Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis
Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of human evolution 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 306 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 283 |
container_title | Journal of human evolution |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Smith, Tanya M Martin, Lawrence B Leakey, Meave G |
description | Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in
Proconsul,
Lufengpithecus, and
Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two
A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to
Proconsul nyanzae,
Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and
Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73122781</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004724840300006X</els_id><sourcerecordid>18923352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Elr3DAUwHFRWpLJ8hFafGlJoE61WNuphJANBnJICrkJzfMzUWPLU8kO9NtXkxmaY3TR5fe0_An5zOgZo0z9uKe00TVvTHNCxSktS9WPH8iCUStro6j6SBb_yT45yPl3MbYRfI_sM66klswsyPIy-gH7anoK8Bwx5-_VECCNeUozTHPCyse2avEF-3E9YJyqEKvzLo3rMD0hzLkq6NlHjDnkI_Kp833G491-SH5dXT5c3NTLu-vbi_NlDY0xU220bajtgCtrGNVcaaWkByaUph01FDxlmiqx6mBlGF-BaC20DJXVoBuQ4pB82567TuOfGfPkhpAB-768Y5yz04Jxrg17FzJjuRCSFyi3cPP1nLBz6xQGn_46Rt2mt3vt7TYxHRXutbd7LHNfdhfMqwHbt6ld4AK-7oDP4Psu-Qghv7lGWi2tKu7n1mHp9hIwuQwBI2AbEsLk2jG885R_6_2cWA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18923352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><description>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in
Proconsul,
Lufengpithecus, and
Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two
A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to
Proconsul nyanzae,
Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and
Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2484</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8606</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12657518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Afropithecus turkanensis ; Animals ; Anthropology, Physical ; Biological Evolution ; Classification ; cross-striation ; crown formation time ; daily secretion rate ; Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology ; Dryopithecus ; enamel microstructure ; enamel thickness ; Environmental studies ; Fauna ; Fossils ; Hominidae ; Humans ; intradian line ; lamination ; Lufengpithecus ; Methodology and general studies ; Miocene hominoid ; Molar - anatomy & histology ; Prehistory and protohistory ; Proconsul ; Retzius line</subject><ispartof>Journal of human evolution, 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14597596$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12657518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><title>Journal of human evolution</title><addtitle>J Hum Evol</addtitle><description>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in
Proconsul,
Lufengpithecus, and
Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two
A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to
Proconsul nyanzae,
Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and
Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</description><subject>Afropithecus turkanensis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropology, Physical</subject><subject>Biological Evolution</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>cross-striation</subject><subject>crown formation time</subject><subject>daily secretion rate</subject><subject>Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Dryopithecus</subject><subject>enamel microstructure</subject><subject>enamel thickness</subject><subject>Environmental studies</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fossils</subject><subject>Hominidae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>intradian line</subject><subject>lamination</subject><subject>Lufengpithecus</subject><subject>Methodology and general studies</subject><subject>Miocene hominoid</subject><subject>Molar - anatomy & histology</subject><subject>Prehistory and protohistory</subject><subject>Proconsul</subject><subject>Retzius line</subject><issn>0047-2484</issn><issn>1095-8606</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Elr3DAUwHFRWpLJ8hFafGlJoE61WNuphJANBnJICrkJzfMzUWPLU8kO9NtXkxmaY3TR5fe0_An5zOgZo0z9uKe00TVvTHNCxSktS9WPH8iCUStro6j6SBb_yT45yPl3MbYRfI_sM66klswsyPIy-gH7anoK8Bwx5-_VECCNeUozTHPCyse2avEF-3E9YJyqEKvzLo3rMD0hzLkq6NlHjDnkI_Kp833G491-SH5dXT5c3NTLu-vbi_NlDY0xU220bajtgCtrGNVcaaWkByaUph01FDxlmiqx6mBlGF-BaC20DJXVoBuQ4pB82567TuOfGfPkhpAB-768Y5yz04Jxrg17FzJjuRCSFyi3cPP1nLBz6xQGn_46Rt2mt3vt7TYxHRXutbd7LHNfdhfMqwHbt6ld4AK-7oDP4Psu-Qghv7lGWi2tKu7n1mHp9hIwuQwBI2AbEsLk2jG885R_6_2cWA</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Smith, Tanya M</creator><creator>Martin, Lawrence B</creator><creator>Leakey, Meave G</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</title><author>Smith, Tanya M ; Martin, Lawrence B ; Leakey, Meave G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-879409fc2698107267665ac13670f080ca017063bfcb812bc3d9cd1e697c74c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Afropithecus turkanensis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropology, Physical</topic><topic>Biological Evolution</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>cross-striation</topic><topic>crown formation time</topic><topic>daily secretion rate</topic><topic>Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Dryopithecus</topic><topic>enamel microstructure</topic><topic>enamel thickness</topic><topic>Environmental studies</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fossils</topic><topic>Hominidae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>intradian line</topic><topic>lamination</topic><topic>Lufengpithecus</topic><topic>Methodology and general studies</topic><topic>Miocene hominoid</topic><topic>Molar - anatomy & histology</topic><topic>Prehistory and protohistory</topic><topic>Proconsul</topic><topic>Retzius line</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, Tanya M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Lawrence B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leakey, Meave G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of human evolution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, Tanya M</au><au>Martin, Lawrence B</au><au>Leakey, Meave G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of human evolution</jtitle><addtitle>J Hum Evol</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>283</spage><epage>306</epage><pages>283-306</pages><issn>0047-2484</issn><eissn>1095-8606</eissn><abstract>Afropithecus turkanensis, a 17–17.5 million year old large-bodied hominoid from Kenya, has previously been reported to be the oldest known thick-enamelled Miocene ape. Most investigations of enamel thickness in Miocene apes have been limited to opportunistic or destructive studies of small samples. Recently, more comprehensive studies of enamel thickness and microstructure in
Proconsul,
Lufengpithecus, and
Dryopithecus, as well as extant apes and fossil humans, have provided information on rates and patterns of dental development, including crown formation time, and have begun to provide a comparative context for interpretation of the evolution of these characters throughout the past 20 million years of hominoid evolution. In this study, enamel thickness and aspects of the enamel microstructure in two
A. turkanensis second molars were quantified and provide insight into rates of enamel apposition, numbers of cells actively secreting enamel, and the time required to form regions of the crown. The average value for relative enamel thickness in the two molars is 21.4, which is a lower value than a previous analysis of this species, but which is still relatively thick compared to extant apes. This value is similar to those of several Miocene hominoids, a fossil hominid, and modern humans. Certain aspects of the enamel microstructure are similar to
Proconsul nyanzae,
Dryopithecus laietanus, Lufengpithecus lufengensis, Graecopithecus freybergi and
Pongo pygmaeus, while other features differ from extant and fossil hominoids. Crown formation times for the two teeth are 2.4–2.6 years and 2.9–3.1 years respectively. These times are similar to a number of extant and fossil hominoids, some of which appear to show additional developmental similarities, including thick enamel. Although thick enamel may be formed through several developmental pathways, most Miocene hominoids and fossil hominids with relatively thick enamel are characterized by a relatively long period of cuspal enamel formation and a rapid rate of enamel secretion throughout the whole cusp, but a shorter total crown formation time than thinner-enamelled extant apes.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12657518</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0047-2484 |
ispartof | Journal of human evolution, 2003-03, Vol.44 (3), p.283-306 |
issn | 0047-2484 1095-8606 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73122781 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Afropithecus turkanensis Animals Anthropology, Physical Biological Evolution Classification cross-striation crown formation time daily secretion rate Dental Enamel - anatomy & histology Dryopithecus enamel microstructure enamel thickness Environmental studies Fauna Fossils Hominidae Humans intradian line lamination Lufengpithecus Methodology and general studies Miocene hominoid Molar - anatomy & histology Prehistory and protohistory Proconsul Retzius line |
title | Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A50%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enamel%20thickness,%20microstructure%20and%20development%20in%20Afropithecus%20turkanensis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20human%20evolution&rft.au=Smith,%20Tanya%20M&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=283&rft.epage=306&rft.pages=283-306&rft.issn=0047-2484&rft.eissn=1095-8606&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00006-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18923352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18923352&rft_id=info:pmid/12657518&rft_els_id=S004724840300006X&rfr_iscdi=true |