Correlates of women’s preferences for treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding

This cross-sectional survey investigated factors associated with treatment preferences of women with menorrhagia. Women ( n=474) aged 35–54 years referred to gynaecology out-patient clinics for menorrhagia were mailed a self-administered questionnaire before their first clinic visit. The main outcom...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Patient education and counseling 2003-02, Vol.49 (2), p.125-132
Hauptverfasser: Vuorma, Sirkku, Teperi, Juha, Hurskainen, Ritva, Aalto, Anna-Mari, Rissanen, Pekka, Kujansuu, Erkki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This cross-sectional survey investigated factors associated with treatment preferences of women with menorrhagia. Women ( n=474) aged 35–54 years referred to gynaecology out-patient clinics for menorrhagia were mailed a self-administered questionnaire before their first clinic visit. The main outcome measure was treatment preference. Hysterectomy and conservative treatment (combined with no treatment) were favoured equally often. In a multivariate analysis, completed family size ( P=0.003), menstrual pain ( P=0.02), irregular periods ( P=0.03), and higher age ( P=0.04) predicted hysterectomy preference, as did lower education level ( P=0.001), gynaecologist consultations ( P=0.002), and unemployment ( P=0.03). The psychological factors assessed were not associated with treatment preference. In conclusion, rational considerations regarding stage of reproductive life and severity of symptoms were linked to women’s treatment preferences. However, education, employment status and use of specialists’ services guided women’s preferences even more powerfully than menstrual symptoms and burden caused by them. Doctors should pay more attention to motivating women for a trial of conservative treatment since only half of the women reported previous treatment for their menstrual problem.
ISSN:0738-3991
1873-5134
DOI:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00069-1