The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research?
Turkstra LS, Holland AL, Bays GA. The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: what have we learned from animal research? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:604-12. Objectives: To encourage rehabilitation specialists to develop a critical approach to the animal research literature that is relevant to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2003-04, Vol.84 (4), p.604-612 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 612 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 604 |
container_title | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Turkstra, Lyn S. Holland, Audrey L. Bays, Gina A. |
description | Turkstra LS, Holland AL, Bays GA. The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: what have we learned from animal research? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:604-12.
Objectives: To encourage rehabilitation specialists to develop a critical approach to the animal research literature that is relevant to human neurorehabilitation and to encourage clinicians to lend their perspectives to basic research.
Data Sources: Scientific publications cited in MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychInfo, and professional presentations of leading neuroscience researchers. The focus was on current publications to 2001, with historical works included when appropriate.
Study Selection: Studies were selected based on their relevance to the objectives.
Data Extraction: Reviewed study methodology and findings and extracted key principles relevant to rehabilitation.
Data Synthesis: Many themes emerging from neuroscience research are relevant to human rehabilitation, including issues related to timing of intervention and recovery, and characteristics of nervous system plasticity.
Conclusions: Although animal research has many limitations, it provides a unique window on nervous system recovery and has generated important directions for future human research. Clinician involvement in basic animal research will improve the extent to which results are relevant to human rehabilitation and recovery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/apmr.2003.50146 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73174297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003999302049742</els_id><sourcerecordid>73174297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e984b36b06faec3d9806068e248615314ebf2c72acde1d883dcc230e590f612c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtLAzEQh4MotlbP3iQnb9vmsZtuvIgUX1DwUlHwELLJLBvZR012K_3vTW3Bk6cwmW-G-X0IXVIypSTjM71u_JQRwqcZoak4QmOacZbkjL4fozGJjURKyUfoLITPWIqM01M0okxIIggdo49VBbiFwXfBOGgN4K7EHky3Ab_FurWxqHThatfr3nXtDX6rdI8rvQH8DbgG7VuwuPRdE2nX6DoOhPhrqttzdFLqOsDF4Z2g14f71eIpWb48Pi_ulonhKe8TkHlacFEQUWow3Mo8niZyYGkuYhqaQlEyM2faWKA2z7k1hnECmSSloMzwCbre71377muA0KvGBQN1rVvohqDmnM5TJucRnO1BE-MGD6Va-3iy3ypK1M6n2vlUO5_q12ecuDqsHooG7B9_EBgBuQcgBtw48Org0bposVe2c_8u_wGGXIUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73174297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Turkstra, Lyn S. ; Holland, Audrey L. ; Bays, Gina A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Turkstra, Lyn S. ; Holland, Audrey L. ; Bays, Gina A.</creatorcontrib><description>Turkstra LS, Holland AL, Bays GA. The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: what have we learned from animal research? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:604-12.
Objectives: To encourage rehabilitation specialists to develop a critical approach to the animal research literature that is relevant to human neurorehabilitation and to encourage clinicians to lend their perspectives to basic research.
Data Sources: Scientific publications cited in MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychInfo, and professional presentations of leading neuroscience researchers. The focus was on current publications to 2001, with historical works included when appropriate.
Study Selection: Studies were selected based on their relevance to the objectives.
Data Extraction: Reviewed study methodology and findings and extracted key principles relevant to rehabilitation.
Data Synthesis: Many themes emerging from neuroscience research are relevant to human rehabilitation, including issues related to timing of intervention and recovery, and characteristics of nervous system plasticity.
Conclusions: Although animal research has many limitations, it provides a unique window on nervous system recovery and has generated important directions for future human research. Clinician involvement in basic animal research will improve the extent to which results are relevant to human rehabilitation and recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9993</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-821X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50146</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12690601</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Humans ; Learning ; Models, Animal ; Neuronal Plasticity - physiology ; Neurosciences ; Recovery of Function ; Rehabilitation - education ; Research Design</subject><ispartof>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2003-04, Vol.84 (4), p.604-612</ispartof><rights>2003 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e984b36b06faec3d9806068e248615314ebf2c72acde1d883dcc230e590f612c3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2003.50146$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12690601$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turkstra, Lyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, Audrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bays, Gina A.</creatorcontrib><title>The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research?</title><title>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><description>Turkstra LS, Holland AL, Bays GA. The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: what have we learned from animal research? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:604-12.
Objectives: To encourage rehabilitation specialists to develop a critical approach to the animal research literature that is relevant to human neurorehabilitation and to encourage clinicians to lend their perspectives to basic research.
Data Sources: Scientific publications cited in MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychInfo, and professional presentations of leading neuroscience researchers. The focus was on current publications to 2001, with historical works included when appropriate.
Study Selection: Studies were selected based on their relevance to the objectives.
Data Extraction: Reviewed study methodology and findings and extracted key principles relevant to rehabilitation.
Data Synthesis: Many themes emerging from neuroscience research are relevant to human rehabilitation, including issues related to timing of intervention and recovery, and characteristics of nervous system plasticity.
Conclusions: Although animal research has many limitations, it provides a unique window on nervous system recovery and has generated important directions for future human research. Clinician involvement in basic animal research will improve the extent to which results are relevant to human rehabilitation and recovery.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Models, Animal</subject><subject>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Rehabilitation - education</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><issn>0003-9993</issn><issn>1532-821X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtLAzEQh4MotlbP3iQnb9vmsZtuvIgUX1DwUlHwELLJLBvZR012K_3vTW3Bk6cwmW-G-X0IXVIypSTjM71u_JQRwqcZoak4QmOacZbkjL4fozGJjURKyUfoLITPWIqM01M0okxIIggdo49VBbiFwXfBOGgN4K7EHky3Ab_FurWxqHThatfr3nXtDX6rdI8rvQH8DbgG7VuwuPRdE2nX6DoOhPhrqttzdFLqOsDF4Z2g14f71eIpWb48Pi_ulonhKe8TkHlacFEQUWow3Mo8niZyYGkuYhqaQlEyM2faWKA2z7k1hnECmSSloMzwCbre71377muA0KvGBQN1rVvohqDmnM5TJucRnO1BE-MGD6Va-3iy3ypK1M6n2vlUO5_q12ecuDqsHooG7B9_EBgBuQcgBtw48Org0bposVe2c_8u_wGGXIUg</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Turkstra, Lyn S.</creator><creator>Holland, Audrey L.</creator><creator>Bays, Gina A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research?</title><author>Turkstra, Lyn S. ; Holland, Audrey L. ; Bays, Gina A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c343t-e984b36b06faec3d9806068e248615314ebf2c72acde1d883dcc230e590f612c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Models, Animal</topic><topic>Neuronal Plasticity - physiology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Rehabilitation - education</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turkstra, Lyn S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holland, Audrey L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bays, Gina A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turkstra, Lyn S.</au><au>Holland, Audrey L.</au><au>Bays, Gina A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research?</atitle><jtitle>Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Phys Med Rehabil</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>604</spage><epage>612</epage><pages>604-612</pages><issn>0003-9993</issn><eissn>1532-821X</eissn><abstract>Turkstra LS, Holland AL, Bays GA. The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: what have we learned from animal research? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:604-12.
Objectives: To encourage rehabilitation specialists to develop a critical approach to the animal research literature that is relevant to human neurorehabilitation and to encourage clinicians to lend their perspectives to basic research.
Data Sources: Scientific publications cited in MEDLINE, PubMed, and PsychInfo, and professional presentations of leading neuroscience researchers. The focus was on current publications to 2001, with historical works included when appropriate.
Study Selection: Studies were selected based on their relevance to the objectives.
Data Extraction: Reviewed study methodology and findings and extracted key principles relevant to rehabilitation.
Data Synthesis: Many themes emerging from neuroscience research are relevant to human rehabilitation, including issues related to timing of intervention and recovery, and characteristics of nervous system plasticity.
Conclusions: Although animal research has many limitations, it provides a unique window on nervous system recovery and has generated important directions for future human research. Clinician involvement in basic animal research will improve the extent to which results are relevant to human rehabilitation and recovery.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>12690601</pmid><doi>10.1053/apmr.2003.50146</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9993 |
ispartof | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2003-04, Vol.84 (4), p.604-612 |
issn | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73174297 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Animals Clinical Trials as Topic Humans Learning Models, Animal Neuronal Plasticity - physiology Neurosciences Recovery of Function Rehabilitation - education Research Design |
title | The neuroscience of recovery and rehabilitation: What have we learned from animal research? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20neuroscience%20of%20recovery%20and%20rehabilitation:%20What%20have%20we%20learned%20from%20animal%20research?&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20physical%20medicine%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Turkstra,%20Lyn%20S.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=604&rft.epage=612&rft.pages=604-612&rft.issn=0003-9993&rft.eissn=1532-821X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/apmr.2003.50146&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73174297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73174297&rft_id=info:pmid/12690601&rft_els_id=S0003999302049742&rfr_iscdi=true |