The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences

Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this impo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences 2003-02, Vol.358 (1430), p.361-374
Hauptverfasser: Baron-Cohen, Simon, Richler, Jennifer, Bisarya, Dheraj, Gurunathan, Nhishanth, Wheelwright, Sally
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 374
container_issue 1430
container_start_page 361
container_title Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences
container_volume 358
creator Baron-Cohen, Simon
Richler, Jennifer
Bisarya, Dheraj
Gurunathan, Nhishanth
Wheelwright, Sally
description Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this important dimension. A second major dimension of sex differences is empathizing (the drive to identify mental states and respond to these with an appropriate emotion). Previous studies find females score higher on empathy measures. We report a new self-report questionnaire, the Systemizing Quotient (SQ), for use with adults of normal intelligence. It contains 40 systemizing items and 20 control items. On each systemizing item, a person can score 2, 1 or 0, so the SQ has a maximum score of 80 and a minimum of zero. In Study 1, we measured the SQ of n = 278 adults (114 males, 164 females) from a general population, to test for predicted sex differences (male superiority) in systemizing. All subjects were also given the Empathy Quotient (EQ) to test if previous reports of female superiority would be replicated. In Study 2 we employed the SQ and the EQ with n = 47 adults (33 males, 14 females) with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), who are predicted to be either normal or superior at systemizing, but impaired at empathizing. Their scores were compared with n = 47 matched adults from the general population in Study 1. In Study 1, as predicted, normal adult males scored significantly higher than females on the SQ and significantly lower on the EQ. In Study 2, again as predicted, adults with AS/HFA scored significantly higher on the SQ than matched controls, and significantly lower on the EQ than matched controls. The SQ reveals both a sex difference in systemizing in the general population and an unusually strong drive to systemize in AS/HFA. These results are discussed in relation to two linked theories: the 'empathizing-systemizing' (E-S) theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism.
doi_str_mv 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73117351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3558148</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3558148</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f7782af146057d1522ea3736d13d7ed0d200f4e17e4acb23062d4f12427690a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUjRCIGQa2rBDyihUpfsVOWICGipcYiRGUx85yE6d1J7E7ttOZzooFf8Af8iU4TVWoEMPKsu45595zz02S-wiOECzyJ86H6QhDiEcIQ3YjOUSUoxQXHN5MDmHBcJpTwg6SO94vIIRFxunt5ABhRgpCyGHyfTJXwK99UK2-0mYGzjsbtDLhKZAGaLNSPuiZDNoaYGsgq64JHlzoMAfHfqncTLlIN5WzrQLWgbmezX9--1F3puw5vaLsgvbt46hXAWNdKxvg1SWodF0rp0yp_N3kVi0br-5t36Pk06uXk_Gb9OT967fj45O05DgLac15jmWNKIMZr1CGsZKEE1YhUnFVwSruoaYKcUVlOcUEMlzRGmGKOSugpOQoeTboLrtpq6oy2nSyEUunW-nWwkot9itGz8XMrgRiBUGIR4FHWwFnz7u4GtFqX6qmkUbZzgu-QWXov0AMKccF7BVHA7B01nun6t00CIo-YdEnLPqERZ9wJDz808Nv-DbSCPADwNl1XKYttQprsbCdM_ErPnycvEBFAVckyzWiBAqYEwQZLBAXV3q56dcDRAQI7X2nxAa2P8ffY5Hruv7TzIOBtfDBup0XkmU5onksp0NZx_u83JWlOxOME56JzzkVX06_vpswdCrGEQ8HfH-FF9opsTdN_Cxj-97XxhFhfVDPr6X085bWhHgQe0RRd028nKomvwAe1h0y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>20472907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Baron-Cohen, Simon ; Richler, Jennifer ; Bisarya, Dheraj ; Gurunathan, Nhishanth ; Wheelwright, Sally</creator><contributor>Hill, E. L. ; Frith, U. ; Frith, U. ; Hill, E. L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baron-Cohen, Simon ; Richler, Jennifer ; Bisarya, Dheraj ; Gurunathan, Nhishanth ; Wheelwright, Sally ; Hill, E. L. ; Frith, U. ; Frith, U. ; Hill, E. L.</creatorcontrib><description>Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this important dimension. A second major dimension of sex differences is empathizing (the drive to identify mental states and respond to these with an appropriate emotion). Previous studies find females score higher on empathy measures. We report a new self-report questionnaire, the Systemizing Quotient (SQ), for use with adults of normal intelligence. It contains 40 systemizing items and 20 control items. On each systemizing item, a person can score 2, 1 or 0, so the SQ has a maximum score of 80 and a minimum of zero. In Study 1, we measured the SQ of n = 278 adults (114 males, 164 females) from a general population, to test for predicted sex differences (male superiority) in systemizing. All subjects were also given the Empathy Quotient (EQ) to test if previous reports of female superiority would be replicated. In Study 2 we employed the SQ and the EQ with n = 47 adults (33 males, 14 females) with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), who are predicted to be either normal or superior at systemizing, but impaired at empathizing. Their scores were compared with n = 47 matched adults from the general population in Study 1. In Study 1, as predicted, normal adult males scored significantly higher than females on the SQ and significantly lower on the EQ. In Study 2, again as predicted, adults with AS/HFA scored significantly higher on the SQ than matched controls, and significantly lower on the EQ than matched controls. The SQ reveals both a sex difference in systemizing in the general population and an unusually strong drive to systemize in AS/HFA. These results are discussed in relation to two linked theories: the 'empathizing-systemizing' (E-S) theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-8436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2970</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2002.1206</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12639333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Royal Society</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asperger Syndrome ; Asperger Syndrome - diagnosis ; Asperger Syndrome - psychology ; Autistic disorder ; Autistic Disorder - diagnosis ; Autistic Disorder - psychology ; Coherence theory ; Empathizing ; Empathy ; Female ; Humans ; Intelligence ; Male ; Mind ; Psychological Tests ; Psychological Theory ; Questionnaires ; Sex Characteristics ; Sex Differences ; Sex linked differences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Systemizing ; T tests ; Test theory</subject><ispartof>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-02, Vol.358 (1430), p.361-374</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 The Royal Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f7782af146057d1522ea3736d13d7ed0d200f4e17e4acb23062d4f12427690a43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f7782af146057d1522ea3736d13d7ed0d200f4e17e4acb23062d4f12427690a43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3558148$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3558148$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,803,885,27924,27925,53791,53793,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12639333$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Hill, E. L.</contributor><contributor>Frith, U.</contributor><contributor>Frith, U.</contributor><contributor>Hill, E. L.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Baron-Cohen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisarya, Dheraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurunathan, Nhishanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheelwright, Sally</creatorcontrib><title>The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences</title><title>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</title><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><description>Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this important dimension. A second major dimension of sex differences is empathizing (the drive to identify mental states and respond to these with an appropriate emotion). Previous studies find females score higher on empathy measures. We report a new self-report questionnaire, the Systemizing Quotient (SQ), for use with adults of normal intelligence. It contains 40 systemizing items and 20 control items. On each systemizing item, a person can score 2, 1 or 0, so the SQ has a maximum score of 80 and a minimum of zero. In Study 1, we measured the SQ of n = 278 adults (114 males, 164 females) from a general population, to test for predicted sex differences (male superiority) in systemizing. All subjects were also given the Empathy Quotient (EQ) to test if previous reports of female superiority would be replicated. In Study 2 we employed the SQ and the EQ with n = 47 adults (33 males, 14 females) with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), who are predicted to be either normal or superior at systemizing, but impaired at empathizing. Their scores were compared with n = 47 matched adults from the general population in Study 1. In Study 1, as predicted, normal adult males scored significantly higher than females on the SQ and significantly lower on the EQ. In Study 2, again as predicted, adults with AS/HFA scored significantly higher on the SQ than matched controls, and significantly lower on the EQ than matched controls. The SQ reveals both a sex difference in systemizing in the general population and an unusually strong drive to systemize in AS/HFA. These results are discussed in relation to two linked theories: the 'empathizing-systemizing' (E-S) theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asperger Syndrome</subject><subject>Asperger Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>Asperger Syndrome - psychology</subject><subject>Autistic disorder</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</subject><subject>Autistic Disorder - psychology</subject><subject>Coherence theory</subject><subject>Empathizing</subject><subject>Empathy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mind</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>Psychological Theory</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sex linked differences</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Systemizing</subject><subject>T tests</subject><subject>Test theory</subject><issn>0962-8436</issn><issn>1471-2970</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUsuO0zAUjRCIGQa2rBDyihUpfsVOWICGipcYiRGUx85yE6d1J7E7ttOZzooFf8Af8iU4TVWoEMPKsu45595zz02S-wiOECzyJ86H6QhDiEcIQ3YjOUSUoxQXHN5MDmHBcJpTwg6SO94vIIRFxunt5ABhRgpCyGHyfTJXwK99UK2-0mYGzjsbtDLhKZAGaLNSPuiZDNoaYGsgq64JHlzoMAfHfqncTLlIN5WzrQLWgbmezX9--1F3puw5vaLsgvbt46hXAWNdKxvg1SWodF0rp0yp_N3kVi0br-5t36Pk06uXk_Gb9OT967fj45O05DgLac15jmWNKIMZr1CGsZKEE1YhUnFVwSruoaYKcUVlOcUEMlzRGmGKOSugpOQoeTboLrtpq6oy2nSyEUunW-nWwkot9itGz8XMrgRiBUGIR4FHWwFnz7u4GtFqX6qmkUbZzgu-QWXov0AMKccF7BVHA7B01nun6t00CIo-YdEnLPqERZ9wJDz808Nv-DbSCPADwNl1XKYttQprsbCdM_ErPnycvEBFAVckyzWiBAqYEwQZLBAXV3q56dcDRAQI7X2nxAa2P8ffY5Hruv7TzIOBtfDBup0XkmU5onksp0NZx_u83JWlOxOME56JzzkVX06_vpswdCrGEQ8HfH-FF9opsTdN_Cxj-97XxhFhfVDPr6X085bWhHgQe0RRd028nKomvwAe1h0y</recordid><startdate>20030228</startdate><enddate>20030228</enddate><creator>Baron-Cohen, Simon</creator><creator>Richler, Jennifer</creator><creator>Bisarya, Dheraj</creator><creator>Gurunathan, Nhishanth</creator><creator>Wheelwright, Sally</creator><general>The Royal Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030228</creationdate><title>The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences</title><author>Baron-Cohen, Simon ; Richler, Jennifer ; Bisarya, Dheraj ; Gurunathan, Nhishanth ; Wheelwright, Sally</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c725t-f7782af146057d1522ea3736d13d7ed0d200f4e17e4acb23062d4f12427690a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asperger Syndrome</topic><topic>Asperger Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>Asperger Syndrome - psychology</topic><topic>Autistic disorder</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - diagnosis</topic><topic>Autistic Disorder - psychology</topic><topic>Coherence theory</topic><topic>Empathizing</topic><topic>Empathy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mind</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>Psychological Theory</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sex linked differences</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Systemizing</topic><topic>T tests</topic><topic>Test theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baron-Cohen, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richler, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bisarya, Dheraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gurunathan, Nhishanth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheelwright, Sally</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baron-Cohen, Simon</au><au>Richler, Jennifer</au><au>Bisarya, Dheraj</au><au>Gurunathan, Nhishanth</au><au>Wheelwright, Sally</au><au>Hill, E. L.</au><au>Frith, U.</au><au>Frith, U.</au><au>Hill, E. L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences</atitle><jtitle>Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci</addtitle><date>2003-02-28</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>1430</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>374</epage><pages>361-374</pages><issn>0962-8436</issn><eissn>1471-2970</eissn><abstract>Systemizing is the drive to analyse systems or construct systems. A recent model of psychological sex differences suggests that this is a major dimension in which the sexes differ, with males being more drawn to systemize than females. Currently, there are no self-report measures to assess this important dimension. A second major dimension of sex differences is empathizing (the drive to identify mental states and respond to these with an appropriate emotion). Previous studies find females score higher on empathy measures. We report a new self-report questionnaire, the Systemizing Quotient (SQ), for use with adults of normal intelligence. It contains 40 systemizing items and 20 control items. On each systemizing item, a person can score 2, 1 or 0, so the SQ has a maximum score of 80 and a minimum of zero. In Study 1, we measured the SQ of n = 278 adults (114 males, 164 females) from a general population, to test for predicted sex differences (male superiority) in systemizing. All subjects were also given the Empathy Quotient (EQ) to test if previous reports of female superiority would be replicated. In Study 2 we employed the SQ and the EQ with n = 47 adults (33 males, 14 females) with Asperger syndrome (AS) or high-functioning autism (HFA), who are predicted to be either normal or superior at systemizing, but impaired at empathizing. Their scores were compared with n = 47 matched adults from the general population in Study 1. In Study 1, as predicted, normal adult males scored significantly higher than females on the SQ and significantly lower on the EQ. In Study 2, again as predicted, adults with AS/HFA scored significantly higher on the SQ than matched controls, and significantly lower on the EQ than matched controls. The SQ reveals both a sex difference in systemizing in the general population and an unusually strong drive to systemize in AS/HFA. These results are discussed in relation to two linked theories: the 'empathizing-systemizing' (E-S) theory of sex differences and the extreme male brain (EMB) theory of autism.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Royal Society</pub><pmid>12639333</pmid><doi>10.1098/rstb.2002.1206</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-8436
ispartof Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological sciences, 2003-02, Vol.358 (1430), p.361-374
issn 0962-8436
1471-2970
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73117351
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; JSTOR
subjects Adult
Asperger Syndrome
Asperger Syndrome - diagnosis
Asperger Syndrome - psychology
Autistic disorder
Autistic Disorder - diagnosis
Autistic Disorder - psychology
Coherence theory
Empathizing
Empathy
Female
Humans
Intelligence
Male
Mind
Psychological Tests
Psychological Theory
Questionnaires
Sex Characteristics
Sex Differences
Sex linked differences
Surveys and Questionnaires
Systemizing
T tests
Test theory
title The systemizing quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high–functioning autism, and normal sex differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A47%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20systemizing%20quotient:%20an%20investigation%20of%20adults%20with%20Asperger%20syndrome%20or%20high%E2%80%93functioning%20autism,%20and%20normal%20sex%20differences&rft.jtitle=Philosophical%20transactions%20of%20the%20Royal%20Society%20of%20London.%20Series%20B.%20Biological%20sciences&rft.au=Baron-Cohen,%20Simon&rft.date=2003-02-28&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=1430&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=374&rft.pages=361-374&rft.issn=0962-8436&rft.eissn=1471-2970&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098/rstb.2002.1206&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3558148%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=20472907&rft_id=info:pmid/12639333&rft_jstor_id=3558148&rfr_iscdi=true