Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis

Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of human evolution 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Tanya M, Martin, Lawrence B, Leakey, Meave G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 306
container_issue 3
container_start_page 283
container_title Journal of human evolution
container_volume 44
creator Smith, Tanya M
Martin, Lawrence B
Leakey, Meave G
description Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in Proconsul, Lufengpithecus, and Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to Proconsul nyanzae, Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73122781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004724840300006X</els_id><sourcerecordid>18923352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Elr3DAUwHFRWpLJ8hFafGlJoE61WNuphJANBnJICrkJzfMzUWPLU8kO9NtXkxmaY3TR5fe0_An5zOgZo0z9uKe00TVvTHNCxSktS9WPH8iCUStro6j6SBb_yT45yPl3MbYRfI_sM66klswsyPIy-gH7anoK8Bwx5-_VECCNeUozTHPCyse2avEF-3E9YJyqEKvzLo3rMD0hzLkq6NlHjDnkI_Kp833G491-SH5dXT5c3NTLu-vbi_NlDY0xU220bajtgCtrGNVcaaWkByaUph01FDxlmiqx6mBlGF-BaC20DJXVoBuQ4pB82567TuOfGfPkhpAB-768Y5yz04Jxrg17FzJjuRCSFyi3cPP1nLBz6xQGn_46Rt2mt3vt7TYxHRXutbd7LHNfdhfMqwHbt6ld4AK-7oDP4Psu-Qghv7lGWi2tKu7n1mHp9hIwuQwBI2AbEsLk2jG885R_6_2cWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18923352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><description>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in Proconsul, Lufengpithecus, and Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to Proconsul nyanzae, Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12657518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Afropithecus turkanensis ; Animals ; Anthropology, Physical ; Biological Evolution ; Classification ; cross-striation ; crown formation time ; daily secretion rate ; Dental Enamel - anatomy &amp; histology ; Dryopithecus ; enamel microstructure ; enamel thickness ; Environmental studies ; Fauna ; Fossils ; Hominidae ; Humans ; intradian line ; lamination ; Lufengpithecus ; Methodology and general studies ; Miocene hominoid ; Molar - anatomy &amp; histology ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Proconsul ; Retzius line</subject><ispartof>Journal of human evolution, 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14597596$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12657518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><title>Journal of human evolution</title><addtitle>J Hum Evol</addtitle><description>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in Proconsul, Lufengpithecus, and Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to Proconsul nyanzae, Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</description><subject>Afropithecus turkanensis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology, Physical</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>cross-striation</subject><subject>crown formation time</subject><subject>daily secretion rate</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Dryopithecus</subject><subject>enamel microstructure</subject><subject>enamel thickness</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Hominidae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intradian line</subject><subject>lamination</subject><subject>Lufengpithecus</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Miocene hominoid</subject><subject>Molar - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Proconsul</subject><subject>Retzius line</subject><issn>0047-2484</issn><issn>1095-8606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Elr3DAUwHFRWpLJ8hFafGlJoE61WNuphJANBnJICrkJzfMzUWPLU8kO9NtXkxmaY3TR5fe0_An5zOgZo0z9uKe00TVvTHNCxSktS9WPH8iCUStro6j6SBb_yT45yPl3MbYRfI_sM66klswsyPIy-gH7anoK8Bwx5-_VECCNeUozTHPCyse2avEF-3E9YJyqEKvzLo3rMD0hzLkq6NlHjDnkI_Kp833G491-SH5dXT5c3NTLu-vbi_NlDY0xU220bajtgCtrGNVcaaWkByaUph01FDxlmiqx6mBlGF-BaC20DJXVoBuQ4pB82567TuOfGfPkhpAB-768Y5yz04Jxrg17FzJjuRCSFyi3cPP1nLBz6xQGn_46Rt2mt3vt7TYxHRXutbd7LHNfdhfMqwHbt6ld4AK-7oDP4Psu-Qghv7lGWi2tKu7n1mHp9hIwuQwBI2AbEsLk2jG885R_6_2cWA</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Smith, Tanya M</creator><creator>Martin, Lawrence B</creator><creator>Leakey, Meave G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><author>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Afropithecus turkanensis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology, Physical</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>cross-striation</topic><topic>crown formation time</topic><topic>daily secretion rate</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Dryopithecus</topic><topic>enamel microstructure</topic><topic>enamel thickness</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Hominidae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intradian line</topic><topic>lamination</topic><topic>Lufengpithecus</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Miocene hominoid</topic><topic>Molar - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Proconsul</topic><topic>Retzius line</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Tanya M</au><au>Martin, Lawrence B</au><au>Leakey, Meave G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human evolution</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Evol</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>283-306</pages><issn>0047-2484</issn><eissn>1095-8606</eissn><abstract>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in Proconsul, Lufengpithecus, and Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to Proconsul nyanzae, Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12657518</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0047-2484
ispartof Journal of human evolution, 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306
issn 0047-2484
1095-8606
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73122781
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Afropithecus turkanensis
Animals
Anthropology, Physical
Biological Evolution
Classification
cross-striation
crown formation time
daily secretion rate
Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology
Dryopithecus
enamel microstructure
enamel thickness
Environmental studies
Fauna
Fossils
Hominidae
Humans
intradian line
lamination
Lufengpithecus
Methodology and general studies
Miocene hominoid
Molar - anatomy & histology
Prehistory and protohistory
Proconsul
Retzius line
title Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A50%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enamel%20thickness,%20microstructure%20and%20development%20in%20Afropithecus%20turkanensis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20evolution&rft.au=Smith,%20Tanya%20M&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=283-306&rft.issn=0047-2484&rft.eissn=1095-8606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18923352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18923352&rft_id=info:pmid/12657518&rft_els_id=S004724840300006X&rfr_iscdi=true