PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection

Mechanical ventilation is a complex therapy with several different parameters which can be altered. In preterm and term infants, more attention has been paid to the levels of peak inspiratory pressure than to the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An awareness that lung protection can be confe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paediatric respiratory reviews 2003-03, Vol.4 (1), p.15-20
Hauptverfasser: Monkman, Shelley, Kirpalani, Haresh
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Paediatric respiratory reviews
container_volume 4
creator Monkman, Shelley
Kirpalani, Haresh
description Mechanical ventilation is a complex therapy with several different parameters which can be altered. In preterm and term infants, more attention has been paid to the levels of peak inspiratory pressure than to the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An awareness that lung protection can be conferred by an appropriate level of PEEP has increasingly stimulated a renewed interest in achieving the “best PEEP” strategy. We review the history of the introduction of PEEP therapy, some of the early demonstrations of its potential for mischief, the evidence on what levels of PEEP are appropriate in infants, some data concerning the lung-protective value of PEEP and finally some recent efforts at defining measures to determine the so-called “best PEEP”. Some of this work has been performed in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In newborns, we are regrettably forced to conclude that there is, for the immediate present, no easy substitute for sensible clinical observations coupled with a judicious and cautious adjustment of PEEP. We anticipate that a more logical application of PEEP with individualisation of therapy, based on a pressure–volume relationship, will in future enable targeted tests of PEEP as a lung-protection strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00312-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73068906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1526054202003123</els_id><sourcerecordid>73068906</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-e05dd305f1add0d57647f8f3e9031a3a8b46faf07af8b0d6f376179d930729d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9KxDAQxoMorq4-gtKT6KE6SZq0PYks6x9YcEE9h2wz0Uq3XZt2wdu-g1d9uX0SU7foURhmMuGb-ZIfIUcUzilQefFABZMhiIidAjsD4JSFfIvs9dcCtn_PERuQfedeASiVQHfJgDJJBbBkj0TT8XgarFcfgfb5M3tBvVivvgJdmgCtxazJlxgUbfkcLOqq6fqqPCA7VhcOD_s6JE_X48fRbTi5v7kbXU3CjMWyCRGEMRyEpdoYMCKWUWwTyzH1r9VcJ7NIWm0h1jaZgZGWx5LGqUk5xCw1lA_JyWavt35r0TVqnrsMi0KXWLVOxRxkkoL0QrERZnXlXI1WLep8rut3RUF1uNQPLtWxUOCjw6W4nzvuDdrZHM3fVM_HCy43AvTfXOZYK5flWGZo8tqzUKbK_7H4Bs_Weio</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73068906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Monkman, Shelley ; Kirpalani, Haresh</creator><creatorcontrib>Monkman, Shelley ; Kirpalani, Haresh</creatorcontrib><description>Mechanical ventilation is a complex therapy with several different parameters which can be altered. In preterm and term infants, more attention has been paid to the levels of peak inspiratory pressure than to the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An awareness that lung protection can be conferred by an appropriate level of PEEP has increasingly stimulated a renewed interest in achieving the “best PEEP” strategy. We review the history of the introduction of PEEP therapy, some of the early demonstrations of its potential for mischief, the evidence on what levels of PEEP are appropriate in infants, some data concerning the lung-protective value of PEEP and finally some recent efforts at defining measures to determine the so-called “best PEEP”. Some of this work has been performed in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In newborns, we are regrettably forced to conclude that there is, for the immediate present, no easy substitute for sensible clinical observations coupled with a judicious and cautious adjustment of PEEP. We anticipate that a more logical application of PEEP with individualisation of therapy, based on a pressure–volume relationship, will in future enable targeted tests of PEEP as a lung-protection strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-0542</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-0550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00312-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12615028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Premature ; lung ; Lung Volume Measurements ; mechanical ventilation ; PEEP ; Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects ; Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - therapy</subject><ispartof>Paediatric respiratory reviews, 2003-03, Vol.4 (1), p.15-20</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-e05dd305f1add0d57647f8f3e9031a3a8b46faf07af8b0d6f376179d930729d13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-e05dd305f1add0d57647f8f3e9031a3a8b46faf07af8b0d6f376179d930729d13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00312-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12615028$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monkman, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpalani, Haresh</creatorcontrib><title>PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection</title><title>Paediatric respiratory reviews</title><addtitle>Paediatr Respir Rev</addtitle><description>Mechanical ventilation is a complex therapy with several different parameters which can be altered. In preterm and term infants, more attention has been paid to the levels of peak inspiratory pressure than to the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An awareness that lung protection can be conferred by an appropriate level of PEEP has increasingly stimulated a renewed interest in achieving the “best PEEP” strategy. We review the history of the introduction of PEEP therapy, some of the early demonstrations of its potential for mischief, the evidence on what levels of PEEP are appropriate in infants, some data concerning the lung-protective value of PEEP and finally some recent efforts at defining measures to determine the so-called “best PEEP”. Some of this work has been performed in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In newborns, we are regrettably forced to conclude that there is, for the immediate present, no easy substitute for sensible clinical observations coupled with a judicious and cautious adjustment of PEEP. We anticipate that a more logical application of PEEP with individualisation of therapy, based on a pressure–volume relationship, will in future enable targeted tests of PEEP as a lung-protection strategy.</description><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Premature</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lung Volume Measurements</subject><subject>mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>PEEP</subject><subject>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</subject><subject>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - therapy</subject><issn>1526-0542</issn><issn>1526-0550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM9KxDAQxoMorq4-gtKT6KE6SZq0PYks6x9YcEE9h2wz0Uq3XZt2wdu-g1d9uX0SU7foURhmMuGb-ZIfIUcUzilQefFABZMhiIidAjsD4JSFfIvs9dcCtn_PERuQfedeASiVQHfJgDJJBbBkj0TT8XgarFcfgfb5M3tBvVivvgJdmgCtxazJlxgUbfkcLOqq6fqqPCA7VhcOD_s6JE_X48fRbTi5v7kbXU3CjMWyCRGEMRyEpdoYMCKWUWwTyzH1r9VcJ7NIWm0h1jaZgZGWx5LGqUk5xCw1lA_JyWavt35r0TVqnrsMi0KXWLVOxRxkkoL0QrERZnXlXI1WLep8rut3RUF1uNQPLtWxUOCjw6W4nzvuDdrZHM3fVM_HCy43AvTfXOZYK5flWGZo8tqzUKbK_7H4Bs_Weio</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Monkman, Shelley</creator><creator>Kirpalani, Haresh</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection</title><author>Monkman, Shelley ; Kirpalani, Haresh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-e05dd305f1add0d57647f8f3e9031a3a8b46faf07af8b0d6f376179d930729d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Premature</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lung Volume Measurements</topic><topic>mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>PEEP</topic><topic>Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects</topic><topic>Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monkman, Shelley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirpalani, Haresh</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Paediatric respiratory reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monkman, Shelley</au><au>Kirpalani, Haresh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection</atitle><jtitle>Paediatric respiratory reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Paediatr Respir Rev</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>15-20</pages><issn>1526-0542</issn><eissn>1526-0550</eissn><abstract>Mechanical ventilation is a complex therapy with several different parameters which can be altered. In preterm and term infants, more attention has been paid to the levels of peak inspiratory pressure than to the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). An awareness that lung protection can be conferred by an appropriate level of PEEP has increasingly stimulated a renewed interest in achieving the “best PEEP” strategy. We review the history of the introduction of PEEP therapy, some of the early demonstrations of its potential for mischief, the evidence on what levels of PEEP are appropriate in infants, some data concerning the lung-protective value of PEEP and finally some recent efforts at defining measures to determine the so-called “best PEEP”. Some of this work has been performed in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. In newborns, we are regrettably forced to conclude that there is, for the immediate present, no easy substitute for sensible clinical observations coupled with a judicious and cautious adjustment of PEEP. We anticipate that a more logical application of PEEP with individualisation of therapy, based on a pressure–volume relationship, will in future enable targeted tests of PEEP as a lung-protection strategy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12615028</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00312-3</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-0542
ispartof Paediatric respiratory reviews, 2003-03, Vol.4 (1), p.15-20
issn 1526-0542
1526-0550
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73068906
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Premature
lung
Lung Volume Measurements
mechanical ventilation
PEEP
Positive-Pressure Respiration - adverse effects
Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn - therapy
title PEEP – a “cheap” and effective lung protection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T01%3A34%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=PEEP%20%E2%80%93%20a%20%E2%80%9Ccheap%E2%80%9D%20and%20effective%20lung%20protection&rft.jtitle=Paediatric%20respiratory%20reviews&rft.au=Monkman,%20Shelley&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=15-20&rft.issn=1526-0542&rft.eissn=1526-0550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1526-0542(02)00312-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73068906%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73068906&rft_id=info:pmid/12615028&rft_els_id=S1526054202003123&rfr_iscdi=true