Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision

Objective: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic that is injected before a vertical midline abdominal incision would decrease the use of postoperative opioids. Study Design: Patients who would undergo abdominal surgical procedures with general anesthesia by a planned vertical midline incisi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2003-04, Vol.188 (4), p.901-905
Hauptverfasser: Updike, Glenn M., Manolitsas, Tom P., Cohn, David E., Eaton, Lynne A., Fowler, Jeffrey M., Young, Donn C., Copeland, Larry J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 905
container_issue 4
container_start_page 901
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 188
creator Updike, Glenn M.
Manolitsas, Tom P.
Cohn, David E.
Eaton, Lynne A.
Fowler, Jeffrey M.
Young, Donn C.
Copeland, Larry J.
description Objective: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic that is injected before a vertical midline abdominal incision would decrease the use of postoperative opioids. Study Design: Patients who would undergo abdominal surgical procedures with general anesthesia by a planned vertical midline incision were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either 0.5% ropivacaine or normal saline solution placebo that was injected in the subcuticular tissue and fascia before the incision of each. All patients received morphine after the operation with a patient-controlled analgesia device. Morphine consumption was measured during the postoperative period at intervals of 0 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and 24 to 48 hours. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the conclusion of the procedure with a visual analog scale. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 16 patients were excluded; therefore, 68 patients had useable data. The two treatment groups did not differ in age, height, weight, the length of the operation, the length of the incision, the position of the incision, the placement of drains, or the procedure that was performed. There was no significant difference in morphine consumption for any of the four intervals. The visual analog scale was not significantly different between the two groups at 6, 12, or 24 hours after operation. The visual analog scale at 48 hours was lower in the group that received ropivacaine (2.69 vs 4.26, P =.02). Data were analyzed by the Student t test. Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with 0.5% ropivacaine given before skin incision does not decrease the postoperative analgesic use in patients who undergo laparotomy by a midline vertical skin incision.
doi_str_mv 10.1067/mob.2003.216
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73227685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002937802715366</els_id><sourcerecordid>73227685</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-c3986ed2a64a854d6f0cb8e52189c4c6ee6d33329fdeb3d2071c39e6ab7ca8013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU-P1CAYxonRuLOrN8-Gi57syJ8Opd42G11NNtGDngmFtx1MCxXoTOZj-Q2lO5PsxQtvgN_zwPs-CL2hZEuJaD5OodsyQviWUfEMbShpm0pIIZ-jDSGEVS1v5BW6Tun3umUte4muKGsoI5Jv0N8fESqY5uwOgLXX4wDJaew8Hk4eTBjD4AxOSyxFj3iOwYBdIqRPuCjDDFE_So9h8bbIejfm9Sh4fHR5j2OY3UEb7TyspnO5Ap8TPu4DLgqIQ8CjnnUMOUwnnPcxLMMeazw5O66iA8T8-LTzxqXi-wq96PWY4PWl3qBfXz7_vPtaPXy__3Z3-1AZLupc1lYKsEyLWstdbUVPTCdhx6hsTW0EgLCcc9b2FjpuGWlokYDQXWO0JJTfoPdn39LznwVSVpNLBsZRewhLUg1nrBFyV8APZ9DEkFKEXs3RTTqeFCVqjUiViNQakSoRFfztxXfpJrBP8CWTAry7ADqVxvuo186fuLrhggtSOHHmoEzh4CCqZMpwSz4ugsnKBvf_H_wDJq2yJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73227685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Updike, Glenn M. ; Manolitsas, Tom P. ; Cohn, David E. ; Eaton, Lynne A. ; Fowler, Jeffrey M. ; Young, Donn C. ; Copeland, Larry J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Updike, Glenn M. ; Manolitsas, Tom P. ; Cohn, David E. ; Eaton, Lynne A. ; Fowler, Jeffrey M. ; Young, Donn C. ; Copeland, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic that is injected before a vertical midline abdominal incision would decrease the use of postoperative opioids. Study Design: Patients who would undergo abdominal surgical procedures with general anesthesia by a planned vertical midline incision were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either 0.5% ropivacaine or normal saline solution placebo that was injected in the subcuticular tissue and fascia before the incision of each. All patients received morphine after the operation with a patient-controlled analgesia device. Morphine consumption was measured during the postoperative period at intervals of 0 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and 24 to 48 hours. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the conclusion of the procedure with a visual analog scale. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 16 patients were excluded; therefore, 68 patients had useable data. The two treatment groups did not differ in age, height, weight, the length of the operation, the length of the incision, the position of the incision, the placement of drains, or the procedure that was performed. There was no significant difference in morphine consumption for any of the four intervals. The visual analog scale was not significantly different between the two groups at 6, 12, or 24 hours after operation. The visual analog scale at 48 hours was lower in the group that received ropivacaine (2.69 vs 4.26, P =.02). Data were analyzed by the Student t test. Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with 0.5% ropivacaine given before skin incision does not decrease the postoperative analgesic use in patients who undergo laparotomy by a midline vertical skin incision.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12712083</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJOGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia, PA: Mosby, Inc</publisher><subject>Amides - administration &amp; dosage ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents ; Biological and medical sciences ; Double-Blind Method ; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Humans ; Laparotomy - methods ; local anesthetic ; Medical sciences ; Morphine - administration &amp; dosage ; Neuropharmacology ; Pain Measurement ; Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy ; Pain, Postoperative - physiopathology ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; postoperative pain ; Pre-emptive analgesia ; Preoperative Care ; Ropivacaine</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2003-04, Vol.188 (4), p.901-905</ispartof><rights>2003</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-c3986ed2a64a854d6f0cb8e52189c4c6ee6d33329fdeb3d2071c39e6ab7ca8013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-c3986ed2a64a854d6f0cb8e52189c4c6ee6d33329fdeb3d2071c39e6ab7ca8013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1067/mob.2003.216$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14736360$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12712083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Updike, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manolitsas, Tom P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Lynne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Donn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><title>Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Objective: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic that is injected before a vertical midline abdominal incision would decrease the use of postoperative opioids. Study Design: Patients who would undergo abdominal surgical procedures with general anesthesia by a planned vertical midline incision were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either 0.5% ropivacaine or normal saline solution placebo that was injected in the subcuticular tissue and fascia before the incision of each. All patients received morphine after the operation with a patient-controlled analgesia device. Morphine consumption was measured during the postoperative period at intervals of 0 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and 24 to 48 hours. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the conclusion of the procedure with a visual analog scale. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 16 patients were excluded; therefore, 68 patients had useable data. The two treatment groups did not differ in age, height, weight, the length of the operation, the length of the incision, the position of the incision, the placement of drains, or the procedure that was performed. There was no significant difference in morphine consumption for any of the four intervals. The visual analog scale was not significantly different between the two groups at 6, 12, or 24 hours after operation. The visual analog scale at 48 hours was lower in the group that received ropivacaine (2.69 vs 4.26, P =.02). Data were analyzed by the Student t test. Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with 0.5% ropivacaine given before skin incision does not decrease the postoperative analgesic use in patients who undergo laparotomy by a midline vertical skin incision.</description><subject>Amides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparotomy - methods</subject><subject>local anesthetic</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Neuropharmacology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain, Postoperative - physiopathology</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>postoperative pain</subject><subject>Pre-emptive analgesia</subject><subject>Preoperative Care</subject><subject>Ropivacaine</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU-P1CAYxonRuLOrN8-Gi57syJ8Opd42G11NNtGDngmFtx1MCxXoTOZj-Q2lO5PsxQtvgN_zwPs-CL2hZEuJaD5OodsyQviWUfEMbShpm0pIIZ-jDSGEVS1v5BW6Tun3umUte4muKGsoI5Jv0N8fESqY5uwOgLXX4wDJaew8Hk4eTBjD4AxOSyxFj3iOwYBdIqRPuCjDDFE_So9h8bbIejfm9Sh4fHR5j2OY3UEb7TyspnO5Ap8TPu4DLgqIQ8CjnnUMOUwnnPcxLMMeazw5O66iA8T8-LTzxqXi-wq96PWY4PWl3qBfXz7_vPtaPXy__3Z3-1AZLupc1lYKsEyLWstdbUVPTCdhx6hsTW0EgLCcc9b2FjpuGWlokYDQXWO0JJTfoPdn39LznwVSVpNLBsZRewhLUg1nrBFyV8APZ9DEkFKEXs3RTTqeFCVqjUiViNQakSoRFfztxXfpJrBP8CWTAry7ADqVxvuo186fuLrhggtSOHHmoEzh4CCqZMpwSz4ugsnKBvf_H_wDJq2yJw</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Updike, Glenn M.</creator><creator>Manolitsas, Tom P.</creator><creator>Cohn, David E.</creator><creator>Eaton, Lynne A.</creator><creator>Fowler, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Young, Donn C.</creator><creator>Copeland, Larry J.</creator><general>Mosby, Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision</title><author>Updike, Glenn M. ; Manolitsas, Tom P. ; Cohn, David E. ; Eaton, Lynne A. ; Fowler, Jeffrey M. ; Young, Donn C. ; Copeland, Larry J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-c3986ed2a64a854d6f0cb8e52189c4c6ee6d33329fdeb3d2071c39e6ab7ca8013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Amides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Analgesics, Opioid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparotomy - methods</topic><topic>local anesthetic</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Morphine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Neuropharmacology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain, Postoperative - physiopathology</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>postoperative pain</topic><topic>Pre-emptive analgesia</topic><topic>Preoperative Care</topic><topic>Ropivacaine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Updike, Glenn M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manolitsas, Tom P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohn, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Lynne A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, Donn C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Copeland, Larry J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Updike, Glenn M.</au><au>Manolitsas, Tom P.</au><au>Cohn, David E.</au><au>Eaton, Lynne A.</au><au>Fowler, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Young, Donn C.</au><au>Copeland, Larry J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>188</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>901</spage><epage>905</epage><pages>901-905</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><coden>AJOGAH</coden><abstract>Objective: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic that is injected before a vertical midline abdominal incision would decrease the use of postoperative opioids. Study Design: Patients who would undergo abdominal surgical procedures with general anesthesia by a planned vertical midline incision were enrolled in the study. Patients were assigned randomly to receive either 0.5% ropivacaine or normal saline solution placebo that was injected in the subcuticular tissue and fascia before the incision of each. All patients received morphine after the operation with a patient-controlled analgesia device. Morphine consumption was measured during the postoperative period at intervals of 0 to 6 hours, 6 to 12 hours, 12 to 24 hours, and 24 to 48 hours. Postoperative pain was assessed at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the conclusion of the procedure with a visual analog scale. Results: Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 16 patients were excluded; therefore, 68 patients had useable data. The two treatment groups did not differ in age, height, weight, the length of the operation, the length of the incision, the position of the incision, the placement of drains, or the procedure that was performed. There was no significant difference in morphine consumption for any of the four intervals. The visual analog scale was not significantly different between the two groups at 6, 12, or 24 hours after operation. The visual analog scale at 48 hours was lower in the group that received ropivacaine (2.69 vs 4.26, P =.02). Data were analyzed by the Student t test. Conclusion: Pre-emptive analgesia with 0.5% ropivacaine given before skin incision does not decrease the postoperative analgesic use in patients who undergo laparotomy by a midline vertical skin incision.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia, PA</cop><pub>Mosby, Inc</pub><pmid>12712083</pmid><doi>10.1067/mob.2003.216</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2003-04, Vol.188 (4), p.901-905
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73227685
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Amides - administration & dosage
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Analgesics, Opioid - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Anesthetics. Neuromuscular blocking agents
Biological and medical sciences
Double-Blind Method
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Humans
Laparotomy - methods
local anesthetic
Medical sciences
Morphine - administration & dosage
Neuropharmacology
Pain Measurement
Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy
Pain, Postoperative - physiopathology
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
postoperative pain
Pre-emptive analgesia
Preoperative Care
Ropivacaine
title Pre-emptive analgesia in gynecologic surgical procedures: Preoperative wound infiltration with ropivacaine in patients who undergo laparotomy through a midline vertical incision
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T13%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre-emptive%20analgesia%20in%20gynecologic%20surgical%20procedures:%20Preoperative%20wound%20infiltration%20with%20ropivacaine%20in%20patients%20who%20undergo%20laparotomy%20through%20a%20midline%20vertical%20incision&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Updike,%20Glenn%20M.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=188&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=901&rft.epage=905&rft.pages=901-905&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft.coden=AJOGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1067/mob.2003.216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73227685%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73227685&rft_id=info:pmid/12712083&rft_els_id=S0002937802715366&rfr_iscdi=true