The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy
A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994–2001. These...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vaccine 2003-06, Vol.21 (19), p.2541-2547 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2547 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 2541 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Chapman, Rachel S. Cross, Kenneth W. Fleming, Douglas M. |
description | A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994–2001. These incidence data were applied to national available data for the UK on current life expectancy to calculate the risk of shingles infections at varying ages.
The potential benefit of an effective vaccine was estimated using three models of vaccine efficacy applied separately to males and females at ages 50, 60 and 65 years and assuming vaccination at a single age. Similar calculations were made using a two dose strategy at age 45 and 65 years and at age 50 and 70 years. The cost per case saved was estimated from a vaccination cost of £40 per dose.
The probability of having had an attack of shingles before age 45 years is 8.6% for males and 10.5% for females, The risk of acquiring shingles over an expected lifetime (assuming no preventive vaccination) for males aged 45 years is 22% and for females 32%. Whichever vaccine efficacy model was chosen, a single vaccination policy at age 65 years was the most favourable option in both males and females. A two age vaccination policy was estimated to increase the cost per case saved by 30% over a single age policy but administration at age 50 and 70 years substantially increased the number of cases saved as compared with a single age policy and was potentially better than vaccination at 45 and 65 years. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00034-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73254039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X03000343</els_id><sourcerecordid>1500796156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-7b10bd5e7c55ddc4344a421fdbe3dd31b0265373552892df43344a3eaa1a1c453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDbb_oQWQWlIDm4lz8iyT6GEfEEgh6TQm5AlOVHwWlvJu5B_H3l3aSCH5CSQnhnNvA8hXzn7yRmvft2yssICOft7xOCYMQZYwAcy47WEohS8_khm_5F9cpDSY4YE8OYT2eelRKzrZkbO7h4c9YPx1g3G0dDR9OCH-94lqgdL_ZioXyx7b_Tow5BoFyJda2P8sLmgy5Dfnj6TvU73yX3ZnXPy5_zs7vSyuL65uDr9fV0YIXEsZMtZa4WTRghrDQKixpJ3tnVgLfA2DyxAghBl3ZS2Q5gIcFpzzQ0KmJPDbd9lDP9WLo1q4ZNxfa8HF1ZJSSgFMmjeBXNKWMkc2pwcvQ0KxmRTcVFl9Psr9DGs4pD3VRybqsKmlNPPYkuZGFKKrlPL6Bc6PinO1GRObcypSYtioDbmFOS6b7vuq3bh7EvVTlUGfuwAnYzuu6iztfTCoaxyeFOjky3nsoi1d1El4ye51kdnRmWDf2eUZy6Asxo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1496649279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Chapman, Rachel S. ; Cross, Kenneth W. ; Fleming, Douglas M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Rachel S. ; Cross, Kenneth W. ; Fleming, Douglas M.</creatorcontrib><description>A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994–2001. These incidence data were applied to national available data for the UK on current life expectancy to calculate the risk of shingles infections at varying ages.
The potential benefit of an effective vaccine was estimated using three models of vaccine efficacy applied separately to males and females at ages 50, 60 and 65 years and assuming vaccination at a single age. Similar calculations were made using a two dose strategy at age 45 and 65 years and at age 50 and 70 years. The cost per case saved was estimated from a vaccination cost of £40 per dose.
The probability of having had an attack of shingles before age 45 years is 8.6% for males and 10.5% for females, The risk of acquiring shingles over an expected lifetime (assuming no preventive vaccination) for males aged 45 years is 22% and for females 32%. Whichever vaccine efficacy model was chosen, a single vaccination policy at age 65 years was the most favourable option in both males and females. A two age vaccination policy was estimated to increase the cost per case saved by 30% over a single age policy but administration at age 50 and 70 years substantially increased the number of cases saved as compared with a single age policy and was potentially better than vaccination at 45 and 65 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00034-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12744889</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VACCDE</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Age ; Age Distribution ; Age Factors ; Aged ; Biological and medical sciences ; England - epidemiology ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herpes Zoster - epidemiology ; Herpes Zoster - prevention & control ; Herpesvirus 3, Human - immunology ; Human viral diseases ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infections ; Infectious diseases ; Life expectancy ; Male ; Males ; Medical sciences ; Microbiology ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; Population ; Probability ; Regression analysis ; Sentinel practices ; Sex Characteristics ; Shingles ; Vaccination policy ; Vaccines ; Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies ; Varicella-zoster virus ; Viral diseases ; Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye ; Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2003-06, Vol.21 (19), p.2541-2547</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jun 2, 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-7b10bd5e7c55ddc4344a421fdbe3dd31b0265373552892df43344a3eaa1a1c453</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-7b10bd5e7c55ddc4344a421fdbe3dd31b0265373552892df43344a3eaa1a1c453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1496649279?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14766533$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12744889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Rachel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Douglas M.</creatorcontrib><title>The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994–2001. These incidence data were applied to national available data for the UK on current life expectancy to calculate the risk of shingles infections at varying ages.
The potential benefit of an effective vaccine was estimated using three models of vaccine efficacy applied separately to males and females at ages 50, 60 and 65 years and assuming vaccination at a single age. Similar calculations were made using a two dose strategy at age 45 and 65 years and at age 50 and 70 years. The cost per case saved was estimated from a vaccination cost of £40 per dose.
The probability of having had an attack of shingles before age 45 years is 8.6% for males and 10.5% for females, The risk of acquiring shingles over an expected lifetime (assuming no preventive vaccination) for males aged 45 years is 22% and for females 32%. Whichever vaccine efficacy model was chosen, a single vaccination policy at age 65 years was the most favourable option in both males and females. A two age vaccination policy was estimated to increase the cost per case saved by 30% over a single age policy but administration at age 50 and 70 years substantially increased the number of cases saved as compared with a single age policy and was potentially better than vaccination at 45 and 65 years.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Age Distribution</subject><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herpes Zoster - epidemiology</subject><subject>Herpes Zoster - prevention & control</subject><subject>Herpesvirus 3, Human - immunology</subject><subject>Human viral diseases</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Life expectancy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sentinel practices</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Shingles</subject><subject>Vaccination policy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Varicella-zoster virus</subject><subject>Viral diseases</subject><subject>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</subject><subject>Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhkVpaDbb_oQWQWlIDm4lz8iyT6GEfEEgh6TQm5AlOVHwWlvJu5B_H3l3aSCH5CSQnhnNvA8hXzn7yRmvft2yssICOft7xOCYMQZYwAcy47WEohS8_khm_5F9cpDSY4YE8OYT2eelRKzrZkbO7h4c9YPx1g3G0dDR9OCH-94lqgdL_ZioXyx7b_Tow5BoFyJda2P8sLmgy5Dfnj6TvU73yX3ZnXPy5_zs7vSyuL65uDr9fV0YIXEsZMtZa4WTRghrDQKixpJ3tnVgLfA2DyxAghBl3ZS2Q5gIcFpzzQ0KmJPDbd9lDP9WLo1q4ZNxfa8HF1ZJSSgFMmjeBXNKWMkc2pwcvQ0KxmRTcVFl9Psr9DGs4pD3VRybqsKmlNPPYkuZGFKKrlPL6Bc6PinO1GRObcypSYtioDbmFOS6b7vuq3bh7EvVTlUGfuwAnYzuu6iztfTCoaxyeFOjky3nsoi1d1El4ye51kdnRmWDf2eUZy6Asxo</recordid><startdate>20030602</startdate><enddate>20030602</enddate><creator>Chapman, Rachel S.</creator><creator>Cross, Kenneth W.</creator><creator>Fleming, Douglas M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030602</creationdate><title>The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy</title><author>Chapman, Rachel S. ; Cross, Kenneth W. ; Fleming, Douglas M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-7b10bd5e7c55ddc4344a421fdbe3dd31b0265373552892df43344a3eaa1a1c453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Age Distribution</topic><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herpes Zoster - epidemiology</topic><topic>Herpes Zoster - prevention & control</topic><topic>Herpesvirus 3, Human - immunology</topic><topic>Human viral diseases</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Life expectancy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sentinel practices</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Shingles</topic><topic>Vaccination policy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Varicella-zoster virus</topic><topic>Viral diseases</topic><topic>Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye</topic><topic>Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chapman, Rachel S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cross, Kenneth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleming, Douglas M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chapman, Rachel S.</au><au>Cross, Kenneth W.</au><au>Fleming, Douglas M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2003-06-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>2541</spage><epage>2547</epage><pages>2541-2547</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><coden>VACCDE</coden><abstract>A vaccine is now available to prevent varicella-zoster infection, but its place in routine preventive care is not yet determined. The age specific incidence of shingles was examined separately by gender and age groups (15–24, 25–44, 45–64, 65–74 and 75 years and more) over the years 1994–2001. These incidence data were applied to national available data for the UK on current life expectancy to calculate the risk of shingles infections at varying ages.
The potential benefit of an effective vaccine was estimated using three models of vaccine efficacy applied separately to males and females at ages 50, 60 and 65 years and assuming vaccination at a single age. Similar calculations were made using a two dose strategy at age 45 and 65 years and at age 50 and 70 years. The cost per case saved was estimated from a vaccination cost of £40 per dose.
The probability of having had an attack of shingles before age 45 years is 8.6% for males and 10.5% for females, The risk of acquiring shingles over an expected lifetime (assuming no preventive vaccination) for males aged 45 years is 22% and for females 32%. Whichever vaccine efficacy model was chosen, a single vaccination policy at age 65 years was the most favourable option in both males and females. A two age vaccination policy was estimated to increase the cost per case saved by 30% over a single age policy but administration at age 50 and 70 years substantially increased the number of cases saved as compared with a single age policy and was potentially better than vaccination at 45 and 65 years.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12744889</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00034-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2003-06, Vol.21 (19), p.2541-2547 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73254039 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Age Age Distribution Age Factors Aged Biological and medical sciences England - epidemiology Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herpes Zoster - epidemiology Herpes Zoster - prevention & control Herpesvirus 3, Human - immunology Human viral diseases Humans Incidence Infections Infectious diseases Life expectancy Male Males Medical sciences Microbiology Middle Aged Older people Population Probability Regression analysis Sentinel practices Sex Characteristics Shingles Vaccination policy Vaccines Vaccines, antisera, therapeutical immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies Varicella-zoster virus Viral diseases Viral diseases with cutaneous or mucosal lesions and viral diseases of the eye Viral Vaccines - therapeutic use Virology |
title | The incidence of shingles and its implications for vaccination policy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20incidence%20of%20shingles%20and%20its%20implications%20for%20vaccination%20policy&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Chapman,%20Rachel%20S.&rft.date=2003-06-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=2541&rft.epage=2547&rft.pages=2541-2547&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft.coden=VACCDE&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00034-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500796156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1496649279&rft_id=info:pmid/12744889&rft_els_id=S0264410X03000343&rfr_iscdi=true |