Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion
We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 192 |
container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Varma, R. Mascarenhas, L. James, D. |
description | We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.25 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73053550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73053550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFLwzAUBvAgiptT_wTpRcFDZ9I06XKUoVMY7DB3Lq_J64y0zWzazf33RjbYydODx4_vg4-QW0bHjNLkqXfrcSLOyJClUsU0o-KcDKmSNM6kSgbkyvsvSqlMubwkA5ZIyiapHJLlstcavS_7KnJ9p12NkSsjMFtoNJoICuNq20AVbVpcN-G5j3a2-4zwR1e9t9vAa2y6AGzjse2sa67JRQmVx5vjHZHV68vH9C2eL2bv0-d5rHnGRGxKnoFEhVomBsAkyHSqEArIUsWV4pMEaFFOCq6RZ9pABpxNtFYA3KSM8xF5OORuWvfdo-_y2nqNVQUNut7nGaeCC0FPULfO-xbLfNPaGtp9zmj-N18e5ssTEeDdMbEvajQndtwrgPsjAK-hKtswiPUnlwopqGDBPR7czla4_6cuXy1mofQXczyHMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73053550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</creatorcontrib><description>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.25</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12601846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>abdominal pregnancy ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cesarean Section ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Embryo Implantation ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Omentum ; perinatal outcome ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; umbilical Doppler sonography</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.25$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.25$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14565051$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12601846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>abdominal pregnancy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Omentum</subject><subject>perinatal outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>umbilical Doppler sonography</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFLwzAUBvAgiptT_wTpRcFDZ9I06XKUoVMY7DB3Lq_J64y0zWzazf33RjbYydODx4_vg4-QW0bHjNLkqXfrcSLOyJClUsU0o-KcDKmSNM6kSgbkyvsvSqlMubwkA5ZIyiapHJLlstcavS_7KnJ9p12NkSsjMFtoNJoICuNq20AVbVpcN-G5j3a2-4zwR1e9t9vAa2y6AGzjse2sa67JRQmVx5vjHZHV68vH9C2eL2bv0-d5rHnGRGxKnoFEhVomBsAkyHSqEArIUsWV4pMEaFFOCq6RZ9pABpxNtFYA3KSM8xF5OORuWvfdo-_y2nqNVQUNut7nGaeCC0FPULfO-xbLfNPaGtp9zmj-N18e5ssTEeDdMbEvajQndtwrgPsjAK-hKtswiPUnlwopqGDBPR7czla4_6cuXy1mofQXczyHMg</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Varma, R.</creator><creator>Mascarenhas, L.</creator><creator>James, D.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><author>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>abdominal pregnancy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Omentum</topic><topic>perinatal outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>umbilical Doppler sonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varma, R.</au><au>Mascarenhas, L.</au><au>James, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>192-194</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>12601846</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.25</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194 |
issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73053550 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | abdominal pregnancy Adult Biological and medical sciences Cesarean Section Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy Embryo Implantation Female Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics Humans Management. Prenatal diagnosis Medical sciences Omentum perinatal outcome Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta umbilical Doppler sonography |
title | Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A03%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20outcome%20of%20advanced%20abdominal%20pregnancy%20with%20exclusive%20omental%20insertion&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Varma,%20R.&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=192-194&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.25&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73053550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73053550&rft_id=info:pmid/12601846&rfr_iscdi=true |