Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs
According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a proces...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Psychological science 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.119-124 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 124 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 119 |
| container_title | Psychological science |
| container_volume | 14 |
| creator | Pecher, Diane Zeelenberg, René Barsalou, Lawrence W. |
| description | According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a processing cost. If perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing, then verifying the properties of concepts should exhibit a switching cost as well. For example, verifying a property in the auditory modality (e.g., BLENDER-loud) should be slower after verifying a property in a different modality (e.g., CRANBERRIES-tart) than after verifying a property in the same modality (e.g., LEAVES-rustling). Only words were presented to subjects, and there were no instructions to use imagery. Nevertheless, switching modalities incurred a cost, analogous to the cost of switching modalities in perception. A second experiment showed that this effect was not due to associative priming between properties in the same modality. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73138853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40063781</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_1467-9280.t01-1-01429</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40063781</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ea0ecbdacc4fdaa5c99914149203de00cc88a4cb654428af0c1f05ee7ec7d7fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUha0KREPhEVpFLNhN8R3_L1FafqRWIBXYWo7nup0oGQfbI5S3x9NELWKTu7F09Z1j2R8h50Avoc4H4FI1ptX0slBooKHAW3NCZk_7F2RGjZCNMkqektc5r2gdxeQrcgqtlCBVOyO3vzD1YdcP9_OrPgRMOJTmNnZu3Zfd_HuKW0ylxzwPMc0XcfC4LXnad6Ov27s_ffEPU3oRc8lvyMvg1hnfHs4z8vPT9Y_Fl-bm2-evi483jRdUlgYdRb_snPc8dM4Jb4wBDty0lHVIqfdaO-6XUnDeaheoh0AFokKvOhWQnZH3-95tir9HzMVu-uxxvXYDxjFbxYBpLdhRkGmuOShxFARV_0yztoLv_gNXcUxDfa0FI4RmRqsKiT3kU8w5YbDb1G9c2lmgdtJnJ0120mSrPgv2UV_NXRzKx-UGu-fUwVcF2j2Q3T3-c_OR1vN9aJVLTE-lnFLJlAb2F9TQrvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195583987</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Pecher, Diane ; Zeelenberg, René ; Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pecher, Diane ; Zeelenberg, René ; Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><description>According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a processing cost. If perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing, then verifying the properties of concepts should exhibit a switching cost as well. For example, verifying a property in the auditory modality (e.g., BLENDER-loud) should be slower after verifying a property in a different modality (e.g., CRANBERRIES-tart) than after verifying a property in the same modality (e.g., LEAVES-rustling). Only words were presented to subjects, and there were no instructions to use imagery. Nevertheless, switching modalities incurred a cost, analogous to the cost of switching modalities in perception. A second experiment showed that this effect was not due to associative priming between properties in the same modality. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12661672</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Blackwell Publishing</publisher><subject>Attention ; Cognition ; Concept Formation ; Costs ; Discrimination Learning ; Error rates ; Experimentation ; Experiments ; Humans ; Imagination ; Language ; Memory ; Motivation ; Paired-Associate Learning ; Perception ; Perceptual processing ; Psychology ; Psychophysics ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Semantics ; Sense of touch ; Senses ; Symbolism ; Visual perception ; Words</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.119-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 American Psychological Society</rights><rights>2003 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ea0ecbdacc4fdaa5c99914149203de00cc88a4cb654428af0c1f05ee7ec7d7fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ea0ecbdacc4fdaa5c99914149203de00cc88a4cb654428af0c1f05ee7ec7d7fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40063781$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40063781$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12661672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pecher, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeelenberg, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><title>Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a processing cost. If perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing, then verifying the properties of concepts should exhibit a switching cost as well. For example, verifying a property in the auditory modality (e.g., BLENDER-loud) should be slower after verifying a property in a different modality (e.g., CRANBERRIES-tart) than after verifying a property in the same modality (e.g., LEAVES-rustling). Only words were presented to subjects, and there were no instructions to use imagery. Nevertheless, switching modalities incurred a cost, analogous to the cost of switching modalities in perception. A second experiment showed that this effect was not due to associative priming between properties in the same modality. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Discrimination Learning</subject><subject>Error rates</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imagination</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Paired-Associate Learning</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptual processing</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sense of touch</subject><subject>Senses</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Words</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUha0KREPhEVpFLNhN8R3_L1FafqRWIBXYWo7nup0oGQfbI5S3x9NELWKTu7F09Z1j2R8h50Avoc4H4FI1ptX0slBooKHAW3NCZk_7F2RGjZCNMkqektc5r2gdxeQrcgqtlCBVOyO3vzD1YdcP9_OrPgRMOJTmNnZu3Zfd_HuKW0ylxzwPMc0XcfC4LXnad6Ov27s_ffEPU3oRc8lvyMvg1hnfHs4z8vPT9Y_Fl-bm2-evi483jRdUlgYdRb_snPc8dM4Jb4wBDty0lHVIqfdaO-6XUnDeaheoh0AFokKvOhWQnZH3-95tir9HzMVu-uxxvXYDxjFbxYBpLdhRkGmuOShxFARV_0yztoLv_gNXcUxDfa0FI4RmRqsKiT3kU8w5YbDb1G9c2lmgdtJnJ0120mSrPgv2UV_NXRzKx-UGu-fUwVcF2j2Q3T3-c_OR1vN9aJVLTE-lnFLJlAb2F9TQrvU</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Pecher, Diane</creator><creator>Zeelenberg, René</creator><creator>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs</title><author>Pecher, Diane ; Zeelenberg, René ; Barsalou, Lawrence W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-ea0ecbdacc4fdaa5c99914149203de00cc88a4cb654428af0c1f05ee7ec7d7fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Discrimination Learning</topic><topic>Error rates</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imagination</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Paired-Associate Learning</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptual processing</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sense of touch</topic><topic>Senses</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Words</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pecher, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeelenberg, René</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pecher, Diane</au><au>Zeelenberg, René</au><au>Barsalou, Lawrence W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>119</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>119-124</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><coden>PSYSET</coden><abstract>According to perceptual symbol systems, sensorimotor simulations underlie the representation of concepts. It follows that sensorimotor phenomena should arise in conceptual processing. Previous studies have shown that switching from one modality to another during perceptual processing incurs a processing cost. If perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing, then verifying the properties of concepts should exhibit a switching cost as well. For example, verifying a property in the auditory modality (e.g., BLENDER-loud) should be slower after verifying a property in a different modality (e.g., CRANBERRIES-tart) than after verifying a property in the same modality (e.g., LEAVES-rustling). Only words were presented to subjects, and there were no instructions to use imagery. Nevertheless, switching modalities incurred a cost, analogous to the cost of switching modalities in perception. A second experiment showed that this effect was not due to associative priming between properties in the same modality. These results support the hypothesis that perceptual simulation underlies conceptual processing.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing</pub><pmid>12661672</pmid><doi>10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0956-7976 |
| ispartof | Psychological science, 2003-03, Vol.14 (2), p.119-124 |
| issn | 0956-7976 1467-9280 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73138853 |
| source | MEDLINE; Business Source Complete; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Attention Cognition Concept Formation Costs Discrimination Learning Error rates Experimentation Experiments Humans Imagination Language Memory Motivation Paired-Associate Learning Perception Perceptual processing Psychology Psychophysics Reaction Time Reading Semantics Sense of touch Senses Symbolism Visual perception Words |
| title | Verifying Different-Modality Properties for Concepts Produces Switching Costs |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T15%3A08%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Verifying%20Different-Modality%20Properties%20for%20Concepts%20Produces%20Switching%20Costs&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Pecher,%20Diane&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=119&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=119-124&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft.coden=PSYSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-9280.t01-1-01429&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40063781%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195583987&rft_id=info:pmid/12661672&rft_jstor_id=40063781&rft_sage_id=10.1111_1467-9280.t01-1-01429&rfr_iscdi=true |