Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion

We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194
Hauptverfasser: Varma, R., Mascarenhas, L., James, D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 2
container_start_page 192
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 21
creator Varma, R.
Mascarenhas, L.
James, D.
description We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.25
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73053550</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>73053550</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MFLwzAUBvAgiptT_wTpRcFDZ9I06XKUoVMY7DB3Lq_J64y0zWzazf33RjbYydODx4_vg4-QW0bHjNLkqXfrcSLOyJClUsU0o-KcDKmSNM6kSgbkyvsvSqlMubwkA5ZIyiapHJLlstcavS_7KnJ9p12NkSsjMFtoNJoICuNq20AVbVpcN-G5j3a2-4zwR1e9t9vAa2y6AGzjse2sa67JRQmVx5vjHZHV68vH9C2eL2bv0-d5rHnGRGxKnoFEhVomBsAkyHSqEArIUsWV4pMEaFFOCq6RZ9pABpxNtFYA3KSM8xF5OORuWvfdo-_y2nqNVQUNut7nGaeCC0FPULfO-xbLfNPaGtp9zmj-N18e5ssTEeDdMbEvajQndtwrgPsjAK-hKtswiPUnlwopqGDBPR7czla4_6cuXy1mofQXczyHMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>73053550</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</creatorcontrib><description>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.25</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12601846</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>abdominal pregnancy ; Adult ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cesarean Section ; Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy ; Embryo Implantation ; Female ; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics ; Humans ; Management. Prenatal diagnosis ; Medical sciences ; Omentum ; perinatal outcome ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery ; Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta ; umbilical Doppler sonography</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.25$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.25$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14565051$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12601846$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D.</creatorcontrib><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>abdominal pregnancy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cesarean Section</subject><subject>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Omentum</subject><subject>perinatal outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery</subject><subject>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</subject><subject>umbilical Doppler sonography</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MFLwzAUBvAgiptT_wTpRcFDZ9I06XKUoVMY7DB3Lq_J64y0zWzazf33RjbYydODx4_vg4-QW0bHjNLkqXfrcSLOyJClUsU0o-KcDKmSNM6kSgbkyvsvSqlMubwkA5ZIyiapHJLlstcavS_7KnJ9p12NkSsjMFtoNJoICuNq20AVbVpcN-G5j3a2-4zwR1e9t9vAa2y6AGzjse2sa67JRQmVx5vjHZHV68vH9C2eL2bv0-d5rHnGRGxKnoFEhVomBsAkyHSqEArIUsWV4pMEaFFOCq6RZ9pABpxNtFYA3KSM8xF5OORuWvfdo-_y2nqNVQUNut7nGaeCC0FPULfO-xbLfNPaGtp9zmj-N18e5ssTEeDdMbEvajQndtwrgPsjAK-hKtswiPUnlwopqGDBPR7czla4_6cuXy1mofQXczyHMg</recordid><startdate>200302</startdate><enddate>200302</enddate><creator>Varma, R.</creator><creator>Mascarenhas, L.</creator><creator>James, D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200302</creationdate><title>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</title><author>Varma, R. ; Mascarenhas, L. ; James, D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-df37a6e9ec62daad2e1c49eaba749399382a0bf8b3ce37cda7a318cc9aa3d4133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>abdominal pregnancy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cesarean Section</topic><topic>Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Management. Prenatal diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Omentum</topic><topic>perinatal outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery</topic><topic>Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta</topic><topic>umbilical Doppler sonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varma, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mascarenhas, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varma, R.</au><au>Mascarenhas, L.</au><au>James, D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2003-02</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>192-194</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>We report the case of an advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion whose extrauterine location was not established until delivery by Cesarean section at 35 weeks' gestation. It is hard to believe that omental placentation alone would be sufficient to sustain a pregnancy beyond a gestation where the fetus is viable. However, this report challenges such myths and opens the debate as to what represents the minimal placental maternal viscus contact necessary to achieve fetal viability. The case also demonstrates the continuing difficulty in diagnosing this rare but serious condition despite advances in obstetric imaging, and advocates methods to avoid missing the diagnosis, which could be easily incorporated at booking and mid‐trimester scans. Apart from this case, few reports describe normal umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry in advanced abdominal pregnancy. There is a paucity of research on suitable clinical investigations prognostic for abdominal pregnancy, although this case provides further evidence for the use of Doppler as a useful surveillance tool in such cases. Finally, this case propagates the ethical and clinical controversy that exists in managing abdominal pregnancy, particularly when diagnosed late after attaining fetal viability. Expectant management may represent a feasible alternative to surgical termination provided the woman is fully informed of the attendant risks and close surveillance of the pregnancy is undertaken. Copyright © 2003 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>12601846</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.25</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2003-02, Vol.21 (2), p.192-194
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73053550
source MEDLINE; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects abdominal pregnancy
Adult
Biological and medical sciences
Cesarean Section
Diseases of mother, fetus and pregnancy
Embryo Implantation
Female
Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics
Humans
Management. Prenatal diagnosis
Medical sciences
Omentum
perinatal outcome
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Abdominal - surgery
Pregnancy. Fetus. Placenta
umbilical Doppler sonography
title Successful outcome of advanced abdominal pregnancy with exclusive omental insertion
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A03%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Successful%20outcome%20of%20advanced%20abdominal%20pregnancy%20with%20exclusive%20omental%20insertion&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Varma,%20R.&rft.date=2003-02&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=192-194&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.25&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73053550%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=73053550&rft_id=info:pmid/12601846&rfr_iscdi=true