Managed Long-Term Care: Limits and Lessons
In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of aging and health 2003-02, Vol.15 (1), p.269-291 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 291 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 269 |
container_title | Journal of aging and health |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sparer, Michael S. |
description | In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial health plans will not provide a quick cure to the long-term care system. At the same time, several states have managed long-term care initiatives that do not rely on commercial health plans but that do an excellent job of case management and that also seem to be among the national leaders in offering home and community-based services. Oregon provides one example, but so does the traditional managed long-term care system in Arizona and the Community Options Program in Wisconsin. The current efforts in Arizona and Wisconsin to abandon these models and to embrace competition may therefore be a mistake. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0898264302239030 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73065453</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0898264302239030</sage_id><sourcerecordid>60619251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f8b2f910f35f7aec4175cb00827e76f94326d1422ff336ec49ec5e4121c33353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkTtLA0EUhQdRTIy2YiXBwm71PuZZSvAFEZtYL5vNTEjI7saZbOG_d0MCQkBS3eJ851zuPULcIDwgGvMI1lnSkoGIHTCciD4qRZm21pyK_lbOtnpPXKS0BABCwHPRQ9LI0lBfXH8UdTH3s-G4qefZxMdqOCqivxRnoVglf7WfA_H18jwZvWXjz9f30dM4K9moTaaDnVJwCIFVMIUvJRpVTgEsGW90cJJJz1AShcCsO935UnmJhCUzKx6I-13uOjbfrU-bvFqk0q9WRe2bNuWGQSup-CioUSFYI4-DoNGRwg68OwCXTRvr7tqcUFkF7KiDYAeVsUkp-pCv46Iq4k-OkG8ryA8r6Cy3-9x2WvnZn2H_8w7IdkDqHv-39N_AXw66iIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215850392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Managed Long-Term Care: Limits and Lessons</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Sparer, Michael S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sparer, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><description>In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial health plans will not provide a quick cure to the long-term care system. At the same time, several states have managed long-term care initiatives that do not rely on commercial health plans but that do an excellent job of case management and that also seem to be among the national leaders in offering home and community-based services. Oregon provides one example, but so does the traditional managed long-term care system in Arizona and the Community Options Program in Wisconsin. The current efforts in Arizona and Wisconsin to abandon these models and to embrace competition may therefore be a mistake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-2643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6887</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0898264302239030</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12613472</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAHEEG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Community Health Services - organization & administration ; Community support ; Health Care Services ; Health Care Services Policy ; Health technology assessment ; Home Health Care ; Humans ; Long Term Care ; Long term health care ; Long-Term Care - organization & administration ; Managed care ; Managed Care Programs - organization & administration ; Managed Care Services ; Medicaid ; Patient Care Management - organization & administration ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of aging and health, 2003-02, Vol.15 (1), p.269-291</ispartof><rights>Copyright SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC. Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f8b2f910f35f7aec4175cb00827e76f94326d1422ff336ec49ec5e4121c33353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0898264302239030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0898264302239030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,33775,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12613472$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sparer, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><title>Managed Long-Term Care: Limits and Lessons</title><title>Journal of aging and health</title><addtitle>J Aging Health</addtitle><description>In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial health plans will not provide a quick cure to the long-term care system. At the same time, several states have managed long-term care initiatives that do not rely on commercial health plans but that do an excellent job of case management and that also seem to be among the national leaders in offering home and community-based services. Oregon provides one example, but so does the traditional managed long-term care system in Arizona and the Community Options Program in Wisconsin. The current efforts in Arizona and Wisconsin to abandon these models and to embrace competition may therefore be a mistake.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Community Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Community support</subject><subject>Health Care Services</subject><subject>Health Care Services Policy</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Home Health Care</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Long Term Care</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Long-Term Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>Managed care</subject><subject>Managed Care Programs - organization & administration</subject><subject>Managed Care Services</subject><subject>Medicaid</subject><subject>Patient Care Management - organization & administration</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0898-2643</issn><issn>1552-6887</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkTtLA0EUhQdRTIy2YiXBwm71PuZZSvAFEZtYL5vNTEjI7saZbOG_d0MCQkBS3eJ851zuPULcIDwgGvMI1lnSkoGIHTCciD4qRZm21pyK_lbOtnpPXKS0BABCwHPRQ9LI0lBfXH8UdTH3s-G4qefZxMdqOCqivxRnoVglf7WfA_H18jwZvWXjz9f30dM4K9moTaaDnVJwCIFVMIUvJRpVTgEsGW90cJJJz1AShcCsO935UnmJhCUzKx6I-13uOjbfrU-bvFqk0q9WRe2bNuWGQSup-CioUSFYI4-DoNGRwg68OwCXTRvr7tqcUFkF7KiDYAeVsUkp-pCv46Iq4k-OkG8ryA8r6Cy3-9x2WvnZn2H_8w7IdkDqHv-39N_AXw66iIs</recordid><startdate>20030201</startdate><enddate>20030201</enddate><creator>Sparer, Michael S.</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030201</creationdate><title>Managed Long-Term Care</title><author>Sparer, Michael S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-6f8b2f910f35f7aec4175cb00827e76f94326d1422ff336ec49ec5e4121c33353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Community Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Community support</topic><topic>Health Care Services</topic><topic>Health Care Services Policy</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Home Health Care</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Long Term Care</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Long-Term Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>Managed care</topic><topic>Managed Care Programs - organization & administration</topic><topic>Managed Care Services</topic><topic>Medicaid</topic><topic>Patient Care Management - organization & administration</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sparer, Michael S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of aging and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sparer, Michael S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Managed Long-Term Care: Limits and Lessons</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aging and health</jtitle><addtitle>J Aging Health</addtitle><date>2003-02-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>269</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>269-291</pages><issn>0898-2643</issn><eissn>1552-6887</eissn><coden>JAHEEG</coden><abstract>In the mid-1990s, states began to reduce their reliance on commercial health plans in the primary and acute care markets. At the same time, however, many states are for the first time encouraging these plans to participate in long-term care programs. The evidence suggests, however, that commercial health plans will not provide a quick cure to the long-term care system. At the same time, several states have managed long-term care initiatives that do not rely on commercial health plans but that do an excellent job of case management and that also seem to be among the national leaders in offering home and community-based services. Oregon provides one example, but so does the traditional managed long-term care system in Arizona and the Community Options Program in Wisconsin. The current efforts in Arizona and Wisconsin to abandon these models and to embrace competition may therefore be a mistake.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><pmid>12613472</pmid><doi>10.1177/0898264302239030</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-2643 |
ispartof | Journal of aging and health, 2003-02, Vol.15 (1), p.269-291 |
issn | 0898-2643 1552-6887 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73065453 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Aged Community Health Services - organization & administration Community support Health Care Services Health Care Services Policy Health technology assessment Home Health Care Humans Long Term Care Long term health care Long-Term Care - organization & administration Managed care Managed Care Programs - organization & administration Managed Care Services Medicaid Patient Care Management - organization & administration United States |
title | Managed Long-Term Care: Limits and Lessons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T19%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Managed%20Long-Term%20Care:%20Limits%20and%20Lessons&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aging%20and%20health&rft.au=Sparer,%20Michael%20S.&rft.date=2003-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=269&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=269-291&rft.issn=0898-2643&rft.eissn=1552-6887&rft.coden=JAHEEG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0898264302239030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E60619251%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215850392&rft_id=info:pmid/12613472&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0898264302239030&rfr_iscdi=true |