Evaluation of a portable device for diagnosing the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome
Waiting times for hospital-based monitoring of the obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) are rising. This study tested whether Embletta, a new portable device, may accurately diagnose OSAHS at home. A synchronous comparison to polysomnography was performed in 40 patients and a comparis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European respiratory journal 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.253-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Waiting times for hospital-based monitoring of the obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS) are rising. This study tested whether Embletta, a new portable device, may accurately diagnose OSAHS at home. A synchronous comparison to polysomnography was performed in 40 patients and a comparison of home Embletta studies with in-laboratory polysomnography was performed in 61 patients. In the synchronous study, the mean difference (polysomnography-Embletta) in apnoeas+hypopnoeas (A+H) x h(-1) in bed was 2 h(-1). In comparison to the apnoea/ hypopnoea index (AHI) x h(-1) slept, the Embletta (A+H) x h(-1) in bed differed by 8 x h(-1). These data were used to construct diagnostic categories in symptomatic patients from their Embletta results: "OSAHS" (> or = 20 (A+H) x h(-1) in bed), "possible OSAHS" (10-20 (A+H) x h(-1) in bed) or "not OSAHS" ( or = 15 on polysomnography, but 18 patients fell into the possible OSAHS category potentially requiring further investigation and 11 home studies failed. Most patients were satisfactorily classified by home Embletta studies but 29 out of 61 required further investigation. The study suggested a 42% saving in diagnostic costs over polysomnography if this approach were adopted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0903-1936 1399-3003 |
DOI: | 10.1183/09031936.03.00298103 |