Test-of-Cure for Asymptomatic Genital Chlamydial Infections in Women: A Cost-Benefit Analysis
Asymptomatic genital infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis is common, and one or more test-of-cure consultations in such cases is routine. The economic implications of two posttreatment strategies, either no test-of-cure, or one test-of-cure consultation with a single test for C. trachomatis, re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sexually transmitted diseases 1992-05, Vol.19 (3), p.133-136 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Asymptomatic genital infection caused by Chlamydia trachomatis is common, and one or more test-of-cure consultations in such cases is routine. The economic implications of two posttreatment strategies, either no test-of-cure, or one test-of-cure consultation with a single test for C. trachomatis, renewed treatment, and another test-of-cure of those still chlamydiapositive, and so on, have been compared. The costs of the testof-cure strategy are twice those of the no-test regimen. Without test-of-cure, 79 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease, 8 cases of infertility requiring treatment, and 2 cases of ectopic pregnancy would occur for every 10,000 patients. It is concluded that routine test-of-cure of asymptomatic genital chiamydial infections after treatment is not cost beneficial. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0148-5717 1537-4521 |
DOI: | 10.1097/00007435-199205000-00004 |