A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet
Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of orthopaedic research 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 358 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 352 |
container_title | Journal of orthopaedic research |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Solomon, L.B Rühli, F.J Taylor, J Ferris, L Pope, R Henneberg, M |
description | Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC.
The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73014949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736026602001316</els_id><sourcerecordid>73014949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vFSEUhonR2Gv1J2iIC6OLUQ4MMKy0NrZaG6v1c0e4wFjqzHCFmer993I7NzVxUzeHzfO-yTkPCN0H8hQIiGcfiWSiIlSIx4Q-IQQYVOIGWgDndcWp_HYTLa6QHXQn53NCiATa3EY7QLlolFALdLqHXcjZ2zHEAZvBYRv71TT6hMfYx-_JrM5wHie3xrHFo0nZdAUxXdgEMg4DBkKwNc5clEzr_XgX3WpNl_297buLPh-8-rT_ujo-OXyzv3dcWS6AVdC4VtkSaIxlhpMlEF5LK5VsrFM1VRSEo9YyploLbSPBLhWnTnDVLmFp2C56NPeuUvw5-TzqPmTru84MPk5ZS0agVrW6FgRJ6lpQUsCH_4DncUpDWUJTxgFo4QrEZ8immHPyrV6l0Ju01kD0Ro2-VKM3dy9DX6rRouQebMunZe_d39TWRQFezMCv0Pn1_7Xqo5NTKAIoEEpZqajmipBH__uqwqQfWkgmuf767lB_ecteHr3_wPRB4Z_PvC-eLoJPOtvgB-tdSOVLaBfDNVv9AZy0vaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235112044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><description>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC.
The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12568969</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOREDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cadaver ; Calcaneus - abnormalities ; Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging ; Dissection ; Foot Deformities - diagnosis ; Foot Deformities - epidemiology ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; South Australia - epidemiology ; Tarsal Bones - abnormalities ; Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>Copyright © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0736-0266%2802%2900131-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS0736-0266%2802%2900131-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12568969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rühli, F.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><description>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC.
The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Calcaneus - abnormalities</subject><subject>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Foot Deformities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Foot Deformities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>South Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - abnormalities</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vFSEUhonR2Gv1J2iIC6OLUQ4MMKy0NrZaG6v1c0e4wFjqzHCFmer993I7NzVxUzeHzfO-yTkPCN0H8hQIiGcfiWSiIlSIx4Q-IQQYVOIGWgDndcWp_HYTLa6QHXQn53NCiATa3EY7QLlolFALdLqHXcjZ2zHEAZvBYRv71TT6hMfYx-_JrM5wHie3xrHFo0nZdAUxXdgEMg4DBkKwNc5clEzr_XgX3WpNl_297buLPh-8-rT_ujo-OXyzv3dcWS6AVdC4VtkSaIxlhpMlEF5LK5VsrFM1VRSEo9YyploLbSPBLhWnTnDVLmFp2C56NPeuUvw5-TzqPmTru84MPk5ZS0agVrW6FgRJ6lpQUsCH_4DncUpDWUJTxgFo4QrEZ8immHPyrV6l0Ju01kD0Ro2-VKM3dy9DX6rRouQebMunZe_d39TWRQFezMCv0Pn1_7Xqo5NTKAIoEEpZqajmipBH__uqwqQfWkgmuf767lB_ecteHr3_wPRB4Z_PvC-eLoJPOtvgB-tdSOVLaBfDNVv9AZy0vaY</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Solomon, L.B</creator><creator>Rühli, F.J</creator><creator>Taylor, J</creator><creator>Ferris, L</creator><creator>Pope, R</creator><creator>Henneberg, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><author>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Calcaneus - abnormalities</topic><topic>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Foot Deformities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Foot Deformities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>South Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - abnormalities</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rühli, F.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, L.B</au><au>Rühli, F.J</au><au>Taylor, J</au><au>Ferris, L</au><au>Pope, R</au><au>Henneberg, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>352-358</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><coden>JOREDR</coden><abstract>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC.
The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12568969</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0736-0266 |
ispartof | Journal of orthopaedic research, 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358 |
issn | 0736-0266 1554-527X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73014949 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cadaver Calcaneus - abnormalities Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging Dissection Foot Deformities - diagnosis Foot Deformities - epidemiology Hospitals, University Humans Middle Aged Sensitivity and Specificity South Australia - epidemiology Tarsal Bones - abnormalities Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A26%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20dissection%20and%20computer%20tomograph%20study%20of%20tarsal%20coalitions%20in%20100%20cadaver%20feet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Solomon,%20L.B&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=352-358&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft.coden=JOREDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73014949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235112044&rft_id=info:pmid/12568969&rft_els_id=S0736026602001316&rfr_iscdi=true |