The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia

Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anesthesia and analgesia 2003-04, Vol.96 (4), p.1167-1172
Hauptverfasser: Calimaran, Arthur L., Strauss-Hoder, Tina P., Wang, Warren Y., McCarthy, Robert J., Wong, Cynthia A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1172
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1167
container_title Anesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 96
creator Calimaran, Arthur L.
Strauss-Hoder, Tina P.
Wang, Warren Y.
McCarthy, Robert J.
Wong, Cynthia A.
description Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg on parturients’ hemodynamic stability, posterior column function, motor strength, and subjective ability to walk. Parturients (n = 153) were randomized to receive either 3 mL of epidural saline or lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000. Hemodynamic variables, proprioception, straight leg raise, and the modified Bromage score were analyzed in 110 parturients who completed the study protocol and were not different between groups. Vibratory sense, the ability to perform a partial deep knee bend and to step up on a stool, and the subjective ability to walk were impaired in a larger number of parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group at 30 min (P < 0.05). At 60 min, there were no differences between the groups except that fewer parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group could step up on a stool. The straight leg raise against resistance and the modified Bromage scale did not correlate well with other tests of motor strength (Spearman’s ρ, 0.273—0.405). These data suggest that the test dose should be avoided immediately after initiation of CSE analgesia when early ambulation is desired.
doi_str_mv 10.1213/01.ANE.0000054204.11293.3C
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73119795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73119795</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5376-95fd35b3a73af859d29fef6f1927b9208a2aa58a697b0bf53ad90bd0b7d6b9ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkV1v2yAUhtG0qc3a_oUJTdru7PFhsNld5KbtpGy7WHqNDjYsbI5JwVa1fz-6WMqQAB3xvBz0gNB7SkrKKP9EaLn-tinJyxAVI1VJKVO85O0rtKKCyaIWqnmNVvmcF0wpdYnepvQrl5Q08gJdUiYFlXWzQk-7vcUb52w34eDw5uj7OcKAdzZN-DYki8OIv4YpRHw3j93kc7l2k40YcBsOxo-2xz-OfoSh-C_c7Uf_NFvscm4LJq_rTPy0ycM1euNgSPZm2a_Q491m1z4U2-_3X9r1tugEr2WhhOu5MBxqDq4RqmfKWScdVaw2ipEGGIBoQKraEOMEh14R0xNT99Io6_gV-ni69xhDfkqa9MGnzg4DjDbMSdecUlUrkcHPJ7CLIaVonT5Gf4D4R1OiX4RrQnUWrs_C9T_hmrc5_G7pMpuD7c_RxXAGPiwApA4GF2HsfDpzlWwqIWTmqhP3HIasN_0e5mcb9d7CMO2X1lwVLH8pqXJR5FlJ_hdj-JkM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73119795</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Calimaran, Arthur L. ; Strauss-Hoder, Tina P. ; Wang, Warren Y. ; McCarthy, Robert J. ; Wong, Cynthia A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calimaran, Arthur L. ; Strauss-Hoder, Tina P. ; Wang, Warren Y. ; McCarthy, Robert J. ; Wong, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><description>Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg on parturients’ hemodynamic stability, posterior column function, motor strength, and subjective ability to walk. Parturients (n = 153) were randomized to receive either 3 mL of epidural saline or lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000. Hemodynamic variables, proprioception, straight leg raise, and the modified Bromage score were analyzed in 110 parturients who completed the study protocol and were not different between groups. Vibratory sense, the ability to perform a partial deep knee bend and to step up on a stool, and the subjective ability to walk were impaired in a larger number of parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group at 30 min (P &lt; 0.05). At 60 min, there were no differences between the groups except that fewer parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group could step up on a stool. The straight leg raise against resistance and the modified Bromage scale did not correlate well with other tests of motor strength (Spearman’s ρ, 0.273—0.405). These data suggest that the test dose should be avoided immediately after initiation of CSE analgesia when early ambulation is desired.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2999</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-7598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000054204.11293.3C</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12651678</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AACRAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hagerstown, MD: International Anesthesia Research Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analgesia, Epidural ; Analgesia, Obstetrical ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Biological and medical sciences ; Blood Pressure - drug effects ; Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage ; Female ; Heart Rate - drug effects ; Humans ; Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment) ; Medical sciences ; Motor Neurons - drug effects ; Nerve Block ; Pregnancy ; Proprioception - drug effects ; Sensation - drug effects ; Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Vibration ; Walking</subject><ispartof>Anesthesia and analgesia, 2003-04, Vol.96 (4), p.1167-1172</ispartof><rights>International Anesthesia Research Society</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5376-95fd35b3a73af859d29fef6f1927b9208a2aa58a697b0bf53ad90bd0b7d6b9ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5376-95fd35b3a73af859d29fef6f1927b9208a2aa58a697b0bf53ad90bd0b7d6b9ef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00000539-200304000-00046$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14684556$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12651678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calimaran, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss-Hoder, Tina P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Warren Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia</title><title>Anesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><description>Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg on parturients’ hemodynamic stability, posterior column function, motor strength, and subjective ability to walk. Parturients (n = 153) were randomized to receive either 3 mL of epidural saline or lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000. Hemodynamic variables, proprioception, straight leg raise, and the modified Bromage score were analyzed in 110 parturients who completed the study protocol and were not different between groups. Vibratory sense, the ability to perform a partial deep knee bend and to step up on a stool, and the subjective ability to walk were impaired in a larger number of parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group at 30 min (P &lt; 0.05). At 60 min, there were no differences between the groups except that fewer parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group could step up on a stool. The straight leg raise against resistance and the modified Bromage scale did not correlate well with other tests of motor strength (Spearman’s ρ, 0.273—0.405). These data suggest that the test dose should be avoided immediately after initiation of CSE analgesia when early ambulation is desired.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analgesia, Epidural</subject><subject>Analgesia, Obstetrical</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Blood Pressure - drug effects</subject><subject>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart Rate - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Motor Neurons - drug effects</subject><subject>Nerve Block</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Proprioception - drug effects</subject><subject>Sensation - drug effects</subject><subject>Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Walking</subject><issn>0003-2999</issn><issn>1526-7598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkV1v2yAUhtG0qc3a_oUJTdru7PFhsNld5KbtpGy7WHqNDjYsbI5JwVa1fz-6WMqQAB3xvBz0gNB7SkrKKP9EaLn-tinJyxAVI1VJKVO85O0rtKKCyaIWqnmNVvmcF0wpdYnepvQrl5Q08gJdUiYFlXWzQk-7vcUb52w34eDw5uj7OcKAdzZN-DYki8OIv4YpRHw3j93kc7l2k40YcBsOxo-2xz-OfoSh-C_c7Uf_NFvscm4LJq_rTPy0ycM1euNgSPZm2a_Q491m1z4U2-_3X9r1tugEr2WhhOu5MBxqDq4RqmfKWScdVaw2ipEGGIBoQKraEOMEh14R0xNT99Io6_gV-ni69xhDfkqa9MGnzg4DjDbMSdecUlUrkcHPJ7CLIaVonT5Gf4D4R1OiX4RrQnUWrs_C9T_hmrc5_G7pMpuD7c_RxXAGPiwApA4GF2HsfDpzlWwqIWTmqhP3HIasN_0e5mcb9d7CMO2X1lwVLH8pqXJR5FlJ_hdj-JkM</recordid><startdate>20030401</startdate><enddate>20030401</enddate><creator>Calimaran, Arthur L.</creator><creator>Strauss-Hoder, Tina P.</creator><creator>Wang, Warren Y.</creator><creator>McCarthy, Robert J.</creator><creator>Wong, Cynthia A.</creator><general>International Anesthesia Research Society</general><general>Lippincott</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030401</creationdate><title>The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia</title><author>Calimaran, Arthur L. ; Strauss-Hoder, Tina P. ; Wang, Warren Y. ; McCarthy, Robert J. ; Wong, Cynthia A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5376-95fd35b3a73af859d29fef6f1927b9208a2aa58a697b0bf53ad90bd0b7d6b9ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analgesia, Epidural</topic><topic>Analgesia, Obstetrical</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Blood Pressure - drug effects</topic><topic>Epinephrine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart Rate - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lidocaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Motor Neurons - drug effects</topic><topic>Nerve Block</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Proprioception - drug effects</topic><topic>Sensation - drug effects</topic><topic>Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Walking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calimaran, Arthur L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strauss-Hoder, Tina P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Warren Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarthy, Robert J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Cynthia A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calimaran, Arthur L.</au><au>Strauss-Hoder, Tina P.</au><au>Wang, Warren Y.</au><au>McCarthy, Robert J.</au><au>Wong, Cynthia A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia</atitle><jtitle>Anesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Anesth Analg</addtitle><date>2003-04-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1167</spage><epage>1172</epage><pages>1167-1172</pages><issn>0003-2999</issn><eissn>1526-7598</eissn><coden>AACRAT</coden><abstract>Labor analgesia initiated with intrathecal bupivacaine and fentanyl, without a local anesthetic epidural test dose, provides effective analgesia and allows ambulation. In this study, we sought to determine the effect of a lidocaine-epinephrine test dose administered immediately after the initiation of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) analgesia with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and fentanyl 25 μg on parturients’ hemodynamic stability, posterior column function, motor strength, and subjective ability to walk. Parturients (n = 153) were randomized to receive either 3 mL of epidural saline or lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 1:200,000. Hemodynamic variables, proprioception, straight leg raise, and the modified Bromage score were analyzed in 110 parturients who completed the study protocol and were not different between groups. Vibratory sense, the ability to perform a partial deep knee bend and to step up on a stool, and the subjective ability to walk were impaired in a larger number of parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group at 30 min (P &lt; 0.05). At 60 min, there were no differences between the groups except that fewer parturients in the lidocaine-epinephrine group could step up on a stool. The straight leg raise against resistance and the modified Bromage scale did not correlate well with other tests of motor strength (Spearman’s ρ, 0.273—0.405). These data suggest that the test dose should be avoided immediately after initiation of CSE analgesia when early ambulation is desired.</abstract><cop>Hagerstown, MD</cop><pub>International Anesthesia Research Society</pub><pmid>12651678</pmid><doi>10.1213/01.ANE.0000054204.11293.3C</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2999
ispartof Anesthesia and analgesia, 2003-04, Vol.96 (4), p.1167-1172
issn 0003-2999
1526-7598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73119795
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Adult
Analgesia, Epidural
Analgesia, Obstetrical
Anesthesia
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Epinephrine - administration & dosage
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Lidocaine - administration & dosage
Local anesthesia. Pain (treatment)
Medical sciences
Motor Neurons - drug effects
Nerve Block
Pregnancy
Proprioception - drug effects
Sensation - drug effects
Vasoconstrictor Agents - administration & dosage
Vibration
Walking
title The Effect of Epidural Test Dose on Motor Function After a Combined Spinal-Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T10%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Epidural%20Test%20Dose%20on%20Motor%20Function%20After%20a%20Combined%20Spinal-Epidural%20Technique%20for%20Labor%20Analgesia&rft.jtitle=Anesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Calimaran,%20Arthur%20L.&rft.date=2003-04-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1167&rft.epage=1172&rft.pages=1167-1172&rft.issn=0003-2999&rft.eissn=1526-7598&rft.coden=AACRAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1213/01.ANE.0000054204.11293.3C&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73119795%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73119795&rft_id=info:pmid/12651678&rfr_iscdi=true