Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator
The most commonly used wear test device for prosthetic hip joints is the so‐called biaxial rocking motion (BRM) design. The design has been criticized for its excessive sliding distance per cycle. The design was modified so that the extent of motion was reduced from 46 to 23°, and comparative tests...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research 2003-04, Vol.65B (1), p.186-192 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 192 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 186 |
| container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research |
| container_volume | 65B |
| creator | Saikko, Vesa Calonius, Olof Keränen, Jaakko |
| description | The most commonly used wear test device for prosthetic hip joints is the so‐called biaxial rocking motion (BRM) design. The design has been criticized for its excessive sliding distance per cycle. The design was modified so that the extent of motion was reduced from 46 to 23°, and comparative tests were run with the use of 1‐kN static load. The present authors have earlier used 1‐kN static load with good results. To further confirm this finding, additional, comparative tests were run with double‐peak dynamic load and 46° extent of motion. All three tests (46°/static, 23°/static and 46°/dynamic), were done with conventional ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished CoCr femoral heads in diluted calf serum lubricant. In all tests, the principal cup wear mechanism was adhesive, manifested as burnishing. With respect to wear particles, those produced in the 46°/dynamic test showed the lowest resemblance to particles isolated from periprosthetic tissues. The 46°/dynamic test produced a mean wear rate 43% higher than 46°/static, whereas the 46°/static and 23°/static tests produced almost identical values. The results indicated that the 46° extent of motion and dynamic load may not always be the optimal combination in BRM tests. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 186–192, 2003 |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.b.10556 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73086848</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20560537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4886-e056e1e69a23a9ffe6593a6ed5b62c55c192972573d70cc718128d8ffd9df6613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Ulv1DAUAOAIgejGiTvyBS5VWi_xkiOtygBq4VAQ3CzHeda4OEvtjDr593g6Q3tjTn56-t4iv6J4S_AZwZie3zXdWZNDzsWL4pBwTsuqVuTlUyzZQXGU0l3GAnP2ujggVDDKVH1YNFfOgZ3Q4BCsJ-gfo26Y_NAj07domkfYpMJgWpRz0xLQA5i4yY1DmGFazgF6QD571Hiz9iagpR9R8t0qmGmIJ8UrZ0KCN7v3uPj56erH5efy-vviy-XH69JWSokSMBdAQNSGMlPnrQSvmRHQ8kZQy7klNa0l5ZK1ElsriSJUtcq5tm6dEIQdFx-2fcc43K8gTbrzyUIIpodhlbRkWAlVqb2QSiWxlHg_zCvnD5V7IckNVV4-w9MttHFIKYLTY_SdibMmWG-uqfM1daMfr5n1u13bVdNB-2x358vg_Q6YZE1w0fTWp2dXCcEx49mRrXvwAeb_zdRfL27-DS-3NT5NsH6qMfGPFpJJrn99W2gp5YW6XfzWFfsLPNHE6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18708972</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</creator><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><description>The most commonly used wear test device for prosthetic hip joints is the so‐called biaxial rocking motion (BRM) design. The design has been criticized for its excessive sliding distance per cycle. The design was modified so that the extent of motion was reduced from 46 to 23°, and comparative tests were run with the use of 1‐kN static load. The present authors have earlier used 1‐kN static load with good results. To further confirm this finding, additional, comparative tests were run with double‐peak dynamic load and 46° extent of motion. All three tests (46°/static, 23°/static and 46°/dynamic), were done with conventional ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished CoCr femoral heads in diluted calf serum lubricant. In all tests, the principal cup wear mechanism was adhesive, manifested as burnishing. With respect to wear particles, those produced in the 46°/dynamic test showed the lowest resemblance to particles isolated from periprosthetic tissues. The 46°/dynamic test produced a mean wear rate 43% higher than 46°/static, whereas the 46°/static and 23°/static tests produced almost identical values. The results indicated that the 46° extent of motion and dynamic load may not always be the optimal combination in BRM tests. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 186–192, 2003</description><identifier>ISSN: 1552-4973</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9304</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4636</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.10556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12632389</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBMRBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biocompatible Materials - standards ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Chromium Alloys ; dynamic load ; Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation ; Equipment Failure Analysis - methods ; extent of motion ; Hip Prosthesis - standards ; hip simulator ; Humans ; Materials Testing - instrumentation ; Materials Testing - methods ; Medical sciences ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Motion ; Polyethylene ; polyethylene wear ; Prosthesis Design ; Surface Properties ; total hip prosthesis ; Weight-Bearing</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research, 2003-04, Vol.65B (1), p.186-192</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4886-e056e1e69a23a9ffe6593a6ed5b62c55c192972573d70cc718128d8ffd9df6613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4886-e056e1e69a23a9ffe6593a6ed5b62c55c192972573d70cc718128d8ffd9df6613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.10556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.b.10556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14665035$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12632389$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calonius, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research</title><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><description>The most commonly used wear test device for prosthetic hip joints is the so‐called biaxial rocking motion (BRM) design. The design has been criticized for its excessive sliding distance per cycle. The design was modified so that the extent of motion was reduced from 46 to 23°, and comparative tests were run with the use of 1‐kN static load. The present authors have earlier used 1‐kN static load with good results. To further confirm this finding, additional, comparative tests were run with double‐peak dynamic load and 46° extent of motion. All three tests (46°/static, 23°/static and 46°/dynamic), were done with conventional ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished CoCr femoral heads in diluted calf serum lubricant. In all tests, the principal cup wear mechanism was adhesive, manifested as burnishing. With respect to wear particles, those produced in the 46°/dynamic test showed the lowest resemblance to particles isolated from periprosthetic tissues. The 46°/dynamic test produced a mean wear rate 43% higher than 46°/static, whereas the 46°/static and 23°/static tests produced almost identical values. The results indicated that the 46° extent of motion and dynamic load may not always be the optimal combination in BRM tests. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 186–192, 2003</description><subject>Biocompatible Materials - standards</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Chromium Alloys</subject><subject>dynamic load</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis - methods</subject><subject>extent of motion</subject><subject>Hip Prosthesis - standards</subject><subject>hip simulator</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Materials Testing - instrumentation</subject><subject>Materials Testing - methods</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</subject><subject>Motion</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>polyethylene wear</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><subject>total hip prosthesis</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing</subject><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><issn>1552-4981</issn><issn>1097-4636</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0Ulv1DAUAOAIgejGiTvyBS5VWi_xkiOtygBq4VAQ3CzHeda4OEvtjDr593g6Q3tjTn56-t4iv6J4S_AZwZie3zXdWZNDzsWL4pBwTsuqVuTlUyzZQXGU0l3GAnP2ujggVDDKVH1YNFfOgZ3Q4BCsJ-gfo26Y_NAj07domkfYpMJgWpRz0xLQA5i4yY1DmGFazgF6QD571Hiz9iagpR9R8t0qmGmIJ8UrZ0KCN7v3uPj56erH5efy-vviy-XH69JWSokSMBdAQNSGMlPnrQSvmRHQ8kZQy7klNa0l5ZK1ElsriSJUtcq5tm6dEIQdFx-2fcc43K8gTbrzyUIIpodhlbRkWAlVqb2QSiWxlHg_zCvnD5V7IckNVV4-w9MttHFIKYLTY_SdibMmWG-uqfM1daMfr5n1u13bVdNB-2x358vg_Q6YZE1w0fTWp2dXCcEx49mRrXvwAeb_zdRfL27-DS-3NT5NsH6qMfGPFpJJrn99W2gp5YW6XfzWFfsLPNHE6Q</recordid><startdate>20030415</startdate><enddate>20030415</enddate><creator>Saikko, Vesa</creator><creator>Calonius, Olof</creator><creator>Keränen, Jaakko</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley & Sons</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030415</creationdate><title>Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator</title><author>Saikko, Vesa ; Calonius, Olof ; Keränen, Jaakko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4886-e056e1e69a23a9ffe6593a6ed5b62c55c192972573d70cc718128d8ffd9df6613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biocompatible Materials - standards</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Chromium Alloys</topic><topic>dynamic load</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis - methods</topic><topic>extent of motion</topic><topic>Hip Prosthesis - standards</topic><topic>hip simulator</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Materials Testing - instrumentation</topic><topic>Materials Testing - methods</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Microscopy, Electron, Scanning</topic><topic>Motion</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>polyethylene wear</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><topic>total hip prosthesis</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Saikko, Vesa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calonius, Olof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keränen, Jaakko</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Saikko, Vesa</au><au>Calonius, Olof</au><au>Keränen, Jaakko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Biomed. Mater. Res</addtitle><date>2003-04-15</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>65B</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>186</spage><epage>192</epage><pages>186-192</pages><issn>1552-4973</issn><issn>0021-9304</issn><eissn>1552-4981</eissn><eissn>1097-4636</eissn><coden>JBMRBG</coden><abstract>The most commonly used wear test device for prosthetic hip joints is the so‐called biaxial rocking motion (BRM) design. The design has been criticized for its excessive sliding distance per cycle. The design was modified so that the extent of motion was reduced from 46 to 23°, and comparative tests were run with the use of 1‐kN static load. The present authors have earlier used 1‐kN static load with good results. To further confirm this finding, additional, comparative tests were run with double‐peak dynamic load and 46° extent of motion. All three tests (46°/static, 23°/static and 46°/dynamic), were done with conventional ultra‐high‐molecular‐weight polyethylene acetabular cups against polished CoCr femoral heads in diluted calf serum lubricant. In all tests, the principal cup wear mechanism was adhesive, manifested as burnishing. With respect to wear particles, those produced in the 46°/dynamic test showed the lowest resemblance to particles isolated from periprosthetic tissues. The 46°/dynamic test produced a mean wear rate 43% higher than 46°/static, whereas the 46°/static and 23°/static tests produced almost identical values. The results indicated that the 46° extent of motion and dynamic load may not always be the optimal combination in BRM tests. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 65B: 186–192, 2003</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>12632389</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.b.10556</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1552-4973 |
| ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research, 2003-04, Vol.65B (1), p.186-192 |
| issn | 1552-4973 0021-9304 1552-4981 1097-4636 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73086848 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Biocompatible Materials - standards Biological and medical sciences Biomechanical Phenomena Chromium Alloys dynamic load Equipment Failure Analysis - instrumentation Equipment Failure Analysis - methods extent of motion Hip Prosthesis - standards hip simulator Humans Materials Testing - instrumentation Materials Testing - methods Medical sciences Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Motion Polyethylene polyethylene wear Prosthesis Design Surface Properties total hip prosthesis Weight-Bearing |
| title | Effect of extent of motion and type of load on the wear of polyethylene in a biaxial hip simulator |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A39%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20extent%20of%20motion%20and%20type%20of%20load%20on%20the%20wear%20of%20polyethylene%20in%20a%20biaxial%20hip%20simulator&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research&rft.au=Saikko,%20Vesa&rft.date=2003-04-15&rft.volume=65B&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=186&rft.epage=192&rft.pages=186-192&rft.issn=1552-4973&rft.eissn=1552-4981&rft.coden=JBMRBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.b.10556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E20560537%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18708972&rft_id=info:pmid/12632389&rfr_iscdi=true |