info:pmid/12720615&rft_galeid=A102657633&rfr_iscdi=true