Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial

Estimating energy requirements is a frequent task in clinical studies. We examined weight patterns of participants enrolled in a clinical trial and evaluated factors that may affect weight stabilization. The Harris-Benedict equation and the FAO/WHO equation, used in conjunction with physical activit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of clinical nutrition 2003-03, Vol.77 (3), p.639-645
Hauptverfasser: LIN, Pao-Hwa, PROSCHAN, Michael A, BRAY, George A, FERNANDEZ, Claudia P, HOBEN, Kimberly, MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene, KARANJA, Njeri, OBARZANEK, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 645
container_issue 3
container_start_page 639
container_title The American journal of clinical nutrition
container_volume 77
creator LIN, Pao-Hwa
PROSCHAN, Michael A
BRAY, George A
FERNANDEZ, Claudia P
HOBEN, Kimberly
MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene
KARANJA, Njeri
OBARZANEK, Eva
description Estimating energy requirements is a frequent task in clinical studies. We examined weight patterns of participants enrolled in a clinical trial and evaluated factors that may affect weight stabilization. The Harris-Benedict equation and the FAO/WHO equation, used in conjunction with physical activity levels estimated with the 7-d Physical Activity Recall, were compared for estimating energy expenditure. This was a multicenter, randomized controlled feeding trial with participants of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. For 11 wk, the amount of food participants received was adjusted to maintain their body weights as close to their initial weights as possible. Change-point regression techniques were used to identify weight-stable periods. Factors related to achieving weight stabilization were examined with logistic regression. A stable weight was achieved by 86% of the 448 participants during the run-in period and by 78% during the intervention period. Energy intake averaged 11 +/- 2.4 MJ/d (2628 +/- 578 kcal/d), with most participants (n = 270) requiring 9-13 MJ/d (2100-3100 kcal/d). The difference between predicted and observed intakes was highest at high estimated energy intakes, mainly because of high and probably incorrect estimates of the activity factor. Participants with lower energy intakes tended to need less adjustment of their energy intakes to maintain a stable weight than did participants with higher energy intakes. Weight stabilization is not affected by diet composition, sex, race, age, or baseline weight. Either the Harris-Benedict equation or the FAO/WHO equation can be used to estimate energy needs. Activity factors > 1.7 often lead to overestimation of energy needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ajcn/77.3.639
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73046365</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>301754811</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3580fdcb0cc2a2987988d4b4b51200b3b79b696e37790d193c00bc8a473c4b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0EtLxDAQwPEgirs-jl6lCHrr7iST5nESEV8geNFzSNNUurSpJu3Bb28WFxY8BYYfw-RPyAWFFQWNa7txYS3lClcC9QFZUo2qRAbykCwBgJWaimpBTlLaAFDGlTgmC8oEgKr4ktw-pKkb7NSNoRjbwgcfP3-K6L_nLvrBhykVXShs4cYwxbHvfVO03jdd-Cym2Nn-jBy1tk_-fPeeko_Hh_f75_L17enl_u61dKiqqcRKQdu4GpxjlmkltVINr3ldUQZQYy11LbTwKKWGJv_B5alTlkt0vGYST8nN396vOH7PPk1m6JLzfW-DH-dkJAIXKKoMr_7BzTjHkG8zDKmuqJAso_IPuTimFH1rvmKuEH8MBbPNarZZjZQGTc6a_eVu6VwPvtnrXccMrnfAJmf7NtrgurR3XDCNlcBfyTR-7w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>231951672</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>LIN, Pao-Hwa ; PROSCHAN, Michael A ; BRAY, George A ; FERNANDEZ, Claudia P ; HOBEN, Kimberly ; MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene ; KARANJA, Njeri ; OBARZANEK, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>LIN, Pao-Hwa ; PROSCHAN, Michael A ; BRAY, George A ; FERNANDEZ, Claudia P ; HOBEN, Kimberly ; MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene ; KARANJA, Njeri ; OBARZANEK, Eva ; DASH Collaborative Research Group</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating energy requirements is a frequent task in clinical studies. We examined weight patterns of participants enrolled in a clinical trial and evaluated factors that may affect weight stabilization. The Harris-Benedict equation and the FAO/WHO equation, used in conjunction with physical activity levels estimated with the 7-d Physical Activity Recall, were compared for estimating energy expenditure. This was a multicenter, randomized controlled feeding trial with participants of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. For 11 wk, the amount of food participants received was adjusted to maintain their body weights as close to their initial weights as possible. Change-point regression techniques were used to identify weight-stable periods. Factors related to achieving weight stabilization were examined with logistic regression. A stable weight was achieved by 86% of the 448 participants during the run-in period and by 78% during the intervention period. Energy intake averaged 11 +/- 2.4 MJ/d (2628 +/- 578 kcal/d), with most participants (n = 270) requiring 9-13 MJ/d (2100-3100 kcal/d). The difference between predicted and observed intakes was highest at high estimated energy intakes, mainly because of high and probably incorrect estimates of the activity factor. Participants with lower energy intakes tended to need less adjustment of their energy intakes to maintain a stable weight than did participants with higher energy intakes. Weight stabilization is not affected by diet composition, sex, race, age, or baseline weight. Either the Harris-Benedict equation or the FAO/WHO equation can be used to estimate energy needs. Activity factors &gt; 1.7 often lead to overestimation of energy needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-3207</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.3.639</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12600854</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJCNAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Society for Clinical Nutrition</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Basal Metabolism - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Body Weight - physiology ; Clinical trials ; Cohort Studies ; Diet ; Energy ; Energy Intake - physiology ; Energy Metabolism - physiology ; Exercise - physiology ; Feeding. Feeding behavior ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nutritional Requirements ; Regression Analysis ; Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><ispartof>The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2003-03, Vol.77 (3), p.639-645</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc. Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3580fdcb0cc2a2987988d4b4b51200b3b79b696e37790d193c00bc8a473c4b273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3580fdcb0cc2a2987988d4b4b51200b3b79b696e37790d193c00bc8a473c4b273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14629356$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12600854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LIN, Pao-Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROSCHAN, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAY, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERNANDEZ, Claudia P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOBEN, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARANJA, Njeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OBARZANEK, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASH Collaborative Research Group</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial</title><title>The American journal of clinical nutrition</title><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><description>Estimating energy requirements is a frequent task in clinical studies. We examined weight patterns of participants enrolled in a clinical trial and evaluated factors that may affect weight stabilization. The Harris-Benedict equation and the FAO/WHO equation, used in conjunction with physical activity levels estimated with the 7-d Physical Activity Recall, were compared for estimating energy expenditure. This was a multicenter, randomized controlled feeding trial with participants of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. For 11 wk, the amount of food participants received was adjusted to maintain their body weights as close to their initial weights as possible. Change-point regression techniques were used to identify weight-stable periods. Factors related to achieving weight stabilization were examined with logistic regression. A stable weight was achieved by 86% of the 448 participants during the run-in period and by 78% during the intervention period. Energy intake averaged 11 +/- 2.4 MJ/d (2628 +/- 578 kcal/d), with most participants (n = 270) requiring 9-13 MJ/d (2100-3100 kcal/d). The difference between predicted and observed intakes was highest at high estimated energy intakes, mainly because of high and probably incorrect estimates of the activity factor. Participants with lower energy intakes tended to need less adjustment of their energy intakes to maintain a stable weight than did participants with higher energy intakes. Weight stabilization is not affected by diet composition, sex, race, age, or baseline weight. Either the Harris-Benedict equation or the FAO/WHO equation can be used to estimate energy needs. Activity factors &gt; 1.7 often lead to overestimation of energy needs.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Basal Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Body Weight - physiology</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy Intake - physiology</subject><subject>Energy Metabolism - physiology</subject><subject>Exercise - physiology</subject><subject>Feeding. Feeding behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nutritional Requirements</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</subject><issn>0002-9165</issn><issn>1938-3207</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0EtLxDAQwPEgirs-jl6lCHrr7iST5nESEV8geNFzSNNUurSpJu3Bb28WFxY8BYYfw-RPyAWFFQWNa7txYS3lClcC9QFZUo2qRAbykCwBgJWaimpBTlLaAFDGlTgmC8oEgKr4ktw-pKkb7NSNoRjbwgcfP3-K6L_nLvrBhykVXShs4cYwxbHvfVO03jdd-Cym2Nn-jBy1tk_-fPeeko_Hh_f75_L17enl_u61dKiqqcRKQdu4GpxjlmkltVINr3ldUQZQYy11LbTwKKWGJv_B5alTlkt0vGYST8nN396vOH7PPk1m6JLzfW-DH-dkJAIXKKoMr_7BzTjHkG8zDKmuqJAso_IPuTimFH1rvmKuEH8MBbPNarZZjZQGTc6a_eVu6VwPvtnrXccMrnfAJmf7NtrgurR3XDCNlcBfyTR-7w</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>LIN, Pao-Hwa</creator><creator>PROSCHAN, Michael A</creator><creator>BRAY, George A</creator><creator>FERNANDEZ, Claudia P</creator><creator>HOBEN, Kimberly</creator><creator>MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene</creator><creator>KARANJA, Njeri</creator><creator>OBARZANEK, Eva</creator><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</general><general>American Society for Clinical Nutrition, Inc</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial</title><author>LIN, Pao-Hwa ; PROSCHAN, Michael A ; BRAY, George A ; FERNANDEZ, Claudia P ; HOBEN, Kimberly ; MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene ; KARANJA, Njeri ; OBARZANEK, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-3580fdcb0cc2a2987988d4b4b51200b3b79b696e37790d193c00bc8a473c4b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Basal Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Body Weight - physiology</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy Intake - physiology</topic><topic>Energy Metabolism - physiology</topic><topic>Exercise - physiology</topic><topic>Feeding. Feeding behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nutritional Requirements</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LIN, Pao-Hwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PROSCHAN, Michael A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BRAY, George A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FERNANDEZ, Claudia P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOBEN, Kimberly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARANJA, Njeri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>OBARZANEK, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASH Collaborative Research Group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LIN, Pao-Hwa</au><au>PROSCHAN, Michael A</au><au>BRAY, George A</au><au>FERNANDEZ, Claudia P</au><au>HOBEN, Kimberly</au><au>MOST-WINDHAUSER, Marlene</au><au>KARANJA, Njeri</au><au>OBARZANEK, Eva</au><aucorp>DASH Collaborative Research Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of clinical nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Clin Nutr</addtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>77</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>639</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>639-645</pages><issn>0002-9165</issn><eissn>1938-3207</eissn><coden>AJCNAC</coden><abstract>Estimating energy requirements is a frequent task in clinical studies. We examined weight patterns of participants enrolled in a clinical trial and evaluated factors that may affect weight stabilization. The Harris-Benedict equation and the FAO/WHO equation, used in conjunction with physical activity levels estimated with the 7-d Physical Activity Recall, were compared for estimating energy expenditure. This was a multicenter, randomized controlled feeding trial with participants of the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Trial. For 11 wk, the amount of food participants received was adjusted to maintain their body weights as close to their initial weights as possible. Change-point regression techniques were used to identify weight-stable periods. Factors related to achieving weight stabilization were examined with logistic regression. A stable weight was achieved by 86% of the 448 participants during the run-in period and by 78% during the intervention period. Energy intake averaged 11 +/- 2.4 MJ/d (2628 +/- 578 kcal/d), with most participants (n = 270) requiring 9-13 MJ/d (2100-3100 kcal/d). The difference between predicted and observed intakes was highest at high estimated energy intakes, mainly because of high and probably incorrect estimates of the activity factor. Participants with lower energy intakes tended to need less adjustment of their energy intakes to maintain a stable weight than did participants with higher energy intakes. Weight stabilization is not affected by diet composition, sex, race, age, or baseline weight. Either the Harris-Benedict equation or the FAO/WHO equation can be used to estimate energy needs. Activity factors &gt; 1.7 often lead to overestimation of energy needs.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Society for Clinical Nutrition</pub><pmid>12600854</pmid><doi>10.1093/ajcn/77.3.639</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9165
ispartof The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2003-03, Vol.77 (3), p.639-645
issn 0002-9165
1938-3207
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73046365
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Basal Metabolism - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Body Weight - physiology
Clinical trials
Cohort Studies
Diet
Energy
Energy Intake - physiology
Energy Metabolism - physiology
Exercise - physiology
Feeding. Feeding behavior
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Nutritional Requirements
Regression Analysis
Vertebrates: anatomy and physiology, studies on body, several organs or systems
title Estimation of energy requirements in a controlled feeding trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A48%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20energy%20requirements%20in%20a%20controlled%20feeding%20trial&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20clinical%20nutrition&rft.au=LIN,%20Pao-Hwa&rft.aucorp=DASH%20Collaborative%20Research%20Group&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=77&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=639&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=639-645&rft.issn=0002-9165&rft.eissn=1938-3207&rft.coden=AJCNAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ajcn/77.3.639&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E301754811%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=231951672&rft_id=info:pmid/12600854&rfr_iscdi=true