Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit
Background and Objectives The Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care (TRICC) study found that critically ill patients tolerate a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold. We investigated red‐cell transfusion practice since publication of the TRICC study in a large Scottish teaching hospital...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vox sanguinis 2003-04, Vol.84 (3), p.211-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Vox sanguinis |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Chohan, S. S. McArdle, F. McClelland, D. B. L. Mackenzie, S. J. Walsh, T. S. |
description | Background and Objectives The Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care (TRICC) study found that critically ill patients tolerate a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold. We investigated red‐cell transfusion practice since publication of the TRICC study in a large Scottish teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU).
Materials and Methods We prospectively collected daily data for a 6‐month period on haemoglobin concentrations, red‐cell transfusions and indications for transfusions, throughout ICU stay for all patients who stayed for longer than 24 h in the ICU.
Results A total of 176 patients were studied, who utilized 1237 ICU days. Of these 176 patients, 52% received red‐cell transfusions. A haemoglobin concentration of ≤ 9 g/dl was measured in 55% of patients; this occurred by day 1 and day 2 in 52% and 77% of these cases, respectively. Overall the haemoglobin concentration was ≤ 9 g/dl for 45% of all patient days. Total red‐cell use was 3·1 units per admission (0·47 units per patient day). Only 18% of transfusion episodes were required as a result of haemorrhage. For ‘non‐haemorrhage’ transfusion episodes, the median pretransfusion haemoglobin concentration was 7·8 g/dl (interquartile range: 7·4–8·4 g/dl), and 64% of transfusion episodes were for 2 units.
Conclusions Clinicians in our centre were conservative, in keeping with recent transfusion guidelines, but deviated from the TRICC protocol by transfusing at haemoglobin concentrations of between 7 and 9 g/dl, rather than below 7 g/dl, and by prescribing 2 unit transfusions. Significant numbers of red‐cell units are still used in the critically ill. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00284.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73166481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73166481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-f8dd54a7dce6c525a33101dbfeaa82f4ccf42ea02f5c9cb1e98eb15697a52e2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCKyBvQHSRwX-JE8QGjaC0VFQtLWVneZzr1tNMMrWdduaheEecZtSKHSv_fefc63sQwpRMKRHFh8WUCsYzItIFI4RPCWGlmK6focnjw3M0IUSwrCJE7qDdEBaEkJKV-Uu0Q1khCZdkgv6cQY0NNA2OXrfB9sF1LV55baIzgG3XNN29a69wvIZ_EA-3vfOwhDYG7FpsvEsK3WCjPeD352eHs9k-DrGvNx-TXxdWkCzvAHfzAP5Ox2Qy0N115-PIDTYaN9pfAb74nk4R2jBIHiz71sVX6IXVTYDX23UPXXz9cj77lh2fHBzOPh9nRnAmMlvWdS60rA0UJme55pwSWs8taF0yK4yxgoEmzOamMnMKVQlzmheV1DkDpvkeejf6psZvewhRLV0YpqRb6PqgJKdFIUqawHIETfph8GDVyrul9htFiRqiUgs1JKKGRNQQlXqISq2T9M22Rj9fQv0k3GaTgLdbQIc0WJuGb1x44oSkksmhh08jd-8a2Px3A-rXye-0SfJslLsQYf0o1_5GFZLLXF3-OFBHl_zn6dFpqSr-F20xwt4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73166481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Chohan, S. S. ; McArdle, F. ; McClelland, D. B. L. ; Mackenzie, S. J. ; Walsh, T. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chohan, S. S. ; McArdle, F. ; McClelland, D. B. L. ; Mackenzie, S. J. ; Walsh, T. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background and Objectives The Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care (TRICC) study found that critically ill patients tolerate a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold. We investigated red‐cell transfusion practice since publication of the TRICC study in a large Scottish teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU).
Materials and Methods We prospectively collected daily data for a 6‐month period on haemoglobin concentrations, red‐cell transfusions and indications for transfusions, throughout ICU stay for all patients who stayed for longer than 24 h in the ICU.
Results A total of 176 patients were studied, who utilized 1237 ICU days. Of these 176 patients, 52% received red‐cell transfusions. A haemoglobin concentration of ≤ 9 g/dl was measured in 55% of patients; this occurred by day 1 and day 2 in 52% and 77% of these cases, respectively. Overall the haemoglobin concentration was ≤ 9 g/dl for 45% of all patient days. Total red‐cell use was 3·1 units per admission (0·47 units per patient day). Only 18% of transfusion episodes were required as a result of haemorrhage. For ‘non‐haemorrhage’ transfusion episodes, the median pretransfusion haemoglobin concentration was 7·8 g/dl (interquartile range: 7·4–8·4 g/dl), and 64% of transfusion episodes were for 2 units.
Conclusions Clinicians in our centre were conservative, in keeping with recent transfusion guidelines, but deviated from the TRICC protocol by transfusing at haemoglobin concentrations of between 7 and 9 g/dl, rather than below 7 g/dl, and by prescribing 2 unit transfusions. Significant numbers of red‐cell units are still used in the critically ill.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-9007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0410</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00284.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12670370</identifier><identifier>CODEN: VOSAAD</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; anaemia ; Anemia - epidemiology ; Anemia - therapy ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis ; Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system ; Cohort Studies ; critical illness ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Erythrocyte Transfusion - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Hemoglobins - analysis ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prevalence ; Prospective Studies ; red cells ; transfusion ; Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy ; trigger ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Vox sanguinis, 2003-04, Vol.84 (3), p.211-218</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-f8dd54a7dce6c525a33101dbfeaa82f4ccf42ea02f5c9cb1e98eb15697a52e2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-f8dd54a7dce6c525a33101dbfeaa82f4ccf42ea02f5c9cb1e98eb15697a52e2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046%2Fj.1423-0410.2003.00284.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046%2Fj.1423-0410.2003.00284.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,1419,27931,27932,45581,45582</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14717271$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12670370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chohan, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, D. B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, T. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit</title><title>Vox sanguinis</title><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><description>Background and Objectives The Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care (TRICC) study found that critically ill patients tolerate a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold. We investigated red‐cell transfusion practice since publication of the TRICC study in a large Scottish teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU).
Materials and Methods We prospectively collected daily data for a 6‐month period on haemoglobin concentrations, red‐cell transfusions and indications for transfusions, throughout ICU stay for all patients who stayed for longer than 24 h in the ICU.
Results A total of 176 patients were studied, who utilized 1237 ICU days. Of these 176 patients, 52% received red‐cell transfusions. A haemoglobin concentration of ≤ 9 g/dl was measured in 55% of patients; this occurred by day 1 and day 2 in 52% and 77% of these cases, respectively. Overall the haemoglobin concentration was ≤ 9 g/dl for 45% of all patient days. Total red‐cell use was 3·1 units per admission (0·47 units per patient day). Only 18% of transfusion episodes were required as a result of haemorrhage. For ‘non‐haemorrhage’ transfusion episodes, the median pretransfusion haemoglobin concentration was 7·8 g/dl (interquartile range: 7·4–8·4 g/dl), and 64% of transfusion episodes were for 2 units.
Conclusions Clinicians in our centre were conservative, in keeping with recent transfusion guidelines, but deviated from the TRICC protocol by transfusing at haemoglobin concentrations of between 7 and 9 g/dl, rather than below 7 g/dl, and by prescribing 2 unit transfusions. Significant numbers of red‐cell units are still used in the critically ill.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>anaemia</subject><subject>Anemia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Anemia - therapy</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</subject><subject>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>critical illness</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Transfusion - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hemoglobins - analysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>red cells</subject><subject>transfusion</subject><subject>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</subject><subject>trigger</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0042-9007</issn><issn>1423-0410</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAUhS0EotPCKyBvQHSRwX-JE8QGjaC0VFQtLWVneZzr1tNMMrWdduaheEecZtSKHSv_fefc63sQwpRMKRHFh8WUCsYzItIFI4RPCWGlmK6focnjw3M0IUSwrCJE7qDdEBaEkJKV-Uu0Q1khCZdkgv6cQY0NNA2OXrfB9sF1LV55baIzgG3XNN29a69wvIZ_EA-3vfOwhDYG7FpsvEsK3WCjPeD352eHs9k-DrGvNx-TXxdWkCzvAHfzAP5Ox2Qy0N115-PIDTYaN9pfAb74nk4R2jBIHiz71sVX6IXVTYDX23UPXXz9cj77lh2fHBzOPh9nRnAmMlvWdS60rA0UJme55pwSWs8taF0yK4yxgoEmzOamMnMKVQlzmheV1DkDpvkeejf6psZvewhRLV0YpqRb6PqgJKdFIUqawHIETfph8GDVyrul9htFiRqiUgs1JKKGRNQQlXqISq2T9M22Rj9fQv0k3GaTgLdbQIc0WJuGb1x44oSkksmhh08jd-8a2Px3A-rXye-0SfJslLsQYf0o1_5GFZLLXF3-OFBHl_zn6dFpqSr-F20xwt4</recordid><startdate>200304</startdate><enddate>200304</enddate><creator>Chohan, S. S.</creator><creator>McArdle, F.</creator><creator>McClelland, D. B. L.</creator><creator>Mackenzie, S. J.</creator><creator>Walsh, T. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200304</creationdate><title>Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit</title><author>Chohan, S. S. ; McArdle, F. ; McClelland, D. B. L. ; Mackenzie, S. J. ; Walsh, T. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4324-f8dd54a7dce6c525a33101dbfeaa82f4ccf42ea02f5c9cb1e98eb15697a52e2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>anaemia</topic><topic>Anemia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Anemia - therapy</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis</topic><topic>Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>critical illness</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Transfusion - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hemoglobins - analysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>red cells</topic><topic>transfusion</topic><topic>Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy</topic><topic>trigger</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chohan, S. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArdle, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClelland, D. B. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mackenzie, S. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, T. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chohan, S. S.</au><au>McArdle, F.</au><au>McClelland, D. B. L.</au><au>Mackenzie, S. J.</au><au>Walsh, T. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit</atitle><jtitle>Vox sanguinis</jtitle><addtitle>Vox Sang</addtitle><date>2003-04</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>211-218</pages><issn>0042-9007</issn><eissn>1423-0410</eissn><coden>VOSAAD</coden><abstract>Background and Objectives The Transfusion Requirements In Critical Care (TRICC) study found that critically ill patients tolerate a restrictive haemoglobin transfusion threshold. We investigated red‐cell transfusion practice since publication of the TRICC study in a large Scottish teaching hospital intensive care unit (ICU).
Materials and Methods We prospectively collected daily data for a 6‐month period on haemoglobin concentrations, red‐cell transfusions and indications for transfusions, throughout ICU stay for all patients who stayed for longer than 24 h in the ICU.
Results A total of 176 patients were studied, who utilized 1237 ICU days. Of these 176 patients, 52% received red‐cell transfusions. A haemoglobin concentration of ≤ 9 g/dl was measured in 55% of patients; this occurred by day 1 and day 2 in 52% and 77% of these cases, respectively. Overall the haemoglobin concentration was ≤ 9 g/dl for 45% of all patient days. Total red‐cell use was 3·1 units per admission (0·47 units per patient day). Only 18% of transfusion episodes were required as a result of haemorrhage. For ‘non‐haemorrhage’ transfusion episodes, the median pretransfusion haemoglobin concentration was 7·8 g/dl (interquartile range: 7·4–8·4 g/dl), and 64% of transfusion episodes were for 2 units.
Conclusions Clinicians in our centre were conservative, in keeping with recent transfusion guidelines, but deviated from the TRICC protocol by transfusing at haemoglobin concentrations of between 7 and 9 g/dl, rather than below 7 g/dl, and by prescribing 2 unit transfusions. Significant numbers of red‐cell units are still used in the critically ill.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><pmid>12670370</pmid><doi>10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00284.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-9007 |
ispartof | Vox sanguinis, 2003-04, Vol.84 (3), p.211-218 |
issn | 0042-9007 1423-0410 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73166481 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over anaemia Anemia - epidemiology Anemia - therapy Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Biological and medical sciences Blood. Blood and plasma substitutes. Blood products. Blood cells. Blood typing. Plasmapheresis. Apheresis Blood. Blood coagulation. Reticuloendothelial system Cohort Studies critical illness Critical Illness - therapy Erythrocyte Transfusion - statistics & numerical data Female Hemoglobins - analysis Humans Intensive Care Units Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Pharmacology. Drug treatments Practice Guidelines as Topic Prevalence Prospective Studies red cells transfusion Transfusions. Complications. Transfusion reactions. Cell and gene therapy trigger United Kingdom |
title | Red cell transfusion practice following the transfusion requirements in critical care (TRICC) study: prospective observational cohort study in a large UK intensive care unit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T08%3A22%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Red%20cell%20transfusion%20practice%20following%20the%20transfusion%20requirements%20in%20critical%20care%20(TRICC)%20study:%20prospective%20observational%20cohort%20study%20in%20a%20large%20UK%20intensive%20care%20unit&rft.jtitle=Vox%20sanguinis&rft.au=Chohan,%20S.%20S.&rft.date=2003-04&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=211-218&rft.issn=0042-9007&rft.eissn=1423-0410&rft.coden=VOSAAD&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00284.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73166481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73166481&rft_id=info:pmid/12670370&rfr_iscdi=true |