The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint?
Studies indicate that 11% to 54% of individuals surveyed would consider donating a kidney, while alive, to a stranger. The idea of ‘living anonymous donors’ (LADs) as a donor source, however, has not been embraced by the medical community. Reservations focus on the belief that LADs might be psycholo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of transplantation 2003-02, Vol.3 (2), p.203-213 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 213 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | American journal of transplantation |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Henderson, Antonia J. Z. Landolt, Monica A. McDonald, Michael F. Barrable, William M. Soos, John G. Gourlay, William Allison, Colleen J. Landsberg, David N. |
description | Studies indicate that 11% to 54% of individuals surveyed would consider donating a kidney, while alive, to a stranger. The idea of ‘living anonymous donors’ (LADs) as a donor source, however, has not been embraced by the medical community. Reservations focus on the belief that LADs might be psychologically unstable and thus unsuitable donors. Our goal was to inform policy development by exploring the psycho‐social make up and motivations of the LAD. Ninety‐three unsolicited individuals contacted our center expressing interest in living anonymous donation. Of these, 43 participated in our study, completing two extensive inventories of psychopathology and personality disorder and taking part in the Comprehensive Psycho‐Social Interview (CPSI). From the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R), and the CPSI, coders assessed psychological health, psycho‐social suitability, commitment, and motivations. Twenty‐one participants passed the stringent criteria to be considered potential LADs. Content analysis of motivations showed that potential LADs were more likely than non‐LADs (those who did not pass the criteria) to have a spiritual belief system and to be altruistic. Non‐LADs were more likely than potential LADs to use donation to make a statement against their families. The authors conclude with a preliminary outline of eight policy recommendations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00019.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73056976</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18939860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-5769cfcb9f76517c9f7cb508a6bce40cb5431e4d92d92e0133f8ede9b8c2e6bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_guTKu9aTpk0bEWTMbwteOK9Dm6aa0aazWXX996ZuzEuFwHkhzzkneRDCBHwCNDxf-IQBeIyE1A8AqA8AhPvrPTTeXezvMo1G6MjahWPiIAkO0YgEDGhAwjEK5-8Kp_pTmzc8NY3p66az-EkXRvX4ujFNe4HTzmQrLXHT4pdMm9XVMToos8qqk22doNfbm_ns3kuf7x5m09STESHci2LGZSlzXsYsIrF0VeYRJBnLpQrB5ZASFRY8cEcBobRMVKF4nshAsbykE3S2mbtsm49O2ZWotZWqqjKj3DNFTCFiPGZ_giThlCfuzxOUbEDZNta2qhTLVtdZ2wsCYlArFmKwJgaDYlArftSKtWs93e7o8loVv41blw643ABfulL9vweL6ePcBfoNxjaFhg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18939860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Henderson, Antonia J. Z. ; Landolt, Monica A. ; McDonald, Michael F. ; Barrable, William M. ; Soos, John G. ; Gourlay, William ; Allison, Colleen J. ; Landsberg, David N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Antonia J. Z. ; Landolt, Monica A. ; McDonald, Michael F. ; Barrable, William M. ; Soos, John G. ; Gourlay, William ; Allison, Colleen J. ; Landsberg, David N.</creatorcontrib><description>Studies indicate that 11% to 54% of individuals surveyed would consider donating a kidney, while alive, to a stranger. The idea of ‘living anonymous donors’ (LADs) as a donor source, however, has not been embraced by the medical community. Reservations focus on the belief that LADs might be psychologically unstable and thus unsuitable donors. Our goal was to inform policy development by exploring the psycho‐social make up and motivations of the LAD. Ninety‐three unsolicited individuals contacted our center expressing interest in living anonymous donation. Of these, 43 participated in our study, completing two extensive inventories of psychopathology and personality disorder and taking part in the Comprehensive Psycho‐Social Interview (CPSI). From the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R), and the CPSI, coders assessed psychological health, psycho‐social suitability, commitment, and motivations. Twenty‐one participants passed the stringent criteria to be considered potential LADs. Content analysis of motivations showed that potential LADs were more likely than non‐LADs (those who did not pass the criteria) to have a spiritual belief system and to be altruistic. Non‐LADs were more likely than potential LADs to use donation to make a statement against their families. The authors conclude with a preliminary outline of eight policy recommendations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1600-6135</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-6143</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00019.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12603214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Munksgaard International Publishers</publisher><subject>Altruism ; Humans ; Interview, Psychological ; Kidney Transplantation - psychology ; Living Donors - psychology ; Motivation ; Personality Disorders - diagnosis ; Psychological Tests ; psychosocial factors ; Volunteers - psychology</subject><ispartof>American journal of transplantation, 2003-02, Vol.3 (2), p.203-213</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-5769cfcb9f76517c9f7cb508a6bce40cb5431e4d92d92e0133f8ede9b8c2e6bf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-5769cfcb9f76517c9f7cb508a6bce40cb5431e4d92d92e0133f8ede9b8c2e6bf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1034%2Fj.1600-6143.2003.00019.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12603214$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Antonia J. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landolt, Monica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrable, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soos, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gourlay, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Colleen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsberg, David N.</creatorcontrib><title>The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint?</title><title>American journal of transplantation</title><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><description>Studies indicate that 11% to 54% of individuals surveyed would consider donating a kidney, while alive, to a stranger. The idea of ‘living anonymous donors’ (LADs) as a donor source, however, has not been embraced by the medical community. Reservations focus on the belief that LADs might be psychologically unstable and thus unsuitable donors. Our goal was to inform policy development by exploring the psycho‐social make up and motivations of the LAD. Ninety‐three unsolicited individuals contacted our center expressing interest in living anonymous donation. Of these, 43 participated in our study, completing two extensive inventories of psychopathology and personality disorder and taking part in the Comprehensive Psycho‐Social Interview (CPSI). From the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R), and the CPSI, coders assessed psychological health, psycho‐social suitability, commitment, and motivations. Twenty‐one participants passed the stringent criteria to be considered potential LADs. Content analysis of motivations showed that potential LADs were more likely than non‐LADs (those who did not pass the criteria) to have a spiritual belief system and to be altruistic. Non‐LADs were more likely than potential LADs to use donation to make a statement against their families. The authors conclude with a preliminary outline of eight policy recommendations.</description><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interview, Psychological</subject><subject>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</subject><subject>Living Donors - psychology</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Psychological Tests</subject><subject>psychosocial factors</subject><subject>Volunteers - psychology</subject><issn>1600-6135</issn><issn>1600-6143</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkF1LwzAUhoMobk7_guTKu9aTpk0bEWTMbwteOK9Dm6aa0aazWXX996ZuzEuFwHkhzzkneRDCBHwCNDxf-IQBeIyE1A8AqA8AhPvrPTTeXezvMo1G6MjahWPiIAkO0YgEDGhAwjEK5-8Kp_pTmzc8NY3p66az-EkXRvX4ujFNe4HTzmQrLXHT4pdMm9XVMToos8qqk22doNfbm_ns3kuf7x5m09STESHci2LGZSlzXsYsIrF0VeYRJBnLpQrB5ZASFRY8cEcBobRMVKF4nshAsbykE3S2mbtsm49O2ZWotZWqqjKj3DNFTCFiPGZ_giThlCfuzxOUbEDZNta2qhTLVtdZ2wsCYlArFmKwJgaDYlArftSKtWs93e7o8loVv41blw643ABfulL9vweL6ePcBfoNxjaFhg</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Henderson, Antonia J. Z.</creator><creator>Landolt, Monica A.</creator><creator>McDonald, Michael F.</creator><creator>Barrable, William M.</creator><creator>Soos, John G.</creator><creator>Gourlay, William</creator><creator>Allison, Colleen J.</creator><creator>Landsberg, David N.</creator><general>Munksgaard International Publishers</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint?</title><author>Henderson, Antonia J. Z. ; Landolt, Monica A. ; McDonald, Michael F. ; Barrable, William M. ; Soos, John G. ; Gourlay, William ; Allison, Colleen J. ; Landsberg, David N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5119-5769cfcb9f76517c9f7cb508a6bce40cb5431e4d92d92e0133f8ede9b8c2e6bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interview, Psychological</topic><topic>Kidney Transplantation - psychology</topic><topic>Living Donors - psychology</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Personality Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Psychological Tests</topic><topic>psychosocial factors</topic><topic>Volunteers - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Henderson, Antonia J. Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landolt, Monica A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Michael F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrable, William M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soos, John G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gourlay, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allison, Colleen J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Landsberg, David N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Henderson, Antonia J. Z.</au><au>Landolt, Monica A.</au><au>McDonald, Michael F.</au><au>Barrable, William M.</au><au>Soos, John G.</au><au>Gourlay, William</au><au>Allison, Colleen J.</au><au>Landsberg, David N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint?</atitle><jtitle>American journal of transplantation</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Transplant</addtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>203-213</pages><issn>1600-6135</issn><eissn>1600-6143</eissn><abstract>Studies indicate that 11% to 54% of individuals surveyed would consider donating a kidney, while alive, to a stranger. The idea of ‘living anonymous donors’ (LADs) as a donor source, however, has not been embraced by the medical community. Reservations focus on the belief that LADs might be psychologically unstable and thus unsuitable donors. Our goal was to inform policy development by exploring the psycho‐social make up and motivations of the LAD. Ninety‐three unsolicited individuals contacted our center expressing interest in living anonymous donation. Of these, 43 participated in our study, completing two extensive inventories of psychopathology and personality disorder and taking part in the Comprehensive Psycho‐Social Interview (CPSI). From the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI), the revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI‐R), and the CPSI, coders assessed psychological health, psycho‐social suitability, commitment, and motivations. Twenty‐one participants passed the stringent criteria to be considered potential LADs. Content analysis of motivations showed that potential LADs were more likely than non‐LADs (those who did not pass the criteria) to have a spiritual belief system and to be altruistic. Non‐LADs were more likely than potential LADs to use donation to make a statement against their families. The authors conclude with a preliminary outline of eight policy recommendations.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Munksgaard International Publishers</pub><pmid>12603214</pmid><doi>10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00019.x</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1600-6135 |
ispartof | American journal of transplantation, 2003-02, Vol.3 (2), p.203-213 |
issn | 1600-6135 1600-6143 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73056976 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Altruism Humans Interview, Psychological Kidney Transplantation - psychology Living Donors - psychology Motivation Personality Disorders - diagnosis Psychological Tests psychosocial factors Volunteers - psychology |
title | The Living Anonymous Kidney Donor: Lunatic or Saint? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Living%20Anonymous%20Kidney%20Donor:%20Lunatic%20or%20Saint?&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20transplantation&rft.au=Henderson,%20Antonia%20J.%20Z.&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=203-213&rft.issn=1600-6135&rft.eissn=1600-6143&rft_id=info:doi/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00019.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18939860%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18939860&rft_id=info:pmid/12603214&rfr_iscdi=true |