Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis

Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2003-04, Vol.111 (5), p.1598-1604
Hauptverfasser: Langford, Richard J, Sgouros, Spyros, Natarajan, Kalyan, Nishikawa, Hiroshi, Dover, Stephen M, Hockley, Anthony D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1604
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1598
container_title Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)
container_volume 111
creator Langford, Richard J
Sgouros, Spyros
Natarajan, Kalyan
Nishikawa, Hiroshi
Dover, Stephen M
Hockley, Anthony D
description Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a “normal” reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, oneway analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1111598, 2003.)
doi_str_mv 10.1097/01.PRS.0000057972.87632.ec
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73133098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73133098</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-ac2999b1c91e0aa8a0005061ff411629b03989efde3d96aec63e9ff1e3298ac73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkVtLwzAUgIMoOqd_QYagL9J6TtKmjW8yvMFE8fYasuyUVdtFk5bpv7fdBsvLgfCd23cYO0WIEVR2CRg_v7zG0L80UxmP80wKHpPdYQNMuYoSnvBdNgAQPEJI-QE7DOETADMh0312gFymKQcxYBeP5resKuP_Rh-uamsa3Xm3bOajcjEae7MoXfhbuNC4UIYjtleYKtDxJg7Z--3N2_g-mjzdPYyvJ5EVCnhkLFdKTdEqJDAmN_2YILEoEkTJ1RSEyhUVMxIzJQ1ZKUgVBZLgKjc2E0N2vq777d1PS6HRdRksdVMuyLVBZwKFAJV34NUatN6F4KnQ376su100gu5VaUDdqdJbVXqlSpPtkk82XdppTbNt6sZNB5xtABOsqYrOhi3DlksyRJA9l6y5pasa8uGrapfk9ZxM1cxXrWUqkoh314AEU4j6Ly7-Aa6ngVI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73133098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><creator>Langford, Richard J ; Sgouros, Spyros ; Natarajan, Kalyan ; Nishikawa, Hiroshi ; Dover, Stephen M ; Hockley, Anthony D</creator><creatorcontrib>Langford, Richard J ; Sgouros, Spyros ; Natarajan, Kalyan ; Nishikawa, Hiroshi ; Dover, Stephen M ; Hockley, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><description>Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a “normal” reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, oneway analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1111598, 2003.)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000057972.87632.ec</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12655203</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cephalometry - methods ; Child, Preschool ; Craniofacial Dysostosis - diagnostic imaging ; Craniofacial Dysostosis - surgery ; Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging ; Craniosynostoses - surgery ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations ; Maxilla - abnormalities ; Maxilla - pathology ; Maxilla - surgery ; Medical sciences ; Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit ; Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging ; Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry ; Reference Values ; Sex Factors ; Syndrome ; Tomography, Spiral Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2003-04, Vol.111 (5), p.1598-1604</ispartof><rights>2003American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-ac2999b1c91e0aa8a0005061ff411629b03989efde3d96aec63e9ff1e3298ac73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-ac2999b1c91e0aa8a0005061ff411629b03989efde3d96aec63e9ff1e3298ac73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14711063$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12655203$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Langford, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgouros, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, Kalyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dover, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><title>Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a “normal” reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, oneway analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1111598, 2003.)</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cephalometry - methods</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Craniofacial Dysostosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Craniofacial Dysostosis - surgery</subject><subject>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Craniosynostoses - surgery</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</subject><subject>Maxilla - abnormalities</subject><subject>Maxilla - pathology</subject><subject>Maxilla - surgery</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Syndrome</subject><subject>Tomography, Spiral Computed - methods</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkVtLwzAUgIMoOqd_QYagL9J6TtKmjW8yvMFE8fYasuyUVdtFk5bpv7fdBsvLgfCd23cYO0WIEVR2CRg_v7zG0L80UxmP80wKHpPdYQNMuYoSnvBdNgAQPEJI-QE7DOETADMh0312gFymKQcxYBeP5resKuP_Rh-uamsa3Xm3bOajcjEae7MoXfhbuNC4UIYjtleYKtDxJg7Z--3N2_g-mjzdPYyvJ5EVCnhkLFdKTdEqJDAmN_2YILEoEkTJ1RSEyhUVMxIzJQ1ZKUgVBZLgKjc2E0N2vq777d1PS6HRdRksdVMuyLVBZwKFAJV34NUatN6F4KnQ376su100gu5VaUDdqdJbVXqlSpPtkk82XdppTbNt6sZNB5xtABOsqYrOhi3DlksyRJA9l6y5pasa8uGrapfk9ZxM1cxXrWUqkoh314AEU4j6Ly7-Aa6ngVI</recordid><startdate>20030415</startdate><enddate>20030415</enddate><creator>Langford, Richard J</creator><creator>Sgouros, Spyros</creator><creator>Natarajan, Kalyan</creator><creator>Nishikawa, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Dover, Stephen M</creator><creator>Hockley, Anthony D</creator><general>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030415</creationdate><title>Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis</title><author>Langford, Richard J ; Sgouros, Spyros ; Natarajan, Kalyan ; Nishikawa, Hiroshi ; Dover, Stephen M ; Hockley, Anthony D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3902-ac2999b1c91e0aa8a0005061ff411629b03989efde3d96aec63e9ff1e3298ac73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cephalometry - methods</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Craniofacial Dysostosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Craniofacial Dysostosis - surgery</topic><topic>Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Craniosynostoses - surgery</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations</topic><topic>Maxilla - abnormalities</topic><topic>Maxilla - pathology</topic><topic>Maxilla - surgery</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Syndrome</topic><topic>Tomography, Spiral Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Langford, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sgouros, Spyros</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natarajan, Kalyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nishikawa, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dover, Stephen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hockley, Anthony D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Langford, Richard J</au><au>Sgouros, Spyros</au><au>Natarajan, Kalyan</au><au>Nishikawa, Hiroshi</au><au>Dover, Stephen M</au><au>Hockley, Anthony D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2003-04-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1598</spage><epage>1604</epage><pages>1598-1604</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Craniosynostosis, and in particular, craniofacial dysostosis, exhibits abnormalities of the nasomaxillary complex in form, position, and development. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the volumetric maxillary abnormality in patients at the time of initial diagnosis of craniosynostosis and to make comparisons with a “normal” reference range for maxillary volumes throughout childhood. The technique of segmentation was applied to preoperative computed tomographic head scans obtained in 31 children (14 boys, 17 girls), between 1 and 34 months of age (mean, 11.06 months), who underwent cranial expansion surgery for craniosynostosis affecting the coronal suture complex. Maxillary volumes were plotted against age for the first 3 years of life and were compared with a healthy population. There was no statistical difference between the two sexes for mean maxillary volume. The mean maxillary volumes for the entire group were statistically smaller than the norm (p = 0.046, linear regression with age as a covariable), but there was no statistical difference among the four different groups of coronal synostosis (unilateral coronal, nonsyndromic bilateral coronal, nonsyndromic complex pansynostosis, syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis) (p = 0.407, oneway analysis of variance). On graphic data analysis, the maxillary volume was smaller than the norm in craniosynostotic children who presented in the first few months of life. However, by 7 months of age in nonsyndromic bilateral coronal synostosis and by 17 months of age in syndromic bilateral coronal synostosis, the maxillary volumes had increased toward the norm. This implies that the effect of the craniosynostotic process on the midface structures is present from birth and parallels the effect on the cranial vault sutures. (Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 1111598, 2003.)</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>12655203</pmid><doi>10.1097/01.PRS.0000057972.87632.ec</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-1052
ispartof Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2003-04, Vol.111 (5), p.1598-1604
issn 0032-1052
1529-4242
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73133098
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload
subjects Age Factors
Biological and medical sciences
Cephalometry - methods
Child, Preschool
Craniofacial Dysostosis - diagnostic imaging
Craniofacial Dysostosis - surgery
Craniosynostoses - diagnostic imaging
Craniosynostoses - surgery
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Malformations and congenital and or hereditary diseases involving bones. Joint deformations
Maxilla - abnormalities
Maxilla - pathology
Maxilla - surgery
Medical sciences
Otorhinolaryngology. Stomatology. Orbit
Postoperative Complications - diagnostic imaging
Radiodiagnosis. Nmr imagery. Nmr spectrometry
Reference Values
Sex Factors
Syndrome
Tomography, Spiral Computed - methods
title Maxillary Volume Growth in Craniosynostosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A44%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maxillary%20Volume%20Growth%20in%20Craniosynostosis&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=Langford,%20Richard%20J&rft.date=2003-04-15&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1598&rft.epage=1604&rft.pages=1598-1604&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/01.PRS.0000057972.87632.ec&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73133098%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73133098&rft_id=info:pmid/12655203&rfr_iscdi=true