Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model

The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.689-694
Hauptverfasser: Weiss, Jeremy, Herrick, Richard C., Taber, Katherine H., Contant, Charles, Plishker, Gordon A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 694
container_issue 4
container_start_page 689
container_title Magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 10
creator Weiss, Jeremy
Herrick, Richard C.
Taber, Katherine H.
Contant, Charles
Plishker, Gordon A.
description The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5, and 4 T). The right arm of the maze extended into the center of a 30-cm horizontal bore magnet, while the left arm extended into a mock magnet bore with the same dimensions. The self-shielded design of the magnet reduces the fringe field to zero within 1 m of the bore, placing the start box of the maze outside the 5-G line of the magnet. Each rat performed a total of ten trials at each level of magnetic field strength. A follow-up subset was run at 4 T with the maze reversed. At 0 T, the rats entered the magnet freely. No significant differences from the control were observed at 1.5 T. At 4 T, however, in 97% of the trials the rats would not enter the magnet. In the maze-reversed subset a majority of the rats turned toward the magnet, indicating that they had learned an aversive response from the previous trials at 4 T. However, in only 4 decisions out of 58 did the rats actually enter the magnet. Eighteen decisions to turn around were made at the edge of the magnet in a region of strong field gradients (up to 13 T/m) and a field strength up to 1.75 T. We propose that the aversive response is most likely due to magnetic induction effects caused by motion in a strong magnetic field gradient.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0730-725X(92)90021-Q
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73130210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0730725X9290021Q</els_id><sourcerecordid>73130210</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f95c568fb9002a28b9876916620c837cfcc1a87336f056290fde18802a02eb33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-gUIOInpYzUezm3gQalErFETw4C2k2UmN7EdNdgX_vVlb9OZpDvPMzDsPQseUXFJC8ytScJIVTLyeK3ahCGE0e95CIyoLngmpxtto9Ivsof0Y3wkhgnGxi3apIFRwNUKzW99m4BzYLuLW4Te_fMO1WTbQeYudh6qM13iCY9eXX7iPvllig6OvVxVg0_jaVLhuS6gO0Y4zVYSjTT1AL_d3L9NZNn96eJxO5pnledFlTgkrcukWQ2DD5ELJIlc0zxmxkhfWWUtN-oDnjoicKeJKoFImljBYcH6AztZrV6H96CF2uvbRQlWZBto-6oJTnkyQBI7XoA1tjAGcXoWUNnxpSvTgTw9y9CBHK6Z__OnnNHay2d8vaij_htbCUv900zfRmsoF01gffzExZlKo4frNGoOk4tND0NF6aCyUPiTVumz9_zm-AbAsijI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73130210</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Weiss, Jeremy ; Herrick, Richard C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Contant, Charles ; Plishker, Gordon A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jeremy ; Herrick, Richard C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Contant, Charles ; Plishker, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><description>The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5, and 4 T). The right arm of the maze extended into the center of a 30-cm horizontal bore magnet, while the left arm extended into a mock magnet bore with the same dimensions. The self-shielded design of the magnet reduces the fringe field to zero within 1 m of the bore, placing the start box of the maze outside the 5-G line of the magnet. Each rat performed a total of ten trials at each level of magnetic field strength. A follow-up subset was run at 4 T with the maze reversed. At 0 T, the rats entered the magnet freely. No significant differences from the control were observed at 1.5 T. At 4 T, however, in 97% of the trials the rats would not enter the magnet. In the maze-reversed subset a majority of the rats turned toward the magnet, indicating that they had learned an aversive response from the previous trials at 4 T. However, in only 4 decisions out of 58 did the rats actually enter the magnet. Eighteen decisions to turn around were made at the edge of the magnet in a region of strong field gradients (up to 13 T/m) and a field strength up to 1.75 T. We propose that the aversive response is most likely due to magnetic induction effects caused by motion in a strong magnetic field gradient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0730-725X(92)90021-Q</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1501539</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MRIMDQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biochemistry and metabolism ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biosafety ; Central nervous system ; Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Magnetic resonance ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects ; Male ; Models, Biological ; Rats ; Static magnetic field effects ; Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.689-694</ispartof><rights>1992</rights><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f95c568fb9002a28b9876916620c837cfcc1a87336f056290fde18802a02eb33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f95c568fb9002a28b9876916620c837cfcc1a87336f056290fde18802a02eb33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0730725X9290021Q$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,4010,27900,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=5428590$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1501539$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrick, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taber, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contant, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plishker, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><title>Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5, and 4 T). The right arm of the maze extended into the center of a 30-cm horizontal bore magnet, while the left arm extended into a mock magnet bore with the same dimensions. The self-shielded design of the magnet reduces the fringe field to zero within 1 m of the bore, placing the start box of the maze outside the 5-G line of the magnet. Each rat performed a total of ten trials at each level of magnetic field strength. A follow-up subset was run at 4 T with the maze reversed. At 0 T, the rats entered the magnet freely. No significant differences from the control were observed at 1.5 T. At 4 T, however, in 97% of the trials the rats would not enter the magnet. In the maze-reversed subset a majority of the rats turned toward the magnet, indicating that they had learned an aversive response from the previous trials at 4 T. However, in only 4 decisions out of 58 did the rats actually enter the magnet. Eighteen decisions to turn around were made at the edge of the magnet in a region of strong field gradients (up to 13 T/m) and a field strength up to 1.75 T. We propose that the aversive response is most likely due to magnetic induction effects caused by motion in a strong magnetic field gradient.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biochemistry and metabolism</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biosafety</subject><subject>Central nervous system</subject><subject>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Static magnetic field effects</subject><subject>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWj_-gUIOInpYzUezm3gQalErFETw4C2k2UmN7EdNdgX_vVlb9OZpDvPMzDsPQseUXFJC8ytScJIVTLyeK3ahCGE0e95CIyoLngmpxtto9Ivsof0Y3wkhgnGxi3apIFRwNUKzW99m4BzYLuLW4Te_fMO1WTbQeYudh6qM13iCY9eXX7iPvllig6OvVxVg0_jaVLhuS6gO0Y4zVYSjTT1AL_d3L9NZNn96eJxO5pnledFlTgkrcukWQ2DD5ELJIlc0zxmxkhfWWUtN-oDnjoicKeJKoFImljBYcH6AztZrV6H96CF2uvbRQlWZBto-6oJTnkyQBI7XoA1tjAGcXoWUNnxpSvTgTw9y9CBHK6Z__OnnNHay2d8vaij_htbCUv900zfRmsoF01gffzExZlKo4frNGoOk4tND0NF6aCyUPiTVumz9_zm-AbAsijI</recordid><startdate>1992</startdate><enddate>1992</enddate><creator>Weiss, Jeremy</creator><creator>Herrick, Richard C.</creator><creator>Taber, Katherine H.</creator><creator>Contant, Charles</creator><creator>Plishker, Gordon A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1992</creationdate><title>Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model</title><author>Weiss, Jeremy ; Herrick, Richard C. ; Taber, Katherine H. ; Contant, Charles ; Plishker, Gordon A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c367t-f95c568fb9002a28b9876916620c837cfcc1a87336f056290fde18802a02eb33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biochemistry and metabolism</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biosafety</topic><topic>Central nervous system</topic><topic>Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Static magnetic field effects</topic><topic>Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weiss, Jeremy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrick, Richard C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taber, Katherine H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contant, Charles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plishker, Gordon A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weiss, Jeremy</au><au>Herrick, Richard C.</au><au>Taber, Katherine H.</au><au>Contant, Charles</au><au>Plishker, Gordon A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>1992</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>689</spage><epage>694</epage><pages>689-694</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><coden>MRIMDQ</coden><abstract>The desire to do clinical imaging and spectroscopy at magnetic field strengths greater than 2 Tesla (T) necessitates investigation of possible bioeffects at these high fields. A simple T-maze was utilized to evaluate the aversive effects of exposure to three levels of static magnetic field (0, 1.5, and 4 T). The right arm of the maze extended into the center of a 30-cm horizontal bore magnet, while the left arm extended into a mock magnet bore with the same dimensions. The self-shielded design of the magnet reduces the fringe field to zero within 1 m of the bore, placing the start box of the maze outside the 5-G line of the magnet. Each rat performed a total of ten trials at each level of magnetic field strength. A follow-up subset was run at 4 T with the maze reversed. At 0 T, the rats entered the magnet freely. No significant differences from the control were observed at 1.5 T. At 4 T, however, in 97% of the trials the rats would not enter the magnet. In the maze-reversed subset a majority of the rats turned toward the magnet, indicating that they had learned an aversive response from the previous trials at 4 T. However, in only 4 decisions out of 58 did the rats actually enter the magnet. Eighteen decisions to turn around were made at the edge of the magnet in a region of strong field gradients (up to 13 T/m) and a field strength up to 1.75 T. We propose that the aversive response is most likely due to magnetic induction effects caused by motion in a strong magnetic field gradient.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>1501539</pmid><doi>10.1016/0730-725X(92)90021-Q</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-725X
ispartof Magnetic resonance imaging, 1992, Vol.10 (4), p.689-694
issn 0730-725X
1873-5894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73130210
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Animals
Biochemistry and metabolism
Biological and medical sciences
Biosafety
Central nervous system
Electromagnetic Fields - adverse effects
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Magnetic resonance
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - adverse effects
Male
Models, Biological
Rats
Static magnetic field effects
Vertebrates: nervous system and sense organs
title Bio-effects of high magnetic fields: A study using a simple animal model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T00%3A28%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bio-effects%20of%20high%20magnetic%20fields:%20A%20study%20using%20a%20simple%20animal%20model&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Weiss,%20Jeremy&rft.date=1992&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=689&rft.epage=694&rft.pages=689-694&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft.coden=MRIMDQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0730-725X(92)90021-Q&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73130210%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73130210&rft_id=info:pmid/1501539&rft_els_id=0730725X9290021Q&rfr_iscdi=true