Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients

Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost‐effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. Se...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pharmacotherapy 2003-04, Vol.23 (4), p.443-450
Hauptverfasser: Crompton, Jason A., Somerville, Troy, Smith, Lonnie, Corbett, Jacke, Nelson, Edward, Holman, John, Shihab, Fuad S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 450
container_issue 4
container_start_page 443
container_title Pharmacotherapy
container_volume 23
creator Crompton, Jason A.
Somerville, Troy
Smith, Lonnie
Corbett, Jacke
Nelson, Edward
Holman, John
Shihab, Fuad S.
description Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost‐effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. Setting. University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic. Patients. Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients. Intervention. The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Measurements and Main Results. Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab‐CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow‐up. At 12‐months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were $51,970.01 and $68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p
doi_str_mv 10.1592/phco.23.4.443.32119
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73193452</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73193452</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-8cb74c6682b370e8a6aa5ba4931c0215c96002f47e9cba118456f95a607ed9cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCL0BC3sAuwa_4sZwppVNpCnRUYGk5jkNNHSfESR__Hg8zoltWlq7OudffB8AbjEpcKfJhuLF9SWjJSsZoSQnG6hlYYCmqQmHMnoMFIkIUCCF5BI5T-oUQwZyRl-AIEy4RE2wBuo2xt7Bv4ZntY995C1cuutZP8N5PN3Blkg_-wXemhhexme3k-wh9hBt_5-NPuHXBTK6BH7M8wmUzhynPognwejQxDcHE3cD6wbs4pVfgRWtCcq8P7wn49uns-nRdbL6cX5wuN4VlWMlC2lowy7kkNRXIScONqWrDFMU2Z6is4jlLy4RTtjYYS1bxVlWGI-GaPKIn4P1-7zD2v2eXJt35ZF3I33H9nLSgWFFWkQzSPWjHPqXRtXoYc9jxUWOkdy3rXcuaUM10bln_bTlbbw_r57pzzZNzqDUD7w6ASdaENndhfXrimBBYKJk5tefufXCP_3Nbf10vt1iSnVvsXZ8m9_DPNeOt5oKKSv_4fK75ant1-f3ySq_pH99wp1U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73193452</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Crompton, Jason A. ; Somerville, Troy ; Smith, Lonnie ; Corbett, Jacke ; Nelson, Edward ; Holman, John ; Shihab, Fuad S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Jason A. ; Somerville, Troy ; Smith, Lonnie ; Corbett, Jacke ; Nelson, Edward ; Holman, John ; Shihab, Fuad S.</creatorcontrib><description>Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost‐effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. Setting. University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic. Patients. Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients. Intervention. The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Measurements and Main Results. Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab‐CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow‐up. At 12‐months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were $51,970.01 and $68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p&lt;0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower ($10,148.50 vs $21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US). Conclusion. Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost‐effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-0008</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9114</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1592/phco.23.4.443.32119</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12680474</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PHPYDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - economics ; Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chi-Square Distribution ; Confidence Intervals ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods ; Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Female ; Graft Rejection - drug therapy ; Graft Rejection - economics ; Humans ; Kidney Transplantation - economics ; Kidney Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Recombinant Fusion Proteins ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><ispartof>Pharmacotherapy, 2003-04, Vol.23 (4), p.443-450</ispartof><rights>2003 Pharmacotherapy Publications Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-8cb74c6682b370e8a6aa5ba4931c0215c96002f47e9cba118456f95a607ed9cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-8cb74c6682b370e8a6aa5ba4931c0215c96002f47e9cba118456f95a607ed9cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1592%2Fphco.23.4.443.32119$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1592%2Fphco.23.4.443.32119$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14771798$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12680474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Troy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Jacke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shihab, Fuad S.</creatorcontrib><title>Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients</title><title>Pharmacotherapy</title><addtitle>Pharmacotherapy</addtitle><description>Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost‐effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. Setting. University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic. Patients. Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients. Intervention. The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Measurements and Main Results. Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab‐CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow‐up. At 12‐months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were $51,970.01 and $68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p&lt;0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower ($10,148.50 vs $21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US). Conclusion. Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost‐effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - economics</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chi-Square Distribution</subject><subject>Confidence Intervals</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</subject><subject>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</subject><subject>Graft Rejection - economics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - economics</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Recombinant Fusion Proteins</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><issn>0277-0008</issn><issn>1875-9114</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEtv1DAURi0EotPCL0BC3sAuwa_4sZwppVNpCnRUYGk5jkNNHSfESR__Hg8zoltWlq7OudffB8AbjEpcKfJhuLF9SWjJSsZoSQnG6hlYYCmqQmHMnoMFIkIUCCF5BI5T-oUQwZyRl-AIEy4RE2wBuo2xt7Bv4ZntY995C1cuutZP8N5PN3Blkg_-wXemhhexme3k-wh9hBt_5-NPuHXBTK6BH7M8wmUzhynPognwejQxDcHE3cD6wbs4pVfgRWtCcq8P7wn49uns-nRdbL6cX5wuN4VlWMlC2lowy7kkNRXIScONqWrDFMU2Z6is4jlLy4RTtjYYS1bxVlWGI-GaPKIn4P1-7zD2v2eXJt35ZF3I33H9nLSgWFFWkQzSPWjHPqXRtXoYc9jxUWOkdy3rXcuaUM10bln_bTlbbw_r57pzzZNzqDUD7w6ASdaENndhfXrimBBYKJk5tefufXCP_3Nbf10vt1iSnVvsXZ8m9_DPNeOt5oKKSv_4fK75ant1-f3ySq_pH99wp1U</recordid><startdate>200304</startdate><enddate>200304</enddate><creator>Crompton, Jason A.</creator><creator>Somerville, Troy</creator><creator>Smith, Lonnie</creator><creator>Corbett, Jacke</creator><creator>Nelson, Edward</creator><creator>Holman, John</creator><creator>Shihab, Fuad S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Pharmacotherapy</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200304</creationdate><title>Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients</title><author>Crompton, Jason A. ; Somerville, Troy ; Smith, Lonnie ; Corbett, Jacke ; Nelson, Edward ; Holman, John ; Shihab, Fuad S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-8cb74c6682b370e8a6aa5ba4931c0215c96002f47e9cba118456f95a607ed9cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - economics</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chi-Square Distribution</topic><topic>Confidence Intervals</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods</topic><topic>Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - drug therapy</topic><topic>Graft Rejection - economics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - economics</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Living Donors - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Recombinant Fusion Proteins</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Crompton, Jason A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somerville, Troy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corbett, Jacke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holman, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shihab, Fuad S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pharmacotherapy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Crompton, Jason A.</au><au>Somerville, Troy</au><au>Smith, Lonnie</au><au>Corbett, Jacke</au><au>Nelson, Edward</au><au>Holman, John</au><au>Shihab, Fuad S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients</atitle><jtitle>Pharmacotherapy</jtitle><addtitle>Pharmacotherapy</addtitle><date>2003-04</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>443</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>443-450</pages><issn>0277-0008</issn><eissn>1875-9114</eissn><coden>PHPYDQ</coden><abstract>Study Objective. To assess the effect of basiliximab (BAS) induction therapy on acute rejection rates and overall costs in adult living related donor (LRD) renal transplant recipients. Design. Retrospective chart review and cost‐effectiveness analysis of the first 12 months after transplantation. Setting. University hospital and outpatient renal transplant clinic. Patients. Sixty consecutive adult LRD renal transplant recipients. Intervention. The treatment group received BAS 20 mg intravenously on postoperative days 0 and 4. The control group received no induction agents. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion, azathioprine, and corticosteroids for maintenance immunosuppression. Measurements and Main Results. Six patients (three in each group) were excluded; three had received muromonab‐CD3 as an induction agent and three were lost to follow‐up. At 12‐months, the frequency of acute rejection episodes was 15% (4/27) in the control group and 22% (6/27) in the BAS group (NS). Renal function, as measured by average serum creatinine level, was similar at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 for both groups. The frequency of infectious complications was similar in both groups. No adverse effects were associated with BAS. Mean initial hospitalization charges were $51,970.01 and $68,093.90 in the control and BAS groups, respectively (p&lt;0.05). The control group had more readmissions (18 vs 14 in the BAS group), but the average charge/readmission was lower ($10,148.50 vs $21,952.58 in the BAS group; NS). All costs were adjusted to 2000 dollars (US). Conclusion. Basiliximab induction therapy did not provide clear clinical efficacy benefit or prove to be cost‐effective compared with no induction in LRD recipients.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>12680474</pmid><doi>10.1592/phco.23.4.443.32119</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0277-0008
ispartof Pharmacotherapy, 2003-04, Vol.23 (4), p.443-450
issn 0277-0008
1875-9114
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73193452
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Antibodies, Monoclonal - economics
Antibodies, Monoclonal - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Chi-Square Distribution
Confidence Intervals
Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods
Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data
Female
Graft Rejection - drug therapy
Graft Rejection - economics
Humans
Kidney Transplantation - economics
Kidney Transplantation - statistics & numerical data
Living Donors - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
Retrospective Studies
Statistics, Nonparametric
title Lack of Economic Benefit with Basiliximab Induction in Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lack%20of%20Economic%20Benefit%20with%20Basiliximab%20Induction%20in%20Living%20Related%20Donor%20Adult%20Renal%20Transplant%20Recipients&rft.jtitle=Pharmacotherapy&rft.au=Crompton,%20Jason%20A.&rft.date=2003-04&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=443-450&rft.issn=0277-0008&rft.eissn=1875-9114&rft.coden=PHPYDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1592/phco.23.4.443.32119&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73193452%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73193452&rft_id=info:pmid/12680474&rfr_iscdi=true