A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet

Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic research 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358
Hauptverfasser: Solomon, L.B, Rühli, F.J, Taylor, J, Ferris, L, Pope, R, Henneberg, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 2
container_start_page 352
container_title Journal of orthopaedic research
container_volume 21
creator Solomon, L.B
Rühli, F.J
Taylor, J
Ferris, L
Pope, R
Henneberg, M
description Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC. The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73014949</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0736026602001316</els_id><sourcerecordid>73014949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1vFSEUhonR2Gv1J2iIC6OLUQ4MMKy0NrZaG6v1c0e4wFjqzHCFmer993I7NzVxUzeHzfO-yTkPCN0H8hQIiGcfiWSiIlSIx4Q-IQQYVOIGWgDndcWp_HYTLa6QHXQn53NCiATa3EY7QLlolFALdLqHXcjZ2zHEAZvBYRv71TT6hMfYx-_JrM5wHie3xrHFo0nZdAUxXdgEMg4DBkKwNc5clEzr_XgX3WpNl_297buLPh-8-rT_ujo-OXyzv3dcWS6AVdC4VtkSaIxlhpMlEF5LK5VsrFM1VRSEo9YyploLbSPBLhWnTnDVLmFp2C56NPeuUvw5-TzqPmTru84MPk5ZS0agVrW6FgRJ6lpQUsCH_4DncUpDWUJTxgFo4QrEZ8immHPyrV6l0Ju01kD0Ro2-VKM3dy9DX6rRouQebMunZe_d39TWRQFezMCv0Pn1_7Xqo5NTKAIoEEpZqajmipBH__uqwqQfWkgmuf767lB_ecteHr3_wPRB4Z_PvC-eLoJPOtvgB-tdSOVLaBfDNVv9AZy0vaY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>235112044</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><description>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC. The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0736-0266</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1554-527X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12568969</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JOREDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cadaver ; Calcaneus - abnormalities ; Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging ; Dissection ; Foot Deformities - diagnosis ; Foot Deformities - epidemiology ; Hospitals, University ; Humans ; Middle Aged ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; South Australia - epidemiology ; Tarsal Bones - abnormalities ; Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of orthopaedic research, 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358</ispartof><rights>2002</rights><rights>Copyright © 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society</rights><rights>Copyright Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. Mar 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1016%2FS0736-0266%2802%2900131-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1016%2FS0736-0266%2802%2900131-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12568969$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rühli, F.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><title>Journal of orthopaedic research</title><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><description>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC. The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Calcaneus - abnormalities</subject><subject>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Foot Deformities - diagnosis</subject><subject>Foot Deformities - epidemiology</subject><subject>Hospitals, University</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>South Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - abnormalities</subject><subject>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0736-0266</issn><issn>1554-527X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk1vFSEUhonR2Gv1J2iIC6OLUQ4MMKy0NrZaG6v1c0e4wFjqzHCFmer993I7NzVxUzeHzfO-yTkPCN0H8hQIiGcfiWSiIlSIx4Q-IQQYVOIGWgDndcWp_HYTLa6QHXQn53NCiATa3EY7QLlolFALdLqHXcjZ2zHEAZvBYRv71TT6hMfYx-_JrM5wHie3xrHFo0nZdAUxXdgEMg4DBkKwNc5clEzr_XgX3WpNl_297buLPh-8-rT_ujo-OXyzv3dcWS6AVdC4VtkSaIxlhpMlEF5LK5VsrFM1VRSEo9YyploLbSPBLhWnTnDVLmFp2C56NPeuUvw5-TzqPmTru84MPk5ZS0agVrW6FgRJ6lpQUsCH_4DncUpDWUJTxgFo4QrEZ8immHPyrV6l0Ju01kD0Ro2-VKM3dy9DX6rRouQebMunZe_d39TWRQFezMCv0Pn1_7Xqo5NTKAIoEEpZqajmipBH__uqwqQfWkgmuf767lB_ecteHr3_wPRB4Z_PvC-eLoJPOtvgB-tdSOVLaBfDNVv9AZy0vaY</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Solomon, L.B</creator><creator>Rühli, F.J</creator><creator>Taylor, J</creator><creator>Ferris, L</creator><creator>Pope, R</creator><creator>Henneberg, M</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</title><author>Solomon, L.B ; Rühli, F.J ; Taylor, J ; Ferris, L ; Pope, R ; Henneberg, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5613-18df9cfee8ac3a50b10547c7978cd9429216d2cc339fc1f871cb952d659fb1ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Calcaneus - abnormalities</topic><topic>Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Foot Deformities - diagnosis</topic><topic>Foot Deformities - epidemiology</topic><topic>Hospitals, University</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>South Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - abnormalities</topic><topic>Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, L.B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rühli, F.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pope, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henneberg, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, L.B</au><au>Rühli, F.J</au><au>Taylor, J</au><au>Ferris, L</au><au>Pope, R</au><au>Henneberg, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet</atitle><jtitle>Journal of orthopaedic research</jtitle><addtitle>J. Orthop. Res</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>352</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>352-358</pages><issn>0736-0266</issn><eissn>1554-527X</eissn><coden>JOREDR</coden><abstract>Most of the clinical studies report the incidence of tarsal coalitions (TC) as less than 1% but they disregard the asymptomatic coalitions. TC have been associated with degenerative arthritic changes. After X-rays, computer tomography (CT) is the most commonly used diagnostic test in the detection of TC. The aims of our study were to establish the incidence of TC; the association between TC and accessory tarsal bones and between TC and tarsal arthritis; and to assess the sensitivity of CT as a diagnostic tool in TC. We performed spiral CT scans of 100 cadaver feet (mean age at death 77.7±10.4), which were subsequently dissected. The dissections identified nine non-osseous TC: two talocalcaneal and seven calcaneonavicular. There was no osseous coalition. Tarsal arthritis was identified in 31 cases. Both talocalcaneal coalitions were associated with arthritis while none of the calcaneonavicular coalitions were associated with tarsal arthritis. The CT diagnosed an osseous talocalcaneal coalition and was suspicious of fibrocartilaginous coalitions in eight cases. There was correlation between dissection and CT in two talocalcaneal coalitions and three calcaneonavicular coalitions thus CT identifying 55.5% of the coalitions. CT did not diagnose four non-osseous coalitions and diagnosed errouresly four possible coalitions. In conclusion our study demonstrated that the incidence of non-osseous TC is higher than previously thought (12.72%). The calcaneonavicular coalitions are the most common single type (9.09%) and they do not seem to be associated with arthritic changes in the tarsal bones. Our CT results suggest that spiral CT has a low sensitivity in the detection of non-osseous coalitions and questions if multislice CT should be used routinely when TC are suspected.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12568969</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0736-0266
ispartof Journal of orthopaedic research, 2003-03, Vol.21 (2), p.352-358
issn 0736-0266
1554-527X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_73014949
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cadaver
Calcaneus - abnormalities
Calcaneus - diagnostic imaging
Dissection
Foot Deformities - diagnosis
Foot Deformities - epidemiology
Hospitals, University
Humans
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
South Australia - epidemiology
Tarsal Bones - abnormalities
Tarsal Bones - diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title A dissection and computer tomograph study of tarsal coalitions in 100 cadaver feet
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A26%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20dissection%20and%20computer%20tomograph%20study%20of%20tarsal%20coalitions%20in%20100%20cadaver%20feet&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20research&rft.au=Solomon,%20L.B&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=352-358&rft.issn=0736-0266&rft.eissn=1554-527X&rft.coden=JOREDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00131-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E73014949%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=235112044&rft_id=info:pmid/12568969&rft_els_id=S0736026602001316&rfr_iscdi=true